Rubn Garca Garca, Ph.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Rubn Garca Garca, Ph.D.

Description:

MSC's Mentoring Program broadens its scope ... Support and commitment provided by Chancellors and MSC's Dean of Academic Affairs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: moisesto
Category:
Tags: garca | msc | rubn

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rubn Garca Garca, Ph.D.


1
Enhancement of the Teaching-Learning Process
through Integration of Technology and
Information Literacy
  • Rubén García García, Ph.D.
  • Director
  • Medical Sciences Campus
  • Maria del Pilar Toral, Ph.D.
  • Co-Director
  • University of Puerto Rico at Carolina

2
Asignan 5.7 millones en fondos federales a
universidades Viernes, 30 de septiembre de 2005
SAN JUAN (EFE)- El comisionado residente en
Washington, Luis Fortuño, anunció hoy que el
gobierno federal ha asignado 5.7 millones de
dólares para Puerto Rico bajo el programa
"Fortaleciendo Instituciones Educativas
Hispanas". Estos fondos podrán ser utilizados,
mediante el desarrollo individual de la
institución o a través de acuerdos cooperativos
entre entidades públicas o privadas, para el
desarrollo de las facultades, la compra de equipo
científico o de laboratorios, entre otras, indicó
Fortuño en un comunicado. El Recinto de Ciencias
Médicas de la Universidad de Puerto Rico (UPR)
recibió 699.911 dólares, la cantidad mayor de
fondos otorgada para el desarrollo individual de
la institución académica. Esta asignación fue
decidida luego de una competencia a nivel
nacional entre estas instituciones educativas
El Recinto de Ciencias Médicas de la Universidad
de Puerto Rico (UPR) recibió 699.911 dólares.
(Archivo)
3
Summary
  • Period covered 5 years (2005-2010)
  • Budget /- 3.5 million
  • Leader institution UPR-MSC
  • Partner institution UPR Carolina
  • Evaluation 97.3, Excellent
  • Components Four

4
Justification
  • Responsibility and commitment in providing
    students the best opportunities
  • Interest in improving the teaching-learning
    process
  • Symbiotic relationship between both institutions
  • Common needs
  • Previous experiences
  • Common strategies

5
Justification (cont.)
  • Convergence in weaknesses, strengths, problems,
    goals, objectives, resources, strategies, ideas,
    experiences, and needs
  • Planning embedded in strategic plans, goals,
    objectives, self-studies, and accreditation
    reports from each institution
  • Collaboration and perspectives
  • Student laboratories at UPRC expand their
    services
  • MSCs Mentoring Program broadens its scope
  • Technology integration models at MSC extended and
    diversified

6
CDP
  • Strengths, Weaknesses, and Problems Analysis -
    Procedures and Participation
  • Mission and Vision - UPR, MSC, UPRC
  • CDPs of Individual Title V Projects
  • Institutional Strategic Plans (2003-2008)
  • Self-studies and MSA-CHE accreditation visits
  • Continuous process, especially at MSC
  • Common characteristics
  • Academic Programs
  • Institutional Management
  • Fiscal Stability

7
Strengths
  • Academic Programs
  • Accreditations
  • Well -qualified and dedicated faculty
  • Faculty development programs
  • Unique academic offerings
  • Community services

8
Strengths (cont.)
  • Institutional Management
  • Ongoing and participative institutional planning
    and assessment
  • Automated services
  • Professional improvement and development for
    administrative personnel
  • Fiscal Stability
  • 9.6 of the governments general revenues
  • Balanced budgets
  • External resources, especially at MSC (65)

9
Weaknesses
  • Academic Programs
  • Limited ability to acquire technological
    equipment and infrastructure budget constraints
    do not allow classroom redesign and equipment
    with the latest technologies
  • Limited ability to train faculty in the
    incorporation of technology in the curricula due
    to restricted budgets
  • Students have weak computer skills
  • Problems within the student population for which
    the institutions do not provide support services
    or assistance

10
Weaknesses (cont.)
  • Institutional Management
  • Limited ability to update and expand technology
    infrastructure
  • Administrative personnel lack the necessary
    training to make effective use of computer
    technology
  • Information and data gathering needs to be
    improved databases need to be strengthened and
    integrated

11
Weaknesses (cont.)
  • Fiscal Stability
  • Need to update Facilities Master Plan and
    Deferred Maintenance Plan
  • Low salaries make recruitment of new personnel
    difficult
  • Limited budget, annual budget cuts

12
Significant Problems
  • Academic Programs
  • 1- At UPRC there is poor academic achievement in
    gateway/bottleneck science and math courses and
    low student retention due to poor student
    academic background and inadequate adjustment to
    university life and general low academic
    achievement at both institutions
  • 2-There is a critical need to provide student
    support services in technology use to address the
    digital divide of the partner institutions
    low-income, Hispanic student
  • 3- Faculty (full and part-time) at both
    institutions evidence uneven levels of mastery of
    instructional methods to integrate technology in
    their courses

13
Significant Problems (cont.)
  • Academic Programs (cont.)
  • 4- The libraries have fiscal constraints that
    limit their development and their capacity to
    acquire new databases, technologies, and online
    services
  • Institutional Management
  • 5- Challenging academic and administrative
    computing and telecommunications infrastructure
  • Fiscal Stability
  • 6- Restricted budgets with constraints on fiscal
    resources due to a tight expenditure structure in
    which institutional budgets are mostly allocated
    to personnel and other operational costs.
    Institutional funds are insufficient to allow
    financing of necessary major academic quality
    enhancement initiatives

