Title: Governor Rowland
1Governor Rowlands
Budget Proposal
FY 2003-2005 Biennium
March 4, 2003
2Back to Basics Budgeting
- States are facing the worst budget crisis since
WWII - Drastic changes in the stock marketunprecedented
growth in the 90s followed by a dramatic drop
off beginning in 2001 - 9/11, its fallout, the anticipation of war may
forestall the nascent recovery - Expansion and creation of new programs in the
90s - Spiraling health care inflation
- Quick fixes and one time revenues have not
provided a remedy - In 2001 and 2002, states generally failed to make
the fundamental choices necessary to adapt to the
changing economy - Instead, quick fixes, one time revenues and
gimmicks were used to fill the gaps as they
surfaced, only the holes reappeared - A structural and balanced solution is overdue
- Tempered spending accompanied by modest tax
increases, shared by all, will provide a basic,
balanced solution
3From Boom to Bust
- CT enjoyed unprecedented surpluses in the mid and
late 90s - From 1995 to 2001, the surpluses were between
81M and 700M per year - But in 2002, the state registered an 800M plus
gross deficit - The deficit would have exceeded 1.2B if not for
actions taken in Special Session
4From Boom to Bust
- During the Boom of the 90s, capital gains
realizations drove much of the surpluses we saw
in the mid to late 90s and into 2001 - In the years of the greatest surpluses, anywhere
between 1/3 and 70 of each fiscal years surplus
was tied to the stock market gains - For six years in a row, CT residents capital
gains increased by booming double-digit growth - From 1994-2000, CT capital gains realizations
grew by more than 500
5From Boom to Bust
- The rising stock market meant healthy increases
in other tax revenues as well - Withholding taxes grew between 7.5 and 15.1
annually - Sales taxes went up 3.6 to 8.6 annually
- The estimates and finals category of the state
income tax rose between 14 and 32 annually
6From Boom to Bust
- But a series of major market corrections occurred
- IT Telecom bubble burst
- Corporate fraud and abuse scandals
- 9/11 tragedy
- The major stock indices are still down between
30 and 75 - With the stock fall came a precipitous fall in
state tax revenue
7From Boom to Bust
- In the current fiscal year the state is looking
at the second year in a row of negative
withholding performance because of poor bonuses
and stock options - Estimates and finals are estimated to be about
10 below last fiscal year - This equates to yet another drop in capital gains
realizations of between 20-25 on an already
pitiful FY 02 base - The sales tax is expected to post a gain of just
0.9, after performing barely above that last
fiscal year
8From Boom to Bust
- How bad was the stock crash on state revenue?
- Wealthy states like Connecticut saw their
revenues drop more than the national average of
6 - In Connecticut, so-called economic growth of
general fund revenues was down 7.5 in FY 02 - In the current fiscal year, a meager rebound from
FY 02 of 1.6 is expected
9Putting the Deficit and State Fiscal Crisis in
Context
10Thank Goodness for the Spending Cap
- Clearly the spending cap isnt perfect since we
do have a deficit - But the spending cap did what it was supposed to
do - Held growth rates between 2.1 and 6.4 over the
past 8 years - Spending growth stayed down under the cap, in
spite of several years of robust revenue growth - In FY 00 and 01, actual GF revenue grew almost
16, but the budget grew over 12 - If not for the constitutional spending cap, our
problems would clearly be much worseour
structural gap would be billions more - Consequently, CTs fiscal situation is less
severe than many other states
11Both a Spending and a Revenue Problem
- If the revenue side is a problem, so is the
spending side - Even if the revenue base had stayed artificially
high for the foreseeable future, we still could
not afford the services our current laws call for - State employees and retiree health care are
expected to grow over 20 in FY 04 - Medicaid is growing at about 9
- Overall growth in the GF is 12.3
- Even if revenues were still growing at 7-9,
there would still be a substantial structural gap
12And a Spending Cap Problem Too!
- The spending cap demands that spending be reduced
from current services by at least 1B over the
next two fiscal years - The FY 04 current services gap is about 2B
- The cap will only allow a blended capped and
uncapped growth of just over 6 - But current services growth is about 12.3,
outpacing allowable growth in expenditures for FY
04 by 763M
13Bond Rating at Risk
- The gaps in our budget clearly put our states
bond rating at risk - Any significant revenue deterioration not offset
by expenditure adjustments or revenue
enhancements could cause a change in the
ratingachieving structural budget balance in FY
04 and beyond will be necessary to maintain the
current rating. Standard and Poors - Adoption of balancing plans with recurring
benefits is critical to the rating. Fitch
Ratings - The basic message here is that there is a
growing negative number with no solution and
there remains a structural imbalance. Moodys
upon putting Connecticut on its watch list for
possible downgrade - A lower bond rating could mean tens of millions
of dollars in increased debt costs decades into
the future, meaning less will go to programs,
services or other expenditures - Because of the deficit mitigation plan, the
rating should be held
14Changing the Entitlement Culture
- The recent fiscal crises have forced states to
rein in burgeoning entitlement programs - At least 40 states, including CT, have enacted
significant Medicaid reforms - At least 22 states have restricted Medicaid
eligibility - At least 16 states have established or increased
co-payments - At least 29 states will implement reductions or
freezes in provider payments - Given the spiraling health care inflation in the
nation, state governments have had to realize
that either benefits must be reduced or service
populations must be restrictedyou cant have it
both ways anymore
15Where Does All the Money Go?
