Title: Basic Pricing Principle
1Basic Pricing Principle the Internet
- Refer to Ch5-7 of Pricing Communication networks
2Todays Agenda
- The QUESTION How to set the price?
- Basic requirements
- What Competition Model the Business in
- Common pricing methods in the internet
- Ways to grasp the max profit from customers
3How to Set a Price?
- A. Basic requirements (in normal cases)
-
- the price lt utility of customers
- the price is sustainable (7.1.2)
- There is no way that the potential entrant can
post price that less than the incumbents for
some service and the serve all of part of the
demand without incurring loss -
4Welfare Maximization (5.4)
- The ideal case welfare maximization (5.4)
- Aim to max total welfare of both customers and
providers
5Welfare Maximization (5.4)
- The ideal case welfare maximization (5.4)
- Lagrange multiplier
Optimal price
Marginal cost pricing
6Todays Agenda
- The QUESTION How to set the price?
- Basic requirements
- What Competition Model the Business in
- Common pricing methods in the internet
- Ways to grasp the max profit from customers
7How to Set a Price?
- B. What Competition Model the Business in
- Monopoly
- Unregulated monopoly
- Regulated monopoly
- Oligopoly
- Perfect Competition
8Unregulated monopoly
- Basic criteria
- maximize total profit of the business (6.2.1)
- differentiate r.w.t. pi, we have
- compared to the welfare maximization curve
(5.5.1) - (will mention in Ramsey pricing)
-
9Unregulated monopoly
- Basic criteria maximize total profit of the
business
10Unregulated monopoly
- maximize total profit of the business (6.2.1)
Social benefit
Profit for business
Welfare lost
11Regulated monopoly
- Probably by negotiation
- The baseline is to allow them to earn some profit
while to maximize social welfare - eg. Scheme of Control Agreement (??????) applied
in power generating companies in Hong Kong - One possible method
- Ramsey-Boiteux pricing (5.5.1)
12Ramsey-Boiteux Pricing (5.5.1)
- Two ways of thinking
- Allow a fixed profit margin between revenue and
cost - Max
- s.t.
- Weight suppliers profit heavier then customers
surplus
13Ramsey-Boiteux Pricing (5.5.1)
- By differentiation wrt p, we have
- If services are independent, we have
- ie. price markup over marginal cost is inversely
proportional to the elasticity of demand
14How to Set a Price?
- B. What Competition Model the Business in
- Monopoly ?
- Unregulated monopoly ?
- Regulated monopoly ?
- Oligopoly
- Perfect Competition
15Oligopoly
- Game theory is wildly used to study interactions
between a small number of competitive firms - Cournot game
- Bertrand game
- Stackelberg game
16Perfect Competition
- Some attributes of the perfect market
- perfect competition - no individual can affect
the market - Perfect information - everyone participant is
fully informed - everyone has equal access to the market
- everyone acts selfishly
- homogeneous commodity
17Perfect Competition
- Some attributes of the perfect market
- Strong network externalities effect
- Eg. Free SMS for intra-provider users
- no transaction costs no lock-in effect
- Eg. Bring phone number to other mobile service
provider - Eg. The pain to fill search for another provider
18How to Set a Price?
- B. What Competition Model the Business in
- Monopoly ?
- Unregulated monopoly ?
- Regulated monopoly ?
- Oligopoly ?
- Perfect Competition ?
19Todays Agenda
- The QUESTION How to set the price?
- Basic requirements
- What Competition Model the Business in
- Common pricing methods in the internet
- Ways to grasp the max profit from customers
20How to Set a Price?
