Title: Altered Hydric Soils
1Altered Hydric Soils
- by
- Wade Hurt, USDA, NRCS, NSSC/ University of
Florida, Gainesville, FL, Chris Noble, USACE,
Vicksburg, MS, and Victor Carlisle, University of
Florida, Gainesville, FL.
2Types of Altered Hydric Soils
- Artificial
- Drained (Protected)
- Historic
- Relict
- The objectives of this lecture are to outline
criteria used to identify each of these
alterations and to outline the impact of
alterations on the hydric status of a soil.
3Development of Altered Soils
- Hydrologic modification may result in
- 1. Artificial Hydric Soils
- 2. Drained (Protected) Hydric Soils.
- Soil modification may result in
- 1. Artificial Hydric Soils
- 2. Historic Hydric Soils
- 3. Relict Hydric Soils
4Hydrologic Modification
- Hydrologic modification results where saturation
and/or inundation (ponding or flooding) has been
changed by human or geologic processes. - Both geologic modifications and human
modifications of hydrology may change the hydric
status of a soil.
5Soil Modification
- Soil modification result where soils (not
hydrology) have been altered either through
geologic or human additions or removals. - Both geologic modifications and human
modifications of a soil may change the hydric
status of a soil.
6Key
- Hydric Soils are currently supporting or capable
of supporting wetland ecosystems. Soil
modifications are not needed to maintain or
restore a wetland. In the case of drained hydric
soils, only removal of hydrologic modifications
are needed to restore wetlands. - Nonhydic soils currently are not supporting nor
are they capable of supporting wetland
ecosystems. Soil modifications are needed to
create a wetland. Hydrology modifications may
also create a wetland on nonhydric soils. The
differences between creation and restoration will
be discussed layer.
7Review Why is a Soil Hydric
- A soil is hydric because it
- 1. Has a hydric soil indicator, or
- 2. Meets hydric soil criteria 3 or 4, or
- 3. By data meets the Hydric Soil
Technical Standard (HSTS).
8Artificial Hydric Soils
- Wetness of these altered soils has been increased
by human activities (constructed wetlands,
irrigation leaks, rice fields, lake skeins and
other construction activities) or the soils have
been altered by human activities (constructed
wetlands, pond fringes and other excavations). - These altered soils are hydric soils because
they - 1. Have a hydric soil indicator, or
- 2. Meet hydric soil criteria 3 or 4, or
- 3. By data meet the HSTS.
9Artificial Hydric Soil
This dug pond has an artificial hydric soil
fringe that was created when the pond was
constructed. It now supports a wetland ecosystem.
10Artificial Hydric Soil
The wetland shown here and on the first slide was
created by removing soil material from a
nonhydric soil. The resulting soil is an
Artificial Hydric Soil.
11Artificial Hydric Soil
Construction activities, note the railroad in the
background, may be the reason wetlands and hydric
soils exist here.
12Drained (Protected) Hydric Soils
- This is the 2nd type of altered hydric soils An
attempt through human activities to decrease the
wetness of these altered soils has been made
(ditches, levees, dams, pumps, etc.). - Even with reduced wetness these altered soils
maintain their hydric status because they - 1. Have a hydric soil indicator or,
- 2. Meet hydric soil criteria 3 or 4 or,
- 3. By data meet the HSTS.
13Ditches, levees, dams, pumps, etc., do not alter
the hydric status of a soil.
14Drained Hydric soils
- The concept of drained hydric soils maintaining
their hydric status should be thoroughly
understood. This is important to wetland
scientist. By recognizing a soil with a hydric
soil indicator as being hydric regardless of
hydrologic alteration we keep soils capable of
supporting wetlands (if hydrology was restored)
in the same class as soils that are currently
supporting wetlands. - I have seen areas ditched, pumped, and protected
by levees in the Mississippi delta that are in
crop production (soybeans) that are still not
drained hydric soils because they still pond
water for up to one month during the growing
season, still have a hydric soil indicator, and
still meet the HSTS. One can hardly never
underestimate the effect of ditches upon the
hydric status of a soil. - In normal circumstances a wetland requires the
presence of three criteria (wetland hydrology,
wetland vegetation, and hydric soils). For an
area to be a wetland each of these criteria are
met independently.
