Title: Chapter Thirty-Six
1Chapter Thirty-Six
2Public Goods -- Definition
- A good is purely public if it is both
nonexcludable and nonrival in consumption. - Nonexcludable -- all consumers can consume the
good. - Nonrival -- each consumer can consume all of the
good.
3Public Goods -- Examples
- Broadcast radio and TV programs.
- National defense.
- Public highways.
- Reductions in air pollution.
- National parks.
4Reservation Prices
- A consumers reservation price for a unit of a
good is his maximum willingness-to-pay for it. - Consumers wealth is
- Utility of not having the good is
5Reservation Prices
- A consumers reservation price for a unit of a
good is his maximum willingness-to-pay for it. - Consumers wealth is
- Utility of not having the good is
- Utility of paying p for the good is
6Reservation Prices
- A consumers reservation price for a unit of a
good is his maximum willingness-to-pay for it. - Consumers wealth is
- Utility of not having the good is
- Utility of paying p for the good is
- Reservation price r is defined by
7Reservation Prices An Example
Consumers utility is
Utility of not buying a unit of good 2 is
Utility of buying one unit of good 2 atprice p is
8Reservation Prices An Example
Reservation price r is defined by
I.e. by
9When Should a Public Good Be Provided?
- One unit of the good costs c.
- Two consumers, A and B.
- Individual payments for providing the public good
are gA and gB. - gA gB ? c if the good is to be provided.
10When Should a Public Good Be Provided?
- Payments must be individually rational i.e.and
11When Should a Public Good Be Provided?
- Payments must be individually rational
i.e.and - Therefore, necessarily and
12When Should a Public Good Be Provided?
- And ifandthen it is Pareto-improving to supply
the unit of good
13When Should a Public Good Be Provided?
- And ifandthen it is Pareto-improving to supply
the unit of good, so is sufficient for it to be
efficient to supply the good.
14Private Provision of a Public Good?
- Suppose and .
- Then A would supply the good even if B made no
contribution. - B then enjoys the good for free free-riding.
15Private Provision of a Public Good?
- Suppose and .
- Then neither A nor B will supply the good alone.
16Private Provision of a Public Good?
- Suppose and .
- Then neither A nor B will supply the good alone.
- Yet, if also, then it is
Pareto-improving for the good to be supplied.
17Private Provision of a Public Good?
- Suppose and .
- Then neither A nor B will supply the good alone.
- Yet, if also, then it is
Pareto-improving for the good to be supplied. - A and B may try to free-ride on each other,
causing no good to be supplied.
18Free-Riding
- Suppose A and B each have just two actions --
individually supply a public good, or not. - Cost of supply c 100.
- Payoff to A from the good 80.
- Payoff to B from the good 65.
19Free-Riding
- Suppose A and B each have just two actions --
individually supply a public good, or not. - Cost of supply c 100.
- Payoff to A from the good 80.
- Payoff to B from the good 65.
- 80 65 gt 100, so supplying the good is
Pareto-improving.
20Free-Riding
Player B
DontBuy
Buy
Buy
Player A
DontBuy
21Free-Riding
Player B
DontBuy
Buy
Buy
Player A
DontBuy
(Dont Buy, Dont Buy) is the unique NE.
22Free-Riding
Player B
DontBuy
Buy
Buy
Player A
DontBuy
But (Dont Buy, Dont Buy) is inefficient.
23Free-Riding
- Now allow A and B to make contributions to
supplying the good. - E.g. A contributes 60 and B contributes 40.
- Payoff to A from the good 20 gt 0.
- Payoff to B from the good 25 gt 0.
24Free-Riding
Player B
DontContribute
Contribute
Contribute
Player A
DontContribute
25Free-Riding
Player B
DontContribute
Contribute
Contribute
Player A
DontContribute
Two NE (Contribute, Contribute) and (Dont
Contribute, Dont Contribute).
26Free-Riding
- So allowing contributions makes possible supply
of a public good when no individual will supply
the good alone. - But what contribution scheme is best?
- And free-riding can persist even with
contributions.
27Variable Public Good Quantities
- E.g. how many broadcast TV programs, or how much
land to include into a national park.
28Variable Public Good Quantities
- E.g. how many broadcast TV programs, or how much
land to include into a national park. - c(G) is the production cost of G units of public
good. - Two individuals, A and B.
- Private consumptions are xA, xB.
29Variable Public Good Quantities
- Budget allocations must satisfy
30Variable Public Good Quantities
- Budget allocations must satisfy
- MRSA MRSB are A Bs marg. rates of
substitution between the private and public
goods. - Pareto efficiency condition for public good
supply is
31Variable Public Good Quantities
- Pareto efficiency condition for public good
supply is - Why?
32Variable Public Good Quantities
- Pareto efficiency condition for public good
supply is - Why?
