Title: Prestressed%20bolt%20joints%20under%20dynamical%20load
1Prestressed bolt joints under dynamical load
- Kerekes Ervin, Dr. Szabó Bertalan, Bernhard
Unger - Steyr-Daimler-Puch AG, Technologie Zentrum
Steyr - Department of Steel Structures, Technical
University of Budapest
2Contents
- Introduction (TZS BME)
- Tests (test bench, load spectras, failures)
- FE model (whole structure, simplified bolt model,
FE loads, stress distributions) - FEMFAT concept (theoretical background)
- Fatigue estimation (fatigue load, damage
distributions) - Comparison between the tests and the calculations
- Conclusions
3We can find everywhere bolt joints
L
Notch effect
Detachable
J
4Test bench
5Three different end plate versions
6The load spectras and the results of the tests
A2
A3
A1/1 and A1/2
7The half FE model of the test bench
Contact area
Contact area
8 Simplified FE model of the bolt joint
Advantages
- few number of elements
- linear
- very fast
- enough precision
9Load Case 1, Prestress of the bolts (minimal
load),
10Load Case 2, The total load (maximal load),
11FEMFAT technical contents
Technological influence factors
Load spectra
FE stress data (linear stress tensors)
FEMFAT
Material data
Endurance safety factor
Damage factor
Brake safety factor
12FEMFAT calculation concept
Load spectra
FE model
s
s
ai
s
i
mi
N
s
s
mi
ai
Neuber hypothesis
S/N curve
k
s
s
D1
ai
Relative stress gradient
s
D
N
D
e
s
S
D
mi
D2
i
s
c
k
D
c
N
.
D
s
D
.
c
s
k
m
i
.
c
s
m
Dn
13Load case definition for Fatigue Analysis
Amplitude stress
Mean stress
14Damage distribution on A1/1 without sequence
effect
15Damage distribution on A1/2 without sequence
effect
16Damage distribution on the A1/1 and the A1/2
cases with sequence effect
- In the A1/1 case on the flange plate
- In the A1/2 case on the flange plate
17The photos of the breaks in the A1/1 and the A1/2
cases
Damage
Damage
!
18Comparison the tests and the FEMFAT results
Test break
FEMFAT calculation without sequence effect
FEMFAT calculation with sequence effect
19Why have we got difference?
Calculation side
Test side
- Linear and simplified hypothesis
- Material properties from literatures
- Simplified bolt model
- Lifetime sk ð small amplitude stress changing
means high lifetime changing !
- Test failures
- Too few tests
D1.77 D1.07 D0.67
20Conclusions
- From the tests and fatigue estimation we can say,
the dangerous places for this kind of load
conditions are the middle screw bores on the
flange plate. - The too high prestress is the reason of this weak
point - The prestresses on the bolts mean a constant
stress, and this is dominant for this type of
load.