Paris Metro Pricing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Paris Metro Pricing

Description:

Paris Metro Pricing. Fredrik Wallenberg. Principles of PMP. Hi QoS. Low QoS ... Speculators add liquidity and will speed up the stabilization of the system ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: fredrikwa
Category:
Tags: hispeed | metro | paris | pricing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Paris Metro Pricing


1
Paris Metro Pricing
  • Fredrik Wallenberg

2
Principles of PMP
  • QoS needs time to stabilize
  • QoS has to be predictable to remain stable

3
Liquidity vs. Stability
  • Speculators add liquidity and will speed up the
    stabilization of the system
  • Sporadic congestion combined with high liquidity
    could create serious ripple effects (more like
    self propagating instability).
  • Purchase of blocks to increase inertia
  • Damaged goods

4
Partition the Network
  • Fixed Partition
  • Routing Priorities
  • Strict priority
  • Weighted Round Robin
  • Small number of partitions (to facilitate
    differentiation and minimize cost)

5
Implementation Issues
  • Use 3-bit priority field available and unused in
    IPv4
  • Will initially require a "wrapper" (that also
    allows network admins to manage policies)
  • Changes in the router Technical tools would be
    those proposed in Diff-Serv QoS
  • Accounting feature
  • Interconnection with networks that dont
    implement PMP
  • Revenue sharing between networks

6
The Good News
  • Bandwidth does not seem to be in short supply,
    especially not on the backbone. Even if QoS is
    needed for the backbone, it should be implemented
    to the bare minimum.
  • PMP is a light weight QoS implementation.

7
The Bad News
  • Subdivision counters statistical multiplexing
  • No QoS guarantee
  • Implementation costs
  • May not be sustainable under competition
  • Demand for predictability
  • Users dont like usage sensitive pricing

8
Users don't like usage sensitive pricing
  • Consumers have shown they are willing to pay more
    for a flat-rate plan than they would under a
    per-use pricing scheme.
  • Flat rates are cheaper to implement and maintain.
  • There are plenty of example of Telecos and ISPs
    worldwide that successfully charge usage based
    pricing, but...

9
Aside on social preferences
  • Seems like we prefer social methods of rationing
    (queues rather than auctions).
  • Challenge is to design pricing schemes that
    approach the goal of efficiency that can be
    achieved by auctions mechanisms, and yet do
    respect consumer aversion to the auction.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com