Legal Compliance Issues for Health Benefit Cards

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Legal Compliance Issues for Health Benefit Cards

Description:

Credit extension. Electronic Payment Card Guidance. 11. Electronic Payment ... Fall-out claims/Pay and chase. 13. Electronic Payment Card Guidance. Rev. Rul. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: nbp9

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Legal Compliance Issues for Health Benefit Cards


1
Legal Compliance Issues for Health Benefit Cards
  • Presented by
  • John Hickman, Alston Bird, LLP
  • jhickman_at_alston.com

2
Health Benefit Card Key Compliance Issues
  • Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • IRS Health Benefit card Guidance
  • Notice 2006-69

3
Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • Code prohibits certain transactions involving HSA
    between fiduciary and disqualified person
    (aka DP)
  • Code Section 4975
  • ERISA Section 406 (if ERISA applies)
  • Administered by DOL (even if ERISA does not
    apply)
  • Consequences for DP other than accountholder
  • (Code) Excise Tax for non-compliance
  • (ERISA) Equitable remedies
  • Consequences for Accountholder
  • HSA ceases to be an HSA under Code Section 223.

4
Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • Who is a fiduciary?
  • HSA Accountholder
  • Trustee or any other person with discretionary
    authority over management and/or control over
    plan assets
  • Person who renders investment advice for a fee
  • Who is DP?
  • Fiduciary
  • Service Provider
  • Employer of employees covered by HSA
  • Family member of the above

5
Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • What are the prohibited transactions?
  • Any direct or indirect
  • Sale or exchange of property between HSA and DP
  • Lending of money or other extension of credit
    between HSA and DP
  • Furnishing of goods or services between the HSA
    and DP
  • Transfer or use of HSA income or plan assets by
    DP
  • Fiduciary deals with income or assets for his/her
    own interest
  • Receipt of consideration by fiduciary for
    personal account from a party dealing with the
    HSA income or assets

6
Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • Identifying PTs
  • Must have right players
  • Fiduciary
  • DP
  • Generally transaction must involve HSA assets
    (but not always)
  • E.g. compensation to service providers
  • Rule of Thumb if DP receives compensation with
    respect to a transaction involving the HSA,
    analysis is required.

7
Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • Exceptions to Prohibited Transaction Rules
  • Certain types of loans
  • Reasonable and necessary services (the service
    provider exception)
  • Ancillary services by a bank to the extent
    certain conditions are met
  • Investment of HSA assets in all or part of the
    assets in deposits that bear reasonable rate of
    interest in a bank
  • No exceptions for fiduciary transactions
  • Independent fiduciary must approve transaction

8
Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • One DOL Opinion on HSAs on point
  • DOL Adv. Op. 2004-09A
  • Trustee deposits 100 in account for setting up
    HSA with trustee
  • What if 100 given directly to accountholder?
  • IRA Guidance is helpful
  • PTE 93-1 and 93-33
  • PBM Case
  • Nationwide (12b-1 Fee) Case

9
Prohibited Transaction Issues
  • Other situations in which PT might occur
  • Retention of card interchange fees by trustee who
    also issues card
  • Receipt of 12b-1 fees from investment funds
  • Receipt of commissions or finder fees by
    service provider from another service provider
  • Choosing investment management company owned by
    fiduciary or family member of fiduciary
  • Inducements offered to accountholder
  • Free services
  • Incentives/rebates
  • Credit extension

10
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
11
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
  • Revenue Ruling 2003-43
  • First piece of guidance on use of electronic
    payment card with medical reimbursement
    arrangements
  • Guidance needed to reconcile general rule that
    substantiation must be provided prior to making
    reimbursement
  • Established restrictive parameters for card use
    to limit situations in which card was used for
    non-medical
  • Notice 2006-69
  • Clarifies rules established by Rev. Rul. 2003-43

12
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
  • Revenue Ruling 2003-43 parameters
  • Swipe privilege limited to health care providers
  • Other specifications
  • Type of Card
  • Available balance linked to FSA/HRA balance
  • Substantiation Requirements
  • Auto adjudication (3 categories)
  • Fall-out claims/Pay and chase

13
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
  • Rev. Rul. 2003-43 requirements (cont)
  • Certification Prior to Enrollment and Annually
  • Participant enrollment form language required
  • Re-affirmation Upon Swipe
  • Language on back of card
  • Sufficiency of cardholder agreement
  • Suspension of Swipe Privilege if Abuse
  • Participant Required to Retain Substantiation
  • All swipes
  • Duration ?

14
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
  • Revenue Ruling 2003-43 requirements (cont)
  • Three Auto-adjudication Categories for Merchants
    with Health Care MCC
  • Copay Match (generally network claims)
  • Match of copay
  • Plan participant specific
  • Recurring Claim (after initial paper claim)
  • Recurrence as to amount, provider, time period
  • Real Time Match
  • Real time verification via (electronic, fax, etc)

15
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
  • Clarifications made by 2006-69-Auto adjudication
  • Co-pay match
  • Multiple of co-pay or combination of co-pays for
    single benefit with variable co-pays
  • Amount cannot exceed 5 times co-pay (or if
    variable co-pay-5 times greatest co-pay amount
    for single benefit)
  • Must be co-pay of specific employee/cardholder
  • TPA/Employer must certify co-pay
  • Spouse/dependent co-pays not allowed
  • Transaction must originate with health care
    provider (i.e. merchant with a health care
    related merchant category code)
  • If amount exceeds maximum amount, must
    substantiate entire expense

16
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
  • Clarifications made by 2006-69-Auto-Adjudication
    (cont)
  • Inventory Information Approval System
  • Merchant approves expense at point of sale from
    pre-approved list
  • Card use is restricted to eligible expense amount
  • Appropriate data is collected and maintained
  • Identity of individual
  • Nature of expense
  • Amount incurred
  • Date incurred
  • Data can be sent to employer/administrator at POS
    or at later date OR just made accessible at later
    date e.g., in event of IRS audit
  • Contrast with real time under 2004-43
  • The Good health care MCC not required
  • The Bad Claims level data must be accessible
  • The Ugly Coordination between retailers and
    TPAs

17
Electronic Payment Card Guidance
  • Clarifications made by 2006-69-Auto-Adjudication
    (cont)
  • Inventory Information Approval System (cont)
  • IRS clarifies that card may be used by merchants
    with no health care merchant category code so
    long as they utilize the inventory information
    approval system.
  • Impacts big retail centers (discount and grocery
    stores)
  • Impacts current card processing procedures

18
Other Guidance in 2006-69
  • Confirms that EOB roll-over does not require
    additional participant certification
  • Confirms that original auto-adjudication
    categories limited to health care MCC
  • Confirms that pay and chase limited to four
    auto-adjudication categories
  • Confirms that self-substantiation and sampling
    not permitted
  • Confirms that penalty for non-compliance is all
    reimbursements (even those properly
    substantiated) may be taxed

19
Action Items What Were They Thinking ?
  • Evaluate current system
  • Do funds flow BEFORE adjudication?
  • If so, does your system fit one of four
    recognized categories
  • Co-pay match at non-health care MCC does not work
  • Can MCCs be expanded?
  • Can claims-level detail be maintained? By whom ?
  • Could there be other real-time adjudication
    techniques?
  • Action Plan
  • Communication to employers
  • Communication to participants
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)