Michigan School Report Card Update

1
Michigan School Report Card Update

• Michigan Department of Education

2
Today We Will discuss

• Whats New for 2005 Report Card
• Education YES!
• Adequate Yearly Progress
• Preview of 2006 Report Card
• State Accreditation
• Adequate Yearly Progress

3
Education YES!until 2005-06
Achievement Change
Achievement Status
Indicators
4
Education YES!

• Achievement Status
• Up to a three year Average
• Weighted Index
• Achievement Change
• Improvement (or Decline)
• Based on 100 by 2013-14
• Achievement Growth
• Delayed until 2006-07
• Indicators of School Performance
• Investments to Improve Achievement
• Self-Assessments

5
Achievement Status and Change

• Elementary
• English Language Arts and Mathematics
• Middle School and High School
• Mathematics, English language arts, Science and
  Social Studies

6
School Performance Indicators
7
Self Assessment Ratings

• Systematically and Consistently Meets Criteria
• Progressing Toward Criteria
• Starting to Meet Criteria
• Not Yet Meeting Criteria

8
Indicators Detail
9
Indicators and Achievement
10
Whats New for 2005 Education YES!

• Display of Evidence and Self-Ratings for the
  Indicators of School Performance
• The Education YES! Composite Grade
• Indicator score cannot improve the composite
  score and grade by more than one letter grade
  more than the achievement grade

11
Education YES!Composite Grade
12
Indicator Evidence
13
Indicator Evidence
14
Whats New for 2005 - AYP

• Students Reported in an Ungraded Setting
• Adjustment for Measurement Error to Improve AYP
  Reliability
• Small Schools
• Subgroup Size for AYP Determination
• Nonstandard Accommodations Count as NOT TESTED

15
2004-05 Report Card

• Minimum n for district AYP based on 1 of
  enrollment if district or school enrollment is
  more than 3,000
• Nonstandard accommodations and unethical
  administrations will not count as participation
  for AYP

16
1 - 2 - Im Confused

• Special Education Alternate Assessment
  Flexibility Approved for 2005
• Applies to Students in Phase 2 Functional
  Independence
• Proposed Federal Rules Expected in the Fall
• 1 Exception Still Needed for Phase 1 students
  most significantly disabled

17
AYP ReliabilityMargin of Error

• Sources of Error
• Measurement Error - APPROVED
• Would the student score the same if tested again?
• Standard Error of Measurement
• Sampling Error NOT APPROVED
• Does the sample of students tested reflect the
  whole school?
• Standard Error of Proportion with Finite Sampling
  Error Correction

18
Measurement Error
19
Measurement Error
20
Provisionally Proficient Students - ELA

• ELA Grade 4
• ELA Scale Score is at or above 508 and Reading
  Scale Score is at or above 478 and Writing Scale
  Score is at or above 475
• ELA Grade 7
• ELA Scale Score is at or above 499 and Reading
  Scale Score is at or above 466 and Writing Scale
  Score is at or above 480

21
Provisionally Proficient Students - Math

• Grade 4 Math
• Math Scale Score is above 510 and Math Scale
  Score is at or below 550
• Grade 8 Math
• Math Scale Score is above 501 and Math Scale
  Score is at or below 559

22
Preview of 2005-06 AYP

• 1st year of 3-8 assessment
• AYP Use all scores for a school
• Composite Percent Proficient
• Cannot ignore valid scores
• Group size rule may be modified
• Full Academic Year rule may be modified
• New AYP objectives
• An impact analysis will be needed
• The new objectives will be based on only 9 years
  to 100 proficiency

23
State Accreditation Issues for 2006

• Student Achievement
• Status New Cut Scores Needed
• Change Cant Compare Old and New Tests
• Growth Cannot measure until 2007
• Indicators of School Performance
• Measure the School Improvement Framework

24
Possible Measurement Tools

• School Report and Self-Assessment
• Focus on Process
• Teacher Survey
• Focus on instruction and collaboration
• School Leader Survey
• Focus on Leadership

25
Possible Measurement Tools

• Hard Data
• Highly Qualified from Registry of Educational
  Personnel
• Coordination With Other Processes
• North Central
• Other Potential Tools
• Parent Survey
• Student Survey

26
Questions

• Do we need a parent survey?
• Do we need a student survey? How does it differ
  by grade range?
• Are we overlooking groups whose perspective is
  important?
• When is the appropriate time to administer the
  data collection?
• January-February?

27
Possible Policy Questions

• Recognition of existing Processes
• North Central
• Fair accountability for non-Title I Schools
• Role of AYP as a part of state accreditation

28
Original Indicator Revision Schedule

• February 2005
• Presentation to State Board of Education
• Winter-Spring 2005
• Development of Measurement Plan
• Fall, 2005
• Field Testing
• Fall 2005
• Data Collection on Revised Indicators
• Winter 2006
• Report Cards Available to Start Appeals

29
Contact Information

• Paul Bielawski
• Office of Educational Assessment and
  Accountability
• Michigan Department of Education
• PO Box 30008
• Lansing, MI 48909
• [phone]
• bielawp_at_michigan.gov