PowerPointPrsentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

PowerPointPrsentation

Description:

Hospitals. University Medical Centers. all hospitals. Percentage hosp beds 8.8 ... 8 systems in University Hospitals add. 5 systems in general hospitals ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: drpeter7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PowerPointPrsentation


1
HOW WE ADAPT TO AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY A EUROPEAN
PROVIDERS VIEW
Buxtehude 06.05.2003
2
WHY BOTHER ADAPTING?
  • to improve medical diagnosis and therapy
  • to become more efficient
  • to exploit new reimbursement opportunities
  • to enhance market position
  • to provide opportunity for clinical research
  • to satisfy physicians wishes

3
Toys for Boys
4
High Tech is fun
5
and intriguing
HOW DO WE PAY FOR IT?
6
REGULATORY PROCESS
Application for new method/ medical device
Federal Joint Committee
tough pt protection laws - radiation
exposure less malpratice pressure
courtesy Anne-Kathrin Haas, AOK
7
TECHNOLOGY AGE
10.400
1.700
10.000
2.500
installed systems 2004
CT systems
MRI systems
lt 5 yrs
5-10 yrs
gt 10 yrs
Source Siemens Medical Solution
8
HIGH TECH DISTRIBUTION
South-America
Other countries
Japan
Rest-Europe
USA
Germany
MR-systems/million pop
MR-systems installed
Source Siemens Medical Solutions, 2003
9
PUBLIC RD EXPENDITURE
per capita public spending for biomedical research
10
MEDICAL DEVICE MANUFACTURERS
  • Europe global innovation leader
  • Germany leader in Europe
  • German manufacturers 2003 Sales 12.5 Billion
  • 50 sales with products with market presence lt 2
    yrs
  • 8 of sales for RD expenditure

11
GERMAN HOSPITALS
Percentage hosp beds 8.8
source Statistisches Bundesamt, 2003
12
HOSPITAL REVENUE
IN-PATIENTS
SHI SICKNESS FUNDS 88
OUT-PATIENTS
PHI 12
SELF-PAYERS
Federal Joint Committee
13
HOSPITAL FINANCING
State subsidies for building and technology
infrastructure
PHI self-paying out-patients
Self-paying in-patients
PHI in-patients
SHI in-patients negotiated annual budget (SHI
PHI patients) until 12/04 based on nights
spent starting 1/05 based on treated diagnosis
(DRG)
14
FINANCING HEALTH SYSTEM
AMBULATORY PHYSICIAN
HOSPITALS
ownership
public corporate
physician
15
TECHNOLOGY SUBSIDIES
University Hospital
General Hospital
amb. care physician
Investment for device approved by Fed. Joint
Committee
16
GERMAN HEALTH CARE TRENDS
  • reimbursement conversion from nights to DRGs
  • shortening of in-hospital stay
  • definitive one-step diagnosis using high tech at
    outset
  • introduction of integrated medical care programs
  • better coordination of in- and out-patient
    sectors
  • increasing emphasis on electronic patient record
    (tele-medicine)
  • enhanced patient awareness
  • increasing number of self-payers
  • more attention to quality of medical services
  • more patient co-payments
  • less medical services sought

17
THE BUDGET EFFECT
Introduction/Increase of co-payments January 2004
10 fewer in-patient services 15 fewer
out-patient services
until 12/2003 the covered top problem
18
WAHT DO WE NEED?
more patient benefit better quality of medical
services more efficient processes better
networking across sectors
19
HOW DO WE ADAPT?
Investment in Infrastructure
  • new buildings
  • new products
  • new markets
  • new technology

20
NEW TECHNOLOGY PET-CT 1 1 3
21
PET/CT STAGING
CT- chest
Dx in 3d
CT- abd/pel
Bone Scint.
Brain MRI
CXR



Biopsy


  • more patient comfort
  • more efficient (faster with less cost)
  • more quality (increased accuracy)

22
PET/CT IMPLEMENTATION
  • DFG quits TA, Fed. Joint Com approves
    device PET/CT still not reimbursable for amb.
    sector
  • add. 8 systems in University Hospitals add. 5
    systems in general hospitals
  • first installation in physicians office
  • first installation in General Hospital
  • DFG decides to fund 5 systems
  • first system sited by manufacturer in Germany
  • first system sited by manufacturer in Europe
  • Technology available from manufacturer

1/2005 1/2004 1/2003 6/2002 1/2002 7/2001 1/2001
7/2000
ADAPTATION TOO SLOW
23
MR/CT COLONOGRAPHY
24
MR/CT COLONOGRAPHY
1/2005 7/2004 1/2004 7/2003 1/2003 6/2002 1/2002 7
/2001 1/2001 7/2000
FAILURE TO ADAPT LACK OF STRUCTURED TA
25
NEW PRODUCT MR BODY SCREEN
colon 10 min
RELEVANT FINDINGS IN 17 OF PATIENTS
heart 20 min
brain 15 min
lung 5 min
arteries 10 min
26
NEW PRODUCT MR BODY SCREEN
  • New Product Whole Body MRI
  • part of comprehensive screening program
  • cost-effectiveness never evaluated
  • in keeping with all laws and regulations
  • targets self-paying patients
  • private insurances may pay as special benefit
  • larger companies offer program as medical
    benefit
  • Follow-UP cost born by SHI and PHI
  • commercially available at 5 sites in Germany,
    today

GERMANY GOES CALIFONIA
27
How do we adapt to available technology?
  • spread of technology is governed by
  • rationing of investment budgets
  • reimbursement rules for SIH pts
  • individual providers decision to target new
    markets (self-payers) with new products
  • HTA lacks implementation and acceptance
  • exception DFG peer review process
  • adaptation of investment and reimbursement rules
    is often uncoordinated and too slow
  • gt Slow adoption of innovations

28
WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO?
  • overcome separation of in- and out-patient
    sectors
  • same financing system
  • structured TA program (like peer review DFG)
  • federal institute for Quality Assurance to
    enhance EBM awareness
  • more transparency and information for the
    general population

29
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com