Revising Style - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Revising Style

Description:

Too dense, turgid, unnecessarily complex 'Few of us are a Kant or a Hegel. ... Too abstract or turgid. Disjointed or not fluent. Incomprehensible, too technical ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: cdl1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Revising Style


1
Revising Style
  • Writing Clear Research Papers

2
Timed Writing
  • 1. Have you written at least three pages of your
    rough draft? (Yes or No)
  • 2. Briefly explain one of the main principles of
    writing clearly.
  • Bonus possibility Find a good textual example in
    your sources to illustrate a point or points in
    Style.

3
Style and Clarity
  • Draft first, revise second
  • The central objective of Style to show how a
    writer quickly and efficiently transforms a rough
    first draft into a version crafted for the
    reader. (p. x)
  • Grammatical terms
  • Principles not rules
  • Why revise ones writing style? What is the
    worst problem of academic writing today?
  • Too dense, turgid, unnecessarily complex
  • Few of us are a Kant or a Hegel. (CR 264)

4
How do we know a sentence is unclear?
  • We feel we have to work harder than we think we
    ought to.
  • What does it mean to be unclear?
  • Too abstract or turgid
  • Disjointed or not fluent
  • Incomprehensible, too technical

5
Go with the Flow Parallelism
  • Words, phrases, or sentences presented in series
    should be in parallel form. That is, multiple
    items presented as if they are on one level
    should share the same grammatical structure.
  • Zachary Seech, Writing Philosophy Papers, 4th ed.
    (Thomson Wadsworth, 2004), 52.

6
Correct These Sentences
  • Wrong Wittgenstein wrote Tractatus
    Logico-Philosophicus, was the author of
    Philosophical Investigations, writing also A
    Lecture on Ethics.
  • Right Wittgenstein wrote Tractatus
    Logico-Philosophicus, Philosophical
    Investigations, and A Lecture on Ethics.

7
  • Wrong The pre-Socratic philosophers of ancient
    Greece wondered at the complexity of the world,
    had looked for a principle of unity in all
    diversity, and claiming a principle of permanence
    in a sea of change.
  • Right The pre-Socratic philosophers of ancient
    Greece wondered at the complexity of the world,
    looked for a principle of unity in all diversity,
    and claimed a principle of permanence in a sea of
    change.

8
Now, the Principles
  • Subject/Characters Make the subject of your
    verbs characters involved in those actions.
  • Verb/Actions Express actions and conditions in
    specific verbs, adverbs, or adjectives. (S 43)
  • What do you think about the epigraphs before each
    chapter?

9
Applying the First Principle
  • Consider these sentences
  • Our lack of knowledge about ultimate causes
    precludes determination of free agency in human
    actions.
  • Better Because we know nothing about ultimate
    causes, we cannot determine if humans act freely.

10
  • The reason for Lockes frequent repetition lies
    in his distrust of the accuracy of the naming
    power of words. (CR 266)
  • Better Locke frequently repeated himself because
    he did not trust words to name things accurately.

11
Quick Tips
  • Make your subjects short, specific, and
    concrete. (CR 267)
  • Investigate the first five or six words of every
    sentence looking for the subject and checking
    that it is a character matching the action.

12
Applying the Second Principle
  • Sub-principle Avoid unnecessary nominalizations.
    (CR 268-69, S 30-36)
  • Husserl provided an investigation into the
    foundations of logic.
  • Better Husserl investigated the foundations of
    logic.
  • Our discussion concerned an ethical dilemma.
  • Better We discussed an ethical dilemma.
  • There is a need for further study of this matter
    of complexity.
  • Better We must study this complex matter further.

13
  • A complex example CR 272, S 35
  • But some nominalizations may be necessary,
    especially in philosophy where the characters are
    often abstract concepts or ideas.

