Title: Tamar Jacoby
1 IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE
- Tamar Jacoby
- President
- ImmigrationWorks USA
2TODAYS AGENDA
- Enforcement the big picture
- I-9 preparedness
- Is E-Verify right for you?
- What to do when you get audited
2
3Part One ENFORCEMENT THE BIG PICTURE
3
4NEW TREND SILENT RAIDS
5SILENT RAIDS WHAT THEY MEAN FOR EMPLOYERS
- Audits reach more companies than raids. Instead
of hundreds of - agents going after one company, now a few
agents go after - hundreds of companies.
- Audits force businesses to terminate every
unauthorized immigrant - not just those on the job at the time of a
raid. - Audits limit future hiring.
- After an audit, unauthorized workers may seek
employment at a - competing company.
6RISING TIDE OF ICE AUDITS
7AUDITING EMPLOYERS, NOT DEPORTING WORKERS
8NEW LEGAL LANDSCAPE
- Criminal charges against employers and
management. -
- Most common charges pattern or practice of
knowingly hiring - unauthorized workers, harboring unauthorized
workers. -
- Reckless disregard standard.
- Inferred knowledge.
- Absence of I-9s for many unauthorized workers.
- Employer failed to respond to SSA inquiries
about - unauthorized workers.
- Double whammy more aggressive enforcement of
anti- - discrimination laws.
9POSSIBLE CHARGES
- Criminal sections of IRCA
- Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act (RICO). - Identity theft.
- Bringing, encouraging, transporting, harboring
and - concealing unauthorized immigrants.
- Money laundering.
10AUDITS HAVE CONSEQUENCES
- WORKSITE ENFORCEMENT
-
- FY2004 three letters from INS to employers
- FY2008 500 ICE I-9 audits
- FY2012 ICE aiming to audit 4,000 employers
-
- FINES
-
- FY2006 0 collected
- FY2012 ICE on pace to collect 15 million
11CASE STUDY NATIONAL BURRITO CHAIN
- Audited in Minnesota, Virginia,
- Washington DC.
- Lost 450 of 1,200 employees in
- Minnesota.
- Protests by labor and immigrants
- rights groups.
- Customers complained about
- service as company trained new
- employees.
- 1.3 million in legal costs in first
- year alone.
-
- DOJ criminal investigation
- ongoing.
12RICO SUITS
- In 1996, Congress expanded the Racketeer
Influenced and - Corrupt Organizations Act to include violations
of federal - immigration law.
- Knowingly hiring illegal immigrants
systematically and on a - large scale can fall under RICO.
- A RICO conviction carries triple penalties.
- In 2002, a major chicken processor was accused
of seeking - out illegal immigrants and faced a RICO
lawsuit. The suit - lasted six years until the court finally
dismissed the charges. - RICO cases are rare six in two years, none
successful.
13SOCIAL SECURITY NO MATCH LETTERS ARE BACK
- SSA resumes no-match letters to employers in
April 2011. - DOJ Office of Special Counsel issues dos and
donts. - MOST IMPORTANT DONT Dont jump to
conclusions. - Conduct follow-up on the no-match letter,
document all - follow-up activities.
- The no-match letter alone is not valid grounds
for - termination.
- Do not terminate without consulting legal
counsel.
13
14Part Two I-9 PREPAREDNESS
15A LEGAL CONSENSUS
- Immigration law firms have learned the hard way
it pays to - listen to their DOS and DONTS
- See a sampling of tips in the slides that
follow. - All agree on three core points
- Treat all employees the same way. Dont vary
- procedures. Dont fish for answers. Dont ask
for - particular documents.
- Have a system. Dedicated employees, established
- procedures, policies and routines you always
follow. - Preventive measures will pay off self audits
and - course corrections.
16- BEST PRACTICES
- FOR I-9 COMPLETION
- GET THE BASICS RIGHT
- Provide adequate training and clear written
policies for your HR staff - Take all instructions on the form literally and
fill in every blank - Meet every deadline lateness cannot be cured
- Workers documents must be original and unexpired
- BE CONSISTENT
- Treat all employees the same regardless of
national origin or citizenship status - Do not ask for additional or different documents
- BE PREPARED
- Conduct regular self-audits catch your own
mistakes - Deal with constructive knowledge situations
(no-match letters, complaints about unauthorized
workers) - But refrain from jumping to conclusions or taking
action prematurely
16
17- I-9 COMPLIANCE
- Make immigration part of all employee handbooks
explain the criminal exposure. - Centralize hiring.
- Establish clear accountability for hiring and
maintaining I-9s. - Treat all workers the same regardless of national
origin or citizenship status. - Do not demand more or different documents from
any employee. - Institute standard procedures to follow when
receiving government inquiries. - Dont ignore red flags!
17
18I-9 compliance 7 tips
- 1. Establish an IRCA compliance policy.
- 2. Do not delegate I-9/visa responsibilities to
the department making the hire. - 3. Accept only original documents.
- 4. Track dates of hire and termination, purge
files no longer required for retention. - 5. Conduct preventative audits.
- 6. Automate a reverification system.
- 7. Switch to an electronic I-9 system.
