Title: TCRP Slides
1NCHRP Project 20-65 Research for the AASHTO
Standing Committee on Public Transportation
2Objective
- The objective of Project 20-65 is to provide
flexible, ongoing, quick-response research on
public transportation issues in support of SCOPT
and State DOT activities.
3Project Panel
- John Dockendorf, Pennsylvania DOT (Chair)
- Mr. Charles Carr, Mississippi DOT
- Edward Coven, Florida DOT
- Ms. Diane Davidson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Ron Epstein, New York State DOT
- Ms. Gale Ogawa, California DOT
- Mr. Michael Sanders, Connecticut DOT
- Mr. David T. Spacek, Illinois DOT
4Project Panel (Cont)
- Mr. Harlan Miller, FHWA Liaison
- Lorna R. Wilson, FTA Liaison
- Shayne Gill, AASHTO Liaison
- Richard Weaver, APTA Liaison
- Mr. Christopher Zeilinger, CTAA Liaison
- Peter Shaw, TRB Liaison
- Gwen Chisholm Smith, NCHRP Staff
- Ms. Janet Weaver, Consultant
5NCHRP Funding Allocations to Date
- FY 2004 300,000
- FY 2005 300,000
- FY 2006 300,000
- FY 2007 250,000
- FY 2008 250,000
- FY 2009 300,000
- Requested in FY 2010 350,000
6Allocation Guidelines
- Research need
- Policy-related and technical issues
- Not editorial in nature
- New product or upgrading an existing item
- For SCOPT use with widespread benefits throughout
State DOTs and the transit industry - Within available Project 20-65 funds
- Beyond the capabilities of SCOPT
-
7Allocation Guidelines (cont)
- Small or moderate in scale
- Less than 100,000
- Usually 10,000 to 50,000
- Short in duration (Usually
- Not a continuing operational activity
- Urgent ready to begin now
- Not able to wait for regular NCHRP/TCRP
- Not inappropriate for the TRB/NCHRP
8Research Topics Solicitation
- Research topics are solicited from SCOPT, the
20-65 project panel, members of AASHTOs MTAP,
members of APTAs State Affairs Committee, and
the staffs of AASHTO, FTA, CTAA, and APTA.
9Consultant Selection
- Currently, a solicitation is prepared for each
topic and sent to the task-order contractors
selected competitively for NCHRP 20-65 Projects .
These task order contractors submit proposals,
as interested. The 20-65 panel reviews the
proposals and selects the contractor for each
topic.
10New Task Order Contractors
- 8 Proposals received
- 6 selected
11Status
- Studies Funded To Date 26 studies, totaling
1,675,000 have been funded to date. - Studies Requested Last Year 16 topics, totaling
1,650,000 were proposed in 2008 (FY 2009). - Studies Funded Last Year 5 topics, totaling
300,000 were funded in 2008 (FY 2009). - Studies Completed To Date/Last Year 18 studies
have been completed to date, including 2 studies
completed in 2008
12Tasks Authorized to Date
- Task 1. Research Agenda/Potential Roles of
SCOPT, 50,000 (Results Provided to SCOPT) - Task 2. Toolbox for Promoting the Transit Bus
Safety and Security Program in Your State,
75,000 (Results Posted on CUTR Model Bus Safety
and Security Program Website) - Task 3. Availability and Accessibility of
Liability and Excess Insurance For Public Transit
and Private Coach Operators, 75,000 (Published
as NCHRP Research Results Digest 295) - Task 4. Impacts of the U.S.'s Aging Population
and Changed Demographics on Public
Transportation, Including ADA Paratransit, Over
the Next Ten Years, 75,000 (Published as
Web-Only Document 86)
13Tasks Authorized to Date, (Cont)
- Task 5. Transit Oriented Development Developing
a Strategy to Measure Success, 25,000
(Published as NCHRP Research Results Digest 294 ) - Task 6. Comparative Review and Analysis of State
Transit Funding Programs, 100,000(Published as
NCHRP Report 569 ) - Task 7. Evaluation of States Ability to Have
Adequate Staff Resources to Implement Federal
Public Transportation Programs,
100,000(Published as NCHRP Research Results
Digest 314 ) - Task 10. FMCSA Regulations as They Apply to FTA
Section 5310/5311 Providers A Handbook,
75,000(Published as NCHRP Research Results
Digest 311)
14Tasks Authorized to Date, (Cont)
- Task 12. Cost-Allocation Methods for Commuter,
Intercity and Freight Operations on Shared-Use
Rail Systems and Corridors, 75,000(Published as
NCHRP Research Results Digest 313 ) - Task 13, State Public Transportation Division
Involvement in State Emergency Planning,
Response, and Recovery, 100,000 (Published as
NCHRP Research Results Digest 326 ) - Task 14, Current Practice and Future Guidance on
the Development of SAFETEA-LU- Required
Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan, 100,000 ( In Publication)
15Tasks Authorized to Date, (Cont)
- Task (15), Updated Research Agenda for State DOT
Public Transportation Divisions and NCHRP Project
20-65, 50,000 (Completed-Results provided to
SCOPT) - Task (16), Current State Eligibility Requirements
for Grantees to Qualify for Federal Section 5310
and 5311 Funds, 25,000 (Completed-Results
provided to SCOPT)
16- Task 17, Compliance Monitoring Tools, 100,000
(Completion expected in April 2009) Cambridge
Systematics, Sue Knapp - Objectives Develop a handbook that includes a)
compliance monitoring tools currently in use by
State DOTs in oversight of their subrecipients of
federal funds (can also include oversight of
recipients of state grants) b) an evaluation of
those tools and c) drafts of new tools (i.e.,
model tools) derived from the evaluation of
existing tools. -
17- Task 18, State DOT Best Practices for Developing
a Title VI Civil Rights Program Document,
50,000 (Completion expected in March 2009)
Cambridge Systematics/ Sue Knapp - Objectives Identify and document best practices
for the following components of a Title VI Civil
