1 Nature of contract - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

1 Nature of contract

Description:

Where people make law for themselves. Where people can express their individual preferences ... In his exuberance he injures the horse by riding too hard. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:845
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: jpkcJ
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 1 Nature of contract


1
  • 1 Nature of contract
  • 2 Elements of contract formation
  • 3 Offer
  • 4 Acceptance
  • 5 Consideration
  • 6 Intention to create legal relations
  • 7 Capacity to contract
  • 8 Legality of object
  • 9 Requirement of writing
  • 10 Contract interpretation

2
1 Nature of contract
  • 1.1 Contract
  • A promise or set of promises which the law will
    enforce.
  • China an agreement the law will enforce.

3
  • 1.2 Contract law
  • Where people make law for themselves
  • Where people can express their individual
    preferences
  • It accommodates most relationships with minimum
    conflict
  • The prime example of law in its facilitative role.

4
2 Elements of contract formation
  • (1) Offer
  • (2) Acceptance
  • (3) Consideration
  • (4) Intention to create legal relations
  • (5) Capacity to contract
  • (6) Legality of object
  • (7) Requirement of writing

5
3 Offer
  • 3.1 Nature
  • (1) A tentative promise made by offeror subject
    to conditions or containing a request to the
    offeree
  • (2) Invitation to treat, invitation to offer
  • Display of goods
  • Mail of catalogue
  • Newspaper mass media advertisement

6
  • (3)Exception
  • Advertisement selling fixed number of items at
    fixed price on first come first to serve basis
  • Reward advertisement
  • 3.2 Communication
  • (1)Orally, or in writing, or by gesture
  • (2)Offer is communicated upon receipt.

7
  • (3) Offeree can not accept an offer until first
    learning of it.
  • One may find and return a lost article to the
    owner unaware of the reward ad. N.
  • Cross offer
  • A writes to B offering to sell her car for 100
    and B has written a letter crossing As letter
    proposing to buy As car for 100. No contract
    unless anyone makes subsequent acceptance.

8
  • 3.3 Standard form (model form)
  • (1) See back, see the reverse side, or
    notices
  • (2) Document provider adequate notice to
    offeree. Else, invalid.

9
  • 3.4 Lapse and revocation
  • (1) Lapse
  • Expiration if time is fixed
  • After reasonable time
  • Either party dies or becomes incompetent
  • (2) Revocation
  • Withdraw anytime before acceptance
  • Effective upon receipt by offeree

10
Case study
  • A sends a letter dated March 5 to B offering to
    sell its house for 1000, saying the offer is
    open until March 9 and it must have heard from B
    by then. B receives it on March 6 and immediately
    prepares letter of acceptance. Before B delivers
    his acceptance in the morning of March 7, A
    changes its mind and calls B saying it cancels
    the offer.

Revocation is valid.
11
  • (3) Rejection
  • Is this good (best) price?
  • (4) Counter offer
  • It is the rejection of previous offer and birth
    of new offer

12
4 Acceptance
  • 4.1 Positive nature
  • (1) Words or conduct
  • Habitual act
  • (2) Silence
  • Offeror normally cant stipulate it as mode of
    acceptance
  • Habitually used, or agreed in advance Y

13
  • 4.2 Communication
  • (1) Same or advantageous method of communication
  • (2) By stipulated method as per offerors advice
  • (3) Post rule (telegram)
  • Valid upon dropping the letter in mailbox
  • Exception offeror stipulated speedier method
    than post
  • (4) Unilateral contract no communication
  • (5) Other situations
  • Valid upon receipt of acceptance
  • Telephone dead line, acceptance is ineffective.

14
  • 4.3 Place of formation
  • (1) Contract is formed in the place where the
    acceptance takes effect.
  • (2) Instantaneous communication place where
    offeror receives acceptance

15
5 Consideration
  • 5.1 Meaning
  • It is the price for which the promise of the
    other is bought
  • Exchange of promise contract
  • Any party have both gains and losses

16
  • 5.2 What constitute consideration?
  • (1) Anything having market value
  • (2) Exception
  • Love
  • Gratitude
  • Past consideration

17
  • 5.3 Adequacy
  • (1) No requirement exchange of equal value
  • (2) 1 is adequate consideration

18
Case study
  • Adams, creditor of Brown, threatened to sue Brown
    for the debt of 1000. Cox, friend of Brown,
    then promised to pay Adams the debt if Adams
    would refrain from suing, and Adams agreed. If
    Cox failed to pay Adams as agreed, and Adams sued
    him for breach of contract, Adams would succeed.

Forbearance to sue is adequate consideration.
19
  • 5.4 Gratuitous promises N
  • (1) Gift promise is gratuitous, not amount to
    contract for lack of consideration.
  • (2) Promisor isnt bound by gratuitous promise,
    once he undertakes the performance of it, he
    should do it without negligence. He is liable, if
    he injure the promisee.
  • 5.5 Motive contrasted with consideration past
    consideration, N
  • (1) Motive is irrelevant. It does not affect
    the question of consideration.