14
Institutional Goals
  • Academic Programs
  • To improve student academic achievement
  • To provide a comprehensive faculty development
    program to improve their skills in the
    integration of modern technology into their
    instruction
  • To improve academic offerings and student
    learning outcomes through the integration of
    innovative technology into the curricula
  • To strengthen and enhance library resources and
    other instructional resources through the use of
    technology
  • To provide readily available information literacy
    support services

15
Institutional Goals (cont.)
  • Institutional Management
  • To upgrade the technology infrastructure to
    support new network resources
  • To maximize student support services
  • To guarantee the necessary support for the
    integration of information technologies into the
    teaching-learning process
  • To enable faculty to comprehensively integrate
    the use of information technology in the daily
    teaching-learning process

16
Institutional Goals (cont.)
  • Institutional Management
  • To increase the cost-effectiveness of programs
    and services provided
  • To reduce the high costs associated with student
    repetition of courses

17
Institutional Objectives
  • Table (pages 27-29), relationship between
  • Significant problems
  • Impact areas
  • Related weaknessess
  • Institutional goals
  • Measurable objectives

18
Institutional Commitment
  • Support and commitment provided by Chancellors
    and MSCs Dean of Academic Affairs
  • Integration of Title V activities into the
    institutions operations
  • Incorporation and expansion of the Projects
    initiatives into the institutions existing
    academic and administrative structures

19
Institutional Commitment (cont.)
  • Budget for
  • Staff members release time
  • Computing resources
  • Office space
  • Operational costs
  • Replacement and/or equipment upgrades
  • Incorporation into the Information Technology
    Plan

20
Major Objectives
  • Increase student academic achievement in
    gatekeeper/bottleneck courses
  • Increase freshmen to sophomore persistence rates
    in UPRCs Natural Sciences Department
  • Increase students proficiency in the use of
    library resources
  • Improve students skills in the efficient use of
    technology

21
Major Objectives (cont.)
  • Increase the availability of library resources
    and services through the Web
  • Increase the number of faculty integrating
    technology into the teaching/learning process
  • Increase and improve the technological
    infrastructure

22
Components
  • 1. Establishment of a Student Resource and
    Assistance Center (SRAC) at UPRC
  • Career planning
  • Mentoring
  • Workshops
  • Tutoring services
  • Face-to-face
  • Online
  • Technology tutorials
  • Mentors and tutors - MSCs students

23
Components (cont.)
  • 2. Establishment of a Faculty Technology Resource
    Center (FTRC) at MSC and UPRC
  • Academic and technological support for
  • Technology and multimedia integration in the
    teaching-learning process
  • Development of online course tutorials
  • Creation of online courses

24
Components (cont.)
  • 3. Enhancement of Library Resources and Services
  • Establishment of an online library information
    system
  • Creation of online tutorials on information
    literacy
  • Purchase of materials and shared databases

25
Components (cont.)
  • 4. Improvement of the technological and
    telecommunications infrastructure
  • 35 classrooms remodeled into electronic/smart
    classrooms
  • Creation of an online technology help desk
  • Installation of lightning rods and electric
    generator at UPRC
  • Improvement of wireless infrastructure at MSC

26
Implementation Strategy and Timetable
  • Table (pages 48-61), relates
  • Specific tasks
  • Primary participants
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Timeframes

27
Conceptual Map
RCM
28
Budget
  • Total 3,499,781
  • Distribution strategy Management at MSC and
    shared resources particular needs of each
    institution
  • Project Management 843, 476
  • Director and Co-Director
  • Administrative personnel
  • Travel to annual conferences
  • External evaluator

29
Budget (cont.)
  • Activity, MSC 1,601,239
  • Shared coordinators
  • Shared administrative personnel
  • Travel to annual conferences
  • Equipment
  • Materials
  • Remodeling
  • Shared library consultant
  • Mentors and tutors
  • Trainings
  • Faculty and librarians

30
Budget (cont.)
  • Activity, UPRC 1,055,066
  • Shared coordinators
  • Shared administrative personnel
  • Travel to annual conferences
  • Equipment
  • Materials
  • Remodeling
  • Trainings

31
Organizational Chart
32
Staff
  • Director Dr. Rubén García García
  • Co-director Dr. Maria del Pilar Toral
  • Coordinators, MSC
  • Faculty
  • Mentoring
  • Library Services
  • Coordinators, UPRC
  • Technology
  • SRAC

33
Staff (cont.)
  • Other personnel, MSC
  • Instructional Designer
  • Librarian
  • Webmaster
  • Administrative Secretary
  • Administrative Assistant
  • Other personnel, UPRC
  • Graphic Designer
  • Laboratory Technician
  • Programmer
  • Administrative Secretary
  • Administrative Assistant

34
Evaluation Plan
  • Summative and Formative
  • External Evaluator
  • Table (pages 90-91), relates
  • Objectives
  • Data elements
  • Data collection procedures
  • Personnel in charge
  • Time line

35
Summary
  • Focus on technology to improve students academic
    persistence and success by
  • Providing student support services
  • Training faculty in the incorporation of
    technology
  • Increasing student access to instructional
    technology and information literacy resources at
    partner institutions
  • Improving the universitys computing and
    telecommunications infrastructure
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com