Rights program document - Procedures used to certify that the statewide
transportation planning process complies with
Title VI, - Procedures the State DOT uses to pass-through FTA
financial assistance in a non-discriminatory
manner,
18Task 18, State DOT Best Practices for Developing
a Title VI Civil Rights Program Document,
- Procedures the State DOT uses to provide
assistance to potential sub-recipients applying
for funding in a non-discriminatory manner, - Procedures the State DOT uses to monitor it
sub-recipients for compliance with Title VI, - Procedures for filing Title VI civil rights
complaints with State DOTs, - Plan for providing access to meaningful
activities and programs for persons with limited
English proficiency, - Notices issued by State DOTs to beneficiaries of
their rights under Title VI, and - Steps taken with public outreach and involvement
activities to ensure that minority persons have
meaningful access to State DOT activities
19- Task 19, Utilization by States of the
Flexibility to Transfer Federal Funds Among
Eligible Federal Programs, 25,000 (Completion
expected in January 2009) AECOM/Mark Schofield - Objective Determine which states have utilized
the option to transfer funds from one or more,
eligible federal programs for the last three
federal fiscal years. An analysis should be
conducted that identifies the specific federal
programs involved in these transfers, the amount
and percentage of eligible federal funds
transferred, the reasons for these transfers, and
the resulting benefits of these actions. -
20- Task 20, Analysis of Rural Intercity Bus
Strategy ,50,000 (Completion expected in March
2009) Cambridge Systematics, Sue Knapp - Objectives of this research are
- 1)Â Â Â Â Â To conduct a sample of states intercity
bus providers and onboard survey. The survey
should provide information on the current
intercity rural service network, describing
miles, demographics of ridership and
origin/destination of riders. - 2)     Develop an organized matrix of the
information revealed from the surveys. The matrix
should inform states on how to best make an
investment given their scenario/rural conditions
and service network. - Â
21Task 20, Analysis of Rural Intercity Bus
Strategy ,50,000, Cont
- 3)Â Â Â Â Â Develop a methodology to estimate the
value of filling the broken connections of
service using the information on current service
to inform on those areas where service is
currently not available.  Would adding services
to fill gaps create meaningful access for rural
travel or does the service benefit travelers
going through state. Provide on information on
how far rural passengers wish to travel when they
use intercity bus?
22- Task 21, Cost/Benefit Analysis of Converting a
Lane for Bus Rapid Transit, 50,000, (Completion
expected in September 2009) ICF Consulting, Inc
Karen Savage -
- Objectives Develop a tool to help practitioners
analyze the effectiveness and public feasibility
of converting an existing lane to a High
Occupancy Vehicle Lane or other means of
providing increased people throughput. - Â
23Studies that will be initiated in 2009
24Task 22, Cost/Benefit Analysis of Converting a
Lane for Bus Rapid Transit Phase II Evaluation
and Methodology.
- The project will develop a cost/benefit analysis
tool for practitioners to use to determine if
converting a mixed flow traffic lane to a BRT
(bus only)/HOVL is effective on the State Highway
System and feasible to the public. (100,000/12
months)
25Task 23, Identification of State and Local
Matching Fund Requirements for State Administered
Federal and State Public Transportation Programs.
- This project will document the current policies
and procedures utilized by states DOTs for their
use of Section 5311 funds for intercity bus
services. This project will also identify best
practices used by states for administration of
the 5311 program. (50,000/6months)
26Task 24, State DOT Role in the Implementation of
Transportation Demand Management Programs.
- This research will examine TDM programs
nationwide from the perspective of what the state
DOTs role is in program implementation and
support. It will identify several states at the
forefront in this area, examine and assess their
programs, and report on the observed benefits and
pitfalls. It will make recommendations based on
these states experiences on how states may go
about implementing TDM programs. (50,000/ 6
months)
27Task 25, Evaluate requirements for the
utilization of Section 5311(f) Funds for
Intercity Bus Service.
- This project will document the current policies
and procedures utilized by applicable state DOTs
for their use of Section 5311 funds for intercity
bus services. The project will also identify
some of the better practices utilized by states
for the administration of this program.
(50,000/6months)
28Task 26, An Analysis of States Implementation of
the FTA 5310, 5316, and 5317 Programs.
- This project will evaluate states implementation
of the first 3 years of FTA funding for these
programs. It will determine the degree of
success states are having in awarding the funds,
and will analyze the extent to which the programs
objectives are being met. Recommendations will
be made that will help formulate the states
positions regarding whether or how these programs
should be changed in the upcoming
reauthorization. (50,000/6months)
29QUESTIONS????
30CONTACT INFORMATION
- Gwen Chisholm Smith
- National Academies
- Transportation Research Board
- Cooperative Research Programs
- 500 5th Street, N.W.
- Washington, D.C 20001
- 202-334-3246
- 202-334-2006 Fax
- gsmith_at_nas.edu
- WWW.TRB.ORG