Staying good while playing God - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Staying good while playing God

Description:

Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University ... www.bioethics.kvl.dk. Contents. Prologue: The role of ethics in the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: mickeyg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Staying good while playing God


1
Staying good while playing God
  • Mickey Gjerris Peter Sandøe
  • Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment
  • Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University
  • www.bioethics.kvl.dk

2
Contents
  • Prologue The role of ethics in the biotechnology
    debate
  • European attitudes to biotechnology
  • The debate on GE and cloning in Europe
  • Cloning in Public
  • What are the ethical concerns?
  • Epilogue

3
The role of ethics in the biotechnology debate
  • To analyse and systematize the content of the
    ethical concerns raised in connection with
    biotechnology
  • To discuss the relationship between these ethical
    concerns and the wider societal and philosophical
    context that shapes them
  • To critically evaluate the different aspects of
    biotechnology and the general impact on society
  • To remind us that ethical reflection and
    decision-making is an existential task not
    merely a professional
  • To remind theologians, philosophers,
    bioethicists, politicians etc. that ethics is a
    lantern, not a hammer

4
European attitudes to biotechnology used on
animals
  • Since 1991 the Eurobarometer survey has examined
    the attitude of the European public
  • In general the surveys show that the European
    public
  • Make balanced judgements on the use of
    biotechnology on animals
  • Differentiates between medical and agricultural
    applications
  • Do not become more positive towards biotechnology
    the more they know about it
  • Have become slightly more positive towards
    biotechnology in general from 1991-2002
  • Are most sceptical towards biotechnology when it
    is applied to animals and/or food-production

5
SHOULD BIOTECHNOLOGY BE ENCOURAGED?
Table 1 Mean scores in the judgement of to what
extent different applications of gene technology
should be encouraged in EU in 1996. Based on
Durant, J. et al (eds), 1998, p.234, 260
6
PERCEPTION BY EUROPEAN PUBLIC
7
Eurobarometer 58.0, 2002
8
What are the ethical concerns?
  • Drawing from the Eurobarometer surveys, a
    qualitative interview study from Denmark (2000)
    and our experience, the ethical concerns that
    will emerge in the discussion om animal
    biotechnology can be placed under these headers
  • Dangers to human health and environment
  • Welfare
  • Other moral concerns
  • Usefullness

9
The debate on GE and cloning of animals in Europe
  • The focus quickly shifts to the consequences if
    and when the technology is used on humans as in
    the case of animal cloning (the slippery slope)
  • Does not treat GE or cloned animals especially
    but includes them in the general discussion about
    the ethical limits to human use of animals
  • Is growing as the the list of possible
    applications grows and thereby the need for
    guidelines and regulation
  • Is characterized by a growing political
    understanding for the need of socially robust
    solutions in light of the case of GM-crops

10
(No Transcript)
11
CLONING IN PUBLIC
  • Objectives
  • To stimulate informed, public debate across
    Europe on farm animal cloning and to ensure
    public participation in the forming of policies
    and regulation on a European level
  • To make recommendations on European regulation
    and on guidelines covering research on farm
    animal cloning and its subsequent applications
  • Deliverables
  • A report on the state-of-the-art and objectives
    of farm animal cloning science
  • Reports on the legal and ethical aspects of farm
    animal cloning
  • A series of articles for leading European
    newspapers and magazines and other publications
    to stimulate public debate on farm animal cloning
  • A participatory conference and two workshops on
    different aspects of farm animal cloning with a
    high degree of public involvement
  • A set of recommendations on future guidelines and
    regulation

Participants The Danish Institute for
Agricultural Sciences (DIAS DK), Institute of
Animal Physiology and Genetics (IAPG CZ),
Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC
PT), Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University
(KVL DK), University of Copenhagen (KU DK),
and University of Wales, Cardiff (UWC GB)
12
CLONING IN PUBLIC
  • Thematic scope
  • The project will concentrate on cloning by means
    of nuclear cell transfer on farm animal species.
    Both the development of the technology itself and
    the possible applications of it will be
    considered.
  • Agricultural sector Farm animal breeding
  • Biomedical sector Basic research, genetically
    identical animals, genetically modified animals,
    bioreactors,
  • Geographical scope
  • The different aspects of farm animal cloning will
    be examined within both member states and
    associated countries. A wider international
    perspective will also be included for example,
    regarding trade, international law and the
    ability of the EU to be competitive in economic
    and technological terms.

13
What are the ethical concerns?
  • Drawing from the Eurobarometer surveys, a
    qualitative interview study from Denmark (2000)
    and our experience, the ethical concerns that
    will emerge in the discussion om animal
    biotechnology can be placed under these headers
  • Dangers to human health and environment
  • Animal welfare
  • Other moral concerns
  • Usefullness
  • We will concentrate on the last two

14
Other moral concerns
  • Under this heading we find complex questions on
    social justice, democracy, globalization and law.
    But we also find the question of the integrity of
    the animals
  • Integrity can be seen as a notion that tries to
    capture the feeling of uneasiness that will not
    leave, although a technology has been proven to
    be without risks and without welfare problems
  • The concept of integrity shows itself in our
    immediate experience of living beings as in the
    case of the blind hens
  • Familiarity and estrangement

15
BLIND HENS
16
The concept of integrity
  • Five different approaches
  • Widening the notion of animal welfare
  • Blind and featherless poultry
  • Moving from individualism to holism
  • Farm animal breeding
  • The untouchableness of life
  • Unneccessary use of technology
  • Bringing in considerations about usefullness
  • Copycat
  • Animals as ressources and aliens
  • Animals as means and ends at the same time

17
(No Transcript)
18
Recommendations for the Danish Parliament
  • Specific legislation on cloning and genetic
    modification of animals
  • Should only be allowed when serving a substantial
    goal
  • Basic research
  • Applied research for the improvement of health
    and environment
  • Production and breeding of animals that produces
    compounds of substantial benefit for health and
    environment
  • Teaching at universities and training of personel
  • Rule of thumb The Principle of Proportionality

19
Epilogue How to proceed?
  • GM-crops have taught us that to introduce
    biotechnology in a large scale socially robust
    limits must be placed on the use of the
    technology.
  • A principle of proportionality will perhaps not
    give scientists the freedom they want, but it
    will ensure that the applications of animal
    biotechnology that stands up to public scrutiny
    (e.g. biomedical uses), are not discarded
    alongside the unacceptable ones (e.g. food
    production).
  • GM crops became rejected partly because the
    ethical concerns of the general public were
    deemed irrelevant or less important in the
    discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com