Bioavailability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Bioavailability

Description:

18-55 years old. Normal weight. Screened for. laboratory test. medical history. medical examination ... at minimum 3 levels. At least 5 determinations per ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:765
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: monikajo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bioavailability


1
(No Transcript)
2
Bioavailability
  • Bioavailability means the rate and extent to
    which the active substance is adsorbed from a
    pharmaceutical product and become available at
    the site of action

3
Bioequivalence
  • Two medical products are bioequivalent if they
    are pharmaceutical equivalent or pharmaceutical
    alternatives and if their bioavailabilities after
    administration in the same molar dose are similar
    to such degree that their effects, with respect
    to both efficicy and safety, will be essentially
    the same

4
Design and conduct of studies
  • The study should be designed in such a way that
    the formulation effect can be distinguished from
    other effects.
  • Most common is a two-period, two-sequence
    crossover design, if the formulations to be
    compared is two
  • Single dose studies
  • Steady-state studies

5
Design and conduct of studies
  • Adequate wash out periods between treatments
  • Sampling schedule
  • to provide an adequate estimation of Cmax
  • to cover the plasma concentration time curve long
    enough, 80 of AUC
  • 24 hours cycle at steady state?
  • drugs with long half-life?

6
Subjects
  • Healthy volunteers
  • The inclusion/exclusion criteria should be
    clearly stated in the protocol
  • Both sex
  • 18-55 years old
  • Normal weight
  • Screened for
  • laboratory test
  • medical history
  • medical examination
  • preferable non-smokers and without a history of
    alcohol or drug abuse

7
Chemical analysis
  • The bioanalytical part of bioequivalence trials
    should be conducted according to the applicable
    principle of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)

8
Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)
  • Test plan (Analytical protocol)
  • Sample traceability
  • Documentation, possible to reconstruct the study
  • Analytical method validation report
  • Analytical report signed by responsible
    investigator

9
Pre-study phase
  • The method used must be well characterised
  • Stability
  • Specificity
  • Accuracy
  • Precision
  • Limit of quantitation
  • Response function

10
Validation objective
  • To demonstrate that the analytical procedure is
    suitable for its intended purpose

11
Analytical method validation
Analytical Procedure
Stability
Selectivity
Robustness
Validation
Accuracy
Calibration curve
Precision - within-run- between-run
Limit of Quantitation LOQ
Recovery
12
Analytical procedure
Separation
Detection
Sample preparation
13
Specificity (selectivity)
  • Ability of an analytical method to measure only
    what it is intended to measure
  • Blank samples from six different subjects
  • Will other drugs, metabolites or endogenous
    components interfere in the measurements?

14
Accuracy
  • The closeness of mean test results obtained by
    the analytical method to the true value
    (concentration) of the analyte.

15
Accuracy
  • Accuracy should be measured at minimum 3 levels
  • At least 5 determinations per concentration
  • The mean value should be within 15 of the actual
    value
  • At the lower limit of quantitation level within
    20 is accepted

x
x
x
x
x
x
16
Precision
  • The closeness of individual measurements of an
    analyte when the procedure is applied repeatedly
    to multiple aliquotes of a single homogenous
    volume of biological matrix

17
Precision
  • Precision should be measured at minimum 3 levels
  • At least 5 determinations per concentration
  • The calculated CV should not exceed 15
  • At the lower limit of quantitation level, CV
    should not exceed 20
  • Subdivided into within-run and between-run

18
Precision and Accuracy
Conc.
Accuracy
Precision
n
nmol/l
()
Within-run
Between-run


0.76
0.6
5.1
6.1
18
23
3.6
1.7
1.8
18
122
3.9
1.3
1.3
18
19
Recovery
  • The extraction efficiency of an analytical method
  • Recovery of an analyte need not be 100

20
Lower limit of quantitation
  • The lowest standard on the calibration curve
    should be accepted as the lower limit of
    quantitation (LLOQ)
  • if

21
Lower limit of quantification
  • The analyte responce at LLOQ is at least 5 times
    the blank response
  • The peak should be identifiable and discrete
  • Precision within 20 CV
  • Accuracy of 80-120

22
LLOQ (1.50 nmol/l) for morphine
23
Calibration/Standard curve
  • A calibration curve is the relation between
    instrument response and known concentrations of
    the analyte
  • Should be prepared in the same biological matrix
    as the samples
  • Should consist of 6-8 samples covering the
    expected range
  • Should include LLOQ and a blank sample
  • Should include a zero sample (with internal
    standard)
  • Same curve fitting, weighting in prestudy and
    study
  • Any changes should be documented

24
Calibration curve
25
Sample dilution
  • Any required sample dilutions should use like
    matrix
  • Dilution QC sample should be used

26
Robustness
  • How many samples can be analysed in one run?

27
Robustness
115
110
105
100
Found concentration
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
95
90
85
Sample No.
28
Stability of your substance
In Freeze/Thaw tests
In room temperature (4 h)
In the automatic injector
In stock solutions
In plasma during storage
29
Analytical method validation
Analytical Procedure
Stability
Selectivity
Robustness
Validation
Accuracy
Calibration curve
Precision - within-run- between-run
Limit of Quantitation LOQ
Recovery
30
References
  • Guidance for IndustryBioanalytical Method
    Validation FDA, May 2001
  • Workshop Report Shah, V.P. Et al.,
    Pharmaceutical Research 1992 9588-592.
  • Workshop Report Shah, V.P. et al.,
    Pharmaceutical Research 2000 171551-1557

31
Costs
  • Validation 130-180.000 SEK
  • Stability 15-20.000 SEK for each time point
  • QA 11.000 SEK/study

32
The study phase (1)
  • ...in which the validated bioanalytical method is
    applied to the actual analysis of samples from
    the biostudy mainly in order to confirm the
    stability, accuracy and precision.

33
The study phase (2)
  • Calibration curve in each run
  • Six Quality Control samples in each run
  • Pre-stablished SOPs for procedures (method)
  • Acceptance criteria for a run- accuracy and
    precision of the calibration curve- accuracy and
    precision of the QC samples- repeat analysis
  • It is preferable to analyse all study samples
    from a subject in a single run

34
The study phase (3)
  • The QC samples should be used to accept or reject
    the run (2 samples at 3 levels)
  • Four QC samples out of six should be within 15
    of their nominal value
  • Two QC samples can be outside 15 but not both
    at the same concentration

35
System suitability test
The lowest calibration sample is injected before
each run. The system is accepted if
  • Signal to noise ratio is above 5 for the
    substance.
  • The peak shape is acceptable after visual
    inspection of the chromatogram
  • The retention times are within 10 of the
    previous run.

36
The analytical report should include
  • Results for all calibration curves
  • Results for all quality control samples
  • Representative number of chromatograms
  • Should include data from subjects who eventually
    dropped-out
  • Reanalysed samples and the reason for reanalyses
  • The analytical validation report
  • The responsible investigator(s) should sign for
    their respective section of the report

37
Chiral active substances
  • The bio-analytical method should be enantiomeric
  • Unless
  • Both products contain the same stable singel
    enantiomer
  • Both products contain the racemate and both
    enantiomers show linear pharmacokinetics

38
Also guidance for
  • Reference and test product
  • Data analysis
  • In vitro dissolution comlementary to a
    bioequivalence study
  • Reporting of results
  • Application for products containing new active
    substances
  • Application for products containing approved
    active substances
  • is given
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com