Aucun titre de diapositive

1

• SRC

2
Safety Regulation Commission

• TWENTIETH MEETING
• Brussels, 25/26 May, 2004

3
Agenda Item 1 - Chairmans Welcome and
Introduction

4

Agenda Item 2 - Approval of Agenda
5
Agenda Item 3 - Report of SRC19

6
Agenda Item 4 - PC19 Feedback

7
PC 19 FEEDBACK

• Paper 8 Arrangements to Ensure Consistency of
  Safety Regulatory Material
• ESSAR development and Monitoring
• Their role in the SES and factors related to
  transposition
• The status (as of end February) of the
  transposition task status (as of end February) of
  the transposition task
• SRCs role in EC Mandates

8
PC 19 FEEDBACK

• Paper 8 Results
• The Provisional Council agreed to
• Support the continuation of work with the
  European Commission on the transposition of ESARR
  requirements into European Community law, in
  accordance with approach at Sections 4, 5 and 6
  of PC/04/19/8
• The SRCs role in relation to the relevant EC
  Mandates as proposed in Section 7 of the paper
  and
• Noted that the European Commission wished to
  further develop its working arrangements with the
  SRC and requested the SRC to take this further.

9
PC 19 FEEDBACK

• Paper 9 SRC Work Programme
• Work Programme Review
• Immediate Priorities
• Resource Issues
• Approval of strategic direction

10
PC 19 FEEDBACK

• Paper 9 Results
• The Provisional Council
• Agreed to the short-term prioritisation of SRCs
  work as presented in PC/04/9/9 and, in
  particular, supported the high priority being
  given to the institutional aspects of the CARDS
  initiative and the inclusion of the development
  of safety level and safety target tools in the
  high priority areas
• Supported the intention of the SRC to conduct
  discussions with all parties, including the
  EUROCONTROL Agency and the European Commission,
  on the approach to be adopted in the high
  priority areas identified in the paper,
• Noted the SRCs intention to return to full Work
  Programme priorities once the initial priorities
  had been addressed and
• Urged the Director General to investigate the
  reallocation of resources within the EUROCONTROL
  Agency to address safety priorities arising from
  the Strategic Safety Action Plan.

11
Agenda Item 5 - SRC Strategy

12
SRC Strategy Directions

• Short Term (1-2 years)
• Continued ESARR Development
• Re-structure ESARRs to align with EC regulatory
  environment
• Work priorities as per PC19
• Re-examine / re-define relationship with EC
• Ensure consistency of regulation between EC and
  non EU States (EU includes bi-lateral
  arrangements)

13
SRC Strategy Directions

• Medium Term (5 years)
• Continued rulemaking in conjunction with EC
• Increased emphass on support to ATM Safety
  Regulation
• Development of independent overview role
• Increased industry input to decision-making
• Continued forum/network for Safety Regulators

14
SRC Strategy Directions

• Long Term (10 years)
• Rulemaking ceases (moves to EASA EC ?)
• Oversight to be operated by EASA ? or another
  arrangements ?
• ATM Safety Regulatory support by SRC continues
• Independent overview role continues

15
SRC Strategy Directions

• Discussion in SPG to continue
• Work in progress

16
Agenda Item 6 - ESARR 1

17
ESARR 1

• Work at RTF level
• ESARR 1 is now focused on safety oversight
• Significant level of agreement on technical
  contents
• Doubts and concerns about final status
• PC19 supported the SRC work to develop ESARR 1

18
RTF Consultation

• Work has been focused on the technical contents
• Edition 0.09 commented by RTF
• Edition 0.010 discussed at RTF26
• Edition 0.1
• To incorporate the modifications agreed at RTF26
• To be circulated to SRC for comment (just after
  SRC20)
• May provide technical contents on which a high
  level of agreement exists
• Does not prejudge the decisions to be made about
  the final nature of the document

19
Discussion about the status

• Courses of action suggested
• Continue development of ESARR 1 following the
  indications given at PC19
• EC mandating EUROCONTROL to develop implementing
  rule (option already ruled out)
• Reconsider the need for safety regulatory
  requirements and transform ESARR 1 into some sort
  of guidance document

20
Aspects related

• Regulation of NSAs
• SES seems to have significant limitations to
  regulate the operation of NSAs beyond the
  provisions of the SES Regulations
• Harmonisation of safety oversight elements in 25
  certification processes?
• Draft common requirements show those limitations
• Obligations placed on providers, not on NSAs
• Lack of references in proposed peer-review

21
Aspects related

• The technical safety perspective...
• Based on findings and lessons from ESIMS, AGAS,
  ICAO IUSOAP, etc

