Title: CATS Update
1CATS Update Administration Code Training, Fall
2008
- LaRue County Schools
- District Assessment Coordinator
- Amanda Reed, Ext. 1126
2Pre-Test
- Work together at your table to decide if each
situation listed is appropriate or inappropriate.
3Assessment Update/Testing Windows
- No Changes in CATS Assessments for 2008-2009
- Fall 2008, September 15 26
- 8th Grade EXPLORE (now it counts!!!)
- 10th Grade PLAN
- 12th Grade On-Demand Writing
- ACCESS for ELLs, Jan 5 Feb 13
- English language proficiency test
- ACT, March 10
- 11th Grade
- Spring 2008, May 4 May 15 (LCHS 1 week early)
- Grades 3 8, 10, 11 KCCT
- Grades 4, 7 12 Writing Portfolio
- HOWEVER, Changes are coming for 703 KAR 5080
Administration Code for Kentuckys Educational
Assessment Program
4Which Code When?
- Draft Changes to Administration Code will go to
Kentucky State Board of Ed. in October - Fall CATSOld Admin Code
- Only impacts 12th grade On-Demand
- Explore and Plan have their own guidelines we
must follow since they are national tests - Spring CATSNew Admin Code
- No substantial change in writing portfolio
guidelines
5Purpose
- To review the appropriate practices for the state
assessment system as defined in the
Administration Code for Kentuckys Educational
Assessment Program (703 KAR 5080)
6Allegations, 2008
- NONE FOR
- LaRUE COUNTY!!!!!!!!
- THANK YOU FOR FOLLOWING THE GUIDELINES IN YOUR
MANUALS, INCLUSION DOCUMENT, ADMINISTRATION
CODE
7Rationale, pg. 3
- Professional Ethics
- 704 KAR 20680
- Educational Defensibility
- Activities to increase students ability to apply
content, not just increase test scores - Student Ownership
- All work done entirely by the student
- Note inclusion of writing portfolio materials
8Appropriate Assessment Practices, pg. 4
- Requires Training
- Read, Sign and Comply Annually
- Prior to portfolio development (writing
portfolios and alternate assessments) - Review before Spring Assessments
- Includes documents and administration manuals
specific to state-required assessment components
9Test Security, pg. 5-7
- No one shall take notes about or discuss the
content, concepts, or structure of any secure
test item. - No deliberate reviewing or reading of test items
by an individual or group is permitted. - Destroy notes, rough drafts created by students
- Dont share information about items
10Test Security (continued)
- Released items can be used
- Security issues with technology
- Electronic devices with wireless communication
or imaging capabilities (cell phones/cameras)
shall not be accessible to students during
testing - Good Faith Effort
- Scanning student responses for stray marks/good
faith effort is acceptable - Reading entire student responses is NOT
acceptable, nor is scoring student pre-writing or
rough drafts
11Test Security (continued)
- Alert papers, pg. 5
- Central Office, School Office, Classroom
- Test manuals to proctors early, BUT test booklets
may not be given to proctors until the first day
of scheduled testing in the school - Test booklets shall be double-locked in
classrooms - Test booklets outside of locked storage must be
attended at all times - Procedures for Reporting Errors, pg. 7
- Example Grade 4, Reading Form 1A, Multiple
Choice number 2, page 30, no correct answer
choice provided
12Classroom Materials, pg. 7-8Classroom materials
shall not provide a testing advantage to any
student.
- During the year, materials may be posted in
classrooms for instructional purposes HOWEVER - Materials containing content information or
strategies for solving problems must be removed
or covered from classroom walls, bulletin boards,
or other surfaces (e.g. ceilings, floors, blinds,
windows, and clothing) during testing sessions. - Periodic Tables or materials without content or
strategies for solving problems need not be
removed or covered.
13Classroom Materials (Continued)
- Why the change in classroom materials?
- NCLB KY was one of only a few states that were
allowing content to stay up on walls - EPAS System (Explore, PLAN, ACT) Attempt to
establish consistency and limit confusion - What Ifs?....dont know yet
- Word walls, ORQ steps, student work,
multiplication tables, etc. - YES Motivational posters are fine.
14Classroom Materials (cont.)Exception for IEP,
504, PSP
- Dictionaries/thesauri
- On-demand Writing test ONLY
- Calculators
- Students may NOT share calculators
- Calculators required for KCCT math, but allowed
for all KCCT - Gr. 8 10 calculators allowed on Explore and
PLAN math, but not science - Students may only use the types of calculators
specified in testing manuals
15Classroom Materials, pg. 7-8 Exception for IEP,
504, PSP
- Shall not distribute any information or
materials that are not sent or specified - Exception Blank writing or graph paper, blank
(clear or colored) overlay sheets, and bookmarks
free of content (stop signs) may be given to
students at their workstationsTHATs IT!!
16Administration Practices, pg. 9-10
General Instructions Do your best. Get
Started. Stay on Task. Assistance or
Evaluative Comments You can do better.
17Administrative Practices (Cont.)
- No one shall coach, edit, or point out errors in
student work on the open response or multiple
choice portions of the test. on-demand as well - Appropriate interaction with students is still
permissible in for writing portfolios. - No evaluative statements
- Beware of body language!
