Title: UNIT 2: The Structure of Phrases and Clauses
1UNIT 2 The Structure of Phrases and Clauses
- English Syntax
- Ricardo de Souza
2Theta-Theory (?-Theory)
- Relational Concepts.
- Argument Structure.
- Predication
3Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
- Constituent selection, or c-selection.
- Semantic selection, or s-selection.
4Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
5Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
6Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
- Our children saw the concert.
- Our children saw that the band isnt that good.
- That the band isnt that good saw our children.
7Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
8Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
9Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
- They sent their children to a boarding school.
- They sent flowers to their wives.
- They sent their wives flowers
- They sent a boarding school their children.
10Theta-Theory (?-Theory)
11Theta-Theory (?-Theory)
- They slept in a tent.
- They slept well.
- They saw that the band isnt that good yesterday.
- They sent their wives flowers on their wedding
anniversaries.
12The Theta Criterion
- Each argument must be associated with one and
only one theta-role. - Each theta-role must be associated with one
and only one argument. - p. 28
13Corollaries of the Theta Criterion
- A predicators (e.g. a lexical verb) ?-grid must
be saturated.
- A predicators (e.g. a lexical verb) ?-grid must
not be either over-saturated or under-saturated.
14Corollaries of the Theta Criterion
- She slept her bed.
- ?She slept her baby.
- They saw that the band isnt that good the
singer. - They saw.
- Robert sent flowers to his wife a box of candy.
- Robert sent to his wife.
15Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Locality and
Minimality in ?-marking
- NPMary showed NPher sister CPwhy NPLouise
had destroyed NPthe painting.
- NP T AGT Mary showed NP T RECEIVER her
sister CP T THM why Louise had destroyed the
painting.
- NPMary showed NPher sister CPwhy NP T AGT
Louise had destroyed NP T THM the painting.
16Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Locality and
Minimality in ?-marking
- NPMary showed NPher sister NPthe painting
CPwhy NPLouise had destroyed.
- NP T AGT Mary showed NP T RECEIVER her
sister NP T THM the painting CP T ?? why
Louise had destroyed the painting.
- NPMary showed NPher sister NPthe painting
CPwhy NP T AGT Louise had destroyed ?? T
THM.
17Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to trace theory and movement
- Which painting did Mary say that Louise had
destroyed?
- Which painting did NP T AGT Mary say CP T
THM that Louise had destroyed?
18Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to trace theory and movement
- Which painting did Mary say CP T THM that NP
T AGT Louise had destroyed ?? T THM t ?
- NP T THM Which painting did Mary say CP T
THM that NP T AGT Louise had destroyed NP
T THM t ?
- NP T THM Which painting did Mary say CP T
THM that NP T AGT Louise had destroyed?
- NP T THM Which paintingi did Mary say CP T
THM that NP T AGT Louise had destroyed NP
T THM ti ?
19Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- In English, PRO is only licensed if
INFL-finite.
- PROs reference to an antecedent can be
controlled by semantic properties of matrix
clause verb.
20Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
NP a new bicycle.
21Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
NP a new bicycle.
22Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
NP a new bicycle.
23Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
NP a new bicycle.
24Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
NP a new bicycle.
25Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
NP a new bicycle.
26Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- I persuaded John PROi to buy a new bicycle.
- I persuaded Johni PROi to buy a new bicycle.
27Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
- I promised John PROi to buy a new bicycle.
- Ii promised John PROi to buy a new bicycle.
28Non-Verbal ?-Role Assigners
- Deverbal nouns.
- Adjectives
- Some prepositions.
29Non ?-Role Assigners
- The copula.
- Other copular verbs.
30Noun Phrases That Are Not ?-Marked
- Adjunct NPs.
- Expletive IT.
- Expletive THERE.
31The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- An endocentric (head centered) view of phrase
structure. - An architecture that predicts relationships
between heads and other elements within a
constituent. - A recursive view of syntax.
32The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- Take X, any given lexical or functional head.
- X0 is a minimum projection.
- X X0 Compl(X). X is an intermediate
projection.
- XP Spec(X) X. XP (or X) is a maximum
projection.
33The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
XP
X
Spec (X)
Compl(X)
34The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
NP
N
Spec
PP
DET
book
P
NP
the
about
grammar
35The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- An endocentric (head centered) view of phrase
structure.
36The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- That book of poems is fabulous.
- That book of poems are fabulous.
37The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
NP
N
Spec
CP
DET
that the teacher recommended
N
PP
the
P
NP
book
about
grammar
38The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- An architecture that predicts relationships
between heads and other elements within a
constituent.
- A complement is the heads sister.
- An adjunct is the sister of X-bar.
39The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
NP
Spec
N
PP
DET
P
NP
book
the
Spec
N
about
N
PP
DET
NP
P
the
grammar
semitic languages
of
40The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- A recursive view of syntax.
41The Architecture of Clauses
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
Helen
study
grammar
42The Architecture of Clauses
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
Helen
last term
V
NP
study
grammar
43The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- Helen studied grammar last term.
- Helen studied last term grammar.
44The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
- A complement is the heads sister.
- In VPs an argument (?-marked constituent) is
normally the complement.
- In VPs, an adjunct is a sister of V.
45The Complementizer Phrase
IP
Spec
I
VP
DET
CP
V
past
C
IP
Helen
think
Spec
I
that
I
VP
NP
past
V
AdjP
syntax
be
easy
46The Complementizer Phrase
IP
Spec
I
VP
CP
NP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
shocked
PRN
that
VP
I
NP
V
past
us
John
resign
47Clauses are CPs
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
48Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
49Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
50Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
51Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
did
VP
NP
t
V
NP
Helen
study
grammar
52Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
53Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
54Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
?
55Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
?
56Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
t
57Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
t
58Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
t
59Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
did
VP
NP
V
t
NP
Helen
study
t
60Agreement Setting the Problem
IP
I
Spec
VP
I
NP
the teacher
?
V
PP
after lunch
V
PP
talk
to his students
61Agreement Setting the Problem
- The teacher talks to his students after lunch.
- The teacher talked to his student after lunch
- The teachers talk to their student after lunch
- The teacher talk to his student after lunch.
- The teacher ed talk to his student after lunch.
62Agreement
IP
Spec
I
NP
...
number
person
number
person
/-finite
63Agreement
IP
Spec
I
NPthe teacher
...
number -pl
person 3rd
number -pl
person 3rd
/-finite
64Agreement Some Proposals
- Agreement takes place between SPEC(X) and X.
- Agreement involves specific features such as
number, person, and gender.
- In contemporary theory, such features are called
phi-features, or f-features.
- The relevant f-features in English are number
and person.
65Agreement Some Proposals
- Languages vary with respect to AGR feature
strength.
- Languages can be considered strong AGR AGR,
or weak AGR -AGR.
- English can be considered -AGR, whereas French,
for example, is AGR.
- In English, morphologically relevant agreement is
seen when there is a combination of the
f-features number-pl person3rd, and the
tense feature finite -past.
66Just to recollect...
- The teacher talks to his students after lunch.
- The teachers talk to their student after lunch
- The teacher talk to his student after lunch.
67The Ban on Stray Affixes...
- The teacher s talk to his student after lunch.
- The teacher ed talk to his student after lunch.
68...And Agreement Related Movement
69Agreement and Affix Lowering
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
NP
VP
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
number -pl
V
NP
often
person 3rd
person 3rd
this book
read
70Agreement and Affix Lowering
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
NP
VP
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
V
NP
often
person 3rd
this book
read
s
71Agreement and Affix Lowering
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
NP
VP
-past
Adv
Louise
t
V
NP
often
this book
read
s
72Affix Lowering Verb Raising Some Proposals
- In -AGR languages, affixes lower to V.
- In AGR languages, Vs raise to I.
- Check French data on p. 90, sentence 162(a).
- In English, a -AGR language, verbal morphemes
which are not VP heads also raise to I.
73Agreement and Auxiliary Verb Raising
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
NP
Perf P
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
number -pl
Perf
VP
often
person 3rd
person 3rd
V
NP
HAVE en
this book
read
74Agreement and Auxiliary Verb Raising
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
NP
Perf P
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
Perf
VP
often
person 3rd
V
NP
s
HAVE en
this book
read
75Agreement and Auxiliary Verb Raising
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
NP
Perf P
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
Perf
VP
often
person 3rd
V
NP
HA
s
t
this book
read
76Just to recollect
- Louise will often read this book.
- Louise often reads this book
- Louise has often read this book
- Louise reads often this book.
- Louise often has read this book.
77Agreement and The Copula
- The Copula (Verb to BE) is an exceptional verb.
- As we have seen, it does not assign ?-roles.
- Also, it is a head of VP that raises to I in
English.
78Agreement and The Copula
- Louise is often interested in this sort of book.
- Louise often is interested in this sort of book.
79Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
a good student
be
80Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
number -pl
number -pl
a good student
be
person 3rd
person 3rd
81Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
a good student
be
82Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
past
NP
Helen
a good student
83Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
was
NP
Helen
a good student
t
84Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
NP
V
NP
Helen
a good student
t
85Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
was
VP
NP
V
NP
Helen
t
a good student
t
86Case Theory Brief Overview
- Case is a morphosyntactic operation that relates
to grammatical relations such as Subject, Object
and Oblique. - Pronouns are morphologically marked for case in
English. - All NPs are abstractly marked for case.
87The Case Filter in English
- All overt NPs must be case-assigned.
- PRO must not be case-assigned.
88Case Theory Brief Overview
- Case is an essential operation for NP licensing.
- NPs must be licensed to become interpretable.
- NPs must abide by case assignment principles to
generate grammatical clauses.
89Case Assignment in English
- A finite Inflection assigns NOMINATIVE case to
SPEC(IP). - Most transitive verbs assign ACCUSATIVE case to
their complements. - Prepositions assign ACCUSATIVE case to their
complements. - NPs in DET position inherit GENITIVE case.
90Case Theory Some Facts
- I want to succeed in this task.
- I want Mary to succeed in this task.
- I want her to succeed in this task.
- To succeed in this task is nearly impossible.
- For us to succeed in this task is nearly
impossible.
91Case Theory Some Facts
- Me want to succeed in this task.
- I want she to succeed in this task.
- We to succeed in this task is nearly impossible.
- For we to succeed in this task is nearly
impossible.
92Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
93Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
ACC
94Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
ACC
NOM
95Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
ACC
NOM
96Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
She
see
Bill
ACC
NOM
97Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
She
see
him
ACC
NOM
98Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
NP
past
V
NP
Her
see
he
ACC
NOM
99Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
NP
P
succed
in
this task
100Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
this task
101Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
this task
ACC
102Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
it
ACC
103Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
for
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
it
ACC
ACC
104Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
for
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
us
NP
P
succed
in
it
ACC
ACC
105Inherent Genitive Case
- The rich schools teachers went on a strike.
- The rich school teachers went on a strike.
106Inherent Genitive Case
NP
Spec
N
DET
N
NP
teachers
VP
DET
N
AdjP
N
rich
school
107Inherent Genitive Case
NP
Spec
N
DET
N
NP
teachers
VP
DET
N
AdjP
N
rich
school
108The rich school teachers
NP
AdjP
Spec
N
Adj
DET
N
rich
the
N
N
school
teacher