Without binding provisions, clearly
established, and developed at a level that
ensures, beyond interpretation, the critical
elements of the safety oversight
processes... ... Safety oversight risks to
become an administrative-type exercise with no
added safety value in Europe
22
Aspects related

• The SRC Advisory Role...
• ... is to provide
• adequate technical advice on safety matters in
  order to facilitate appropriate PC decisions on
  complex issues that multiple aspects apart from
  safety

23
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• Note and discuss the contents of this working
  paper
• Reconfirm the current course of action with
  regard to the development of ESARR 1 consistently
  with the indications of PC19

24
Agenda Item 7 Single European Sky (SES)

25
Agenda Item 7 - Single European Sky (SES)
7.1 Single Sky Mandates Update
26
SES Mandates

• The following papers presented for your
  information
• EUROCONTROL Working Arrangements for the
  Development of SES Interoperability Implementing
  Rules
• How the Implementing rules will be produced
• Groups, people, inputs outputs etc
• The Three interoperability mandates as approved
  by the SES committee

27
Interoperability Mandate 1Co-ordination and
Transfer

• Title
• Mandate to EUROCONTROL to assist the European
  Commission in the development of an implementing
  rule for interoperability on Co-ordination and
  Transfer.
• Purpose of this mandate
• EUROCONTROL is mandated to develop a draft
  implementing rule for interoperability on
  co-ordination and transfer between Air Traffic
  Service Units. This implementing rule will
  address the system information exchange between
  Air Traffic Service Units in the process of
  notification, co-ordination and transfer of
  flights. This implementing rule will address also
  civil military coordination through the
  application of flexible use of airspace.
• Unofficial translation
• Certain OLDI message sets

28
Interoperability Mandate 2Initial Flight Plan

• Title
• Mandate to EUROCONTROL to assist the European
  Commission in the development of an implementing
  rule for interoperability on Initial Flight Plan.
• Purpose of this mandate
• EUROCONTROL is mandated to develop a draft
  implementing rule for interoperability on the
  initial flight plan. The purpose of this
  implementing rule will be to ensure that the key
  elements of a flight plan are common to all
  actors and that the updating of these key
  elements are made available to each relevant
  actor in order to perform his specific duty in an
  effective and efficient manner.
• Unofficial translation
• Procedures and responsibility for updating
  flight-plans to reduce inconsistencies, airline,
  ATCU and CFMU etc

29
Interoperability Mandate 3Flight Message
Transfer Protocol

• 1. TITLE
• Mandate to EUROCONTROL to assist the European
  Commission in the development of an implementing
  rule for interoperability on Flight Message
  Transfer Protocol
• 2. PURPOSE OF THIS MANDATE
• EUROCONTROL is mandated to develop a draft
  implementing rule for interoperability on
  communication services to support Flight Message
  Transfer Protocol between Air Traffic Service
  Units. This implementing rule will address also
  civil military coordination.
• Unofficial Translation
• Message transfer protocol for OLDI over IP rather
  than X25

30
Development and enactment of implementing rules
following agreed mandates(Art. 8 of the SES
Framework Regulation) in accordance with
EUROCONTROL Convention


EUROCONTROLAgency
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
EUROCONTROL Provisional Council
EuropeanCommission
EUROCONTROLGeneral Mandate
SESCommittee
Mandate
Regular information
Provisional Council
EuropeanCommission
Agency
Initial Plan
EUROCONTROLConsultationGroups (2)
(1)
Technical consultation
First Draft Proposal
ENPRM (3)
Formal consultation
(1)
Final Report(draft implementing rules)
EuropeanCommission
(1) Workshop(s) will be organised as agreed in
the mandate(2) As appropriate(3) Including
States, CMIC, SRC, RC, CESC, (PRC, Enlarged
Committee on Route Charges as appropriate)
SESCommittee
EUROCONTROLRegulation(Pan European)
EuropeanCommission
31
SES Mandates Groups involved (Step 2
Producing)
32
SES Mandates Roles of groups

• Implementing Rule Drafting Group (IRDG)
• The IRDG is responsible for the identification of
  the regulatory objectives and of the regulatory
  approach.
• Based on this approach, the group will proceed
  with development of the Implementing Rule. It
  will also develop or define the necessary Means
  of Compliance and Guiding material supporting
  regulatory provisions, as appropriate.
• The group will integrate the outcome of the other
  groups (e.g. the safety requirements developed by
  the Safety Focus Group) into the draft
  implementing rule.
• Within the Agency, the RU will provide the
  leadership of the group.

