Routing Mechanisms in Ad-Hoc Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Routing Mechanisms in Ad-Hoc Networks

Description:

Classification of Routing Protocols for MANET (Topology based) ... MANET: Mobile Ad hoc Network (IETF working group) 11/07/2003. Advanced Communication Services ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: zhou55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Routing Mechanisms in Ad-Hoc Networks


1
Routing Mechanisms in Ad-Hoc Networks
  • Mentor Dr. Stephan Rupp
  • Student Wenbo Fu

2
Ad-hoc Network
  • DefinitionAd hoc network is a collection of
    wireless nodes that can dynamically be set up
    anywhere and anytime without using any
    pre-existing network infrastructure.
  • Application- Military battlefield.
  • - Disaster field
  • - Conference
  • - Sensor Dust

3
Characteristics of Ad hoc Network
  • Ad hoc Network is a mobile, mutlihop, wireless
    network with autonomous terminals.

- Dynamic topologies - Bandwidth-constrained -
Energy-constrained operation - Limited physical
security
4
How to find a route in Ad hoc Network?
5
Agenda
  • Overview of Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocol
  • Proactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols (Link-State)
  • Reactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols
  • Conclusions

6
Classification of Routing Protocols for MANET
(Topology based)
7
Proactive vs Reactive Routing Protocols
  • Proactive routing protocols (table-driven
    protocols) attempt to maintain consistent, up to
    date routes from each node to every other nodes
    in the network.
  • Reactive routing protocols (on-demand driven
    protocols) create routes only when desired by the
    source node.

8
Proactive vs Reactive Routing Protocols
  • Proactive Routing Protocols
  • Routes to all reachable nodes in the network
    available.
  • Minimal initial delay for application.
  • - Larger signalling traffic and power
    consumption.
  • Reactive Routing Protocols
  • Smaller signalling traffic and power
    consumption.
  • - A long delay for application when no route to
    the destination available

9
Agenda
  • Overview of Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocol
  • Proactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols (Link-State)
  • Reactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols
  • Conclusions

10
Update local Link -State relevant tables
11
Overhead of Link-State Protocols
  • Message generation
  • - What, Who, When
  • Message processing
  • - Local tables updating
  • - Route computation
  • Message forwarding
  • - Who
  • Goal Decrease unnecessary overhead.

12
OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing Protocol)
  • - MPR (Multipoint relays)- MPR selector-
    Symmetric 1-hop neighbours- Symmetric strict
    2-hop neighbours

13
TBRPF (Topology Dissemination Based on
Reverse-Path Forwarding)
  • Reported Nodes set (RN)
  • Reported Tree (RT)
  • Local links
  • Dijkstras algorithm

14
Comparison between OLSR and TBRPF
15
Agenda
  • Overview of Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocol
  • Proactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols (Link-State)
  • Reactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols
  • Conclusions

16
Procedure Diagram of Reactive Protocols
17
Overhead of Reactive Protocols
  • Route discovery
  • - Information maintained in intermediate nodes
  • - Information contained or hidden in messages
  • - Length of flooding
  • Route maintenance
  • - How to find an alternative route
  • - How to inform influenced nodes
  • Goal Minimize application delay and decrease
    unnecessary overhead.

18
AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector)
  • Intermediate nodes - Backward and forward
    path.- Precursor list
  • Expanding ring search (TTL)

19
DSR ( Dynamic Source Routing)
  • Muliple path- Load balance- Packet salvaging

20
Comparison between AODV and DSR
21
Agenda
  • Overview of Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocol
  • Proactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols (Link-State)
  • Reactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols
  • Conclusions

22
Conclusions
  • Four candidates for standard protocols of IETF
    with different features.
  • Algotithms are continuously modified and
    improved.
  • Feasibility still needs to be tested in practice.
  • No clear winners among specification.
  • Issues such as security and interworking should
    be emphasized in future.

23
Acknowledgements
  • Dr. Stephan Rupp
  • Prof. Paul J. Kuehn
  • Miss Napat Nantavechsanti
  • Mr. Thomas Buergstein

24
  • Q A
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com