Leaping off Laurels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Leaping off Laurels

Description:

... the ACC, but has that contributed to entrenched complacency about patient safety? Are we so enamoured with this Good Thing that we are blind to anything else, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Cher6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leaping off Laurels


1
Leaping off Laurels
  • Susan Dovey

2
What this talk is about
  • For decades new Zealand has enjoyed resting on
    the laurels of the ACC, but has that contributed
    to entrenched complacency about patient safety?
  • Are we so enamoured with this Good Thing that we
    are blind to anything else, and unable to follow
    where other countries are now leading?

3
Plan for this talk
  • A story about fires
  • A story about our NZ health system
  • A story about other countries and patient safety
  • A discussion about how we might leap WITH our
    laurels

4
Fires
  • Dr Donald Berwick, Harvard School of Public
    Health
  • Mann Gulch fire, August 4 1949
  • escape fire prevention

5
Ingredients of the US fire
  • Uncontrolled escalation of healthcare costs
  • 5of GDP in 1963 15 in 2005
  • A medical-industrial complex undermining the
    professional values of physicians
  • Of 23 OECD countries, the US had the highest
    infant mortality rates
  • The US ranked among the bottom of OECD countries
    on healthy life expectancy at age 60
  • 98,000 Americans die annually from medical errors
    in hospitals
  • A series of malpractice crises

6
  • Malpractice crises highlight deeper problems
    in our current liability system and the need for
    better solutions. The liability system does not
    compensate patients in an equitable way nor does
    it effectively deter medical errors or encourage
    participation in patient safety initiatives such
    as adverse event reporting.
  • Williams CH, Mello MM. Medical malpractice
    Impact of the crisis and effect of state tort
    reforms. Robert Wood Johnson Policy Brief No 10,
    May 2006

7
Lessons for the US health system from Mann Gulch
  • We need to face reality
  • Drop the Pulaskis
  • Stay in formation
  • Talk to each other and listen
  • Leadership

8
Ingredients of New Zealands Escape Fire
  • Our size
  • Our health system structure
  • Our ACC

9
Whew!!!
10
We also need to face reality
  • Infant mortality 2006
  • United States 6.37 41st
  • New Zealand 5.67 35th
  • Taiwan 5.54 34th
  • Greece 5.34 32nd
  • United Kingdom 5.01 28th
  • Canada 4.63 22nd
  • Australia 4.57 19th
  • Japan 2.80 3rd
  • Sweden 2.76 2nd
  • Singapore 2.36 1st

11
Patient safety is a problem in NZ
  • 182 sentinel and serious adverse events
    (including 40 deaths) in NZ public hospitals
    2006/07
  • 1 research study, published in 2002
  • Adverse event in 10.37 of admissions
  • 4.5 of adverse events death
  • Given 834,843 admissions, maybe 86,000 adverse
    events and 4000 deaths
  • 5-10 times more likely to die from medical
    misadventure in our hospitals than by a traffic
    accident

12
What are other countries doing that we are not?
  • National patient safety strategies in many
    countries
  • Finding out about threats to patient safety and
    how to remove them
  • RESEARCH
  • Teaching health professionals about patient
    safety
  • Monitoring and surveillance

13
What are we doing that other countries are not?
  • Telling ourselves that we dont have a problem
  • Focusing on our systems for dealing with
    patients complaints as a means of improving
    patient safety

14
Patient safety in primary carewhat do we know?
  • Only 49 English-language research papers
  • Almost all primary care research comes out of
    Australia, the US, and the UK
  • 1 paper from NZ (part of an international study)

15
What we know
  • Reporting systems are most common way to collect
    safety event data
  • Incident reporting systems have been trialed and
    are acceptable to primary care providers
  • the National Reporting and Learning System in the
    UK is the only national safety event reporting
    system accessible to primary health care workers
  • The language is a problem
  • Adverse Events in 0.75 to 80 per 100,000
    consultations
  • (NZ 145 to 15,440 Adverse Events)
  • Preventability 4.3 83 of all errors
  • Clinician attitudes to safety event reporting are
    positive