33
SES Mandates Roles of groups

• Safety Focus Group (SFG)
• The Safety Focus Group is responsible for the
  development of the Safety Case.
• The group will run the safety assessment of the
  proposed implementing rule, including the
  Functional Hazard Assessment and the Preliminary
  System Safety Assessment.
• Based on the safety assessment, the Group will
  provide the safety requirements to be integrated
  in the implementing rule.
• Within the Agency, DAP/SAF will provide the
  leadership of the group.

34
SES Mandates Roles of groups

• Review Board of Initial Plan/Implementing Rules
• The Review Board is responsible for the internal
  review of the mandate deliverables, first the
  Initial Plan, and then the Implementing Rule and
  its associated materials (notably the Explanatory
  Part and Safety Case). It is not a steering group
  as project organisation matters are beyond the
  scope of the Review Board. Members of the Review
  Board shall not be members of mandate working
  groups.
• During the Initial Plan development phase, its
  role is to comment and advise on the Initial Plan
  before it is submitted to the EC.
• During the development phase, its role is to
  comment and advise on the Implementing Rule and
  its associated material before the commencement
  of the formal consultation process.
• Review Board meetings will normally take place
  every month.

35
SES Mandates Involvement on groups (generic)
P producer R reviewer
36
SRC interface arrangements
37
Consultation

• Informal
• Routine report to SPG on
• Deliverable (work packages drafts and final)
• Working group meetings
• SPG meets monthly
• SPG report goes to SRC
• SPG represents SRC for comments
• Formal
• Through ENPRM to SRC
• Decision on action to be taken made by EC, not
  EUROCONTROL

38
Formal Consultation list

• National Civil and Military Authorities
• Departments/ ministries of Transport and Defence
  of the EUROCONTROL/ECAC Member States, Aviation
  Regulatory Authorities of the EUROCONTROL Member
  States, FAA (Federal Aviation Administration),
  NAVCANADA, US-Department of Defence
• Air Navigation Service Providers
• Civil and Military Air Navigation Service
  Providers of the EUROCONTROL/ ECAC Member States
• International Organisations
• ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation),
  ECAC (European Civil Aviation Conference), CANSO
  (Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation), JAA
  (Joint Aviation Authority), ACI (Airports Council
  International)
• Airspace Users Organisations
• IATA (International Air Transport Association),
  IACA (International Air Carrier Association),
  IAOPA (International Council of Aircraft Owner
  and Pilot Associations), EBAA (European Business
  Aviation Association), ERAA (European Regions
  Airlines Association), ELFAA (European Low Fares
  Airlines Association), AEA (Association of
  European Airlines)
• Military Airspace Users
• NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation),
  Military Aviation Forces of the EUROCONTROL
  Member States,
• Industrial and Social Representatives
• IFALPA (International Federation of Air Line
  Pilots Associations), IFATCA (International
  Federation of Air Traffic Controllers
  Associations), IFATSEA (International Federation
  of Air Traffic Safety Electronic Associations),
  ECA (The European Cockpit Association), AECMA
  (European Association of Aerospace Industries),
  EUROCAE (European Organisation for Civil Aviation
  Equipment), ATCEU (Air Traffic Controllers
  European Unions Coordination), ETF (European
  Transport Workers Federation)
• EUROCONTROL Bodies (through their Chairman)
• CMIC (Civil / Military Interface Standing
  Committee), SRC (Safety Regulation Commission),
  PRC (Performance Review Commission), RC
  (Regulatory Committee), CESC (Chief Executive
  Standing Conference)
• NB The European Commission, as customer of the
  SES mandates, is not mentioned explicitly in the
  above list but will of course be kept fully
  involved.

39
Coordination and transferTime plan
40
Initial Flight PlanTime plan
41
Flight Message Transfer ProtocolTime Plan
42
SES Mandates Recommendations

• SRC is invited to propose attendees at SPG for
  informal comment process.

43
Agenda Item 7 - Single European Sky (SES)
7.2 ESARR Transposition
44
Agenda Item 7 - 7.2. ESARR Transposition
45
Outcome of Study

• New structure proposed
• New ESARR 1 (current ESARR 1 under development)
• New ESARR 2 (current ESARR 2)
• New ESARR 3 (current ESARR 3, 4, 5 and 6)
• Each one would contain
• Preamble/Introduction
• Body
• Annexes (with the specific safety requirements)
• Approach intended to maximise the possibilities
  of having an easy transposition into EC law

46
Possible Course of Action

• SPG may review the deliverables to confirm the
  feasibility of the proposal
• Further refinement of those deliverables can
  take place at RTF in close coordination with EC
• A completely renewed set of ESARRs could be
  developed for submission to PC

