Title: fighting for private businesses since 1977
1Age Discrimination update on government
policies and how smaller firms are responding
Victoria Carson Campaigns Manager Forum of
Private Business (FPB)
Tuesday 01 May 2007
2Agenda
- The Forum of Private Business
- The regulation - information provision and costs
to smaller firms - Smaller firm response to an ageing workforce
3The FPB
- FPB represents 25,000 privately owned businesses
in the UK - Together those 25,000 businesses represent
600,000 employees - We are a non party political organisation
4Our mission statement
- The Forum of Private Business fights for the fair
treatment of private businesses by
decision-makers and supports the profitable
growth of members
5Age Discrimination the demographic
- Aging population
- Projected future age of the workforce
- Rise in regulations
6Age Discrimination the regulation
- Scope of the regulation
- Information provision to businesses
- Costs for smaller employers
-
- Impact
7Scope
- Applies to recruitment, promotion and training
- No unjustified retirement ages of below 65
- Removes the upper age limit for unfair dismissal
and redundancy rights - Removes age limits for Statutory Sick Pay,
Statutory Maternity Pay, and Statutory Paternity
Pay
8Information provision
- Provision of information from Government
- early promises to publish age regulations early
in 2004, giving employers at least two years to
prepare, not adhered to - Business friendly guidance is crucial, but
lacking - Government guidance was complex. Smaller
businesses rely heavily on advice from the
providers of relevant employee benefit schemes.
This was thought to be lacking
9Costs
10Small firm response
- Dangerous wait and see approach
- As a result of the lack of useable information
many businesses are taking a wait and see
approach. Failure to comply could result in high
costs or closure, however many businesses are
unsure what to do and are waiting for case law to
point the way forward
11Small firm response
- Pensions
- Specifically our members have reported changes
to their pension schemes. In particular to cover
employees under 25 years of age - Recruitment
- Restrictions to recruitment advertising have
made it difficult for the smaller employer to
recruit effectively - Healthcare
- We do not have data on this yet but members are
likely to incur the cost of providing health
insurance to older employees - Retirement age and policies
- Almost a third of organisations already have no
mandatory retirement age (CIPD Oct 2005) this
growth in flexible retirement policies may be
adversely affected if they now have to introduce
a default age and new processes
12Conclusion
there is a danger that Information provision
regarding employee benefits packages is essential
for smaller businesses to cope with the
changes By imposing minimum standards in this
manner, it can foster a box ticking culture
rather than a diversity culture Tribunal claims
may increase resulting in increased costs all
round Businesses may fear the recruitment
process/employing in case they step out of
line
13The Forum of Private Business (FPB)
- The FPB fights for fair treatment of private
businesses by decision-makers and supports the
profitable growth of members. - Victoria.carson_at_fpb.org
- www.fpb.org