- Any discussion of the equity of spending cuts
must begin with an understanding of where the
money currently goes - Total personnel costs make up about 30 of GF
spending - Debt service accounts for about 8 of GF spending
- Various entitlements amount to about 25 of GF
spending - Local aid is about 17 of GF spending
- Is there any doubt, then, that labor cost must be
part of the solution
16The Economic Outlook
- What Does the Future Hold?
- From a national perspective, the recession and
sluggish recovery appear to be longer than the
early 90s downturn - Recovery over the next several years appears
moderate and prolonged - Consumer moderation in spending prevails over the
next several years - Jobless Recovery Phenomenon --Productivity
gains rather than job growth will drive the
economy - Job, personal income and GSP growth will lag the
nation - Connecticut tends to lead nation into recession,
lags by two quarters in coming out - A Slew of Uncertainties
- Economic recovery or continued recession rests on
two main factors (1) the performance of the
equity markets and (2) the outcome of the threat
of war with Iraq
17Liquidating the FY 2002 03 Deficit
- How did the deficit come about?
- Total revenues are down by 388M below budgeted
amounts for FY 03 - Personal income taxes are down 421M because of
reduced corporate bonuses and a downturn in
capital gains revenue due to deterioration of the
market - Sales and use tax revenues are down 82M
- On the positive side, corporate tax revenue is up
by 40M due to corporate downsizing in the
private sector
18Liquidating the FY 2002-03 Deficit
- On the spending side, the state is expecting that
expenditures will exceed budgeted appropriations
by about 140M - Medicaid is anticipated to be over budget by
almost 100M caused by the softened economy,
liberal eligibility rules and health care
inflation. Specific areas of deficiency include
HUSKY enrollment for both adults and children,
pharmacy expenditures and healthy home care
enrollment - Major workers compensation deficiencies
totalling about 17M - State employee and retiree health accounts have a
deficiency of about 16M due to heavier than
anticipated enrollment activity
19Liquidating the FY 2002-03 Deficit
- When the FY 03 budget adjustments were passed
last year, the legislature cut 94M in
anticipation that the administration would
receive savings from union concessions for the
current year - As no concessions were forthcoming, a portion of
that 94M will be made up through savings from
layoffs of nearly 3,000 state employees and
savings from an early retirement plan. (Even with
these measures we are still short by 50M)
20Liquidating the FY 2002-03 Deficit
- Deficit mitigation plan to close entirety of
638.3M gross deficit and deposit 47.8 million
into Budget Reserve Fund. Combination of
measures taken by Governor already, the
legislative deficit mitigation bill, and future
steps to be taken by the Governor within his own
authority - November allotment rescissions of 27.9M in
addition to 35M in Section 52 extraordinary
rescissions already accounted for in the FY 03
adjusted budget passed last year (these Section
52 cuts do not reduce the deficit) - January allotment rescissions and agency forced
lapses of 9.1M after duplication with
legislative deficit mitigation plan is taken out.
The legislatures deficit plan also enacted some
of the Governors forced lapses. Because the
budget is balanced, the remaining forced lapses
will not be taken and will be available for
expenditure.
21Liquidating the FY 2002-03 Deficit
- 107.6 million in attainable spending reductions
in legislative deficit mitigation plan out of
222.5 million reported in bill. Included in the
attainable cuts is 4.65 million FY 2000-01
surplus. Included here is 21 million for
layoffs and 23 million for the early retirement
that was passed - Within existing authority, Governor and the
Secretary of OPM can choose to lapse salary
reserve monies of 29.5 million - Within existing executive authority, the Governor
and the Secretary of OPM can choose to lapse
18.7M in collective bargaining monies that were
set aside for unsettled contracts
22Liquidating the FY 2002-03 Deficit
- According to OPMs analysis, the legislative
deficit mitigation plan will infuse 485.2M into
the general fund revenue stream. Pure tax
increases amount to about 296M, with an
additional temporary corporate surcharge raising
46M. Other transfers and accrual changes make
up rest - New additional tax increases in this budget
proposal that raise 8.1M in FY 03 -
23Liquidating the FY 2002-03 Deficit
- About 350M in ongoing and temporary tax
increases, or about 50 - About 223M in spending cuts, or one-third
- Its fair. Its equitable. The plan should
preserve the states bond rating - Final estimated FY 03 spending in the general
fund will be about 28M higher than what the
Governor was going to initially propose (12.112B
versus 12.140B) - It balances the state budget and reduces next
fiscal years hole by more than one half. Total
FY 04 mitigation is 1.118B, dropping gap from
over 2B to just below 900M - Mitigation because of plan in FY 05 is 1.146B,
dropping gap from over 2.5B to below 1.4B
24The FY 2003-05 Biennial Budget
- The Spending Plan
- Governor Rowland continues his record of fiscal
prudence - The proposed FY 04 budget is 333M below the cap
and for FY 05 65.6M below the cap - GF current services reduced by 1.16B in year one
and 1.59B in year two - GF net revenues increased 852M in FY 04 and
950M in FY 05
25The FY 2003-05 Biennial Budget
- Revenue Forecasts
- Revenue assumptions are based upon the most
prudent and realistic forecasts currently
available
26The FY 2003-05 Biennial Budget
- Revenue Forecasts
- For the state income tax, modest growth is
predicted for the withholding side and even more
modest growth is predicted in the estimates and
finals component. It will raise 4.75B in FY 04
and over 5B in FY 05
27The FY 2003-05 Biennial Budget
- Revenue Forecasts
- The Sales and Use Tax, the states second largest
tax generator, will rebound during the FY2003-05
biennium and will raise almost 3.3B in the first
year and 3.46B in the second year
28The FY 2003-05 Biennial Budget
- Limiting the use of one-time revenues
- Many states have used one-time revenues as a
quick fix in order to avoid the necessity of
making significant structural changes to both the
expenditure and revenue sides of the budget.
