Title: EUROCONTROL Navigation Domain
1EUROCONTROL Navigation Domain
- The Data Collection Network
- EGNOS revealed
- GNSS 2004 Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Santiago Soley, PILDO Labs S.L.
2Summary
- EUROCONTROL GNSS-1 Operational Validation
- The Data Collection Network
- A Methodology to assess EGNOS performance
- First Glance
- Anomaly Investigation
- Towards the Final Results
- Conclusions and Future Work
3EUROCONTROL
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air
Navigation
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air
Navigation
32 Member States
31 Member States
4GNSS-1 Operational Validation
- EUROCONTROL will coordinate the GNSS-1
Operational Validation - To support the Member States in achieving the
approval for the provision of EGNOS services
throughout ECAC (European Civil Aviation
Conference) - Two distinct areas of work
- Technical Validation of the performance
- SARPS requirements RNP values
- MOPS DO229C compliant receiver
- Definition of operational rules and procedures
for aircraft to use the system for a particular
application (APV implementation)
5The Data Collection Network Objectives
- Collect ESTB/EGNOS Data and Evaluate them from
different sites in Europe - Group of experts to support
- the development of the tools need in the future
EGNOS Operational Validation - PEGASUS - definition of data collection and processing
procedures - Baseline for the future static campaign in the
GOV Plan extended with the Air Navigation
Service Providers participation
6The Network
Tromsö
ESTB reference station (RIMS) EURIDIS
reference station ESTB processing facilities
(CPF, MCC) NLES
Höfn
Hönefoss
IOR PRN131
Rotterdam
Scilly
Toulouse
Lisboa
Barcelona
Fucino
Ankara
Palma
Malaga
Kourou
Matera
Canaries
Hartebeesthoek
7The Methodology
8A First Glance
EGNOS post-SIS1 EEC, April 23rd, 2004
9Summary of results Vertical Position Error 95
10Summary of results APV-II Availability (AL 20m)
11Anomaly Investigation
- What to do if some anomalies appear that makes
some of the test fail? - Just a first check on the obtained performance is
not enough to declare the system not compliant
with the requirements - detailed analysis on what caused a test fail
- Different methods and techniques used by the
Network
12Example 1 Jump on the VPE
Jump on the position error periodically
experienced
Delft, December 26th, 2002
13Example 1 Jump on the VPE
Multipath
Mc combination
Delft, December 26th, 2002
14Example 2 Integrity Failures
Integrity failures HPEgtHPL
Barcelona, February 6th, 2003
15Example 2 Integrity Failures
MT02/03 anomalies
Psedorange correction oscillations broadcast in
MT02 and MT03 UDREIlt12 IODFlt3
Barcelona, February 6th, 2003
16Example 3 Integrity Failures
MT26 anomalies
60 MI in about 500 epochs
Barcelona, September 12th, 2002
17Example 4 Integrity Failures
8 consecutive MI
Barcelona, May 22th, 2003
18Example 4 Integrity Failures
satellite clock jump
Fast Corrections UDREI
NO Alarm Conditions (IODF lt3 UDREIlt15)
9 s
Sudden jump in C1 code Pseudorange for PRN
29. The ESTB declares the sat. as NOT
MONITORED (UDREI14) 9 sec. after.
Prefit- residuals
Barcelona, May 22th, 2003
19Example 5 Integrity Failures
VPE/VPL
Large number of MI
2040
1917
Barcelona, November 20th, 2003
20Example 5 Integrity Failures
PRN16 C1-Rho (shifted)
PRN16 L1-L2 (shifted)
PRN16 P2-P1 (shifted)
STEC (m L1)
PRN16 STEC /- UIRE (ESTB)
2040
1917
Barcelona, November 20th, 2003
21Example 5 Integrity Failures
Ionospheric storm
Kp index from Oct. 17th up to Dec. 1st 2003
22Towards the final results
- To validate SARPS requirements in a reasonable
period of time just the data collected from the
network would not be enough - simulations or other methods get up to the
required level of confidence from the
measurements - Impossible to do it for all locations under all
conditions - extrapolation of the local results from the
network sites - Global Assessment
23The Global Monitoring System
GPS networks
24h RINEX files
Automatic data gathering
BRUS
PEGASUS
24h GPS and GEO binary data
Automatic daily processing
INTERNET
Slog
Automatic data collecting
Automatic results presentation
Receiver
WEB server
e-mail
24The Global Monitoring System
- Cross-check with simulations
- Network results extrapolation
- Global Assessment
HPE 95 Integrity Events
HPL 99 satellites used
25Conclusions
- Summary of the activities from the Data
Collection Network Eurocontrol - gain knowledge on how the data need to be
collected, processed and analysed EGNOS
Operational Validation - Methodology (3 axis)
- Actual performance- First glance report
- System Behaviour - Anomaly investigation
- Confidence, Extrapolation Global Monitoring
System - Dynamic trials
26Future Work
- Improving the network layout and the automation
of procedures - continuous data logging
- automated results data sharing - ftp
- Potential data exploitation and validation of the
Global Monitoring System results - harmonization with the network sites ones
- Data campaigns with the first EGNOS SIS
- reuse of all the ESTB lessons learned
- expected that the encountered anomalies rarely
happen - EGNOS SIS-1 confirms that
27Questions?