- C. Common pricing methods in the internet
- Dynamic pricing
- Two part tariff (5.5.2)
- Optional two-part tariff (5.5.3)
- Flat-rate pricing (7.5)
- Bargaining (7.2)
- Shapley value (7.1.3)
- Paris Metro pricing
21Dynamic Pricing
- Principle to ask the customers using the service
in the peak hours to pay more - Peak-load Pricing (5.4.4)
- Charge an extra premium in peak hours
- Time-of-day pricing
- Divide time into different section, charge with
different prices - eg. Free night/weekend mobile phone minutes in US
- Real-time pricing
- Charges varies depending on real-time traffic
22Peak-load Pricing (5.4.4)
- Principle ask customers using the busiest
timeslots to pay a premium of yt - K demand at the busiest timeslots
- Xt demand timeslot t
- a marginal cost
To reach welfare maximization
utility
price
s.t. Xt lt K
23Two-part tariff (5.5.2)
- Principle charge customers with
- a. fixed charge
- b. usage charge
- eg. ?? (amuement park in HK) - pay a low
entrance fee, and pay separately for each ride - eg. pubs - pay fixed cover fee, and pay
separately for each drink (if your main purpose
to a pub is merely drinking P )
24Two-part tariff (5.5.2)
- Advantage
- providers could recover cost no matter no much a
customer use the service - Disadvantages
- 1. social welfare decreases
- 2. some users with low usage will be kicked out
-
- Others
- low usage customers would pay more relatively
25Two-part tariff (5.5.2)
- Observations
- Demand changes depends on utility
- Social welfare decreases
F 900
Demand u(x)
F 300
MC
x
26Optional two-part tariff (5.5.3)
- Principle set up varies fixed charges and usage
charges, customers picket charging scheme that
fit most to their usage - eg. Mobile plans (a partially correct example)
- 98/1000 mins, 1.0/min onwards
- 150/1200 mins, 0.5/min onwards
- Implementation
- A set of K optional two-part tariffs, specified
by pairs (ak, pk), where ak lt ak1 , pk gt pk1 - Observation
- Given a K-part optional tariff, we can always
construct a K1 part tariff that is not Pareto
inferior (explain later)
27Optional two-part tariff (5.5.3)
- Advantages
- Users with different utility could choose among
combinations - Disadvantages
- Some users might take arbitrages (if plan set
badly)
28Flat-rate pricing (7.5)
- Principle all-you-can-eat for a fixed price
- eg. Countless examples
- Advantages
- Easy to implement
- Appealing to customers
- Make the Internet dumb-er
- Disadvantages
- Produce high social waste
- Lost low-profile customers
- Not subsidy-free
29Flat-rate pricing (7.5)
30How to Set a Price?
- C. Common pricing methods in the internet
- Dynamic pricing ?
- Two part tariff (5.5.2) ?
- Optional two-part tariff ?
- Flat-rate pricing (7.5) ?
- Bargaining (7.2)
- Shapley value (7.1.3)
- Paris Metro pricing
31Bargaining (7.2)
- Table rule
- The bargain ends when both players accept the
price - Utility of both players discounts by time
- Could talk about this at later presentations!
Is gt ? Else propose
.
32Shapley value (7.1.3)
- Principle
- a mechanism to distribute revenue/cost among
several actors in the system - Eg. No example.
- Intuitive meaning
- for each permutation of the actors, find the
marginal utility gain for each additional player
added into the system. The resultant value is
then normalized
33Shapley value (7.1.3)
Mission A?D
Permutation A B C D
A B C D 0 0 0 2
A B D C 0 0 1 1
A C B D 0 0 0 2
A C D B 0 1 0 1
A D C B 0 1 1 0
A D B C 0 1 1 0
B A C D 0 0 0 2
B A D C 0 0 1 1
B C A D 0 0 0 2
B C D A 2 0 0 0
B D A C 1 0 1 0
B D C A 2 0 0 0
C A B D 0 0 0 2
16.5
B
A
33
D
C
33
16.5
34Shapley value (7.1.3)
- Axioms
- Dummy if v(S U i) v(S) 0, then
- fi(v) 0
- Symmetry if i, j symmetic, then
- fi(v) fj(v)
- Additively fi(v w) fi(v) fi(w)
- Efficiency
- There exists a unique value that satisfy the
above four axioms, which is the Shapley value -
35Shapley value (7.1.3)
- Advantages
- Fair (supposingly)
- Disadvantages
- Value must be calculated centrally
- Impossible to implement in large scale
36How to Set a Price?
