Title: Dr Mark Hadley
1Parity Violation The Biggest Scientific
Blunder of the 20th Century?
2Is Nature Symmetrical?
We thought so until 1956 !!
- A Major change in our view of space and time
- Round Earth
- Heliocentric view of Universe
- Special Relativity (time is not absolute)
- General relativity (spacetime is curved)
- Big bang Universe finite in space and time
- Expanding Universe (time asymmetry)
3Plan
- Parity violation the conventional view
- My interest
- Review of Parity conservation
- Mechanics
- Electromagnetism
- Weak Interactions
- An alternative view
- Parity is Conserved !!
4Space Inversion
Inversion reflection 180 rotation
Axial or Pseudo vector
5Effect of Parity - momentum
The Parity Operator gives the transformation due
an inversion of the spatial coordinates
6Effect of Parity - spin
7Physical Review October 1956 p254-258
Parity violation in the weak interactions
Tsung Dao Lee
Chen Ning Yang
8Start with a symmetrical state
Look for an asymmetric outcome
e-
?
60Ni e- ?e
60Co
I(?)d? k (1 acos? )sin?d?
9Experimentalists
Wu  Ambler  Hayward
 Hoppes  Hudson
National Bureau of Standards USA 1956
10actual result
I(?)d? k (1 v/c cos? )sin?d?
11Nobel prize winners 1957
Parity violation in the weak interactions
Tsung Dao Lee
Chen Ning Yang
12But not quite so simple.
- Is the initial state symmetrical?
-
- We see from this analysis that the logical path
from the observed asymmetry to the inferred
nonconservation of parity in ß decay is
considerably more complex than the popular
presentations would indicate. - L. E. Ballentine
13A gravitational explanation for quantum theory
- Aims to explain
- QM
- Particle spectrum
- Fundamental interactions
- Predictions
- No graviton (Gravity waves are just classical
waves) - Spin-half
- Parity is conserved
14Parity is violated - FACT
The Nobel Prize Committee say so.
All the books say so.
15Doh !
16Explanations using GR
?
- Boundary Conditions
- Common source
?
17Doh!!
Doh !!
18Where have they gone wrong?
- Exactly what has been observed?
- Exactly what has been violated?
- What, exactly, is the definition of Parity?
19Parity in Newtonian Mechanics
Parity conserved
Before
After
?
F ma E ½m v2
F m(-a) -F m (-a) -F (-m)(-a) F
(-m)(-a) ( )E ½( m) v2
?
?
?
20Parity in Newtonian Mechanics
- P operator is chosen
- For simplicity
- To conserve parity
- Supported by
- Special Relativity (t-component of the energy
momentum 4-vector) - General Relativity
21Parity in electromagnetism
Start with a symmetrical state
e-
Magnetic field pointing out
22Parity in Electromagnetism
Parity conserved
Before
After
?
F q(E v x B) Note
-F q(-E -v x (-B)) -F q(-E -v x B) -F
-q(E -v x B) -F -q(E -v x (-B))
?
?
?
23Parity on magnetic poles
24Parity in electromagnetism
e-
Magnetic field pointing out
25e-
Magnetic field pointing in
26Duality Transforamtion
- The roles of E and B can be reversed by a duality
transformation
27Parity in Electromagnetism
- P operator is chosen
- To conserve parity
- For simplicity
- Supported by the covariant formulation
-
28Effect of Parity
The Parity Operator gives the transformation due
an inversion of the spatial coordinates. We do
not have a free choice of P operator. What are
the transformations in beta decay?
29- We see from this analysis that the logical path
from the observed asymmetry to the inferred
nonconservation of parity in ß decay is
considerably more complex than the popular
presentations would indicate. - L. E. Ballentine
The assumption that the Cobalt nucleous is
symmetrical is not only non-trivial -
it may well be wrong !
30What is the mirror image of a Cobalt atom?
60Co
60Co
e-
(not to scale)
31Parity
- Reverses
- Momentum
- Lepton number etc.
- Charge
- Unchanged
- Spin
-
32Conclusions
- Space Inversion is a symmetry of Nature
- Parity is conserved
- The conventional P operator is not conserved.
33Just a change of convention?
- The conventional P operator may be combined with
another transformation of degenerate multiplets.
(eg particle anti-particle, neutrino flavours) - Impacts on unifying theories.
- Not merely a matter of convention on other
particles P could have the usual effect.
Weinberg
34Parity violation
How could they get it so wrong?
35How could they get it so wrong?
- The Parity operation was defined before the
experiments were done. - Particles were defined as eigenstates of Parity.
- Simplicity of the operator took precendence over
conservation - even though QFT required particles
and antiparticles to be combined in the same
equations. - There was no higher theory to appeal to.
Watch this space!
36Parity isConserved
37Eigenvectors of P, H,J3 with eigenvalues 0,M,s
Parity
Lorentz Boost
38CP violation
- Boundary conditions
- Matter dominated Universe
- T asymmetry (CPT theorem)
- Expanding Universe
- Parity CP for some particles only!
- More complicated effects of P on other
degeneracies.