47
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• Note and discuss the contents of this working
  paper
• Agree on the course of action proposed and
  therefore task SPG to review the deliverables
  from the ESARRs transposition study and confirm,
  if appropriate, the feasibility of adopting the
  approach proposed

48
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• Agree that, if the SPG outcome is positive, SRU
  initiates actions in co-ordination with EC, and
  within the scope of RTF, in order to develop a
  completely renewed set of ESARRs in line with the
  approach outlined in this working paper

49
Agenda Item 8 - Support to States CARDS -
HELLASFALIA

50
CARDS - Reminder

• ASATC Project (Aviation Safety and ATC)
• Countries
• Croatia, Bosnia Herzegovina, Serbia
  Montenegro, Albania, FYROM
• Objective
• Establishing highly professional CAAs
• Timing
• Mid 2004-December 2006
• Content
• 8 Work Packages, including WP01 (ATM safety
  regulation, 901 k)

51
CARDS - Update

• Priority of CARDS was confirmed at PC19
• CARDS already included in SRC WP
• WP01 drafted by SRU to plan the actions
• Signature of agreement between EUROCONTROL and EC
  expected in the next weeks

52
CARDS Actions planned

• Inception Period (by the end of 2004)
• Regional Workshop on ATM
• Development of Implementing Plans for each
  country
• Core Period (2005-2006)
• Development of safety oversight procedures
• Sizing of resources needed
• Assistance in drafting safety standards
• Training (safety auditing, safety occurrences,
  safety regulatory principles, SES regulations,
  etc)
• Review Period
• Update of Implementation Plans
• Final workshops

53
HELLASFALIA

• HELLASFALIA Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority
  (HCAA) Air Navigation Safety Regulations
  Alignment and Management System
• HCAA requested EUROCONTROL support on this
  project related to the implementation of ESARRs.
• HELLASFALIA is set up to recuperate the delays in
  the ESARRs implementation

54
HELLASFALIA

• EUROCONTROL support concerns
• a) review of ESARRs 2 documentation developed by
  the HCAA and
• b) development of ESARRs 3, 4 and 5.2 associated
  documentation.
• Timing from July 2004 until end 2005.
• SRU effort included in the Work Programme

55
Agenda Item 9 - Target Level of Safety

56
Target level of safety

• At PC19 a number of concerns were raised
  regarding the subject of TLS.
• We wish to review existing actions in this
  subject
• And propose further actions to ensure these
  existing actions meet SRC needs.

57
Planned aims

• SRC has always planned for the following
• That the TLS be partitioned to define design
  targets for elements of the ATM system, in so far
  as practicable
• To be confirmed on a regular basis as an
  appropriate figure by use of actual data
  collected from states
• To be used to confirm over time that the achieved
  Level of Safety in ECAC was meeting the target
• That the additional Maximum Tolerable probability
  of occurrence (actually rate of occurrences)
  noted in ESARR 4 Fig A-2 be defined when enough
  and consistent data have been collected by
  EUROCONTROL
• That guidance should be published that allows the
  States to determine their own National TLS.

58
Recent activities at SRC level

• ESARR 2 data collection is ongoing
• SRC Document 32 has been published early March
  2004 using ESARR 2 and other safety data to
  confirm the achieved TLS is consistent with the
  TLS
• Guidance material EAM 4 GUI 4 A method for
  States to Determine National ATM Safety Minima
  has been published
• Also, in implementation of ESARR 4, particular
  aspects of application of the TLS have been
  noted, and clarification has been requested.

59
Activities at National Level

• There are also expected activities at national
  level
• The first is implementation of the ESARRs,
  associated guidance documents and SRC policy
  Documents. These are all necessary elements to
  put in place an ATM regulatory system that
  achieves, as an output, the necessary level of
  safety.
• The second is for the States to continue the
  implementation of ESARR 2. Without consistent and
  sufficient data on present safety levels the SRC
  cannot determine future targets or measure
  achieved levels of safety.
• The third is for the States to define National
  Target Levels of Safety for all severity classes,
  either in accordance with EAM 4 GUI 4 or using an
  alternative method.

60
Existing plans

• These are contained in the SRC Document 3 in
  section D.1

61
Additional plan

• it is proposed to more fully explain these
  concerns from States initially through the RTF
  sub group, and then through communication with
  the SRC.
• A second activity proposed will be for the SRC to
  ensure that the necessary and relevant tasks have
  been fully identified in the Work Programme.

62
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to-
• Note and discuss the contents of this paper
• Agree the further update of SRC Document 3 to
  include all TLS tasks in Section D.1
• Agree to provide more comments, initially through
  RTF, on problems found in application of TLS.

