Leadership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Leadership

Description:

... and initiating structure were not thought to be on the same continuum. ... Behaviors viewed as distinct and independent (two different continua) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:413
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: accwebItr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leadership


1
Leadership
  • Chapter Four
  • Leadership Behaviors, Attitudes, and Styles

2
An Effective Leader
is one who helps group members attain
productivity, including high quality and customer
satisfaction.
3
Research on Leadership Styles
  • Many research studies could be categorized under
    the heading of style approach, only a few
    strongly represent the idea
  • Ohio state
  • University of Michigan
  • Studies by Blake and Mouton

4
Behavioral Approaches
In the late 1940s, researchers began to explore
the notion that how a person acts determines that
persons leadership effectiveness. Instead of
searching for traits, these researchers examined
leader behaviors and their impact on the
performance and satisfaction of followers.
5
The Michigan Studies
  • The Michigan Studies were conducted to determine
    the pattern of leadership behavior that result in
    effective group performance.

6
University of Michigan Studies
  • Studied leaders behaviors performance on small
    group performance
  • Two behaviors identified
  • Employee orientation
  • Leaders approach with strong human relations
    emphasis
  • Production orientation
  • Leadership behaviors that stress technological
    advancement and production aspects of the job

7
The Michigan Studies
Job-Centered Leader Behavior
Employee-Centered Leader Behavior
Attempts to build work group performance by
paying attention to the efficient completion of
the task. Primary emphasis is on the task.
Attempts to build work group performance by
paying attention to the human aspects of the
group. Primary emphasis is on the person.
The studies suggested that a leader could exhibit
either behavior, but not both at the same time.
8
The Ohio State Studies
  • The Ohio State Studies were conducted at about
    the same time as the Michigan Studies.
  • The Ohio State Studies found that leaders engaged
    in two separate sets of leadership behaviors,
    referred to as consideration and initiating
    structure.

9
Ohio State Studies
  • Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LDBQ)
  • Administered to hundreds of individuals in
    various fields
  • Two general types of leader behaviors
  • Initiating structure (Task)
  • Consideration (Relational)

10
The Ohio State Studies
Consideration
Initiating Structure
Involves being concerned with subordinates
feelings and respecting subordinates ideas.
Involves clearly defining the leader-subordinate
roles so that subordinates know what is expected
of them.
Unlike the Michigan Studies variables,
consideration and initiating structure were not
thought to be on the same continuum. Instead,
they were seen as independent dimensions of
leadership behavior.

11
Initiating Structure
  • Organizing and defining relationships in the
    group by engaging in such activities as assigning
    specific tasks, specifying procedures to be
    followed, scheduling work, and clarifying
    expectations for team members
  • Also referred to as production emphasis, task
    orientation, and task motivation

12
Consideration
  • The degree to which the leader creates an
    environment of emotional support, warmth,
    friendliness, and trust
  • Involves being friendly and approachable, looking
    out for the personal welfare of the group,
    keeping the group abreast of new developments,
    and doing small favors for the group

13
Four Combinations of Initiating Structure and
Consideration
14
Results
  • Behaviors viewed as distinct and independent (two
    different continua)
  • The degree to which a leader exhibited one
    behavior was not related to the degree to which
    he or she exhibited the other behavior
  • When two behaviors were treated as independent
    orientations, leaders were seen as being able to
    be oriented to both
  • Determining how a leader optimally mixed task
    and relationship behaviors has been the central
    task for research in style approach

15
Why Trait and Behavior Approaches Fall Short
Trait approaches consider personal
characteristics of the leader that may be
important in achieving success in a leadership
role.
A shortcoming of both of these approaches is that
they fail to take into account the interaction
between people, tasks, and environment.
Behavioral approaches attempt to specify which
kinds of leader behaviors are necessary for
effective leadership.
16
Style Approach
  • Emphasizes the behavior of the leader
  • Focuses exclusively on what leaders do and how
    they act
  • Explains how leaders combine two kinds of
    behaviors to influence subordinates in efforts to
    reach a goal

17
Task-Related LeadershipAttitudes and Behaviors
  • Adaptability to the situation
  • Direction setting
  • High performance standards
  • Risk taking and a bias for action
  • Hands-on guidance and feedback
  • Stability of performance
  • Ability to ask tough questions

18
Task Behaviors vs. Relational Behaviors
  • Task Behaviors
  • Facilitates goal accomplishment
  • Relationship Behaviors
  • Help subordinates feel comfortable with
    themselves, with each other, and with the groups
    situation

19
Relationship-OrientedAttitudes and Behaviors
  • Aligning and mobilizing people
  • Concert building
  • Creating inspiration and visibility
  • Satisfying higher-level needs
  • Giving emotional support and encouragement
  • Promoting principles and values
  • Being a servant leader

20
Servant Leadership
  • Place service before self-interest
  • Listen first to express confidence in others
  • Inspire trust by being trustworthy
  • Focus on what is feasible to accomplish
  • Lend a hand
  • Provide tools

21
360-Degree Feedback
  • A formal evaluation of superiors based on input
    from people who work for and with them
  • Often referred to as multisource feedback or
    multirater feedback
  • Most often used for leadership and management
    development

22
A 360-Degree Feedback Chart
23
Leadership Style
  • The relatively consistent pattern of behavior
    that characterizes a leader
  • Often based on the dimensions of initiating
    structure and consideration
  • Examples Hes a real command-and-control type,
    shes a consensus leader.