- C. Common pricing methods in the internet
- Dynamic pricing ?
- Two part tariff (5.5.2) ?
- Optional two-part tariff ?
- Flat-rate pricing (7.5) ?
- Bargaining (7.2) ?
- Shapley value (7.1.3) ?
- Paris Metro pricing
37Paris Metro pricing
- Principle
- by dividing the internet into different separate
channels with different prices, channels with
higher price would attract less traffic and hence
provide better service - Intuition
- first class in trains always have seats (more
expensive) - if first class run out of seats, you simply take
standard class.
38Paris Metro pricing
- Implementation
- Divide physical channel into several logical
channels - Fixed capacity for each channel, all best effort,
no QoS - Set different prices for each channel, flat-rate
perhaps
39How to Set a Price?
- C. Common pricing methods in the internet
- Dynamic pricing ?
- Two part tariff (5.5.2) ?
- Optional two-part tariff ?
- Flat-rate pricing (7.5) ?
- Bargaining (7.2) ?
- Shapley value (7.1.3) ?
- Paris Metro pricing ?
40Todays Agenda
- The QUESTION How to set the price?
- Basic requirements
- What Competition Model the Business in
- Common pricing methods in the internet
- Ways to grasp the max profit from customers
41How to Set a Price?
- D. Ways to grasp the max profit from customers
- Price discrimination (6.2.2)
- Individual pricing
- Versoning
- Group pricing
- Bundling (6.2.3)
- Service differentiation (6.2.4)
- Coffee in starbucks
- Others
- Taxations
- Equilibrium Modeling
42Individual Pricing (6.2.2)
- Principle
- charge each user individually such that
- the price of each user utility of the user
- Eg. Coorperate bandwidth wholesale (if the
provider is a monopoly) - Properties
- Maximize welfare
- No customer surplus
43Versoning (6.2.2)
- Principle provider posts offers and allow
customers to select their best plan - eg. Communication time-of-day, duration,
location, distance (from the book) - Advantage
- Welfare better than flat-pricing
- Disadvantages
- Welfare worse than individual pricing
- Users might select the wrong plan
44Individual Pricing (6.2.2)
How provider could maximize total revenue by
providing discounts
User 1 might switch to the plan for user 2 to
gain customers surplus B
By having discount of B, user 1 is motivated to
use plan 1.
45Group Pricing
- Principle
- divide customers into classes and provide
different charges - Eg. I. Adult / student / elderly tickets
- II. Coupon system
- Intuitive reasoning
- To divide customers with different elasticity
46How to Set a Price?
- D. Ways to grasp the max profit from customers
- Price discrimination (6.2.2)
- Individual pricing ?
- Versoning ?
- Bundling (6.2.3)
- Group pricing ?
- Service differentiation (6.2.4)
- Coffee in starbucks
- Others
- Taxations
- Equilibrium Modeling
47Service differentiation
- Principle
- Add costless difference in service/product for
differenciation - Eg. Menu in starbucks
- Latte 20 / 23 / 26
- Cappuccino 25 / 28 / 31
- Mocha 30 / 33 / 36
- Eg. Popcorns in cinemas
- Small 30
- Medium 35
- Large 40
48Todays Agenda
- The QUESTION How to set the price?
- Basic requirements
- What Competition Model the Business in
- Common pricing methods in the internet
- Ways to grasp the max profit from customers
49Backup Slides
50Ramsey-Boiteux Pricing (5.5.1)
- If services are dependent, we have
- The price might be lower than marginal cost when
the services are complements to each others