63
Agenda Item 10 - Strategic Safety Action Plan
(SSAP)
64
Agenda Item 10 - 10.1 SSAP Update - Workshops
65
Strategic Safety Action Plan

• Regional Workshops
• Venue Date Theme
• Rome 20/21 April Reporting-Data sharing
• Tallinn 29/30 June SMS Implementation
• TBD 5/6 October (provisional) TBD
• TBD 23/24 November TBD

66
Strategic Safety Action PlanMonitoring

• Tasks identified by lead stakeholder
• SSAP incorporated into ECIP/LCIP monitoring
  process, but
• more regular/timely reporting required
• specific reporting forms to be sent
  (electronically) for each task
• either - on a regular base or
• - as demanded by task timescales

67
Strategic Safety Action PlanÜberlingen Report

• SSAP drawn up as part of the response to the
  Überlingen accident.
• Dealt with all safety issues that could be
  identified at that time through ACAS.
• Pending production of the final Accident report.
• Full review of safety issues arising can now take
  place in the light of safety recommendation.

68
Agenda Item 10 - 10.2 Survey of Practices in
Safety Nets (SPIN)
69
Eight Improvement Areas

• Ground-based Safety Nets

70
Eight Improvement Areas

• EUROCONTROL to assist those States that have not
  yet implemented Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA)
• Actions to establish and implement guidance
  material, standards and regulations for
  ground-based safety nets
• Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA)
• Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW)
• Area Proximity Warning (APW)

71
Eight Improvement Areas

• Guidance material, standards and regulations
  whats new ?
• Triggered by Linate and Überlingen tragedies
• Recommended by high-level group (AGAS), mandated
  by Provisional Council (PC)
• Active involvement of the Regulator from
  beginning
• Holistic approach, addressing the whole chain
• Firmly anchored in our shared value, Safety

Step 1 Fact finding
Step 2 Identifying the targets
Step 3 Confirming the targets
Step 4 Decision making
Step 5 Local imple-mentation
early benefits
72
Eight Improvement Areas
Step 1 A 3600 review of what exists in terms of
products and processes Keywords objective,
independent, credible
Step 1 Fact finding
Step 2 Identifying the targets
Step 3 Confirming the targets
Step 4 Decision making
Step 5 Local imple-mentation
early benefits
73
Eight Improvement Areas
Further Studies ? EATM Working Arrangements ?
Step 2 Weighing the facts and drawing the
line Keywords cost benefit analysis, (limited)
safety case, regulatory impact assessment
Step 1 Fact finding
Step 2 Identifying the targets
Step 3 Confirming the targets
Step 4 Decision making
Step 5 Local imple-mentation
early benefits
74
Eight Improvement Areas
EATM (Teams, ACG) SRC procedures
Step 3 Building commitment to implement Keywords
fairness, realism
Step 1 Fact finding
Step 2 Identifying the targets
Step 3 Confirming the targets
Step 4 Decision making
Step 5 Local imple-mentation
early benefits
75
Eight Improvement Areas
Step 4 Final word from the competent
bodies Keywords weight, enforcement power
Step 1 Fact finding
Step 2 Identifying the targets
Step 3 Confirming the targets
Step 4 Decision making
Step 5 Local imple-mentation
early benefits
76
Eight Improvement Areas
Never Again
Step 5 Safety improvement Keywords transparent,
uniform
Step 1 Fact finding
Step 2 Identifying the targets
Step 3 Confirming the targets
Step 4 Decision making
Step 5 Local imple-mentation
early benefits
77
Eight Improvement Areas
Steps 1 - 5 Not just for Ground-based Safety
Nets Keywords last-resort voice comms, MEL
concept, RA downlink, ...
Step 1 Fact finding
Step 2 Identifying the targets
Step 3 Confirming the targets
Step 4 Decision making
Step 5 Local imple-mentation
early benefits
78
Eight Improvement Areas

• Ground-based Safety Nets
• Success criterion measurable safety improvement
• Opportunities early spin-off from sharing and
  learning

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT SAFETY NETS BE IMPLEMENTED
79
Work Programme actions (A.9)
80
Relationship of Spin activities with SRC SSAP
actions

• Task 1
• Perform survey of existing ground-based safety
  net implementations (STCA, MSAW and APW), to
  determine what can realistically be achieved,
  including
• Review of operational, technical, managerial and
  inspection and oversight practices
• The survey shall cover all airspace/phases-of-flig
  ht where surveillance-based services are provided
  (IFR-only, IFR/VFR, en-route, final approach, ),
  from a service provider and regulator
  perspective, covering in particular operations in
  national ATC centres, and as far as practical
  also operations in military ATC centres and
  remote and/or independently operated control
  towers. All facets of operations shall be
  covered, including, but not limited to
• Operating instructions, initial and refresher
  training
• Relevant aspects of (and requirements on)
  surveillance infrastructure
• Use of flight data, if any
• Architectural and other measures to ensure
  independence
• Performance monitoring, evaluation and
  improvement
• Occurrence analysis.

