Slayt Basligi Yok - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Slayt Basligi Yok

Description:

1Electronics and Communication Engineering Dept, DOGUS University, Zeamet Sokak, ... problem domain into simpler more tracktable interacting subdomain (SD) problems. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: TUBI9
Category:
Tags: basligi | slayt | subdomain | yok

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Slayt Basligi Yok


1
Field and Network Theories in ECE
Levent SEVGI 1Electronics and Communication
Engineering Dept, DOGUS University, Zeamet Sokak,
No 21, Acibadem / KADIKOY - Istanbul
2
Well-posed Problems
  • A problem is said to be well-posed if the
    following conditions are met
  • Existence implies that the conditions do not
    over determine the problem and the solution
    exists,
  • Uniqueness implies that the conditions do not
    under determine the solution and it assures that
    the solution, no matter how obtained, is the
    correct and the only one.
  • Stability implies that arbitrary small
    perturbations in data, e.g., sources, do not,
    for any physical quantity, let to infinity.
  • Completeness, is to represent any excitation in
    terms of building blocks called Modes (i.e.,
    eigensolutions.

3
Complexity Architecture
  • Wave interaction with complex environmens poses
    major challenges to the analytic modeler.
    Complexity in the context of waves, encompasses
    many scales which are conveniently referenced
    to the relevant wavelengths ?2?c/? in the
    interrogating wave signal, where c is the
    wavespeed in a reference ambient medium and ?
    is the radian frequency.
  • These relative scales si / ? can be associated
    with physical dimensions si ? di wavelengths si
    ? ?i in various materials temporal widths si ?
    Ti of the signal spectra sampling window widths
    si ? Wi in the processing data, etc.
  • The wave modeler must decide how to
    parameterize a complex physical problem so as
    to take best advantage of the wave-based and
    computational tools at his disposal. It is
    natural to employ an architecture which
    decomposes the overall complex problem domain
    into simpler more tracktable interacting
    subdomain (SD) problems.

4
Complexity Architecture
  • A general framework for decomposing an overall
    complex problem space into interacting
    subdomains

5
Guided waves and Reduction
  • The steady-state EM vector fields excited by a
    specified electric and magnetic current
    distributions, J and M, respectively, are
    defined by Maxwells field equations
  • on the perfectly conducting boundary of the
    uniform waveguide, the tangential component of
    the electric field must vanish

6
Complexity Architecture
  • Transmission line model

7
Complexity Architecture
  • Scattered (S) parameter model

8
Maxwells Equations and Decomposition
Full, Source-excited Maxwells equations BC
Longitudinal Fields (dependent)
Transverse Source-excited Maxwells equations
BC
Eigensolutions (source-free)
Modal Amplitudes (scalar)
Source-free Transverse Field equations BC
TE Type (Dirichlet)
Transmission Line Equations
Transverse Vector Eigenfunctions (scalarization)
TM Type (Neumann)
Mixed (Cauchy)
9
Guided waves and Reduction
  • EIGENVALUE PROBLEM

(Dirichlet type)
  • TRANSMISSION LINE PROBLEM

10
Sturm-Liouville Equation (SL)
  • Each 1D problem in a coordinate-separable
    reduced 2D or 3D problem is parameterized by SL
    theory which deals with eigenspectra of 1D
    linear second-order diferential operators in
    bounded and unbounded domains.

with suitable boundary condititons at zZL (left
boundary) and zZR (right boundary) represents
our EM equations. Depending on the p(z), q(z) and
?(z) this may be Helmholtz wave equation, Laplace
equation, diffusion equation, etc.
  • This represents a Transmission Line problem if
    ? is a fixed parameter.
  • It is an Eigenvalue problem if ? is a free
    parameter that does not equal to an eigenvalue
    (Since eigenvalues are real, choosing Im ??0
    guarantees uniqueness).

11
Alternative representations
  • Phase space wave dynamics can be organized
    around two complementary phenomenologies -
    progressing and oscillatory - which are closely
    related to local vs. global descriptions.
  • Progressing wave objects (rays or wavefronts)
    are responsible for point-to-point propagation
    and sample the physical environmentlocally
    along their trajectories.
  • Oscillatory wave objects (modes or resonances)
    form standing waves over extended (global)
    portions of the physical environment.
  • An alternative approach to the local-global
    parameterization of wave phenomena is through
    the use of Poisson summation, which converts an
    infinite or truncated n-sum (poorly convergent)
    series into an m-sum (good convergent ) series
    in Fourier domain.

12
Sturm-Liouville Equation
  • A generic problem for transmission lines is the
    Greens function problem. Solving
    Sturm-Liouville equation when ? is a fixed
    parameter yields nothing but the Greens
    function.
  • The Greens function is the response of a
    linear system to a point source of unit
    strength. A source of unit strength at a
    position a along, for example, z coordinate
    can be represented by the Dirac delta function.
  • Greens function solution may also be built
    from eigenfunction solutions.
  • Alternatively, eigenfunctions may also be
    derived from the Greens function solution.
  • This illustrates that a guided wave problem may
    be handled as either an eigenvalue problem or
    transmission line problem, since the former
    also yields the latter and vice versa.

13
Normal Mode Solution
  • NM is the solution of source-free wave equation
    in a coordinate system that yields separation of
    variables
  • NM satisfy transverse boundary conditions on
    each transverse cross-section
  • NM confinement may be due to fixed transverse
    boundaries and/or mode dependent virtual
    boundaries (refractive confinement)
  • NM propagate in longitudinal direction with
    distinct propagation constants
  • Each NM carries finite energy (can be
    normalized) and is independent of every other
    NM (orthogonality)

14
Example Parallel plate waveguide
x
PEC
z
PEC
  • Start with Maxwell equations

and obtain two sets of equations as
15
Example Parallel plate waveguide
  • Set 1 TMz

Set 1 and Set 2 are decoupled
  • Set 2 TEz

16
Example Parallel plate waveguide
  • Any of Jx, My or Jz excite SET 1 (TMz)
  • Any of Jy, Mx or Mz excite SET 2 (TMz)
  • Lets look at TEz with Jy source only and start
    with second order decoupled, Maxwells (wave)
    equations.

Boundary conditions

wavenumber
17
Example Parallel plate waveguide
  • The Greens function associated with this
    problem is


Normalized Eigenfunciton
Z dependent coefficient
18
Example Parallel plate waveguide
  • Using the identities

one obtains
  • Defining and yields

19
Example Parallel plate waveguide
  • Z dependent solution is
  • and, finally the Greens function is obtained as
  • Ey may directly be obtained from the Greens
    function as

20
Example Parallel plate waveguide
  • For a line source at (x,z) the solution will
    then be

21
Example 2 Open surface waveguide
22
Software Calibration SSPE vs. NM
23
Conclusions and Discussions
  • Field and network theories are two fundamental
    approaches in ECE.
  • Any ECE problem can be postulated via one of
    these two approaches, the solution can be
    derived, and may then be transformed into the
    other.
  • The problem at hand, the parameter regime, or
    the geometry give clues to choose the best
    suitable approach.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com