Poor fiscal practice will impact our bond ratings
if no structural changes to state budgets are
made - Connecticut has used one-time revenues of 656.3M
as well to adjust and balance the FY 03 budget as
follows - 475M in the FY 03 budget adjustment plan of last
year including 85M in additional tax amnesty
monies over what was budgeted - 181M under House Bill 6495
- The use of one time revenues drops from
approximately 5.4 in FY 03 to 1.7 in FY 04 and
to 1.3 in FY 05. Total one-times 207M and
172M in each each year. Included are sweeps of
ECLM, CEF, CHFA, CDA, and CII
29Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Taxes were already increased 250M last year
30Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
31Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Legislative deficit mitigation plan increased
income tax rate - Effective with income year 2003, increase the
4.5 to 5 only 3 rate unchanged - 0.5 percentage point across-the-board rate
increase for all filers - Raises 231M in FY 03, 428M in FY 04, and 446M
in FY 05
32Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- To ensure that the current fiscal year deficit is
closed - New tax tables will be in force by April 1
- Increase withholding so as to collect a full six
months worth of increases in the three remaining
months of the fiscal year - In effect, taxpayers would be asked to double up
- April, May and June make up for January, February
and March - New tax tables would be issued again for
implementation in July, which would be the
permanent ones
33Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Reducing the property tax credit on all filers
- Reduce the 500 property tax credit to no more
than 400 and remove the minimum 100 credit for
higher income filers - Phase out the minimum 100 property tax credit,
even at higher income levels - The property tax credit begins to be phased down
beginning at 54,500 for singles and 100,500 for
joint filers. The current 100 minimum begins at
144,500 for singles and 190,500 for joint
filers
34Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- What The Property Tax Credit Change Will Mean?
- All who pay at least 500 in property taxes and
file for the credit will see the 100 loss.
Those who pay and claim less than 500 in
property taxes will see a reduction of up to 100
and those whose claim is less than 400 will have
no reduction - Increase revenue in FY 04 by 68M and by 69.4M
in FY 05 - Property tax minimum phase-out saves 12M in FY
04 and FY 05
35Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Elimination of phase-in of higher singles
exemption - Last session, the legislature suspended the
phase-in for two years effective January 1, 2002.
The 2001 exemption level of 12,500 remains in
effect until January 1, 2004 - The Governor proposes to permanently repeal any
further changes to the singles exemptions. The
exemption and phase-out threshold will stay at
the January 2001 levels permanently. Will save
7M in the FY 05
36Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Summary of Income Tax Increases
- Total income tax increases or repeal of past
reductions amount to 231M in FY 03, 508M in FY
04 and 535M in FY 05 - On the property tax credit, no filer gets hit
with more than a 100 loss. Every filer is
paying 0.5 percentage points more on all taxable
income period - Families earning less than 100K pay less than
500 more than they did before about 10 per
week - The filer earning 500K will pay up to 2,550
more. The filer earning 1M will pay up to 5,050
more - About three quarters of the tax hike will be
borne by those earning more than 100K - Since the beginning of the Rowland
administration, families earning less than 125K
still enjoy an overall income tax decrease
37Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Lowering sales tax exemption on clothing and
footwear - Accomplished in the legislative deficit
mitigation plan - Return to the 50 threshold per item effective
April 1 - Increased revenue to the general fund of 8.2M in
the current fiscal year, 33.6M in FY 04 and
35.3M in FY 05 - New proposal Eliminate sales-tax free week to
save 3M in FY 04 and 3M in FY 05
38Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Sales on business computer services
- Repeal the phase-down
- The Governor is proposing a permanent rate of 1.
This change would raise about 10.8M in FY 05
39Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Corporate tax surcharge
- 20 surcharge in income year, falling to 10 in
income year 2004. Surcharge will be gone by
income year 2005 - Businesses will pay in estimated taxes what would
have been owed if the tax were in place as of
January 1 - Last session, two major changes increased
corporate expenses by at least 60M. Total of
105M in new temporary surcharges in the two
income years
40Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Increasing the Cable TV Gross Receipts Tax
- Increase cable gross receipts tax portion of the
public service tax from 5 to 6 to raise 6.3M
in FY 04 and 6.7M in FY 05 - The Hospital Sales Tax
- Permanently rescind the 5.75 hospital sales tax
- Cigarette Tax Increase
- Increase the cigarette tax rate to 1.51,
effective March 15 to raise 31M in FY 03, 78M
in FY 04, and 76M in FY 05
41Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Increases in the real estate conveyance tax
- Effective April 1
- No increase in the real estate conveyance tax on
homes valued at or under 300K or on the first
300K of a homes value - The incremental portion of a homes value between
300K and 800K will be taxed at .75 as opposed
to 0.5 - The portion of a home over 800K will be taxed at
an incremental rate of 1.5 as opposed to 1 - The commercial rate will increase from 1 to
1.5 - Will raise 5M in FY 03, 25M in FY 04, 25M in
FY 05
42Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Tourism funding changes
- Combine the Historical Commission, the Commission
on the Arts, the Film Commission and the Tourism
Office into a new commission, the Commission on
the Arts, Culture, and Tourism - To bring greater oversight and accountability to
the system, current tourism districts will be
disbanded and the central commission will
determine what local entities should be set up
and the funding they should receive
43Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Escheating unclaimed bottle deposits to the State
of Connecticut - The Governor again is proposing that unclaimed
deposits on unreturned beverage containers be
escheated to the state - Will raise 18M in year one and 20M in year two
Its Time!!
44Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Internet sales tax
- Change Connecticuts status on the Streamlined
Sales Tax project from observer status to voting
participant status - Connecticut is currently losing between
300-400M - Governor Rowland now favors taxation of internet
sales
45Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Governor Rowland is proposing ongoing tax
increases, including the permanent freeze of the
singles exemption at 12,500, of 214 million.
Including the legislative deficit mitigation
plan, total taxes will increase 851 million.
46Tax Changes and Revenue Enhancements
- Net tax decrease of 961M
- Economic Competitiveness fundamentally safeguarded
47Education Developing the Next Generation
- Reducing Racial Isolation and Improving Urban
Education Sheff Initiatives - Under Governor Rowland, spending on initiatives
to improve urban education and reduce racial
isolation has increased from 21M to 208M over
the decade - Funding for Magnet Schools will increase from
45M in FY03 to 73M in FY05, the number of
schools will increase from 31 to 48 and
enrollment will go from 11,000 to 17,000 over the
biennium - Funding for the OPEN Choice Program will increase
300K in FY 04 and 1.6M in FY05, with enrollment
going from 1,600 to 2,000 in FY05 - Funding for Charter Schools will be 16M in FY04
and 16.8M in FY05 with 2,400 students
participating in FY05 up by 150 students over the
biennium - The Interdistrict Cooperation Grant, serving some
60,000 students, will be increased by 1.2M
during the biennium
48Education Developing the Next Generation
- Reducing Racial Isolation and Improving Urban
Education Sheff Initiatives
49Education Developing the Next Generation
- School Choice
- Governor proposes allowing parents of children in
failing schools to take up to 3,000 in ECS
funding to attend school of their choice
including public, magnet, charter or private
schools - Regional Vo-Tech Schools
- Due to fiscal exigencies, institute a freeze in
enrollment at current levels for FY04 - Educational Cost Sharing
- To restrain growth but maintain equalized
distribution (a) keep ECS Cap in place but
continue 50M subsidy for capped towns, (b)
eliminate Density Supplement (c) institute 3
reduction in each towns grant for the biennium
and (d) calculate ECS grant only once for the
biennium - These measures will save 170M over the biennium
- The proposed 1.488B for ECS, although a 27M
reduction from current year, is up 100M from FY
01 level -
50Education Developing the Next Generation
- Special Education Changes
- Under current law, the threshold for state
funding of per pupil costs would go from 5x to
4.5x costing 37.3M over the biennium. - The proposed budget maintains the current
eligible costs over 5x the average per pupil cost
funding level and caps the grant at FY03 level - Holding Other Grants to Level Funding
- Because of the States fiscal condition, level
funding is proposed for Public and Non-public
School Transportation, Adult Education and Health
and Welfare Services grants - RESC Subsidies
- Reduce current operating subsidy grant by 1M and
lease grant by 300K
51Education Developing the Next Generation
- Restructuring Higher Education
- The proposed budget recommends creation of a new
governing entity the Board of Regents for
Higher Education
52Education Developing the Next Generation
- Higher Education Block Grants
- Governor Rowland has always considered higher
education to be a key component in growing the
economy and attracting new employers - Under the Governor, from FY95-FY03, education
block grants increased more than a third for
UConn and CSU and almost 50 at the CTCs - The proposed budget fully funds the states
portion of all new facility costs at each unit - Because of fiscal constraints, the units will get
1/2 of the gross increase in the Current Service
level for annualization and new wage increases,
less the amount estimated for unsettled
collective bargaining contracts - The units can cover these reductions through
concessions from bargaining units or
implementation of announced layoffs - Despite these cutbacks, block grants increase by
about 3M across all units in FY 04 and by an
additional 7M in FY 05 without the CSU/CTC
merger, block grants would have increased 14M in
FY 04 and an additional 18M in FY 05
53Education Developing the Next Generation
- Eliminating NEBHE Funding
- Encourages New England states to join a compact
to provide benefits similar to the NEHBE
sponsored program that allows students to enroll
(at reduced rates) in NE colleges with programs
not offered in state - Matching Grants
- Proposes to defer bond authorization for
endowment fund-raising match during the biennium - Tuition Aid
54Education Developing the Next Generation
- 21st Century UConn Continues
- The Governor is committed to maintaining UConn as
one of the best research institutions in the
nation and attracting academically gifted
students who will become future leaders in the
state - The Governor proposes no changes to his program
that allocates 1.3B to capital improvements at
the Storrs, regional and Health Center campuses - Renewed Commitments to CSU and the CTCs
- Since the Governor took office through FY07,
capital funding for CSU is 843M and for the CTCs
it is 708M - For this biennium, capital funding for CSU has
increased some 17M and for the CTCs about 30M
55Maintaining a Commitment to the Development of
Nursing Home Alternatives
- For the past 8 years, Governor Rowland has
championed the enhancement of long-term care
alternatives in the community - The Governor proposes to fully fund Home Care
expansion, assisted living in congregate and HUD
facilities, and 276 freestanding assisted living
units
56Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Health Care Costs Skyrocketing
- There is not one single driver of health care
costs today, complicating cost containment
strategies - State government is more vulnerable than the
private sector because of the richness of its
employee plan and the Medicaid benefit, as well
as the acuity of clients served - Burgeoning Eligibility Rolls
- Increases due to economic recession
- Legislature expanded eligibility in the 90s
57Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Governor Rowland is recommending a series of
changes to the states entitlements - Repeal of Certain Entitlements
- Removal of Certain Eligibility Groups from the
Benefit Rolls - Reductions in Benefit Levels for Remaining
Recipients - New or Increased Cost-Sharing for Recipients
- Competitive Bidding and Provider Reimbursement
Reductions
58Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Joining many other states that have closed their
General Assistance programs, the Governor
proposes to eliminate cash and medical assistance
under SAGA to approximately 25,000 individuals.
59Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Medicaid is expected to grow 17 from 2.7B in FY
03 to 3.17B in FY 05 if no changes are made. To
cut costs, the Governor is proposing to - Eliminate Medical Coverage for 27,000 HUSKY
Adults with income between 100-150 of FPL with
an anticipated savings of 54.9M in FY 04 and
65.9M in FY 05 (Accomplished in legislative
deficit mitigation bill) - Eliminate Other Optional Medical Coverage in
Medicaid affecting approximately 7,000
individuals will have an anticipated savings of
7.2M in FY 04 and 12M in FY 05 (Partially
accomplished in legislative deficit mitigation
bill) - Presumptive Eligibility
- Guaranteed Eligibility
- Continuous Eligibility
60Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Reductions in Benefit Levels and Increased
Cost-Shares - Restructure Benefits in Medicaid managed care and
FFS - Benefits will more closely resemble commercial
coverage - Institute Premium and other cost-sharing
- Will save 6.5M in FY 04 and 15M in FY 05
- Small Employer Health Insurance Subsidy Program
- Establish a capped, non-entitlement program for
3-5,000 enrollees under 300 FPL. Budget
includes 1.8M in FY 04 and 3.6 M in FY 05 to
implement. - Medicaid Co-Pays
- Impose Co-payments to the extent permitted by
federal law on doctor visits, outpatient services
and pharmacy. Will save 11.1M in FY 04 and
11.7M in FY 05 (Accomplished in legislative
deficit mitigation bill)
61Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Changes to HUSKY B Program
- Increase HUSKY B Premiums
- 30 per child for income between 185-235 FPL
- 50 per child for income between 236-300 FPL
- Suspend HUSKY B Enrollment
- Restructure HUSKY B Benefits
- Benefits will more closely resemble commercial
coverage - These measures will save 4.6M in FY 04 and
10.78M in FY 05
62Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Pharmacy Changes
- The state has already enacted cost-cutting
measures across Medicaid and ConnPACE. To
further curtail the high cost of prescription
drugs, the Governor is proposing to - Reduce the dispensing fee from 3.85 to 3.50
(Partially accomplished in legislative deficit
mitigation plan) - Reduce the AWP reimbursement from 12 to 13.5
- Phase-in implementation of a preferred drug list
for certain drugs limited to PPIs in FY 04 - Maximize dosage efficiencies
63Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Additional changes to the ConnPACE program
- Increase the co-pay from 12 to 15
(Accomplished through legislative deficit
mitigation plan actually goes to 16.25) - Institute an asset test of 50K for singles and
75K for married - Limit the quantity dispensed to a 30-day supply
- Suspend the COLA used in determining income
eligibility
64Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Medical Provider and Private Provider Rate
Increases - While rate increases are limited because of the
fiscal exigencies, some increases are budgeted
for in the first year of the biennium
65Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Continue to support TFA families, but make the
following changes - Limit the number of TFA extensions from 3 to 2
creates savings of 2.3M in FY 04 and 5.7M in
FY 05 (Accomplished through legislative deficit
mitigation plan) - Modify TFA child care eligibility from 75 of
state median income to 55. Savings are 1.2M in
FY 04 and 1.1M in FY 05 (Partially accomplished
through legislative deficit mitigation plan) - Revise methodology for child support pass through
to maximize revenue for 6.75M in FY 04 and 9M
in FY 05 - Defer COLA for TFA and AABD to save 3.6M in FY
04 and 7.7M in FY 05 - Eliminate AABD pass through for a savings of
500K annually (Accomplished through legislative
deficit mitigation plan) - Discontinue cash, medical and state food stamp
assistance for legal aliens to save 1.3M in FY
04 and 1M in FY 05 - Eliminate Safety Net Services, but preserve T-RAP
66Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Improving Dental Services for Children on
Medicaid - Implement a carve-out dental program funded by
elimination of adult dental services (10M) and
transfer of an additional undetermined amount
from managed care - Procure a dental benefits manager to coordinate
all coverage - Develop a hybrid system of community dentists and
new innovative community-based programs to
increase access and oral health education - Major Changes in DPH
- 15M, to bring to a total of 20M, in bonding for
a state-of-the-art Public Health Laboratory - Eliminate general fund support for immunizations
and assess insurers for the cost of vaccines
67Putting Reins on the Human Services Safety Net
- Initiatives in DMR
- Make Birth to Three a non-entitlement program
which could result in capping enrollment,
reduction in benefits, and/or means testing and
cost sharing - 5M in FY 04 and 7M in
- FY 05 for new placements, including new high
school graduates, age-outs from DCF, and
emergency placements
68Investing in Behavioral Health
- KidCare. The first phase has been initiated over
the past year with 14 Emergency Mobile Crisis
teams and 60 Care Coordinators statewide. About
13.3M will have been expended in FY 03 that
will rise to 14.4M in FY 04for these new
programs - DCF, DMHAS and DSS are implementing an integrated
system for financing and delivering public
behavioral health services and programs for
children and adults
69Investment in Child Protection and Welfare
- DCF budget has increased from 256.3M in FY 95 to
a proposed appropriation of 609.4M in FY 05, an
increase of 353M or 138. DCF will increase 41M
