Title: False Confessions
1- False Confessions
-
- Police Interrogations
2Outline
- False Confessions
- The Reid model of interrogation
- Interrogations and the courts
- PEACE Model of Interviewing
3 4False Confession
- A false confession occurs when an individual
confesses to a crime they did not commit - or
- exaggerates their involvement in a crime they did
commit
5Incidence
- Bedeau Radelet (1987)
- 49 out of 350 cases
- Scheck, Neufeld, Dwyer (2000)
- 15 of 70 cases
- Innocence Project in NY City
- 35 out of 130 cases (DNA exonerations)
6Types of False Confessions
- a) Voluntary
- b) Coerced-compliant
- c) Coerced-internalized
7a) Voluntary False Confessions
- A voluntary false confession occurs without being
prompted by the police - Can be the result of
- an attempt to protect the real offender
- a desire for notoriety
- a need to be punished
- inability to distinguish fact from fantasy
8Charles Anne Lindberghs Baby Son
9b) Coerced-Compliant
- A coerced-compliant false confession The
confessor knows that they did not commit the
crime - Occurs in response to a desire to escape further
interrogation or to gain a promised reward - Most Common type
10Gerry Conlon and the IRA bombings
11c) Coerced-Internalized
- A coerced-internalized false confession The
confessor comes to believe that they did commit
the crime - Results from highly suggestive interrogations
- Some people are more susceptible to this type of
confession
12i) Vulnerable Memory
- Mentally weak (IQ lt 80)
- Drugged/Intoxicated
- Sleep Deprivation
- Interrogative Suggestibility
- State of Anxiety
13ii) Use of false evidence
- Failed fool-proof Polygraph test
- DNA found at crime scene
- Witness identified suspect
- Co-suspect implicated suspect in crime
14The Paul Ingram Case
15Characteristics of confessions?
- Younger gt Older
- Caucasians gt Blacks/Asians
- Females gt males
- First offenders gt previous convictions
- Property gt Violent
- Non-Serious gt Serious
- Strong evidence gt weak evidence
16Compliance and Suggestibility
- Compliance Tendency to go along with people in
authority (related to coerced-compliant
confessions) - Suggestibility Tendency to internalize
information communicated during questioning
(related to coerced-internalized confessions)
17False Confession Study
18False Confessions in the Laboratory
19Police Interrogations
20Police Investigations
- Rely on witnesses, victims, and suspects to fill
in the crime details - Evidence is collected through interviews,
interrogations, confessions, etc.
21Police Interrogations
- Obtain a confession (most important)
- Gain information that will further the
investigation (e.g., the location of evidence)
22The Coercive Nature of Police Interrogations
- History of coercive measures
- Mid-1900s whipping suspects was common
- 1980s stun guns used by the NYPD
- More recently psychological methods such as
trickery and deceit
23 24The Reid Model of Interrogation
- The Reid model is the most common interrogation
method used in Canada
25Reid Model.
- Involves 3 stages
- Gather evidence
- Conduct a non-accusatorial interview to assess
guilt (detecting deception) - Conduct an accusatorial interrogation to obtain a
confession -
26Step 1 Direct Positive Confrontation
- Certain and confident
- Fabricated evidence is good
- Pause, observe, repeat confrontation
- Passive reaction Deception
27Two Kinds of Suspects
28Step 2 Theme Development
- Possible themes for emotional suspects
- Anyone in situation would have done same
- Minimize crimes moral seriousness
- Suggest morally acceptable reasons
- Condemn others (e.g., victim)
29themes for emotional suspects
- Praise flattery
- Suspects role in crime has been exaggerated
- Not in suspects best interest to continue with
criminal activities
30Themes Non-emotional Suspects
- Catch them in a lie
- Get suspect associated with crime scene
- Non-criminal intent behind act
- No point in denying involvement
- Play one co-offender off the other
31Step 3 Do Not Allow Denials
- Guilty
- Hesitant
- Defensive
- Qualified
- Innocent
- Spontaneous
- Forceful
- Direct
- Eye-contact
- Leans forward in chair
- Assertive posture
32Steps 4 Overcoming Objections
Guilty
- Denial Objection
Withdrawal - Act here
Not Guilty
Continue With Plain Denials
33Steps 5 Procurement and Retention of Suspects
Attention
- Reduce psychological distance
34Step 6 Handling Passiveness
- Suspect about to give in
- Focus on central theme
- Crying/Blank stare Suspect ready to confess
35Step 7 Alternative Questions
- Present 2 options
- Best case
- Worse case
- Most important part of
- Reid technique
- Timing is critical
36Step 8 Orally Relate Offence Details
- Get full details of the crime
37Step 9 Convert Oral Confession into Written
Confession
- Written confession is more incriminating
38Reid Model of Interrogation
- The psychology behind this technique is to make
the anxiety associated with not confessing to the
crime greater than the anxiety related to the
consequences of confessing
39Problem 1 Detecting Deception?
- Reid technique based on deception detection
- People cant do it!
- The Kassin Fong (1999) Study
40Problem 2 Investigator Biases
- Assumption of Guilt
- Ask more guilt-presumptive questions
- More coercive
- More persistent
- More pressure
- Suspect gets defensive looks guilty by Reid
41Problem 3Coercive Tactics Interrogation
- Minimization Soft sell techniques that provide a
sense of false security - Maximization Scare tactics that intimidate
42Problem 4Suspect Vulnerabilities
- Current mental state
- Mentally weak (IQ lt 80)
- Drugged/Intoxicated
- Sleep Deprivation
- Compliance Suggestibility
- State of Anxiety
- Reading ability
- Understanding of legal rights
43Beyond False Confessions
- Inadmissible confessions that are TRUE!
- Coerced confessions resulting in resentment
- Coercion resulting in post-traumatic stress
disorder - Undermining public confidence
- The boomerang effect
44Confessions The Court of Law
45Admissibility of Confessions
- For confessions to be admitted into court they
must - Be given voluntarily
- Be given by a person who is competent
-
46Admissibility of Confessions
- Confessions that are obtained by overtly coercive
tactics (e.g., denying the suspect food) will not
be admissible in court - (R. v. Hoilett, 1999)
- More subtle forms of coercion (e.g., exaggerating
evidence) are acceptable in Canada (R v. Oickle,
2000)
47Whats Allowed in Canada?
- No Explicit Threats or Promises
- No Overt Oppression
- Must have Operating Mind
- Some Police Trickery OK
48PEACE model of Interviewing
- - Preparation and Planning
- - Engage and Explain
- - Account
- - Closure
- - Evaluation
49Preparation and Planning
- Interviewee characteristics
- Contribution to investigation
- Questions you want to ask
50Engage and Explain
- Introduction
- Address needs (e.g., washroom)
- Reason, Rights, Route Map, and Routines
51Account
- Get free narrative Dont interrupt!
- Probe the account
- Open, Probe, Summarize
- Challenge if needed
- Use evidence
- Inquisitorial approach
52Closure
- Review the account
- Answer any interviewee questions
- Get/Give contact information
53Evaluation
- Consider information gained
- Evaluate own performance
- Get supervisor to evaluate
- Should videotape all interviews
54PEACE vs. REID
- No attempt to detect deception
- Ties person into story vs. presenting up-front
- No coercive tactics
- Not focused on confessions
55PEACE Model
- Ethical and Inquisitorial Approach
- Elimination of coercive interrogations but same
level of confessions!