Dividend Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Dividend Policy

Description:

Dividend Policy Firm has 2 choices Pay dividend Reinvest funds instead of paying out Dividend policy is the time pattern of dividend payout Should the firm pay out a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:408
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: commerce4
Category:
Tags: dividend | policy

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dividend Policy


1
Dividend Policy
  • Firm has 2 choices
  • Pay dividend
  • Reinvest funds instead of paying out
  • Dividend policy is the time pattern of dividend
    payout
  • Should the firm pay out a large percentage or
    small percentage of profits and when?

2
Life Cycle of Dividend Policy
3
The Irrelevance of Dividend Policy
  • Investors only care about total returns
  • Not how they are divided between dividends and
    capital gains
  • Dividends are merely a financing decision
  • Only important driver of value is future earnings
    power

4
Clientele Effect
  • Some investors prefer low dividend payouts and
    will buy shares in those companies that offer low
    dividend payouts
  • Some investors prefer high dividend payouts and
    will buy shares in those companies that offer
    high dividend payouts

5
Implications of Clientele Effect
  • What do you think will happen if a firm changes
    its policy from a high payout to a low payout?
  • What do you think will happen if a firm changes
    its policy from a low payout to a high payout?
  • If this is the case, does dividend POLICY matter?

6
Factors Favouring Low Payout
  • Tax
  • STC 12.5 CGT 10
  • retentions lead to capital gains ? lower tax
  • if no ve NPV projects free cash flow
  • (a) pay dividend
  • if personal lt corporate tax rate
  • (b) invest in short term instruments
  • if personal gt corporate tax rate

7
Factors Favouring High Payout
  • Desire for current income
  • Widows and orphans
  • Shares with relatively high degree of safety and
    dividend income
  • Uncertainty resolution
  • Bird in hand theory
  • Dividends are less risky than capital gains

8
Information Content of Dividends
  • Asymmetric information managers have more
    information about the health of the company than
    investors
  • Changes in dividends convey information
  • Dividend increases
  • Management believes it can be sustained
  • Signal of a healthy, growing firm
  • Dividend decreases
  • Management believes it can no longer sustain the
    current level of dividends
  • Signal of a firm that is having financial
    difficulties

9
Lintners Study (1956)
  • 1. Firms set target dividend payout ratios.
  • 2. They change dividends to match long-term
    sustainable shifts in earnings.
  • 3. Managers increase dividends only if they feel
    they can be maintained.
  • 4. Managers are more concerned about dividend
    changes than about levels of dividends. WHY?

10
Academic Thinking on Dividend Policy
  • Dividend payout ratio should primarily reflect
  • Expected capital requirements
  • (above expected operating cash flow)
  • Riskiness of the business
  • (variability of cash flow)
  • Target capital structure
  • (also partly related to risk)
  • Availability and cost of outside capital

11
How does theory measure up to reality?
  • Models versus Perceptions.
  • Academia makes provision for broad range of
    dividend theories.
  • Problem is no single theory has been proven to
    hold up in the market over extended periods.
  • Current prevailing view is that signalling
    (information content) and clientele effects are
    observable but true driver is market sentiment
    vis-à-vis growth and safety.

12
Alternative Share Buybacks
  • Buyback shares
  • Tender offer company states a purchase price
    and a desired number of shares
  • Open market buys shares in the open market
  • Reduces cash and equity
  • Simple method for changing capital structure
  • Value of the firm will be the same regardless of
    whether dividend paid or shares repurchased

13
Common Rationales
  • Deploy excess cash
  • (shortage of viable investments)
  • To increase share price
  • (management believes shares underpriced)
  • Replace cash dividends
  • (possible tax advantages)
  • Prevent dilution of earnings
  • (enhance EPS, or prevent reduction in EPS caused
    by exercise of share options)
  • Rationalize capital structure
  • (Higher D/E can be sustained)

14
Current US Situation
  • Historically, dividend paying stocks favoured.
    (Quarterly payments expected from good
    companies)
  • WHY?
  • Move to growth stocks in last two decades,
    especially with advent of technology and IT
    sector.
  • IT firms actually penalised for paying good
    dividends to shareholders.
  • After bull markets of last few years, companies
    sitting on large cash reserves (if no profitable
    opportunities exist, pay out to shareholders?)

15
Current issues favouring payout?
  • Bush regime pushing through tax cuts (lower tax
    rates to apply to 2010 and divs not taxed in
    hands of shareholders)
  • Scepticism concerning accounting profits. (Enron,
    et al)
  • Current volatility in markets means share holders
    desire safety, which can be accomplished by
    paying certain stream of dividends versus
    uncertainty of future share prices.

16
Current issues against payout?
  • Emergence of more small-cap firms, high on growth
    but low on cash. (Fama and French, 2001)
  • Buybacks preferred over dividends. (discretionary
    versus compulsory)
  • Academic theory irrelevance of dividends
  • Future uncertainty (war, oil prices, etc.)

17
So are academic views upheld?
  • Given the above there is little evidence for
    signalling and the clientele effect.
  • Indeed, the prevalent driver of dividend policy
    in the US seems to be sentiment as proposed by
    Baker and Wurgler (2002).

18
What is the South African situation?
  • Bhana (1991) finds indications that announcements
    of dividends have significant impact on share
    pricing in the direction of the announcement.
    positive (negative) announcement increase
    (decrease)
  • Therefore strong proof that information content
    holds for SA.
  • Importantly, overreaction hypothesis also holds
    market reacts correctly for positive
    announcement but overreacts for negative
    announcements.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com