18Supervision Test Order, pg. 10-11
- During testing, proctors shall circulate
throughout the testing site to monitor students
as they work, verifying that students are working
appropriately and individually. Principals
district administrators shall ensure that proper
monitoring occurs. - Watch for work-aheads, work-behinds
- Make sure students complete all parts for that
session - Students SHALL NOT be allowed to move about the
room during testing - A student SHALL NOT be left alone in a room to
take a test - Space in the testing location SHALL NOT limit the
proctors ability to circulate and monitor
students during testing
19Supervision Test Order, pg. 10-11
- Monitor Lunch, restroom breaks
- Same grade, same section, same time
- Follow time limits in testing Manuals for
extended time, follow school procedures - Students cannot transport secure materials
- Illness during assessment session
- Normal instruction should continue during testing
windows, pg 12
20Disciplinary Practices Student Motivation, pg.
12
- Re-administering for disciplinary purpose
- The original responses, along with the rewritten
ones clearly marked NOT TO BE SCOREDITEMS
RETAKEN FOR DISCIPLINARY PURPOSES, shall be
submitted to the testing contractor.
21Good Faith Effort, pg. 13
- Checklist communicated to students parents
prior to testing - No evaluative statements
- Feedback may not be given to students until after
test materials have left the building - Checklist may include a pre-writing requirement
however, the type of pre-writing used shall be
determined by the studentPre-write activities on
state assessments shall not require students to
develop a complete first draft.
22Rewards, pg. 13
- Rewards for scores on good faith effort
checklists or performance on state assessments
shall be consistent with those applied within the
regular curriculum or within the larger school
program in general and attainable year round for
student achievement. - Reward systems implemented solely for state
assessments are not permitted.
23Writing Portfolio Development, pg. 13-15
- Teachers/Peers may
- Ask questions to clarify, indicate position of
errors, share scoring rubric - Teachers/Peers may not
- Make direct corrections, revisions, working after
completion date (First day of testing window)
24Writing Portfolios, pg. 13-16
- Teachers allow ample time for preparation of
portfolio entries in the classroom and may allow
some student work outside of classhowever
excessive time shall not be spent on portfolio
development and conferencing. - Typewritten pieces are not required for the
Writing Portfolio. Pieces can be handwritten. - If typewritten is desired, students should type
their own Writing Portfolios unless physically
unable to do so.
25Writing Portfolios, pg. 13-16
- When signing and scribing is used, the exact
words of the student should be written down.
The student can then work on editing and adding
needed articles, conjunctions, etc. - Cookie Cutter pieces are a violation of
administration code - Teachers are responsible for continuing the
development of writing portfolios for transfer
students.
26Writing Portfolio Scoring, pg. 16
- Assigning scores of NAPD to portfolios prior to
official scoring sessions is prohibited although
classroom grades are acceptable for individual
writing pieces. - Who can be an official scorer?
- Certified staff
- Teacher or administrator certification
- Employed by district
- May be on leave of absence or a sub
- Current year training
27Inclusion of Special Populations, pg. 17
- Inclusion Doc. 703 KAR 5070 (under revision)
- Accommodations provided during state assessments
must - Have occurred regularly during the year (roughly
weekly) - Be consistent with the students up-to-date IEP,
504, or PSP (Area of ID, Goals, PLEP,
Accommodations marked) - Alternate Assessment
- Student Ownership
- Proctors must complete specific training
- Assessments are secure materials
- Accommodations/assistive devices consistent with
classroom instruction - All work must be complete by the established
deadline
28Additional Information, pg. 17-20
- Violations of the Administration Code, pg. 17-19,
see next four slides - Review of Secure Materials, pg. 19-20
- No longer allowed at the district level only
upon request of KDE - Reporting Nonacademic Information, pg. 20
29Violations of Administration Code, pg 17-19
- All allegations, or perceived inappropriate
testing procedure or behavior, should be reported
to the Building Assessment Coordinator (BAC) and
then to the District Assessment Coordinator
(DAC). - If the DAC is the one not following proper
procedure and does not correct or report the
situation, then a call or email can be placed to
Patsy Kenner by any concerned person - In LaRue County, most of our allegations have
been self-reported when someone realizes they
have made a mistake. We operate under an honor
system. If you believe you have made a mistake,
report it to your BAC so we can handle it
appropriately.
30Steps in an Investigation
- Allegation referred to CATS Allegations
Coordinator - KDE staff reviews allegation and/or director
contacts superintendent requesting more
information - KDE staff conducts investigation using the Code
of Ethics (Administration Code) as the standard
by which a practice is measured as appropriate or
inappropriate
31Steps in an Investigation
- KDE staff interviews district personnel, collects
notarized statements and supporting documents - CATS Allegation Coordinator writes report
- Board of Review reviews findings in report and
makes recommendation to Commissioner - Commissioner writes letter to District
Superintendent with his decision. - Scores may be lowered for individual students or
schools as a result of educator action
32Steps in an Investigation
- Name of educator(s) involved sent to Education
Professional Standards Board (EPSB) - EPSB contact person(s) named in investigation