Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET)

Description:

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) Ad-hoc network: A collection of wireless mobile hosts forming a temporary network without the aid of any established infrastructure or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:208
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: Informat2299
Learn more at: https://ics.uci.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET)


1
Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET)
  • Ad-hoc network
  • A collection of wireless mobile hosts forming a
    temporary network without the aid of any
    established infrastructure or centralized
    administration.
  • Significant differences to existing wired
    networks
  • Wireless
  • Self-starting
  • No administrator
  • Cannot assume that every computer is within
    communication range of every other computer
  • Possibly quite dynamic topology of
    interconnections
  • Traffic types unicast/multicast/anycast/geocast

2
Routing in MANET
  • Routing assumptions for unicast traffic
  • Flat topology assumption
  • Proactive DSDV, TORA, WRP
  • Reactive AODV, DSR, STAR
  • Hierarchical topology assumption
  • Clustering CBRP, PATM
  • Geographic assumption
  • Location aided routing LAR, GeoCast

3
Classification of Routing Protocols for MANETS
4
Desired Properties of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols
  • Distributed
  • Bandwidth efficient
  • Reduce control traffic/overhead
  • Battery efficient
  • Fast route convergence
  • Correct loop free
  • Reduce overhead
  • Unidirectional Link Support

5
Performance Metrics of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols
  • Maximize
  • end-to-end throughput
  • delivery ratio
  • Minimize
  • Congestion (load-balancing)
  • end-to-end delay
  • packet loss
  • shortest path/minimum hop (route length)
  • overhead (bandwidth)
  • energy consumption

6
Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) vs. Sensor Networks
MANET SensorNet
applications meeting, group collaboration smart building, habitat monitoring
comm. address-centric comm. data centric comm.
topology peer-to-peer sensors ? base peer-to-peer
traffic random periodic, synchronous
platform laptops, PDAs motes more resource constrained
scale 10s to 100s gt1000 larger scale and more redundancy
mobility slow (meeting) fast (cars) focus on mobility slow (habitat) fast less focus on mobility so far
similarity No infrastructure, multi-hop, wireless networks No infrastructure, multi-hop, wireless networks
7
Address Centric Routing (AC)
Temperature Reading (source 2)
Temperature Reading (source 1)
Z
B
Give Me The Average Temperature? ( sink )
8
Data Centric Routing (DC)
Temperature Reading (source 2)
Temperature Reading (source 1)
Z
B
Give Me The Average Temperature? ( sink )
9
Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) Johnson96
  • When node S wants to send a packet to node D, but
    does not know a route to D, node S initiates a
    route discovery using Route Request (RREQ)
  • Each node appends own identifier when forwarding
    RREQ
  • Promiscuous mode

10
Route Discovery in DSR
Y
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Represents a node that has received RREQ for D
from S
11
Route Discovery in DSR
Y
Broadcast transmission
Z
S
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Represents transmission of RREQ
X,Y Represents list of identifiers appended
to RREQ
12
Route Discovery in DSR
Y
Z
S
S,E
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
S,C
H
D
K
I
N
  • Node H receives packet RREQ from two neighbors
  • potential for collision

13
Route Discovery in DSR
Y
Z
S
E
F
S,E,F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
S,C,G
I
N
  • Node C receives RREQ from G and H, but does not
    forward
  • it again, because node C has already forwarded
    RREQ once

14
Route Discovery in DSR
Y
Z
S
E
F
S,E,F,J
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
S,C,G,K
  • Nodes J and K both broadcast RREQ to node D
  • Caveat Since nodes J and K are hidden from each
    other, their
  • transmissions may collide

15
Route Discovery in DSR
  • Broadcast storm prevention
  • Drop previously seen messages
  • Loop prevention
  • Host drops messages with its address in route
    record (like BGP)

16
Route Discovery in DSR
  • Destination D on receiving the first RREQ, sends
    a Route Reply (RREP)
  • RREP is sent on a route obtained by reversing the
    route appended to received RREQ
  • Not always the case, sometimes need new route
    request
  • RREP includes the route from S to D on which RREQ
    was received by node D

17
Route Reply in DSR
Y
Z
S
RREP S,E,F,J,D
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Represents RREP control message
18
Dynamic Source Routing (DSR)
  • Node S on receiving RREP, caches the route
    included in the RREP
  • When node S sends a data packet to D, the entire
    route is included in the packet header
  • hence the name source routing
  • Intermediate nodes use the source route included
    in a packet to determine to whom a packet should
    be forwarded

19
Data Delivery in DSR
Y
Z
DATA S,E,F,J,D
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Packet header size grows with route length
20
Data Delivery in DSR
  • Send route error packet if next hop cannot be
    reached
  • Delete route from the cache when receiving error
    packet
  • Passive acknowledgement
  • When node overhears next hop forwarding message.