24
Participative Leadership
  • Participative leaders share decision making with
    group members
  • Three subtypes
  • Consultative leaders confer with group members
  • Consensus leaders strive for consensus among
    group members
  • Democratic leaders confer final authority to the
    group

25
Autocratic Leadership
  • Autocratic leaders retain most of the authority
    for themselves
  • Autocratic leaders make decisions confidently,
    assume that group members will comply, and are
    not overly concerned with group members
    attitudes toward a decision

26
Leadership Grid Styles
  • The Leadership Grid simultaneously specifies
    concern for production and concern for people
  • Leadership Grid styles include
  • Authority-Compliance
  • Country Club Management
  • Impoverished Management
  • Middle-of-the-Road Management
  • Team Management

27
Blake and Moutons Leadership Grid of Style
Approach
  • Most well-known model of leader behavior
  • Explains how leaders help organizations to reach
    their purposes through two factors
  • Concern for production
  • How a leader is concerned with achieving
    organizational tasks
  • Concern for people
  • How a leader attends to the people with the
    organization who are trying to achieve its goals.

28
Blake and Moutons Leadership Grid of Style
Approach
  • Joins concern for production and concern for
    people on two intersecting axes
  • X axis concern for results
  • Y axis concern for people
  • Portrays five major leadership styles
  • Authority-Compliance (9,1)
  • Country Club management (1,9)
  • Impoverished management (1,1)
  • Middle-of-the-Road management (5,5)
  • Team management (9,9)

29
Authority-Compliance Management
  • Places heavy emphasis on task and job
    requirements
  • Less emphasis on people
  • Communication under-emphasized
  • Leadership is controlling, demanding, and
    overpowering

30
Country Club Management
  • Low concern for task accomplishment
  • High concern for interpersonal relationships
  • De-emphasis on production
  • Leadership characterized as agreeable, eager to
    help, comforting, and uncontroversial

31
Impoverished Management
  • No concern for task, as well as interpersonal
    relationships
  • Going through the motions with lack of
    involvement
  • Leaderships described as indifferent,
    noncommittal, resigned, and apathetic

32
Middle-of-the-Road Management
  • Leaders are compromisers
  • Immediate concern for task and interpersonal
    relationship
  • Leader avoids conflict and emphasizes moderate
    levels of production and relations with others to
    establish equilibrium
  • Leaders are described as one who is expedient,
    soft-pedals disagreement, and is interested in
    group progress over their own convictions

33
Team Management
  • Places strong emphasis on both tasks and
    interpersonal relationships
  • Promotes high degree of participation and
    teamwork
  • Satisfies a basic need in employees to be
    involved and committed to their work
  • Leaders characterized as clear, open-minded,
    determined, and one who stimulates participation

34
Combined Styles
  • Blake and his colleagues have identified two
    styles that incorporate multiple aspects of the
    grid
  • Paternalism/Maternalism
  • Leaders uses both (1,9) and (9,1) styles but does
    not integrate the two
  • Opportunistic
  • Leader uses any combination of the basic five
    styles for purpose of personal advancement

35
How does the Style Approach work?
  • Provides framework for assessing leadership
    behaviors in a broad way and general way
  • Gives leaders a way to look at their behavior by
    sub-dividing it into the two dimensions
  • Reminds leaders that their impact occurs through
    both the task they perform and the relationship
    they create.

36
Strengths and Weaknesses of the Style Approach
  • Strengths
  • Easily applied
  • Studies on leadership style validates and gives
    credibility to the approach
  • Provides core of the leadership process
  • Can be used as a heuristic (cognitive map)
  • Approach applies to everything a leader does
  • Weaknesses
  • Hasnt adequately shown how leaders styles are
    associated with performance outcomes
  • There is no universal leadership style
  • Implies that the most effective leadership style
    is the Team Management style (9,9)

37
Entrepreneurial Leadership
  • Strong achievement drive and sensible
    risk-taking
  • High degrees of enthusiasm and creativity
  • Tendency to act quickly when opportunity arises
  • Constant hurry combined with impatience
  • Visionary perspective

38
Entrepreneurial Leadership
  • Dislike of hierarchy and bureaucracy
  • Preference for dealing with external customers
  • Eye on the future

39
Gender Differences in Leadership Style
  • One researcher concluded that men tended toward a
    command-and-control style. In contrast, women
    tended toward a transformational style, relying
    heavily on interpersonal skills.
  • While researchers found leadership style
    differences between men and women, on the
    dimension of overall effectiveness, the sexes
    were perceived the same.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com