Title: Assessment of conscientiousness and its relation to professionalism
1 Assessment of conscientiousness and its
relation to professionalism
- John C. McLachlan
- School of Medicine and Health
- Durham University
- j.c.mclachlan_at_durham.ac.uk
2 Jane Macnaughton
Marina Sawdon
Gabrielle Finn
3Metrics
The Conscientiousness Index
Validity
Practicality
Reliability
4Durham Undergraduate Medicine Programme
- 2 year Phase 1 programme
- 102 students
- Case based with early exposure to patients
- Subsequently join with Newcastle students and go
to Base Units across the North East
5Assessment in the Professional Behaviour Domain
- Objective testing of cognitive knowledge through
MCQs and EMIs - Subjective testing of knowledge and awareness in
SAQs and Data Interpretation questions - Analysis of reflection in written assignments and
reports - Formative assessment of portfolio
- No assessment of behaviours
6Approaches currently being explored in the Durham
programme
- MultiSource Feedback
- Significant Event Recording
- Conscientiousness Index (CI)
- (In press in Academic Medicine)
7There is evidence that concerns about
undergraduate programme performance are a risk
factor for subsequent disciplinary action
- 1. Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu
ND. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is
associated with subsequent disciplinary action by
a state medical board. Acad Med. 2004 79244-9. - 2. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler
TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT, Veloski JJ, Hodgson CS.
Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior
behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med. 2005
3532673-82. - 3. Teherani A, Hodgson CS, Banach M, Papadakis
MA. Domains of unprofessional behavior during
medical school associated with future
disciplinary action by a state medical board.
Acad Med. 2005 80(10 Suppl)S17-20.
8Conscientiousness Index1 point awarded if
student has
- Respond on immune status after 2nd request
- Provided information on criminal record status
after 2nd request - Provided photograph after 2nd request
- Completed each Edpac examination sheet correctly
after induction session and formative practice
9Conscientiousness Index1 point awarded if
student has
- Attended each compulsory class or provided
satisfactory explanation - Submitted each assignment on time or provided
satisfactory explanation - Completed each module evaluation form when
requested, after induction session - Completed other required activities (e.g. Base
Unit Allocation form) when requested
10CI points can be deducted
- If an individual student fails to carry out an
action unique to them which they could reasonably
be expected to do - e.g. Failure to respond to staff e-mails
requiring a response after the third e-mail has
been opened and read. - e.g. Failure to keep an appointment with a staff
member after it has been explicitly agreed - e.g. Failure to return library material after
repeated requests - (Serious incidents are the subject of a
Significant Event Procedure or Fitness to
Practice Procedure rather than deduction of a CI
point) -
11Additional CI points can be awarded
- If a student displays unusual professionalism in
difficult circumstances - e.g. responding well to a medical emergency
- e.g. volunteering to assist others when unaware
of implications for CI points -
12Metrics
The Conscientiousness Index
Validity
Practicality
Reliability
13Typical Distribution
14CI parameters
15Metrics
The Conscientiousness Index
Validity
Practicality
Reliability
16Validity 1 staff estimates
- Take ten top, middle and bottom scores from each
year - Give experienced staff a randomised list and ask
to rate professionalism - Ratings are I am happy with this students
approach to professionalism, I have concerns
about this students approach to professionalism
and Dont know this student well enough to
comment
17(No Transcript)
18Validity 1
- More unknowns in Year 1 than Year 2
- (77 versus 61)
- More unknowns in middle group
- (43 vs 56 vs 39)
- Combining both year groups, 67 out of 79 Concerns
in lowest group, 9 in middle and 3 in top - Of 14 Critical Incident forms, 10 in lowest 10
- Correlates moderately with exam performance but
not with current Professional Behaviour measure
19Validity 2 student estimates
- Invite students to name most professional and
least professional peers - Correlate most professional and least
professional scores with CI - No correlation between most professional
rankings and CI - Highly significant correlations between least
professional scores and CI - Spearmans Rho -.257 (p 0.002) for Year 1 and
- Spearmans Rho -.314 (p 0.006) for Year 2)
20Metrics
The Conscientiousness Index
Validity
Practicality
Reliability
21Reliability 1
- When the academic year is split into two, and
performance on the first half year compared to
the performance on the second half year, the
Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient is 0.60 for
Year 2 and 0.59 for Year 1
22Reliability 2
- How stable are findings from year to year?
23Is there a correlation between year 1 and year 2
CI scores?
24How do students change from year 1 to year 2?
25Is there a difference between males and females
in CI scores?
26Is there a difference between school leavers and
graduate entrants in CI scores?
27Metrics
The Conscientiousness Index
Validity
Practicality
Reliability
28Practicality
- Objective
- Can largely be done by admin staff
- Does not require a decision to report
- Runs continuously all year
- Requires registers to be taken
- Requires centralisation of information previously
gathered but not collated
29Summary
- Low CI is valid by 2 independent measures as a
measure of lack of professionalism - It is reliable within and between years as a
strong educational effect - It is practical (low cost and easy to
administer) - The property it measures is objective and scalar
30Potential uses
- Summative
- Used to determine progression. Can identify
outliers and major changes. Can be used to
explore failure to remediate - Formative
- Used for feedback to student
- Informative
- Used to inform the organisation of potential
issues which may lie far in the future