81
Outputs of SPIN

• It is hoped that the findings of the SPIN
  activity will supply a significant part of the
  information necessary to meet the SSAP objectives
• But, It needs the right level of input from
  states
• So, we would hope that you can use this
  information paper to forewarn any suitable
  contacts in your country and convey the names to
  us for inclusion in the study.

82
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to-
• note and discuss the contents of this paper
• Consider and notify suitable points of contact.

83
Agenda Item 10 - 10.3 ESARR 2 Training
84
Background

• SRC WP 19.11 Gave the overall SeRT approach
• Topics to be addressed
• Issued to be considered by SRU in conjunction
  with SAF and IANS
• Level of difficulty
• Etc.
• Course 5 Detailed ESARR2 training is to be
  developed with priority by the end of 2004
  beginning of 2005

85
Work achieved so far

• Co-ordination with IANS, SAF HUM, PRU and Legal
  Service
• EU will be approached for the subjects related to
  the EU Directives 56/94 and 42/03
• Cleared the overlap with existing courses SAF-AOI
  and SAF-SMG
• Training objectives and syllabus written for 3
  modules

86
Work achieved so far (contd)

• Safety Management

• Safety Regulation

Investigation Package Proposed Means of Compliance
ESARR2
ESARR2, GUI1-7, COD 1-2 (AST)
OCI Guidelines, HEIDI, SOFIA,HERA, TOKAI,
Checklist...
TRAINING
MODULE 1
MODULE 2
MODULE 3
Leader SRU Support SAF
Leader joint SAF/SRU
Leader SAF Support SRU
What is ESARR2 What are the requirements Objective
sScope Regulatory Audit ..
Practical experience in using the tools SOFIA
- HERA TOKAI - HEIDI Other tools and techniques
What is the Package, Phases, Tools (AST), How to
set reporting system How to investigate ..
87
Work achieved so far (contd)

• Target population identified
• Modularity and Training Objectives
• Course size
• Course length
• Course Deliverables
• Pre-requisites
• Level of difficulty
• Evaluation of the delegates

88
Planning for development

• Continuation of the efforts in conjunction with
  Agency (IANS, SAF etc)
• Level 1 and some level 2 training objectives will
  be covered via an e-learning module
• Present the released issue of the SRU report at
  SRC 21
• Start the development so as to have a pilot
  course by December (the latest in January)
• Run the first validated courses in the first half
  of 2005.

89
Agenda Item 10 - 10.4 ESIMS
90
Trigger for changes

• ESIMS Programme approved in November 2002
• 28 visits till end 2003 most ECAC States
  visited by July 2004
• SRC DOC 27 with de-identified findings
  conclusions
• SSAP recommends to strenghen ESIMS
• Institutionalised programme- Periodic auditing
• Disclosure of some audit findings
• Assistance Training
• Public actions vis-à-vis  recalcitrant  States
• Coordination with ICAO and the EC

91
Institutionalised programme

• One off exercise
• Resource limitations
• Limited follow up (LCIP, Letter to SRC
  Commissioners, SRC Closed Sessions)
• Experience shows that effectiveness of
  international safety oversight depends on follow
  up audits
• Proposal to have at least one audit in any
  six-year period (in addition to IUSOAP)

92

ESARRs Implementation Monitoring Support
Programme
ICAO UNIVERSAL SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT PROGRAMME
EUROCONTROL
ICAO
National Saf. Regulator
Service Provider
SAFETY OVERSIGHT
SMS INTERNAL VERIFICATION (Safety
Surveys/Audits/Reviews)
93
ESIMS-IUSOAP coordination

• Objectives-
• Respect of integrity of each programme
• Optimisation of scarce resources (human,
  financial) and of audit strategies
• Synergy of actions in case of non compliance
• Approach-
• Coordination and articulation of audit schedules
• Similar approach (incl. Public summary report)
• Sharing of audit reports (ECAC)
• ESIMS auditors (nat. secondts SRU) to
  participate to ICAO audits in ECAC

94
Actions to be Taken

• Assistance Training
• Generic and to the benefit of the majority
• Specific Programmes, subject to resources
  availability
• Coordination ICAO and EC (e.g., Balkan States)
• Other actions to rectify the situation
• Public Summary Report
• Report at Permanent Commission action
• Public Actions
• Coordination ICAO and EC

95
Draft Recommendations to PC

• Subject to the adoption of the text of the draft
  MOU by the International Civil Aviation
  Organisation, the Provisional Council is invited
  to
• adopt the text of the draft MOU between
  EUROCONTROL and ICAO
• adopt the draft Directive relating to the
  conclusion of this draft MOU
• submit the draft Directive for the Permanent
  Commissions approval
• request the SRC to further develop, and implement
  from mid 2005 onwards, the ESIMS Programme
  according to the principles described in section
  3 of this paper.