19Best practices for 1-9
20Common Mistakes in Hiring
- Unequal treatment because of citizenship or
- immigration status
- Unequal treatment because of nationality, which
- includes place of birth, appearance, accent
and - language
- Asking for specific documents from employee,
such - as Green Card
- Verifying some peoples documents and not others
- Having a citizen-only hiring policy
20
21Ten 1-9 mistakes
22Correcting Errors Found During an In-House I-9
Audit
- New I-9 form should not be substituted for
- incorrect, old I-9
- I-9 may either be corrected, showing date of
- correction, or
- New amended I-9 completed and stapled to old
- incorrect I-9
23Part Three IS E-VERIFY RIGHT FOR YOU?
24WHAT IS E-VERIFY
- Free, voluntary, internet-based system to
confirm the legal - status of newly hired employees.
- Created in 1996, rapid growth in recent years.
- Compares SS and DHS immigration databases to
the - employees name and other Form I-9 information.
- Takes three to five seconds to process.
24
25E-VERIFY ACCURACY
- 96 percent of E-Verify inquiries correctly
determine employment- - authorization.
- 99.5 percent of work-authorized employees
verified through - E-Verify are verified without secondary
processing. - Inaccuracy rate for authorized workers is less
than 1 percent. - More than three-quarters of the cases in which
there is an inaccurate - determination are unauthorized workers.
- Inaccuracy rate for unauthorized workers
estimated in the 50 - percent range. (E-Verify does not catch
identity theft.) - As of April 2012, more than 345,000 employers
were using the - system, up from 9,300 in June 2006.
26RESTAURATEURS USING E-VERIFY
- First months can be confusing and disruptive
transition issues. - Applicant pool changes. Turnover often increases.
New training procedures sometimes required. - After transition period, many restaurateurs seem
satisfied.
27 BENEFITS OF E-VERIFY
- Controllable costs now vs. uncontrollable costs
later if company is audited - Discourages unauthorized job applicants
- Fewer discrepancies in Social Security records
- Limited safe harbor under federal and state laws
- Favorable public image
- Eligibility for federal and some state contracts
- Prerequisite for business license in some states
- Shows intent to comply a plus with ICE auditors
27
28 DRAWBACKS OF E-VERIFY
- Transition headaches, different labor pool
- Added burden of government oversight
- Must permit DHS and SSA inspections
-
- Continued susceptibility to ID fraud
- No inoculation from ICE audit
29E-VERIFY IN CONGRESS
- Mandating E-Verify for all employers was a
priority for House - Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith.
- Smiths mandate passed in the House Judiciary
committee. - U.S. Chamber, National Restaurant Association
and - ImmigrationWorks supported the Smith bill
because of safe - harbor provisions and preemption language.
- Opposition from agriculture and anti-preemption
Republicans - has prevented bill from coming to the floor.
- E-Verify must be extended by Congress before
October 2012. - LONG VIEW mandatory E-Verify is coming. Not
if, but when.
30E-VERIFY IN THE STATES
- 19 states mandate E-Verify for some or all
employers. - Some states mandate only for state agencies or
state - contractors, others for all employers, public
and private. - Depending how you count, seven to nine states
mandate - E-Verify for all employers Alabama, Arizona,
Georgia, - Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, - Tennessee, Utah.
- 2011 California law prohibits state and
municipalities from - requiring E-Verify.
-
30
31Part Four WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU GET AUDITED
32BE PREPARED A TALE OF TWO AUDITS
- Regional staffing company and national cleaning
service. - Full preventive audit vs. last-minute dash to
comply. - Five violations vs. half of workforce.
- 10 to 25 per I-9.
- Shows company where to improve.
- Self-audits and preventive efforts make a
difference in ICE eyes.
33 DEFENDING AN ICE I-9 AUDIT
-
- Cooperate, but know your rights
- Do not waive the 72-hour response time
- You can negotiate for more time
- Seek legal counsel
- Keep copies of all documents provided to ICE
- Do not accept the ICE agents assessment as
final - Review Notice of intent to fine with counsel
- Negotiate liability and amount of penalty
- Consider appealing
34THE OUTCOME
- ICE response can take months.
- Notice of discrepancies things you can fix.
- Notice of unauthorized aliens.
- Here too you can negotiate response time.
- ASK workers to rectify situation reasonable
time frame. - Many workers will flee.
- Pay employees whats due them.
- Treat all similar employees the same way.
35ITS NOT OVER EVEN WHEN ITS OVER
- An audit is not the end its often the
beginning of a - relationship with ICE.
- Past audits increase the likelihood of future
audits. - ICE may encourage enrollment in E-Verify or
IMAGE. - Negotiation is often possible be prepared.
- ICE may not be so friendly the second time
around.
36CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH
37 TAMAR JACOBY ImmigrationWorks USA737 8th
Street, SESuite 201Washington, DC
20003202-506-4541info_at_immigrationworksusa.org
ImmigrationWorks USA is a national federation
of employers working to advance better
immigration law. The network links major
corporations, national trade associations and 25
state-based coalitions of small to medium-sized
business owners concerned that the broken
immigration system is holding back the growth of
the U.S. economy. Their shared aim legislation
that brings Americas annual legal intake of
foreign workers more realistically into line with
the countrys labor needs.