in the biennium - In 2002, 1,103 children in need were placed in
permanent homes, an increase of 655 from 1996 - Covenant to Care
- Funding is continued for the Covenant to Care
program which works as liaison between church
groups and social workers - Closing Long Lane School
- The facility will close in the Spring of 2003 and
services will be outsourced in order to provide a
high level of care together with cost savings - DCF is negotiating with private providers to
develop appropriate services for this population
70Ending the Gridlock
- Transportation Strategy Board (TSB)
- The proposed budget carries forward 6.3M to
continue ongoing initiatives initially funded by
the TSB that include - Extension of Shore Line East to Serve
Bridgeport/Stamford - Expanding bus service to/from train stations
- Enhancing commuter busses in Fairfield County
- Expanding express bus service into downtown
Hartford - Continuing funding for Tweed-New Haven Airport
- The budget also includes 13M in bonding for 1300
train station parking slots in New Haven and
Bridgeport and 1M for highway improvements in
the Coastal Corridor - Bus and Rail Fare Increases
- Bus transit fares will rise by 25 cents on
January 1, 2004 rail fares will rise by about
15 in October 2003. - Transit users are only being asked to pay their
fair share of the operating costs by FY05 state
rail subsidy will be 73.5M and the bus subsidy
will be 76.1M
71Protecting the Homeland and Ensuring Public Safety
- The proposed bond package includes 3M to equip
Connecticuts new Urban Search and Rescue (USaR),
88K in capital equipment to purchase personal
protective equipment for troopers and 500K in
federal Byrne money to provide training to USaR
team and fund Statewide Anti-terrorism Task Force - An additional 1.1M in the bond package would be
for the Military Department to purchase a mobile
command post and related equipment - 10M for the purchase of a 100 bed mobile and
surge hospital along with 65 HEPA filtrated
isolation rooms in emergency rooms across the
state - A total of 20M for the development of a new
Public Health lab with a Level 3 capacity - 75K to DPH to outfit, train and equip the
Disaster Medical Assistance Team. (DMAT)
72Other Public Safety Changes
- DPS
- Suspending scheduled trooper training classes
through FY 04 and perhaps through FY 05 - Suspending the 1248 Trooper mandate through
December 31, 2005 - Number of troopers will remain above level of
several years ago - DOC
- In order to manage the growing prison population,
Governor Rowland proposes enabling legislation to
send an additional 1,000 inmates out of state in
order to save 1.6M of direct inmate costs in the
first year and 9.2M in the second year of the
biennium - This will temporarily, or even permanently,
postpone the need for prison expansion at Somers
73Agency Consolidation and Downsizing
- Closures as a Result of Layoffs
- Without concession savings, the Governor had to
resort to layoffs to save money and close the
deficit. Office closures as a result will impact
clients and taxpayers alike. In the case of DSS,
DOL and DMV, offices chosen for closure were
either small or were located close to another
agency office.
74Agency Consolidation and Downsizing
- Because of layoffs in DEP, numerous parks are
targeted for reduced hours or will be changed to
walk-in parks which do not accommodate
vehicular traffic or provide staff
75Agency Consolidation and Downsizing
- While some downsizing was a result of the lack of
labor concessions, Governor Rowland is also
proposing consolidations and downsizing to reduce
duplication of services and inefficiency - In addition, Governor Rowland is proposing
closing down all legislative commissions
76General Government Changes and Efficiencies
- From FY 95 to FY 03, Legislative Managements
budget has increased 57 - Now they want ANOTHER 20 over the biennium
- The Governor cannot adjust the budget submitted
to him by the legislative branch, but he CAN
recommend lapses for the branch
77General Government Changes and Efficiencies
- Recommended lapses for the legislative branch
- Eliminate new positions asked for by Legislative
Management - Eliminate the Industrial Renewal Plan
appropriation - Eliminate CTN coverage
- Annualize all rescissions the Governor made at
Legislative Management - Total reductions are 7.3M in FY 04 and 9.3M in
FY 05
78Agency Consolidations and Downsizing
- The Department of Higher Education, the
Chancellors Offices of the State University
System, and the community colleges will be merged
into a new Board of Regents for Higher Education - The Commission on the Arts, the Film Commission,
the Historical Commission, and the Office of
Tourism are being merged into the new Commission
on Arts, Culture and Tourism - The Department of Agriculture and the Regional
Market Fund will be merged into the Department of
Consumer Protection and Agriculture - The Boards of Parole and Pardons are being merged
into the Department of Correction - The Office of Workforce Competitiveness will be
merged into the Department of Economic and
Community Development - BESB is being split up between DSS and SDE in
anticipation of more efficient administration and
improved client services. CDHI is merged into DSS - The Elections Enforcement Commission, the Ethics
Commission and the Freedom of Information
Commission are being merged into the new
Commission on Fair and Open Government - The business offices of the Connecticut Siting
Council and DPUC are being merged
79General Government Changes and Efficiencies
- Changes at DMV
- Eliminate the requirement to establish a