21
DSR Optimization Route Caching
  • Each node caches a new route it learns by any
    means
  • Through Route Request (RREQ)
  • When node K receives RREQ S,C,G destined for
    node D, node K learns route K,G,C,S to node S
  • Through Route Reply (RREP)
  • When node S finds RREP S,E,F,J,D to node D,
    node S also learns route S,E,F to node F
  • When node F forwards RREP S,E,F,J,D, node F
    learns route F,J,D to node D

22
DSR Optimization Route Caching
  • Through DATA packets source routes
  • When node E forwards Data S,E,F,J,D it learns
    route E,F,J,D to node D
  • A node may also learn a route when it overhears
    Data
  • Problem Stale caches may increase overheads
  • Splicing of cached routes
  • Example know A,H,I overheard I,G,F

23
DSR Optimization Piggybacking
  • Possible to piggyback route reply on new route
    requests
  • Also small data
  • TCP handshake
  • Host must forward piggybacked data when replying
    to request with cached routes

24
DSR Optimization Error Handling
  • Disconnected network leads to repeated route
    requests
  • Addressed through exponential backoff
  • Eavesdropping on route error packets
  • Temporarily mark invalid route
  • Other nodes may reply with invalid cached routes

25
Dynamic Source Routing Advantages
  • Routes maintained only between nodes who need to
    communicate
  • reduces overhead of route table maintenance
  • Routing cache can further reduce route discovery
    overhead
  • A single route discovery may yield many routes to
    the destination, due to intermediate nodes
    replying from local caches

26
Dynamic Source Routing Disadvantages
  • Packet header size grows with route length due to
    source routing
  • Flooding of route requests may potentially reach
    all nodes in the network
  • Stale caches will lead to increased overhead

27
Distance-Vector routing
  • Each node maintains a routing table containing
  • Number of hops to each destination
  • Next hop to reach each destination
  • list of all destinations
  • The succession of next hops leads to a
    destination
  • Each node periodically broadcasts its current
    estimate of the shortest distance to each
    available destination to all of its neighbors
  • Typical representative Distributed Bellman-Ford
    (DBF)

28
AODV (Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector)
  • AODV is based on the DSDV (Destination-Sequenced
    Distance Vector) algorithm
  • Distance vector
  • Different sequence numbers for each destination.
  • Creation of routes on a demand basis traffic
    reactive
  • Nodes that are not on a selected path do not
    maintain routing information or participate in
    routing table exchanges!
  • Goal Minimize broadcast overhead and
    transmission latency

29
Route Sequence Numbers
  • Unique counter for each destination
  • Symbolizes the freshness of a route
  • Source specifies the most recently known route
    during route establishment
  • Updated occasionally
  • Link failure
  • Destination moves
  • Intermediate nodes move

30
Route Requests from S to D in AODV
Y
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Represents a node that has received RREQ for D
from S
31
Route Requests from S to D in AODV
Y
Broadcast transmission
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Represents transmission of RREQ
32
Route Requests from S to D in AODV
Y
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Represents links on Reverse Path
33
Reverse Path Setup from S to D in AODV
Y
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
  • Node C receives RREQ from G and H, but does not
    forward
  • it again, because node C has already forwarded
    RREQ once

34
Reverse Path Setup from S to D in AODV
Y
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
35
Reverse Path Setup in AODV
Y
  • Node D does not forward RREQ, because node D
  • is the intended target of the RREQ

Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
36
Route Reply from D to S in AODV
Y
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Represents links on path taken by RREP
37
Route Reply in AODV
  • Intermediate node may also send a Route Reply
    (RREP) provided that it knows a more recent path
    than the one previously known to sender S
  • Recent path means higher sequence number
  • The likelihood that an intermediate node will
    send a RREP not as high as DSR
  • An intermediate node which knows a route, but
    with a smaller sequence number, cannot send Route
    Reply

38
Forward Path Setup in AODV
Y
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
Forward links are setup when RREP travels
along the reverse path Represents a link on the
forward path
39
Data Delivery in AODV
Y
Routing table entries used to forward data
packet. Route is not included in packet header.
DATA
Z
S
E
F
B
C
M
L
J
A
G
H
D
K
I
N
40
Local Link Maintenance
  • Periodic hello messages broadcast to immediate
    neighbors
  • Failing to receive hello messages indicates a
    link failure
  • Link failure notifications sent to source nodes
  • Sources rediscover new route to destination

41
AODV Key Advantages
  • Partial routing tables are constructed
    reactively
  • Entries are updated only when a node sends to an
    unreachable node
  • No periodic global updates
  • Node not on active paths maintain no routing
    entries
  • ? Reduce packet overhead
  • Routing table
  • No source routing needed ? reduce bit overhead
  • Route caching ? reduce establishment latency
  • Sequence number ? override stale routes
  • source based broadcast id? loop freedom
  • Push link failure to relevant nodes
  • ? Reduce establishment latency

42
AODV and DSR Disadvantages
  • Common problems for both AODV and DSR
  • Potential collisions between route requests
    propagated by neighboring nodes
  • Insertion of random delays before forwarding RREQ
  • Increased contention if too many route replies
    come back due to nodes replying using their local
    cache - Route Reply Storm problem
  • Random delays carrier sensing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com