20
Case study
  • Adams saved Bodnar from drowning. Afterwards
    Bodnar promised to pay Adams 100 out of
    gratitude. Bodnars promise was made for past
    consideration, therefore unenforceable.

21
  • 5.6 Existing legal duty N
  • (1) Statutory duty N
  • Police, teacher, etc.
  • A promise to members of crew to increase their
    pay if they dont desert the ship, is
    unenforceable.

22
  • (2) Existing contractual duty N
  • Shield against economic blackmail construction
    firm
  • Add difficulty for contract modification in
    order for it to be enforceable, peppercorn type
    negligible value or under seal may be good choice.

23
  • 5.7 Gratuitous reduction of debt N
  • (1) Consideration makes debt reduction difficult.
  • (2) Way out
  • Time is of value. Payment before due date is
    sufficient consideration.
  • Trade the debt with object of negligible value.
  • Third party purchases the debt from the creditor
    debt transaction.
  • Creditor agrees in writing and under seal to
    reduce the debt.

24
  • A owed B 1000 falling due on March 1. B needed
    money urgently. He would not care if A could not
    repay the same amount. His reduction of the debt
    can only be enforceable under the following
    manners

? B agreed to reduce it to 800, in return A
would repay him before March1.
? B agreed to abandon the debt, in return A gave
him something of value, e.g., a watch
? As friend, C agreed to pay B 800, in return B
would refrain from suing A.
? A and B made the debt reduction agreement in
writing and under seal.
25
6 Intention to create legal relations
  • 6.1 Business agreement
  • (1) Rule such intention is presumed present.
  • (2) Exception hard evidence to prove that they
    are not serious.
  • 6.2 Family, domestic arrangement
  • (1) Rule such intention is presumed not
    present.
  • (2) Exception hard evidence to prove that they
    are serious.
  • (3) Reliance cost, pre-contract fault liability

26
7 Capacity to contract
  • 7.1 Minors
  • (1) Necessaries enforceable
  • Two criteria determining necessity must be
    necessary in relation to his station in life
    must not already have adequate stock of them.
  • Food, clothing, lodging, medical attention, legal
    advice and transport Y
  • Expensive jewelry, love N
  • Only liable for reasonable price, not contract
    price. In Chinese tong sou wu qi

27
  • (2) Not liable for non-necessaries
  • May repudiate if the goods are still in his
    possession
  • If he sells, cant repudiate unless returns the
    money paid.
  • People trading with minor run two risks whether
    he will pay for it whether he will refund.
  • (3) Contract indirectly affecting minor
  • Adult can recover money lent to minor only if in
    fact used for necessities.
  • If it is spent at races, lender cant recover it.
  • Exemption from contract liability, no exemption
    from tort liability.

28
Case study
  • A minor hires a riding horse promising to handle
    with care. In his exuberance he injures the horse
    by riding too hard.
  • The owner cant sue A for breach of contract for
    riding horse is non-necessary. He may not A for
    tort of negligence either. He can only sue A
    something outside of the contract.

29
  • (5) Upon attaining majority
  • Repudiate non-necessity contract acquiring
    permanent continuous interest. Else, enforceable.
  • Ratify non-necessity contract without continuous
    interest, then enforceable.

30
  • 7.2 Other person of diminished capacity
  • (1) Unsound mind
  • (2) Incapacitated through drink or drugs
  • (3) Protection similar to minors.
  • 7.3 Corporations
  • (1) It can make any contract that natural
    person does. Most company laws adopt this.
  • (2) Ultra vires abandoned
  • 7.4 Bankrupt debtors
  • (1) Under certain contractual disabilities,
    until he receives a discharge from the court.

31
8 Legality of object
  • 8.1 Void v Illegal contract
  • (1) Void restore to position before contract
    was attempted.
  • (2) Illegal contract no remedy for plaintiff.
    If property has been transferred, no recovery
    will be allowed.
  • 8.2 Illegal by statute
  • (1) smuggling, drug traffic, sex dealing etc.

32
  • 8.3 Illegal by common law and public policy
  • (1) Contract contemplating the commission of
    tort, is illegal.
  • (2) Promise to pay witness for appearing or not
    appearing to give evidence in criminal procedure
    is illegal.
  • 8.4 Void by statute
  • (1) Any provision in employment contract
    depriving employees protection of Workers
    Compensation Act.
  • (2) Bankruptcy Act transfer of property by
    gift or at inadequate price 12 months before
    bankruptcy is void.

33
9 Requirement of writing
  • (1) Contract concerning interests in land
  • (2) Not to be performed by either party with 1
    year
  • (3) Ratifying minors contract
  • (4) Guarantee
  • (5) Arrangement made in consideration of marriage
  • (6) Executors promise to answer damages out of
    his own estate

34
10 Contract interpretation
  • 10.1 Express terms
  • (1) Plain-meaning (strict) approach, liberal
    approach
  • 10.2 Parol Evidence rule oral evidence
  • 10.3 Implied terms as a method of interpretation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com