96
Recommendations

• The SRC is invited-
• a) To discuss and agree the contents of this
  paper
• b) To request SRC Chairman to consider any
  relevant comments submitted by EUROCONTOL and
  ICAO Legal Services by the end of May, and to
  subsequently submit a final version of the SRC
  Action Paper to PC20.

97

Agenda Item 11 - Key Safety Indicators in ATM
98
BACKGROUND

• PC14 Decision
• PC17 SRC report on the ESARR 2 Safety Indicators
  structure
• Lack of Key ATM Safety Performance Indicator
  (composite index) or a small set of key indicators

99
KSI Current position

• PC14 Decision
• PC17 SRC report on the ESARR 2 Safety Indicators
  structure
• Lack of Key ATM Safety Performance Indicator
  (composite index) or a small set of key
  indicators is yet to be developed

100
KSI Issues and progress report

• Existing industry indicators are limited to
  accidents and fatal accidents
• Exposure data
• Severity and risk assessment is in early days
• Precedence from FAA withdrawn from public domain

101
KSI Issues and progress report (contd)

• End of the phase of collection and analysis of
  the state-of-the art in the filed by both SRU and
  PRU
• Any model will have to be based on the wide
  variety of safety measurements already in place
  in EUROCONTROL (SRU, SAF)
• Several issues required to be solved to get the
  stakeholders approval
• A detailed report to support a further decision
  regarding the subject will be develop for
  PC22(April 2005)

102
Recommendations for SRC

• The SRC is invited to approve the attached PC
  paper for submission to the Provisional Councils
  20th Session in July 2004

103
Agenda Item 12 - SRC Work Programme -
Prioritisation

104
SRC Work Programme - Prioritisation

• Version 6.0 approved at SRC 19 but
• Resolution/required by Provisional
  Council/clarification on 3 top strategic
  priorities-
• Single European Sky
• Strategic Safety Action Plan
• Support to States, especially CARDS
• PC 19 added a fourth
• Target levels of safety
• PC decisions developed by SPG into a full
  prioritisation scheme.

105
Prioritisation Scheme(Annex A)

• Priority 1
• Single European Sky (SES)
• Maintenance of currently approved ESARRs.
• Full ESARR Review (as per A8 b, d, e).
• Development and approval of ESARR 1.
• Transposition of ESARRs into Community Law.
• Strategic Safety Action Plan (SSAP)
• All tasks currently indicated as SSAP in Work
  Programme.
• Essential related tasks indicated as SSAP (B1f,
  B1g, B2e, B2f).

106

• Priority 1 (continued)
• Programmes for Support to States (STS)
• Agreed programmes (as per B5)
• (CARDS, HELLASFALIA).
• Target Levels of Safety (TLS)
• Tasks supporting the determination of TLS.
• Tasks supporting provision of guidance to States.
• High priority political and strategic issues
  concerning the progress of Safety regulation in
  Europe, and the role and operation of the
  SRC/SRU.

107

• Priority 2
• Development and maintenance of high-priority of
  ESARR Advisory material (explanatory material,
  essential AMC).
• Monitoring and support for ESARR implementation.
• Safety measurement.
• Identification of key risk areas.
• Progressing identified by risk areas
• High priority interface tasks.
• Review of EATM Programme deliverables.

108

• Priority 3
• Development and maintenance of low-priority of
  ESARR Advisory material. (FAQ non-essential AMC,
  etc.)
• Promotion activities.
• Research and development.
• Low priority interface tasks.
• Further development of ESARRs (except specific
  aspects where fringed to be high-priority)
• Except for aspects included in Priority 1
• (eg. Annual Safety Report)

109
Overview
The "high priority tasks" are indicated in the
Appendices A1 to F7(SRC Task Sheets) ? Single
European Sky Programme
SES? European SSAP actions
SSAP? those subtasks that are inevitably
linked to the main SSAP task
SSAP()? Support to CARDS HELLASFALIA
Programme Support to States
STS? Safety levels and targets
TLS? all high priority
support activities priority
1 All other activities are
classified as medium priority
2and low priority
3

