Lamarck Vs. Darwin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Lamarck Vs. Darwin

Description:

... living things change over time Proposed a mechanism for how organisms change over time before Darwin did and called it inheritance of ... a Lamarckian explanation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: medelberg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lamarck Vs. Darwin


1
Lamarck Vs. Darwin
  • Dr. Edelberg

2
Early Ideas-Before Darwin Lamarck
  • Earth was relatively young (6000years)
  • Livings things were created perfectly from the
    beginning
  • Earth and living things remain unchanged

3
Jean Baptist Lamarck
  • One of the first to state living things change
    over time
  • Proposed a mechanism for how organisms change
    over time before Darwin did and called it
    inheritance of acquired traits
  • Lamarcks hypothesis was wrong

4
Two ideas on how living things evolve
  • Consider the long legs of wading birds
  • How could such a bird evolve long legs?
  • Read Scenario A and B on the following slides
    and then answer the questions that follow the two
    scenarios
  • When reading the two scenarios, assume the
    species ancestral to long legged birds had short
    legs and could only wade in shallow water along
    the shore eating snails and small fish

5
Evolution of long legged birds
  • Snowy Egret
  • Great Blue Heron

6
Scenario A
  • A change in the environment increased competition
    between the birds resulting in depletion of food
    supply in the shallow waters
  • This caused a need for the short leg birds to
    wade into deeper water in order to get food to
    survive
  • This forced them to stretch their legs, which
    caused their legs to get a little longer
  • When the birds produced offspring, the baby birds
    grew with slightly longer legs inherited from
    their parents.

7
Scenario A-continued
  • These offspring birds needed to wade out even
    farther, so they stretched their legs even more
    and made their legs a little bit longer
  • In turn, their offspring grew up with even longer
    legs inherited from their parents
  • Eventually, after many generations of this
    process, the legs of these birds were so much
    longer than the ancestral birds, that the new
    birds could be described as a new species

8
Scenario B
  • Within the species of ancestral short legged
    shorebirds there is a range of leg lengths from a
    bit shorter to a bit longer than the average leg
    length
  • A change in the environment increases competition
    between the birds, depleting the food supply in
    the shallow water
  • The birds with the slightly longer legs could
    wade out a little farther
  • As a result, they obtained more food, lived a
    little longer, and therefore produced more
    offspring

9
Scenario B-continued
  • Those birds with the shorter legs would tend to
    starve to death
  • Since the tendency for leg length was already
    inheritable, the surviving longer leg birds
    tended to have more longer leg offspring
  • Eventually, after many generations of this
    process, the average leg length of the birds was
    so much longer than the ancestral birds that the
    new birds could be described as a new species

10
Comparing Scenarios
  • Compare and contrast the two scenarios
  • Which scenario seems more accurate?
  • Cite statements that seem false and explain why
  • Hypothesize which scenario is consistent with
    Lamarcks theory and which scenario is consistent
    with Darwins theory
  • TO BE HANDED IN

11
Comparing Lamarck and Darwin
  • Lamarck and Darwin Summary of theories
  • Click on link above and then click on each link
    below until you have read all 4 associated pages
    (How they agreed, What Lamarck believed, What
    Darwin believed and Why we believe Darwin.
  • After studying differences click on next slide

12
Comparing Darwin and Lamarck
  • Which scenario now sounds like an explanation
    that Darwin might give? Why?
  • Which scenario now sounds like an explanation
    that Lamarck might give? Why?
  • What are the specific clues that most clearly
    distinguishes a Darwinian explanation from a
    Lamarckian explanation?
  • What explanation is most likely correct?
  • TO BE HANDED IN
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com