14
Additional Principles
  • Use the passive voice properly.
  • Avoid unnecessarily long compound noun phrases.
  • Put old, familiar information before new,
    unfamiliar information. (Cohesion)
  • Put more complex information last in a sentence.
    (Emphasis)

15
Another Example
  • "Or, in line with a suggestion made by Henri
    Gobard, would it be better to translate this as
    a "double hold," like a full nelson in wrestling,
    so as to better describe the treatment forced on
    the unconscious when it is bound at both ends,
    leaving it no choice than to respond Oedipus, in
    sickness as in health, in its crises as in their
    outcome, in its resolution as in its problem"
    (110).
  • Deleuze and Guattari. Anti-Oedipus Capitalism
    and Schitzophrenia. Translated by Robert Hurley,
    Helen Lane, and Mark Seem. Minneapolis
    University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
  • SolutionFollowing a suggestion by Henri Gobard,
    we can translate this idea as double hold.  It
    describes the force imposed on the unconscious
    bound by both ends The unconscious has no
    choice but to respond Oedipus for a resolution
    or cry Oedipus about its problem.

16
Timed Writing
  • From the point of view of stylistic clarity,
    which abstract is best and why? Which abstract is
    worst and why?

17
Applying the Principles
  • Does the abstract contain the essential parts?
    Identify them.
  • Can you distinguish psychological topics from
    subjects? Does the abstract have a coherent topic
    string?
  • Are there any examples of nominalizations? Are
    they useful?
  • Are there any examples of metadiscourse? Is it
    useful?
  • Can you rewrite any sentences to make the
    abstract clearer?

18
Of Theories of Coercion, Two Axes, and Some
Grinding
  • The recent accounts of coercion can be mapped
    onto two different axes whether they focus on
    the situation of the coercee or the activities of
    the coercer, and whether or not they depend upon
    moral judgments in their analysis of coercion.
    Why, however, has no recent theory seriously
    explored a non-moralized, coercer-focused
    approach to coercion? There are important
    reasons, I argue, to think that contemporary
    theories are disadvantageous to a new theory in
    this unexplored quadrant. What is crucial in
    thinking about coercion is to focus on the
    willingness and ability of the coercers to use
    their powers against coercees.

19
Environmental Damage and the Puzzle of the
Self-Torturer
  • Collective conduct that severely damages the
    environment has been traced by current
    researchers to interpersonal conflicts of
    interests. Even in the absence of interpersonal
    conflicts, conduct of the relevant sort can
    flourish. This can be seen by considering the
    puzzle of the self-torturer. To prevent us from
    destroying the earth, I argue that being
    sympathetic and well-informed may not be enough.

20
Chasing Chimeras Aesthetic Constructions of the
Animal
  • How are we to see ourselves in relation to the
    animals gaze? To address this question, I
    examine the writings of Derrida and Kofman to
    locate how they each speak of the animals gaze.
    After briefly addressing the animals face,
    particularly as posed by Levinas, I turn to
    Derridas analyses. The themes. These themes
    are illustrated by Balthus in his painting which
    Kofman analyzes in her book. This painting.

21
Emphasis (Stress)
  • What are some key points of advice?
  • Shift less important information to the left.
  • Shift more important information to the right.
  • Extract and Isolate
  • Dont put the most important ideas in the middle
    of the sentence.
  • Sometimes you should break a sentence in two for
    emphasis and clarity.
  • Remember these are tools not rules!

22
What are some syntactic devices to employ?
  • Examples
  • There are important benefits to the doctrine of
    determinism.
  • What is most important is the relationship
    between subject and object.
  • It is well-explained in Ethics that determinism
    has important practical benefits.

23
A Coherent Paragraph
  • Paragraph Issue (short opening segment
    identifying topic)
  • Discussion (longer following segment explaining
    topic)
  • Psychological Topics and Grammatical Topics
  • As for phenomenology, it is not clear how it will
    be developed in the 21st century.
  • I cannot explain the reasons for a sound defense
    of free will.
  • The reasons for a sound defense of free will, I
    cannot explain.

24
A Coherent Paragraph
  • Main Principles, pp. 81-82
  • Themes conceptually related words
  • Thematic strings sequences of themes
  • Topic strings and thematic strings are the frame
    within which you develop new ideas.

25
A Coherent Paragraph
  • Diagnosis and Revision, pp. 94-95
  • Whats the point?
  • Point the specific sentence on the page that
    the writer would send as a telegram if asked
    Whats your point?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com