vision-screening program, saving 1.1M annually - Eliminate the requirement that DMV collect social
security numbers prior to issuing registration to
save 600K annually - Repeal the statutory requirement that DMV enforce
delinquent property taxes and parking tickets to
save 250K annually - Teachers Retirement Board Changes
- Fund retirement contributions for the Teachers
Retirement Board for FY 04 and FY 05 at the FY 03
level. The state will fund approximately 68.5
of the certified amount for FY 04 and 65.9 of
the certified amount for FY 05 - Increase the active teachers contributions to
the Retired Teacher Health Insurance Premium
account from 1 to 1.25 effective July 1, 2004 - Increase the states share and the retirees
shares for the Boards health insurance plan from
25 to 1/3rd the estimated cost of the plan
effective July 1, 2005 - Increase the states share of the municipal
health insurance subsidy from 25 to 1/3rd of the
110 subsidy effective July 1, 2005
80General Government Changes and Efficiencies
- Relocate Elected Officials from 55 Elm Street to
20 Church Street - 20 Church Street provides more square feet,
better parking, and the ability for the AG to
consolidate approximately 103 positions from
Sherman Street into one building - Purchase of 20 Church Street is far wiser than
leasing 55 Elm Street and will save 45M over 20
years
81Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Under Governor Rowland, unionized state workers
have received wage increases on average of 43
82Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Fringe benefits are among the best in Connecticut
and the nation - Drug co-pays are either 3 generic or 6 brand
for a 90-day supply of medication - Compared to the plan by legislative Democrats to
increase ConnPACE elderly drug program co-pay
from 12 to 16.25, much less than the co-pays of
private sector drug plans - State employees also have a defined pension
benefit plan that gives them, on average, between
1.3 and 2 for each year they worked - In FY 00, health and retirement contributions in
all funds were 814M compared to this fiscal year
of 1.07B, an increase of 257M in three years - Estimates suggest that in the next two years
costs in all funds will increase another 339M - Since FY 95 general fund fringe benefit costs
have increased 89 through this fiscal year and
are estimated at 144 through FY 05
83Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Administrations labor offers
- The administration has been flexible in its
concession requests from the union including
developing a plan that would have brought back
every state employee and offered unprecedented
job protection through December 31, 2006
84Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Retired Teachers, not on municipal plans, pay 25
of the cost of their Medicare Supplement policy
plus deductibles and between 15 and 35 of each
drugs cost - In comparison, state retirees and employees
receive medical coverage for themselves and
dependents at no cost to them and the drug co-pay
is 3 or 6 for up to a 90 day supply. The
proposed change would increase the co-pay to 5
and 10 for a months supply (double for a 90-day
supply)
85Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Layoffs
- Due to the lack of reasonable concessions agreed
to by the SEBAC coalition, Governor Rowland was
compelled to resort to layoffs - The FY03 budget was passed with 94M in targeted
general fund savings to come from state employee
concessions. In order to realize any cost
savings in this fiscal year, layoffs were needed
when labor concessions were not successful - In the development of the FY 03-05 budget, it was
clear labor concessions are needed to help close
the budget gap, especially because labor costs
represent almost 1/3 of total spending - A total of 3006 employees have been issued
layoff notices most of whom have separated from
state service - General and transportation fund savings is about
140M in year one and 160M in year two. General
fund savings in the current fiscal year will be
23M
86Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Early Retirement Incentive Plan
- (Accomplished in legislative deficit mitigation
plan) - In addition to layoff savings, an ERIP with a
window from March 1, 2003 through June 1, 2003
will effect savings - The ERIP will provide three chips to be used
for age or service, or a combination of the two - All employees 52 or older with at least 10 years
service or hazardous duty employees with at least
twenty years service will be eligible - Payments for accrued leave will occur over a
three-year period starting July 1, 2005 - Over 10,500 employees will be eligible for the
incentive and it is anticipated approximately
4,300 will take advantage of it - A targeted ERIP is proposed for the FY 05-07
budget, giving the administration the ability to
offer early retirement to individuals in certain
agencies, programs, or classifications to reduce
cost in out years - Total savings in the GF and STF resulting from
ERIP is 22.7M in FY 03, 164.4M in FY04 and
150.5M in FY 05
87Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Total work force reduction and savings
- Layoffs and ERIP together will reduce the states
work force by at least 4,544 after some refills
of positions throughout the biennium - The total saving from the two work force
reductions is 304M in FY 04 and 310.8M in FY 05
in the GF and STF - This package of layoffs and ERIP is roughly
equivalent to the general and transportation fund
savings that were requested by labor givebacks.