15Historic Hydric Soils
- This is the 3rd type of altered hydric soils
These altered soils have had additional soil
material placed on top of the original soil by
human activities to the extent that that they are
no longer hydric (1993 flooding deposition on the
Missouri River flood plain, filling a wetland).
The additions may be intentional (illegal fill)
or non intentional (erosional deposition). - These altered soils are nonhydric because they
- 1. Do not have a hydric soil indicator and,
- 2. Do not meet hydric soil criteria 3 or 4 and,
- 3. Do not, by data, meet the HSTS.
16Historic Hydric Soils are altered soils that were
once hydric but have had human modifications
(additions) such that they are no longer hydric.
The additions may be intentional (illegal fill)
or non intentional (erosional deposition).
Nonhydric Hydric
15 cm
17Historic Hydric Soils
- Even though fill material has been placed over
the entire soil area shown in the previous slide
it has areas that are still hydric as well as
areas that are no longer hydric. The area to the
right of the vertical arrow is still hydric even
though fill material has been placed on the
surface it has the HS Indicator S6 (Stripped
Matrix) starting within 15 cm (6 inches) of the
surface. The lower horizontal arrow indicated
where the stripped matrix starts. The soil area
to the left of the vertical arrow still has a
stripped matrix but it starts below the depth
required (15 cm) by the HS Indicator S6 (Stripped
Matrix). - Can you think of other ways (other than the
presence of a HS Indicator) that a soil can be
proven to be hydric? What about monitoring to
see if it floods or ponds long enough to satisfy
Criteria 3 or 4 or monitoring to see if it meets
the HSTS?
18Areas which may have changed from hydric to
nonhydric.
Channelization and the resulting spoil may change
the hydric status of a soil. Also the
surrounding area may have reduced wetness.
Culvert
19Historic Hydric or Still Hydric?
Depleted Matrix starts here
20Historic?
- The soil in the previous slide has had fill
material placed over the original soil. The knife
blade points to the limit of the 10YR 5/4 fill
material (24 cm). The blue arrow points to the
start of HS indicator F3, Depleted Matrix (28
cm). This new soil is nonhydric because the
depleted matrix does not start within 25 cm and
because the fill material has a chroma of 4. This
is a Historic Hydric Soil. - What if the same fill material was only 18 cm
thick over the same underlying soil? This means
the depleted matrix would start at 22 cm. Would
the soil be hydric or nonhydric? This new soil
would still be nonhydric. Remember the
introductory Unless otherwise indicated,all
mineral layers above any of the Indicators have
dominant chroma 2 or less,or the layer(s)with
dominant chroma of more than 2 is less than 15 cm
(6 in)thick (Hurt, et al. 2002, p.5). It would
still be a Historic Hydric Soil. - In this example the fill material would have to
be less than 15 cm (6 in) thick for the soil to
be a hydric soil.
21Relict Hydric Soils
- This is the 4th type of altered hydric soils
These altered soils were once hydric but are no
longer hydric due to geologic activities (pimple
mounds of Texas Gulf Coast Prairie, stream
downcutting). - Only on close examination is it evident that
hydric soil morphologies do not exist. - These altered soils are nonhydric because they
- 1. Do not have a hydric soil indicator and,
- 2. Do not meet hydric soil criteria 3 or 4 and,
- 3. Do not, by data, meet the HSTS.
22Relict Hydric Soils
- Several morphological characteristics can suggest
relict redoximorphic features (Vepraskas, 1994).
These are - 1. Feature type and boundary characteristics,
- 2. Location to macropores,
- 3. Redox feature color, and
- 4. Pore lining continuity.
231. Feature and Boundary Characteristics
- A. Nodules and concretions
- B. Other redox concretions.
241 A Nodules and Concretions Feature and Boundary
Characteristics
- Contemporary nodules and concretions have
- 1. Diffuse boundaries (the color grade is
commonly more than 2 mm wide), - 2. Irregular surfaces, and
- 3. If smooth and round surfaces, red to yellow
corona (halos) should be present. - Relict nodules and concretions may have
- 1. Sharp boundaries (color grade is commonly less
than 0.1 mm wide) and - 2. Smooth surfaces.