110
Resources

• Estimates made of work programme demands
• On current staff projections we can achieve
  priority 1 that is
• SES, SSAP, Support to States, TLS
• Plus associated technical administrative
  support
• But little else, unless priority one tasks are
  displaced
• (Estimates subject to necessary approximations)

111
SRC Stategy

• SRC 19 decided on a revision of SRC strategy
• Work in progress
• SRC strategy to be encompassed in an SRC Business
  Plan
• In future, the vehicle for PC approval of SRCs
  work
• But first

112
The way forward

• Full SRC work programme to PC by correspondance
• Information paper to PC 20, advising of
• Development of SRC Business Plan
• Plan to submit to PC 23 (July 2005)
• Meanwhile, short term strategy is already set by
  PC 19 decisions.

113
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to -
• Note the content of this paper
• Approve the revised Work Programme document SRC
  Doc 3 for publication
• as Version 7.0 Released Issue
• If approved, to further approve its submission to
  the Provisional Council by correspondence before
  PC 20 (July 2004)
• Approve the development of an SRC Business Plan
  to become the means of PCs approval of SRCs
  work in the future
• Approve the submission of an information paper to
  PC presenting the above arrangements.

114
Agenda Item 13 - Staffing Budget
115
Agenda Item 14 - ESARR 2 Implementation

116
BACKGROUND

• PC14 Decision
• PC17 SRC report on the ESARR 2 Safety Indicators
  structure
• Lack of Key ATM Safety Performance Indicator
  (composite index) or a small set of key indicators

117
KSI Current position

• PC14 Decision
• PC17 SRC report on the ESARR 2 Safety Indicators
  structure
• Lack of Key ATM Safety Performance Indicator
  (composite index) or a small set of key
  indicators is yet to be developed

118
KSI Issues and progress report

• Existing industry indicators are limited to
  accidents and fatal accidents
• Exposure data
• Severity and risk assessment is in early days
• Precedence from FAA withdrawn from public domain

119
KSI Issues and progress report (contd)

• End of the phase of collection and analysis of
  the state-of-the art in the filed by both SRU and
  PRU
• Any model will have to be based on the wide
  variety of safety measurements already in place
  in EUROCONTROL (SRU, SAF)
• Several issues required to be solved to get the
  stakeholders approval
• A detailed report to support a further decision
  regarding the subject will be develop for
  PC22(April 2005)

120
Recommendations for SRC

• The SRC is invited to approve the attached PC
  paper for submission to the Provisional Councils
  20th Session in July 2004

121
Agenda Item 14 - ESARR 2 Implementation
14.1 Responses to DG letter
122
Criteria in the DG Letter

• ? Appointment of an AST FP
• ? National AST returned for year 2003 before end
  of March
• ? Copy of the related ESARR 2 National Regulation

123
Agenda Item 14 - ESARR 2 Implementation
14.2 AST Issues
124
Main Issues with AST returns

• Main issues at national level already reported at
  SRC 19 in Feb
• AST quality visibly increased but still not
  enough
• States are starting to report Causes (Tables D
  and E)
• First statistics output is available and will be
  provided to SPG for Annual Report Development
  Iterations
• Few ASTs are at very poor quality but we can
  detect an overall improvement
• Big demand for training

125
Agenda Item 15 - Any Other Business
15.1 One Sky Teams
126
ONE SKY TEAMS

• Web based environment
• EUROCONTROL account is needed
• Informative message to SRC - SPG
• RTF Members on March 19
• Still 44 users with no account
• Self registration requested

127
What is OST ?

• A tool based on the CIRCA tool (EC)
• A virtual workspace
• With a single source of content
• For geographically dispersed teams
• 4 Profiles
• Information
• Library
• Newsgroups
• Meetings

128
Why a collaborative environment ?

• User friendly
• Single trusted source of content
• Support to real interactive work
• Organisation of sharing information
• Improvement of commenting and decision making
  process
• Saving overhead costs
• Relevant information in a secured controlled
  way, anytime, from anywhere

129
Main Services

• Information with hyperlinks
• Library
• Documents attributes
• Downloading via e-mail or http
• Possibility for notification of new uploads
• Transparency
• Newsgroups for interactive discussions fora
• Meetings

130
Reminder

• OST is only efficient if
• ALL of our Members have access
• Without an account no access possible
• New invitations will be sent for Self
  Registration
• Please register
• Thank you

131
Agenda Item 15 - Any Other Business
15.2 2004 Meetings
132
Next SRC Meeting

• SRC21 Tuesday, 21 September
• Wednesday, 22 September 2004

133

• SRC