Title: Honoraria for Design Build Projects
1- Honoraria for Design Build Projects
- Methodology Assessment Matrix
2Honoraria
- Principles for the selection of a Design Builder
- Development of the Honoraria Matrix
- How to use the Honoraria Matrix
3Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
- Association of Consulting Engineers of Canada
- Canadian Construction Association
- Canadian Design-Build Institute
- Construction Specifications Canada
- Royal Architectural Institute of Canada
- Department of Foreign Affairs and International
Trade - Department of National Defence
- Public Works and Government Services Canada
- Defence Construction Canada
4Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
- Principles for the selection of a Design Builder
- Remuneration
- 50 of a reasonable fee
- Based on complexity of the project and on level
of detail contained in the Request for Proposal
5Guide for Calculation of Remuneration
- Remuneration estimate of construction cost x
scope factor x cost factor
6Scope Factor
- Combination of
- Level of detail in the RFP documents
- High
- Medium
- Low
- Complexity of the project
- High
- Medium
- Low
7Scope Factor
8Cost Factor
9Example
- Aquatic Centre with competition pool, wave pool,
leisure water play area, weight training, and
exercise room - 32,000,000 - RFP included building program, functional
relationships and description of intended image
and character - Best Value Selection 50 quality/50 price
requiring a comprehensive proposal
10Example - Scope Factor
11Example - Cost Factor
12Example - Remuneration
- 32,000,000 x 0.006 x 0.872 167,000
13 Remuneration
- Guide for the Calculation of Remuneration for
Design-Build Proposals - _at_
- www.cdbi.org
14Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Design
- For what project complexity is the delivery
method best suited - To what extent must user requirements be defined
prior to tender - What level of design quality is
characteristically achieved with the delivery
method
15Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Design
- How complex is the design review process for the
owner - To what extent can the delivery method
accommodate scope/design changes during
construction phase -
16Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Design
- To what extent does the delivery method
inherently minimize changes - To what degree do the owner and user have direct
contact with the designer and are they able to
directly influence the design -
17Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Schedule
- To what extent can the delivery method achieve
accelerated delivery, or ensure delivery to
specific schedule - Ability to accommodate early construction start
-
18Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Cost
- Potential to obtain an early cost commitment
- To what extent does the method accommodate
adjustments to scope change during construction
to achieve final costs within budget - To what ability can the delivery method reduce
claims/costs for changes and delays -
19Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Cost
- Ability to meet cash flow
- To what extent does the method permit the Owner
to influence systems, materials and construction
methods to minimize life cycle costs
20Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Contracting
- To what extent is the required design and
construction experience and knowledge available
for the method - Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on
publicly funded projects - Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on
privately funded projects
21Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Contracting
- Ability to pre-qualify subcontractors
- To what extent does the method employ a simple
bid evaluation and selection system - What level of construction quality can be
achieved with the applicable delivery method
22Methodology Assessment Matrix
- Risk
- To what extent does the method permit the Owner
to transfer the liability for design errors and
omissions, delays, construction errors and
omissions and non conformance to contract
documents
23Methodology Assessment Matrix
- General
- To what extent do Owners have the experience and
knowledge required to employ the method - Market readiness