25Relict Features
These redoximorphic features (nodules) most
likely are relict because they have sharp
boundaries and smooth surfaces. (photograph
Vepraskas. 1994)
261 B Other Redox Concentrations Feature and
Boundary Characteristics
- Contemporary redox concentrations have diffuse
boundaries. - Relict redox concentrations may have sharp
boundaries.
27Contemporary redox concentrations have diffuse
boundaries. Relict redox concentrations may have
sharp boundaries.
3 cm
1 cm
282 Redox Macropore Features
- Contemporary macropores may have
- Fe depletions along stable macropores in which
roots repeatedly grow that are not overlain by
iron rich coatings. - Relict macropores may have
- Fe depletions along stable macropores in which
roots repeatedly grow that are overlain by iron
rich coatings.
293 Redox Color Features
- Contemporary redox colors may be the results of
the iron minerals - 1. Ferrihydrite (5YR), Lepidiocrocite (7.5YR),
Goethite (7.5YR, 10YR), and Jarosite (2.5Y) and - 2. Have value and chroma 4 or more.
- Relict redox colors may be the results of the
iron mineral - 1. Hematite (10R, 5R, 2.5YR) and
- 2. Have value and chroma lt4.
304 Pore Lining Continuity
- Contemporary pore linings may be continuous
especially around living roots. Relict pore
linings may be broken and unrelated to live
roots. - Pictured below is a continuous pore lining
(reddish area) parallel to a reduced area
(blue-green).
31Relict Hydric Soils Texas Gulf Coast Prairie
Present Land Surface Geologic Land Surface
Geologic Hydric Soil Boundary
Telferner
Present Hydric Soil Boundary
2m
Nada, Dry
Nada, Wet
0-10 cm lfs 10YR 5/3 10-29 cm sc 10YR 5/2 cd
10R 3/3
Cieno
0-19 cm fsl 10YR 4/2 19-27 cm scl 10YR 4/2 fd
7.5YR 4/6
0-12 cm fsl 10YR 4/2 12-29 cm scl 10YR 4/2 cd
7.5YR 4/6
0-10 cm l 10YR 5/3 cd 7.5YR 4/6 10-25 cm sl
10YR 5/2 cd 7.5YR 4/6
cd common distinct fd few distinct
32Relict Hydric Soils Texas Gulf Coast Prairie
- The landscape depicted in the previous slide
shows an area where climatic changes have made
what once was the lowest area (Telferner soils)
is now the highest area. Only by close
examination do we know that the Telferner soils
are now relict hydric soils the redox
concentrations are 10R 3/3. cd common distinct
and fd few distinct
33Redox features forming
Original surface
Fill
34Time and the formation of redox features
- The soil shown on the previous slide has fill
material about 10 inches thick placed over the
original soil that had a depleted matrix. - The fill material had been in place for only a
few years and redox features are forming in the
lower ½ of the fill material indicating that in a
few more years a hydric soil indicator would be
present in the new soil.
35Summary
- The types of Altered Hydric Soils are Artificial,
Drained (Protected), Historic, and Relict hydric
soil. Artificial hydric soils were once nonhydric
but now are hydric soils created by human
modifications to hydrology (additional water) or
soil (removal of soil). Drained hydric soils
were hydric and still are hydric soils created
by human modifications to hydrology. Historic
hydric soils were once hydric but are now
nonhydric soils created by geologic or human
modifications to soils (additions). Relict hydric
soils were hydric but are now nonhydric soils
created by geologic modifications to hydrology. - A soil is hydric because it (1) Has a hydric
soil indicator or, (2) Meets hydric soil criteria
3 or 4 or, (3) By data meets the HSTS.
36Caveats
- Modified soil and hydrology may be due to illegal
or legal activities. - By federal or state agency policy, modified areas
may be subject to litigation (Section 404 CWA,
Swampbuster) or still eligible for programs
(USDAs EWP).
37Literature Cited
- Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas (Eds.). 2006. Field
indicators of hydric soils in the United States
(Version 6.0), USDA, NRCS, Fort Worth, TX.
http//soils.usda.gov/soil_use/hydric/field_ind.pd
f - Vepraskas, M. J. 1994. Redoximorphic Features for
Identifying Aquic Conditions. Tech. Bulletin 301.
North Carolina Ag. Research Service, North
Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, North Carolina.