Contracts: Parol Evidence Rule and Interpretation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Contracts: Parol Evidence Rule and Interpretation

Description:

Convey (i.e. transfer title to) land. Suretyship (answering for the debt or default of another) Contracts which by their terms are not to be performed within one year ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:177
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Contracts: Parol Evidence Rule and Interpretation


1
Contracts Parol Evidence Rule and Interpretation
  • Anglo-American Law 2003

2
Which contracts must be in writing? (Statute of
Frauds)
  • Convey (i.e. transfer title to) land
  • Suretyship (answering for the debt or default of
    another)
  • Contracts which by their terms are not to be
    performed within one year
  • Promise in consideration of marriage
  • Contract for sale of goods

3
Parol Evidence Rule I
  • Bars evidence relating to terms agreed (orally or
    in writing) on prior to integrated writing
  • Bars evidence of terms agreed on orally at time
    of creation of written agreement
  • Policy encourages complete, clear written
    agreements, minimizes disputes. Also
  • When parties intend a writing to be final and
    complete, we should enforce their desire to
    supersede all previous written agreements
  • Writing should be privileged over contemporaneous
    oral agreements (discourages perjury).

4
  • A total integration that is, a contract which
    the parties intend to be final and complete may
    not be contradicted or supplemented.
  • A partial integration (a writing which the the
    parties intend to be final but not complete) may
    not be contradicted, but may be supplemented by
    additional terms.

5
How to tell whether Integration is Total
  • Merger Clause
  • Contract appears to be total integration, but no
    merger clause.
  • Willistons view would it have been natural
    for the parties to have negotiated a side
    agreement?
  • If no, contract is total integration, and no
    parol evidence admissible.
  • If yes, additional terms which are consistent may
    be supplied by parol evidence.
  • Note Parol Evidence Rule does not bar evidence
    of subsequent agreements supported by independent
    consideration

6
Interpretation Rules Part I
  • Applied in 2 settings
  • ascertain whether a proposed additional term is
    contradictory/complementary (for statute of
    frauds purposes
  • Resolve disputes over meaning of contract terms

7
Interpretation Rules Part II
  • Plain meaning
  • Course of dealing/course of performance
  • Usage of trade
  • Under modern common law, course of dealing and
    trade usage can trump plain meaning
  • U.C.C. changes this.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)