Animal Cognition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Animal Cognition

Description:

We also consider how far the abilities of other species resemble our own. ... Koi Carp. Chickens. Rats. Human Infants. Studying animal abilities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2027
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: keithcl
Category:
Tags: animal | cognition

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Animal Cognition


1
Animal Cognition
  • Outline
  • The module investigates other species ability to
    learn, think and solve problems. We also consider
    how far the abilities of other species resemble
    our own.
  • The first half of the course considers learning,
    later sessions examine other abilities.
  • Assesment
  • Three class tests (20) and an unseen exam (80)
  • Set text
  • Wynne, C.D.L. (2001). Animal Cognition.
    Basingstoke Palgrave

2
Aims
  • By the end of todays session you should be able
    to
  • Describe key approaches to the study of animal
    behaviour
  • Identify some of the strengths and weaknesses of
    different methodologies for studying animal
    behaviour
  • Contrast proximate and ultimate causes of
    behaviour

3
Comparative Psychology is the scientific study of
animal behaviour.
  • It's roots go back at least to the 19th century.
  • As well as On the origin of species (1859)
    Charles Darwin published works on animal
    behaviour, including The expression of emotions
    in man and animals (1872).

4
Evolution
  • Darwins theory of evolution depends on three
    principles
  • Variation. There are differences between
    individuals
  • Transmission. Parents pass their characteristics
    on to their offspring
  • Natural selection. Some characteristics make it
    more likely that individuals will reproduce
    successfully.
  • If a particular behaviour pattern is claimed to
    have been selected through evolution then that it
    should be possible to show that the behaviour
    directly or indirectly increased reproductive
    success.

5
When studying animal behaviour we can ask two
types of questions
  • What Alcock (1993) calls 'how' questions.
  • How does a given individual produce the
    behaviour.
  • Such explanations could include the brain
    mechanisms producing the behaviour or the role of
    environmental stimuli and learning.
  • Concerned with the immediate or proximal causes
    of behaviour.
  • What Alcock (1993) calls 'why' questions
  • Why does the individual posses the ability?
  • Focus on the distal or ultimate causes of
    behaviour. How the individual came to be
    'designed' in such a way as to be capable of
    displaying the behaviour.
  • 'Why' questions ask what benefits the ability
    provides which allowed it to evolve. The adaptive
    significance of the behaviour.

6
Birdsong as an example
  • Many species of bird sing.
  • How questions
  • What brain structures are involved in learning
    production of song
  • How do environmental stimuli influence the song
    produced.
  • In white-crowned sparrows individuals learn their
    regional dialect during a critical period (Marler
    Tamura, 1964)
  • The ability to produce a normal song in adulthood
    also requires practice during a later stage of
    development (Konishi, 1964).

7
Birdsong as an example
  • Why questions
  • Why do some species sing, when others dont
  • Why do some species learn their song, while
    others have an innate song.
  • What functions does song serve?
  • Dialects might contribute to the separation of
    populations.
  • In laboratory studies female sparrows do prefer
    familiar songs (Baker, Spitler-Nabors Bradley,
    1982).
  • However, observations in the wild suggest dialect
    isnt a major influence on mate choice (Chilton,
    Lein Baptista, 1990).

8
Three big questions
  • How can we study the mental abilities of other
    species?
  • How do nature nurture contribute to animal
    behaviour?
  • What do the answers to these questions tell us
    about human behaviour?

9
Animal intelligence
  • Brain weight is roughly proportional to body
    weight.
  • By expressing brain weight as a function of body
    weight, it is possible to obtain a measure of
    relative brain weight.
  • We can ask whether differences in brain size are
    associated with differences in general
    intelligence or with differences in particular
    specialized abilities.
  • We can also ask whether the rapid expansion of
    the brain in human evolution was a cause or
    consequence of changes in behaviour.

10
Cephalization index Brain weight/body weight2/3.
Data from Russell (1979)
11
Comparing species
  • Angermeier (1984) reviewed studies of the number
    of rewards necessary to train animals to repeat a
    simple response.
  • Species Guessed rank Actual rank Number
  • (1 fastest learner) of rewards
    needed
  • Bees
  • Koi Carp
  • Chickens
  • Rats
  • Human Infants

12
Studying animal abilities
  • Researchers need to be careful to draw justified
    conclusions from their observations. One danger
    is anthropomorphism, interpreting the behaviour
    of other species as if they were human.
  • Lloyd Morgans cannon
  • In no case may we interpret an action as the
    outcome of the exercise of a higher psychical
    faculty if it can be interpreted as the outcome
    of the exercise of one which stands lower in the
    psychological scale Morgan (1894)

13
Two approaches to the study of animal behaviour
  • American comparative psychology was influenced by
    behaviourism.
  • In mainland Europe, research into animal
    behaviour was influenced by Ethology.
  • Both approaches tended to view animal behaviour
    as mechanistic.
  • Interest in Animal Cognition is a more recent
    development.

14
Behaviourism
  • Founded by John B Watson (1913) who declared
    objective behaviour to be the only legitimate
    focus of psychology.
  • Saw Pavlov's research as providing the basis for
    understanding behaviour. Early theorists argued
    that all psychological events were built up from
    stimulus response links.
  • Research following on from this tradition
    involves laboratory study under controlled
    conditions.
  • Often this research ignored possible species
    differences.
  • Different strands within the comparative
    tradition differed in their views about the role
    of theory and the status of intervening events
    such as mental representations.

15
Ethology
  • Developed primarily in Europe. Ethology focussed
    on the observation of naturally occurring
    behaviour.
  • Famous early ethologists include Konrad Lorenz
    Niko Tinbergen. Lorenz is famous for his work on
    imprinting by young ducks on their mother.
    Tinbergen studied the begging response in gull
    chicks.
  • Explanations focus on instinctive behaviour
    patterns.
  • Differences between species were studied to
    identify the functions of particular traits.
  • Tinbergen (1963) argued that we need to
    understand the mechanisms, development, survival
    value and evolution of behaviour.

16
  • The ethologists argued that instinctive behaviour
    should be
  • Stereotyped
  • Species-specific
  • Appear in isolated individuals
  • Not require practice
  • Lorenz Tinbergen, (1938)
  • Early work in this tradition typically studied
    behaviours which met these criteria. However,
    modern approaches take a less restrictive view of
    instinct and do not draw as rigid a line between
    genetic and environmental influences. Genes and
    environment commonly interact.

17
Further Reading
  • Chapter one in Wynne (2001) Animal Cognition
    provides a good general introduction to some of
    the issues discussed.
  • Chapter nine considers species differences in
    intelligence.
  • Several classic papers including Watsons
    description of behaviourism Psychology as the
    Behaviourist sees it and papers by Darwin are
    available from Christopher Greens Classics in
    the History of Psychology site
    http//psychclassics.asu.edu/index.htm

18
Seminars
For seminars today youll be in the following
rooms. On weeks where there is a practical
demonstration or class test arrangements will
differ. See the seminar timetable for details.
Sessions with Sniffy are in the NT lab (T013).
NB an early version of this slide showed some
rooms as N block, rather than E block, rooms.
Groups may be reallocated based on attendance in
week one.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com