Interaction%20Challenges%20for%20Intelligent%20Assistants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Interaction%20Challenges%20for%20Intelligent%20Assistants

Description:

Interaction Challenges for Intelligent Assistants Jim Blythe USC Information Sciences Institute – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:211
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: JimB211
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interaction%20Challenges%20for%20Intelligent%20Assistants


1
Interaction Challenges for Intelligent Assistants
  • Jim Blythe
  • USC Information Sciences Institute

2
  • How to build truly useful assistants?
  • Personalized, Learn, Engender trust,
  • Become partners
  • Organizer Neil Yorke-Smith
  • Committee Pauline Berry, Timothy Bickmore, Mihai
    Boicu, Justine Cassell, Ed Chi, Mike Cox, John
    Gersh, Jihie Kim, Jay Modi, Donald Patterson,
    Debra Schreckenghost, Richard Simpson, Stephen
    Smith, Sashank Varma
  • 28 accepted papers

3
Topics
  • Trust
  • When to assist?
  • Learning
  • Modeling
  • Desktop assistants
  • Panel with symp. on multidisciplinary
    collaboration for socially assistive robots
  • Panel with intentions in intelligent systems

4
How To Make Users Happy
  • And avoid annoying users
  • - Brad Myers invited talk

5
User Happiness?
  • Hu f (Performance)

6
User Happiness?
Hu f (Performance, Trust)
7
User Happiness!
Hu f (EAssistant ENegative EPositive EValue
EUser ECorrected EBy-hand ECost EAvoided
EApparentness ECorrect-difficulty ESensible
WQuality WCommitment TBy-hand TBy-Hand-start-up
TBy-Hand-per-unit TAssistant TTraining-start-up
TAssistant-per-unit TInteraction-per-unit
TMonitoring TCorrecting TResponsiveness
TSystem-Training TUser-training
TAverage-for-each-correction AError-rate Nunits
PPleasantness UPerceive UWhy UProvenance
UPredictability IAssistant-interfere
IScreen-space ICognitive IAppropriate-Time
CAutonomy CCorrecting SSensible-Actions
SUser-models SLearningRSocial-Presence DHand
VImportance)
8
A Tale of Two Associates
  • Pilots Associate (1985-1991)
  • Single Pilot
  • Direct pilot interaction with associate meant
    added workload
  • Design philosophy minimized direct pilot
    interaction with associate
  • Moderate user acceptance
  • Rotorcraft Pilots Associate (1994-1999)
  • Two Pilots
  • 1/3 of human activity is crew coordination
  • Design philosophy included some direct pilot
    interaction with associate
  • Improved User Acceptance

9
Why and how to model multi-modal interaction for
a mobile robot companion
  • Shuyin Li Britta Wrede Best paper
  • Tested policies with users interacting with a
    robot
  • Communicate pre-interaction attention
  • Need to make social remarks with non-verbal
    methods (because people tend to reply in kind)

Biron and Barthoc
10
Interaction Challenges for Agents with Common
Sense
  • Invited talk from Henry Lieberman
  • We now have several sources of common sense
    knowledge, e.g. Cyc, Open Mind, ThoughtTreasure
  • Some strategies and examples of exploiting common
    sense to build better interfaces

11
Strategies for using common sense in interfaces
  • Find underconstrained situations
  • Find situations where every little helps
  • Know a little about everything, but not too much
    about anything
  • Make better mistakes! Not just right and
    wrong, being reasonable is better
  • Plausible mistakes can increase trust
  • Set user expectations

12
Examples of interfaces using common sense
  • ARIA photo agent more powerful matching of tags
    using common sense
  • Predictive typing
  • Im having landlord problems because my
    roommate was late with my r..
  • BEAM
  • (Gil Chklovski)

13
Trust
  • Openness and understanding more important
  • as systems become more complex.
  • Methods to improve understanding explanations
    McGuinness et al.
  • HTN metamodel Wallace
  • Patterson would I trust a fork? a bridge? a
    space shuttle?
  • predictability, understandability, similarity,
    liability, social/emotional

14
Learning (and Trust)
  • Adaptive (Learning) vs Adaptable (Instructed by
    user)
  • important for believability and trust

15
Supporting interaction in Robocare intelligent
assistant agent
Cesta et al. Best application paper
Use of multiagent technology
  • Endowed with human like I/O channels by
    engineering state of the art components
  • Face Lucia (Piero Cosi, ISTC, Pd)
  • Voice Sonic (Univ.Colorado)
  • Simple Interaction Manager

Robust continuous behavior at home with person
16
Multiple Intelligent Systems
17
Supporting interaction in Robocare intelligent
assistant agent
  • Integrates multiple systems to produce a socially
    acceptable robotic care assistant
  • Interesting DCOP solution to allow multiple
    systems and guarantee coherent behaviour
  • System follows a STN to notice deviations from
    expected behaviour

18
  • Experiments in face/no-face in RoboCare
  • People prefer no-face
  • less artificial, more integrated in the
    domestic environment

19
Desktop assistants
  • Many papers on desktop assistants
  • 6 from the Calo project

PeXA architecture
20
Towel todo manager
  • Towel Conley et al taking an IM approach to
    give access to tasks

Inspired by Diamond Help Rich et al. 06
21
Did Ken sacrifice himself to User Testing?
  • Registered to give talk at AAAI Spring symposium

22
Should Ken have worked on meeting scheduling?
  • Registered to give talk at AAAI Spring symposium
  • Booked another trip in same week

23
Should Ken have worked on meeting scheduling?
  • Registered to give talk at AAAI Spring symposium
  • Booked trip to Hawaii in same week
  • Ultimate in user testing? You decide..
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com