16
What we dont know
  • Much about patients their perceptions of patient
    safety issues, their contributions to safety
  • Prevalence of patient safety problems
  • International differences
  • Characteristics of safe/unsafe general practices

17
More of what we know
  • A central focus on primary care is
  • NECESSARY
  • Most people receive most health care in primary
    care
  • Patient safety events in hospitals can be averted
    in primary care
  • CHALLENGING
  • In its diversity
  • In its dependence on private funding
  • In its variety of governance (infra)structures

18
Its NECESSARY because
  • 3.4 million people visit a GP per year
  • X
  • 5.68 visits pppa
  • 19.3 million GP consultations p.a.
  • X
  • 1.8 problems / consultation
  • 34.7 million treatment plans /year
  • each could be a safe decision, OR NOT
  • Statistics NZ December 2007, NatMedCa, HSRC
    Evaluation of PC Strategy

19
What is RNZCGP doing for GP teams ?
DHB / Sector / HSC
PHOs / OGP
Cornerstone / A4X
Professional / MOPS
20
What could strengthen Patient Safety in Primary
Care ?
  • A NZ patient safety strategy reflecting a primary
    care led health system (the Primary Health Care
    Strategy)
  • Finding out about threats to patient safety and
    how to remove them
  • RESEARCH
  • Teaching health professionals about patient
    safety
  • Monitoring and surveillance

21
Where are we coming from ?
Occasional statement and media releases
Promoting SAFE practice in healthcare
Sentinel EventReporting by healthcare
professionals in some hospitals and primary
care practices
ACC treatmentinjuries
Identifying UNSAFE practice in healthcare
Patient complaints to the Health and Safety
Commissioner
Dealing with HARM
22
Whats wrong with this model?
? REACTIVE rather than PROACTIVE
? driven by HARM rather than SAFETY
? FRAGMENTED rather than COHESIVE
? INDIVIDUAL engagement rather than UNIVERSAL
responsibility
? AVOIDING (GUILT) things that go wrong vs
EMBRACING prevention before harm happens
? TOP DOWN rather than BOTTOM UP
23
Where could we go to?Taking our focus from the
Ambulance at the bottom of the Cliff the
fence at the top of the cliff
Safety Commissionerpromotes safe practice
derived from
Occasional statement and media releases
Promoting SAFE practice in healthcare
RESEARCH to define safe practice
Sentinel EventReporting by healthcare
professionals in some hospitals and primary
care practices
Identifying UNSAFE practice in healthcare
ACCtreatmentinjuries
Other
SentinelEvent reporting
Significant Event reporting
ACCtreatmentinjuries
ACCtreatmentinjuries
ACCtreatmentinjuries
Other
Consistency of definitions
Patient complaints to the Health and Disability
Commissioner
HDC
HDC
Dealing with HARM
ADDITIONAL
24
THANK YOU
25
What can we do together to make progress?
  • Trust
  • Informed and committed dialogue
  • Action with integrity
  • Stronger trust
  • Increasingly rapid and effective action

26
Simplicityon the other side of complexity 
  • I would not give a fig for the simplicity on
    this side of complexity, but I would give my life
    for the simplicity on the other side of
    complexity
  • Oliver Wendell Holmes Jnr

27
How big is the risk in NZ ?
  • International Primary Care Adverse Events
  • Makem M, Dovey S. Report to WHO World Alliance
    for Patient Safety.
  • Patient Safety Methods and Measures used for
    Research in Primary Care (In Press), December
    2007.

28
What value can general practice add?
  • A General Practice Quality System RNZCGP
    supporting professional and practices

Professional
Team
29
SEA in A4X in Cornerstone
30
Back to NZ
31
Situational limits on quality/safety
  • Undifferentiated problems / patients not
    practised in the story
  • Time pressure and affordability expectations
  • Limited access to diagnostics
  • Limited access to more than one clinician at any
    one time
  • Multiple different GPs and nurses
  • Poorly monitored home settings
  • Multiple agencies with limited coordination
    ability
  • 3 Question
  • Is there a risk? How big? In the NZ
    setting?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com