Tina McKeon, Ph.D.

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Tina McKeon, Ph.D.

Description:

Patent Infringement: what it is, what it isn't and why it matters to you. Tina McKeon, Ph.D. FIRE Series: University of Rochester Medical Center Office of Technology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tina McKeon, Ph.D.


1
Patent Infringement what it is, what it isn't
and why it matters to you.
Tina McKeon, Ph.D. FIRE Series University of
Rochester Medical Center Office of Technology
Transfer
2
The U.S. Patent Office and the Courts
Chart by R. Polk Wagner
3
Infringement
  • Patents grant their owners the right to exclude
    others from practicing the claimed invention.
  • Unauthorized practice is infringement.
  • Direct infringement
  • Making the invention
  • Using the invention
  • Selling the invention
  • Offering the invention for sale
  • Importing the invention
  • Indirect infringement
  • Inducing infringement
  • Contributing to infringement

4
Issued Patent
  • Right to Exclude
  • NOT an affirmative right
  • A ticket to the courthouse

5
Infringement
  • How is infringement determined?
  • Determine the scope of the claim(s)
  • Compare the elements of the claim to the
    composition or method accused of infringement
    using the all elements rule every element
    required by the claim must be present in the
    accused composition or method either literally or
    under Doctrine of Equivalents

6
Elements recited
Cheese
Edible Salad
2 Slices of Bread
Meat Product
7
Accused Burger I
October 23, 1980
Hamburger Weekly
Say Goodbye to Unmanageable Burgers -J.
Fadrigo Finally, the scientists at Acme
Burger emerged from the depths of their
laboratories. With their resurfacing, the
scientists brought the latest in burger
technology. This revolutionary new burger has an
edible salad component, meat product and cheese,
all between the two slices of bread. The
edible salad component makes for a better
handling burger. Look for these new burgers to
hit the market early next year.
8
Accused Burger II
October 23, 1980
Hamburger Weekly
Say Goodbye to Unmanageable Burgers -J.
Fadrigo Finally, the scientists at Acme
Burger emerged from the depths of their
laboratories. With their resurfacing, the
scientists brought the latest in burger
technology. This revolutionary new burger has an
edible salad component and meat product, both,
between the two slices of bread. The edible
salad component is covered with a cheese-flavored
sauce. Look for these new burgers to hit the
market early next year.
9
Literal Infringement Analysis
10
Non-literal Infringement Analysis
11
Exceptions to Infringement
  • Research or De minimis Exception
  • Exception related to FDA approval

12
Research Exception
  • Narrow exception
  • For amusement, to satisfy idle curiosity, or for
    strictly philosophical inquiry

13
Madey v. Duke
  • Former faculty member sued the university for
    infringing his patented free electron laser
    technology
  • University moved to dismiss the complaint based
    on experimental use by a nonprofit research
    institution
  • Court rejected research exception because the
    infringing activities were in furtherance of
    Dukes commercial activities (educating students
    and obtaining grant support)
  • Employees at a research university may
    infringe valid patents when conducting their
    research activities!

14
FDA Exception
  • It shall not be an act of infringement to make,
    use, offer to sell, or sell within the United
    States or import into the United States a
    patented invention. solely for uses reasonably
    related to the development and submission of
    information under a Federal law which regulates
    the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or
    veterinary biological products.

15
Integra LifeSciences v. Merck KGaA
  • Integras patents claimed RGD peptides.
  • Merck KGaA (and Scripps) used the claimed RGD
    peptides to develop non-infringing agents.
  • Integra sued Merck (and Scripps) for infringement
  • Merck argued that they were not infringing
    because their work with Scripps falls under the
    statutory safe harbor provision.

16
Integra Life Sciences v. Merck KGaA (cont.)
  • Supreme Court
  • Mercks preclinical use of the patented peptides
    falls within the safe harbor their use was
    sufficiently related to the FDA approval process

17
Integra Life Sciences v. Merck KGaA (cont.)
  • Practical impact for patent holder
  • Try to claim methods of using your compounds for
    research (e.g., as controls) the law is more
    unsettled regarding any exception for research
  • Try to claim your compounds bound to some
    physical structure (e.g., bound to an assay plate
    or bead)
  • Practical impact for non-patent holder
  • Document uses related to future FDA approval

18
Defenses
  • Invalidity
  • Unenforceability (inequitable conduct)
  • Improper inventorship

19
Invalidity
  • The claimed subject matter was not new
  • The claimed subject matter was obvious
  • The specification is not a sufficient written
    description
  • The specification does not enable others to
    practice the invention claimed

20
Inequitable Conduct
  • Each person associated with prosecuting an
    application in the USPTO has a duty of candor to
    the Office
  • Must provide information that would be material
    to patentability (if in doubt, disclose!)
  • Must not provide false information
  • Often raised as a defense to charge of
    infringement
  • Requires both intent to deceive PTO and
    materiality (relevance) of the information
  • If duty of candor is violated, entire patent is
    unenforceable
  • Practical impact Check the Invention Disclosure
    Statement and make sure all of the statements in
    the application and those made during its
    prosecution are accurate.

21
Remedies
  • Patent Act provides for both injunctive relief
    for patent infringement and damages no less than
    a reasonable royalty (if cannot prove lost
    profits)
  • If product not marked, no damages until actual
    notice of infringement given.
  • Enhanced damages (up to 3x) and attorneys fees
    may be awarded in exceptional cases

22
Medical practitioner exception to remedies
Entity with which medical practitioner has a
professional affiliation for performing medical
activity
Licensed practitioner or acting under direction
of same
  • No remedies are available from
  • a medical practitioner or a related medical
    entity
  • with respect to a medical practitioners
    performance of a medical activity that
    constitutes an infringement

Not the use of a patented machine, manufacture,
or composition practice of a patented method of
using a composition or the practice of a process
in violation of a biotechnology patent
Performance of a medical or surgical procedure on
a body
23
Summary
  • Infringement is the unauthorized use of an
    invention claimed in a valid patent
  • Exceptions and defenses to patent infringement
    are relevant to university employees
  • Take steps to make your own patents strong
    (valid, enforceable and with proper inventorship)
  • Take steps to avoid infringing a third partys
    patent
  • Remedies and damages can be substantial

24
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)