- The public good is nonrival in consumption, so 1
extra unit of public good is fully consumed by
both A and B.
33Variable Public Good Quantities
- Suppose
- MRSA is As utility-preserving compensation in
private good units for a one-unit reduction in
public good. - Similarly for B.
34Variable Public Good Quantities
- is the total payment
to A B of private good that preserves both
utilities if G is lowered by 1 unit.
35Variable Public Good Quantities
- is the total payment
to A B of private good that preserves both
utilities if G is lowered by 1 unit. - Since ,
making 1 less public good unit releases more
private good than the compensation payment
requires ? Pareto-improvement from reduced G.
36Variable Public Good Quantities
37Variable Public Good Quantities
- Now suppose
- is the total payment
by A B of private good that preserves both
utilities if G is raised by 1 unit.
38Variable Public Good Quantities
- Now suppose
- is the total payment
by A B of private good that preserves both
utilities if G is raised by 1 unit. - This payment provides more than 1 more public
good unit ? Pareto-improvement from increased G.
39Variable Public Good Quantities
- Hence, necessarily, efficient public good
production requires
40Variable Public Good Quantities
- Hence, necessarily, efficient public good
production requires - Suppose there are n consumers i 1,,n. Then
efficient public good production requires
41Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
42Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
- Two consumers, A and B.
-
-
- Utility-maximization requires
43Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
- Two consumers, A and B.
-
-
- Utility-maximization requires
- is is public good
demand/marg. utility curve i A,B.
44Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
pG
MUB
MUA
G
45Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
pG
MUAMUB
MUB
MUA
G
46Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
pG
MUAMUB
MC(G)
MUB
MUA
G
47Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
pG
MUAMUB
MC(G)
MUB
MUA
G
G
48Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
pG
MUAMUB
MC(G)
MUB
pG
MUA
G
G
49Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
pG
MUAMUB
MC(G)
MUB
pG
MUA
G
G
50Efficient Public Good Supply -- the Quasilinear
Preferences Case
pG
MUAMUB
MC(G)
MUB
pG
MUA
G
G
Efficient public good supply requires A B to
state truthfully their marginal valuations.
51Free-Riding Revisited
- When is free-riding individually rational?
52Free-Riding Revisited
- When is free-riding individually rational?
- Individuals can contribute only positively to
public good supply nobody can lower the supply
level.
53Free-Riding Revisited
- When is free-riding individually rational?
- Individuals can contribute only positively to
public good supply nobody can lower the supply
level. - Individual utility-maximization may require a
lower public good level. - Free-riding is rational in such cases.
54Free-Riding Revisited
- Given A contributes gA units of public good, Bs
problem issubject to
55Free-Riding Revisited
G
Bs budget constraint slope -1
gA
xB
56Free-Riding Revisited
G
Bs budget constraint slope -1
gA
is not allowed
xB
57Free-Riding Revisited
G
Bs budget constraint slope -1
gA
is not allowed
xB
58Free-Riding Revisited
G
Bs budget constraint slope -1
gA
is not allowed
xB
59Free-Riding Revisited
G
Bs budget constraint slope -1
(i.e. free-riding) is best for B
gA
is not allowed
xB
60Demand Revelation
- A scheme that makes it rational for individuals
to reveal truthfully their private valuations of
a public good is a revelation mechanism. - E.g. the Groves-Clarke taxation scheme.
- How does it work?
61Demand Revelation
- N individuals i 1,,N.
- All have quasi-linear preferences.
- vi is individual is true (private) valuation of
the public good. - Individual i must provide ci private good units
if the public good is supplied.
62Demand Revelation
- ni vi - ci is net value, for i 1,,N.
- Pareto-improving to supply the public good if
63Demand Revelation
- ni vi - ci is net value, for i 1,,N.
- Pareto-improving to supply the public good if
64Demand Revelation
- If andor
andthen individual j is pivotal i.e. changes
the supply decision.
65Demand Revelation
- What loss does a pivotal individual j inflict on
others?
66Demand Revelation
- What loss does a pivotal individual j inflict on
others? - If then is the loss.
67Demand Revelation
- What loss does a pivotal individual j inflict on
others? - If then is the
loss. - If then is the loss.
68Demand Revelation
- For efficiency, a pivotal agent must face the
full cost or benefit of her action. - The GC tax scheme makes pivotal agents face the
full stated costs or benefits of their actions in
a way that makes these statements truthful.
69Demand Revelation
- The GC tax scheme
- Assign a cost ci to each individual.
- Each agent states a public good net valuation,
si. - Public good is supplied if otherwise not.
70Demand Revelation
- A pivotal person j who changes the outcome from
supply to not supplypays a tax of
71Demand Revelation
- A pivotal person j who changes the outcome from
supply to not supplypays a tax of - A pivotal person j who changes the outcome from
not supply to supplypays a tax of
72Demand Revelation
- Note Taxes are not paid to other individuals,
but to some other agent outside the market.