This is a real ongoing savings without inhibiting
the states ability to manage its business
88Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- Other potential work force reductions
- The administration will continue to look for
opportunities that can save money beyond the net
savings assumptions for the ERIP - ERIP provides opportunities to reduce the scope
of public sector services and transfer the
responsibility to the private sector without
staff layoffs. As a result, taxpayers would
benefit from lower overall costs - Portions of the savings could also be invested to
close the private and public sector wage
disparity as well as reduce the DMR waiting list - The budget includes less than 200 of the
additional 1,000 layoffs that the Governor
announced. Since an ERIP has been passed, there
is a strong likelihood that the balance of these
further layoffs will not have to be carried out
if the plan can be implemented in a timely fashion
89Sizing Government To Fit The Times
- All monies for unsettled contracts from FY 03-05
are removed in this budget
90The Capital Budget
- Given the uncertain times, prudence dictates that
the capital program and debt issuance be scaled
back significantly - Governor Rowland has put a moratorium on
discretionary bond projects - For the foreseeable future, only school
construction, higher education, transportation
and emergency needs will be bonded - Long-term GO state debt continues to increase
over 600M on average per year, much of which is
driven by the school construction conversion
91The Capital Budget
- Debt service as a percentage of general and
transportation fund expenditures is expected to
leap from 10.8 in FY 03 to 12.2 in FY 04 and
12.8 in FY 05 - The actual amount of General Fund debt service
will increase next fiscal year by 203M and
another 159M in FY 05 - About 50M of the increase in each year is due to
payments for the five-year notes to retire the FY
02 deficit
92The Capital Budget
- New net general obligation authorizations for FY
04, including the UConn 2000 program already in
law, are 900M - In FY 05, net new authorizations, including UConn
2000, will be 1.05B - Net new authorizations in the Special
Transportation Fund will be 242.2M in FY 04 and
195M in FY 05
93The Capital Budget
- School construction authorizations for FY 04 will
be 488M and 623M in FY 05 - That is between 50 and 60 of all bond
authorizations each year - In the mid 90s, authorizations were between 73M
and 130M annually - Total education-related authorizations are 843M
or 94 of total net authorizations in FY 04 and
891M or 85 of total net authorizations in FY 05
94The Capital Budget
- Already Enacted School Construction Changes
- The latest priority school list is capped at 1B
for Dec 03 Dec 04 - Effective for the Dec 03 list, communities must
gain local approval before any project is
submitted for inclusion on the priority list - Reimbursement was lowered from 100 to 95 for
the construction of Vo-Ag centers, Regional
Special Ed facilities, and Interdistrict Magnet
schools - Proposed School Construction Changes
- Reduce the Dec 01 list (1.7B) and move 400M to
the Dec 02 list - Reduce the Dec 02 list (1B) to 600M, plus the
400M from the Dec 01 list - Limit the Dec 03 list to 600M in new projects,
plus the 400M from Dec 02 list - Cap the Dec 04 and Dec 05 lists at 600M
- Cap future lists at 800M
- State reimbursement for new (not delayed)
projects on the Dec 03-05 lists will be 10
percentage points below current levels, changing
the scale from 20-80 to 10-70 for three years.
Thereafter, reimbursement will return to current
levels - Delay the start dates of some Vo-Tech school
construction projects to the second year of the
biennium
95The Capital Budget
- The Governor is proposing some major
cancellations, including - 132M in the urban act in FY 04 on top of 154M
reduced in FY 03, leaving 60M for projects - 20M in the Manufacturing Assistance Act, leaving
50M for projects - 100M in Clean Water GO bond authorizations,
leaving 25M to match 100M in revenue bonds - About 10M in open space preservation funding
- Other projects in the bond package include
- 20M for the core financial system in FY 05
- 30M for LoCIP in FY 04 and again in FY 05
- 10M for affordable housing in FY 04
- 25M in FY 05 for Clean Water GO bonds
- 7M over the biennium for UConn Law School
building repair - 10M annually for prison infrastructure
- 19M for acquisition of 20 Church Street
96Municipal Aid
- From legislative deficit mitigation plan,
municipal aid is projected to be reduced in FY 04
by about 50 million, or 2 percent. Aid would
increase by 13 million in FY 05
97Municipal Aid
- Important to remember that many communities have
significant undesignated fund balances while the
state has completely depleted its 600M Rainy Day
Fund
98Municipal Aid
- PILOT Payments
- Both State Owned Property and Private Tax Exempt
PILOT Programs will be funded in FY 04 and FY 05
at the FY 03 funding levels of 65M and 100.9M,
respectively - Full funding the State Owned Property PILOT would
have cost 69.9M in FY 04 and 87.4M in FY 05 - Full funding the Private Tax Exempt Property
would have cost 104.5M in FY 04 and 125.2M in
FY 05 - Pequot Aid
- 6.71M was reduced utilizing the Governors
extraordinary rescission authority this fiscal
year - HB 6495 provides for an additional cut of 21.5M
this fiscal year. This program would be funded at
106M this year - Funding for this grant is proposed at 85M per
year for both FY 04 and FY 05
99Municipal Aid
- Manufacturing PILOT
- Program began in FY 92 as a modest 15.8M program
designed to facilitate the conversion of defense
contracting manufacturers - Has been expanded over the years to include a
number of activities and types of equipment not
traditionally associated with manufacturing - Governor Rowland proposes to remove the following
activities and types of equipment from the
program - Video and sound recordings and machinery and
equipment used in direct or indirect mail
distribution effective immediately - Commercial trucks, including trucks for hire
immediately - Governor Rowland proposes to reduce the town
reimbursement from 80 to 65. Businesses that
continue in the program cannot be charged any tax
by towns during eligibility period - Funding drops by about 11 million over the
beinnium
100Municipal Aid
- Eliminate Property Tax Exemption for the Disabled
- Removes the exemption for totally disabled
persons for which the state currently pays 419K.
Most totally disabled persons receive benefits