Title: Gender, Informality and Employment Adjustment in Latin American
1Gender, Informality and Employment Adjustment in
Latin American
- Rossana Galli and David Kucera
2Overview
- Introduction Competing hypotheses regarding the
cyclic movement of formal vs. informal employment
and mens vs. womens employment, and the
intersection of the two - Defining formality and informality in the data
- Overall trends and patterns
- Gender differences in trends and patterns
- Informal employment and womens employment as
cyclic buffers - Conclusions
3Informal Employment Shares, Enterprise and Social
Security Coverage Definitions
4Informal Employment Shares, Enterprise and Social
Security Coverage Definitions
5Female Propensity of Informal Employment, With
and Without Domestic Services, Enterprise
Definition
6Female Propensity of Informal Employmentby
Employment Category
7Female Propensity of Informal Employment,Social
Security Coverage Definition
8Percentage of Workers with Social Security
Coverageby Employment Category
9Conclusion
- With the exception of Brazil, no clearcut trend
increases trends in informality - Womens overrepresentation in informality a
result of their concentration in domestic
services - Roughly equal gender representation within
self-employment, but women have much lower social
security coverage within self-employment - No strong evidence of informality as a buffer A
result of stronger unemployment insurance system
and/or predominance of procyclical forms of
informal employment (independent or types of
subordinate)? - Some evidence of womens employment as a buffer
within informality (total informality definition) - Informality and female propensity of informality
higher in rural (non-agricultural) areas - Data problems, particularly problematic for
econometric analysis