73Demand Revelation
- Why is the GC tax scheme a revelation mechanism?
74Demand Revelation
- Why is the GC tax scheme a revelation mechanism?
- An example 3 persons A, B and C.
- Valuations of the public good are40 for A, 50
for B, 110 for C. - Cost of supplying the good is 180.
75Demand Revelation
- Why is the GC tax scheme a revelation mechanism?
- An example 3 persons A, B and C.
- Valuations of the public good are40 for A, 50
for B, 110 for C. - Cost of supplying the good is 180.
- 180 lt 40 50 110 so it is efficient to
supply the good.
76Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
77Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
- B Cs net valuations sum to(50 - 60) (110
- 60) 40 gt 0. - A, B Cs net valuations sum to
- (40 - 60) 40 20 gt 0.
78Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
- B Cs net valuations sum to(50 - 60) (110
- 60) 40 gt 0. - A, B Cs net valuations sum to
- (40 - 60) 40 20 gt 0.
- So A is not pivotal.
79Demand Revelation
- If B and C are truthful, then what net valuation
sA should A state?
80Demand Revelation
- If B and C are truthful, then what net valuation
sA should A state? - If sA gt -20, then A makes supply of the public
good, and a loss of 20 to him, more likely.
81Demand Revelation
- If B and C are truthful, then what net valuation
sA should A state? - If sA gt -20, then A makes supply of the public
good, and a loss of 20 to him, more likely. - A prevents supply by becoming pivotal, requiring
sA (50 - 60) (110 - 60) lt 0I.e. A must
state sA lt -40.
82Demand Revelation
- Then A suffers a GC tax of -10 50 40,
- As net payoff is - 20 - 40 -60 lt -20.
83Demand Revelation
- Then A suffers a GC tax of -10 50 40,
- As net payoff is - 20 - 40 -60 lt -20.
- A can do no better than state the truth sA
-20.
84Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
85Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
- A Cs net valuations sum to(40 - 60) (110
- 60) 30 gt 0. - A, B Cs net valuations sum to
- (50 - 60) 30 20 gt 0.
86Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
- A Cs net valuations sum to(40 - 60) (110
- 60) 30 gt 0. - A, B Cs net valuations sum to
- (50 - 60) 30 20 gt 0.
- So B is not pivotal.
87Demand Revelation
- What net valuation sB should B state?
88Demand Revelation
- What net valuation sB should B state?
- If sB gt -10, then B makes supply of the public
good, and a loss of 10 to him, more likely.
89Demand Revelation
- What net valuation sB should B state?
- If sB gt -10, then B makes supply of the public
good, and a loss of 10 to him, more likely. - B prevents supply by becoming pivotal, requiring
sB (40 - 60) (110 - 60) lt 0I.e. B must
state sB lt -30.
90Demand Revelation
- Then B suffers a GC tax of -20 50 30,
- Bs net payoff is - 10 - 30 -40 lt -10.
- B can do no better than state the truth sB
-10.
91Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
92Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
- A Bs net valuations sum to(40 - 60) (50 -
60) -30 lt 0. - A, B Cs net valuations sum to
- (110 - 60) - 30 20 gt 0.
93Demand Revelation
- Assign c1 60, c2 60, c3 60.
- A Bs net valuations sum to(40 - 60) (50 -
60) -30 lt 0. - A, B Cs net valuations sum to
- (110 - 60) - 30 20 gt 0.
- So C is pivotal.
94Demand Revelation
- What net valuation sC should C state?
95Demand Revelation
- What net valuation sC should C state?
- sC gt 50 changes nothing. C stays pivotal and
must pay a GC tax of -(40 - 60) - (50 - 60)
30, for a net payoff of (110 - 60) - 30 20
gt 0.
96Demand Revelation
- What net valuation sC should C state?
- sC gt 50 changes nothing. C stays pivotal and
must pay a GC tax of -(40 - 60) - (50 - 60)
30, for a net payoff of (110 - 60) - 30 20
gt 0. - sC lt 50 makes it less likely that the public
good will be supplied, in which case C loses 110
- 60 50.
97Demand Revelation
- What net valuation sC should C state?
- sC gt 50 changes nothing. C stays pivotal and
must pay a GC tax of -(40 - 60) - (50 - 60)
30, for a net payoff of (110 - 60) - 30 20
gt 0. - sC lt 50 makes it less likely that the public
good will be supplied, in which case C loses 110
- 60 50. - C can do no better than state the truth sC 50.
98Demand Revelation
- GC tax scheme implements efficient supply of the
public good.
99Demand Revelation
- GC tax scheme implements efficient supply of the
public good. - But, causes an inefficiency due to taxes removing
private good from pivotal individuals.