Get a Handle on Internal Controls - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Get a Handle on Internal Controls

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: William Miller Last modified by: William Miller Created Date: 10/10/2006 8:05:40 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: William1413
Learn more at: https://nashvilleaga.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Get a Handle on Internal Controls


1
(No Transcript)
2
Get a Handle on Internal Controls
  • William D. Miller
  • Johnson County Auditor

3
Why?
  • Internal Control Common Sense
  • Fiscal Officers are guardians of taxpayers money
  • Think of it as YOUR money, not the governments,
    would you spend the same way

4
Its All About Risk
  • If money is involved there is risk
  • If it can be converted to money, there is risk
  • If it can be used for personal gain there is risk
  • If it can be misused there is risk

5
Common Problems
  • Organization attitude
  • Internal controls not documented
  • Internal control policies not followed
  • Failure to review controls for adequacy
  • Too much trust in entrusted employees
  • Top management oversight is lacking
  • Staffing levels impinge on ability to control

6
Organization Attitude
  • Critical Element
  • Does top management pay attention?
  • Is the internal control system proactively
    employed or reactive to problems (horse out of
    the barn)?
  • Do managers and staff think about internal
    controls?
  • Are there systematic reviews of IC systems?

7
Documentation and Execution
  • Have organization risks been assessed,
    prioritized and targeted for controls?
  • Can employees find the policies and procedures
    needed to implement internal controls?
  • Do employees have a working knowledge of the
    system?
  • Are IC procedures available and do they
    specifically define responsibilities?
  • If documented, are they followed?

8
Who do you Trust-Johnny Carson?
  • Internal Controls Trust
  • Trust is the archenemy of internal controls
  • Trust is bestowed automatically
  • Trust is challenged after the fact
  • There are always footprints when internal
    controls are breachedGee, I should have known!

9
Top Management Oversight
  • Top managers need to make presence known
  • Use reporting systems to ensure controls are
    working
  • Spot check controls in action
  • Review controls to ensure they are working and to
    identify changes over time

10
Staffing Requirements
  • Not enough staff is not good enough
  • Compensating controls can be implemented
  • Remote locations require oversight for internal
    controlUse and verify reporting systems and spot
    checks
  • If contracted out, require independent audit

11
Consequences
  • Wastetaxpayer funds spent unwisely
  • Abusetaxpayer funded programs improperly managed
    sometimes with harmful consequences
  • FraudPerpetrators find weaknesses and exploit
    them for ill-gotten gains

12
Contract Change Orders
  • Identification of cause for change order
  • Assessment of liability for change
  • Independent estimate of cost for change
  • Comparison of independent estimate to estimate
    provided by contractor
  • Development of negotiation strategy

13
Change Orders
  • Documentation of negotiations
  • Review, approval and documentation of agreed upon
    costs
  • Verification of accuracy of invoices submitted
    for payment

14
INVOICE
  • Labor 10 hours _at_ 48.10
    491.00 Materials
    151.36 657.59
  • 10 Markup on Materials 15.23
  • 3 Small Tools 59.18
  • ________
  • Amount Due 716.77 WRONG
  • 3 of 657.59 19.73
  • The internal control was to add up the 4 figures!

15
Purchase Cards
  • Highly vulnerable for misuse
  • Speed of transactions and after the fact review
    and approval
  • Good for small purchases and cost saver
  • Requires diligence in managing use
  • Poor controls lead to big problems

16
P-Card Internal Controls
  • Establish who needs them- review regularly
  • Limits, review authorities chain of review
  • Establish appropriate/inappropriate charges
    clearly
  • Review invoicesdont rubber stamp
  • Cancel the account as well as the card

17
Inventory Controls
  • Inventory records were poor
  • Process was faultyallowed self reporting and not
    at time of purchase
  • Not enough information collected
  • Falsified dates of purchase (2011, 2012)
  • RESULT Missing assets

18
DFS Hotline System
  • Cited Unable to Investigate When Could
  • 18 cases received subsequent call and action was
    takennot so for 313
  • 25 of all calls received were treated as unable
    to investigate

19
Quality Control IssuesFailure to Respond
  • Unable to Investigate Calls
  • Many calls could/should have been referred to
    field offices for some type of action
  • Out in the cold
  • Cage boy
  • Hockey stick
  • Excrement in home
  • Breast feeding

20
DFS Reasons
  • Call taker cited did not meet a lock out lawa
    law that does not exist
  • 38 degrees never killed anyone
  • Did not attempt to locate or identify individual
    when could have gone to school
  • Could not locate addressaudit found it in DFS
    own system

21
Can Fraud Be Far Behind?
  • Lack of internal controls can lead to fraud
  • Failure to apply established internal controls
    can lead to fraud
  • Failure to oversee internal controls can lead to
    fraud

22
VA Loan Guaranty Program
  • Guarantees up to 56,000
  • The purpose of the program is to allow veterans
    to get into homes with no down payment and to
    induce lenders to accept VA loans
  • The program is a benefit program, supported by
    Congress, Veterans Groups, and is viewed as an
    entitlement by the veterans

23
VA Loan Guaranty Program
  • In the event of foreclosure, the VA will either
    pay the lender the guaranty or take the property
    and try to sell it.
  • VA's foreclosure rate is about 10. VA took
    possession of most homes
  • The loan program had never been audited by
    outside auditors.

24
CONDITIONS FOR PROGRAMSource William D.
Miller
  • All Favorable
  • Houses Sold Well
  • Few Complaints
  • Foreclosures were Low Compared to Total Program
  • Everyone was Satisfied with Program Management
  • Situation 3

25
AUDIT APPROACH
  • Target bad loans with low number of payments
  • Compare foreclosure rates to other housing
    programs
  • Determine if occupants were veterans
  • Determine patterns in foreclosures
  • Occurring in same general area
  • Specific Regional Offices or Lenders
  • Situation 3

26
Audit Procedure
  • Key on the loan application
  • Verify everything on it, income, expenses, number
    of children, savings accounts
  • Drive by job locations
  • Interview applicants
  • Interview employers

27
What we found
  • Poor underwriting of loans (ties into Mgt
    Philosophy-benefit program)
  • Patterns showed suspicious activity in Colorado
  • Major fraud against 3 govt agencies discovered

28
What was happening
  • Condo mgt company was recruiting soldiers and
    spouses to buy their condos
  • Condos went into foreclosure when soldiers were
    reassigned
  • VA stuck with the guaranty payment

29
What was happening
  • The condo operation was an elaborate scam to get
    the guaranty money from the government (VA, HUD,
    FHA)
  • 5 companies were involved2 loan processing
    companies-1 condo mgt company, 1 financial
    lending company, 1 builder

30
How did we prove it
  • Developed corporate matrix and tracked players
    (some were silent partners)
  • Determined that the 3 key officers in all the
    companies were the same people although the
    companies were in 4 states

31
How did we prove it
  • Verification of loan app included
  • Bank inquiries re amounts in accts
  • Interviews with applicants at their homes (could
    see evidence of false info on apps-pictures of
    kids they didnt declare)
  • Tracked defaulters to Europe and Okinawa

32
How did we prove it
  • Reviewed lender files and compared to VA
    filesvery interesting notes in those files
    (required subpoenas)
  • Interviewed loan processors and with some
    criminal investigation work cracked a loan
    processor

33
Outcome
  • Attorney for the firms was disbarred
  • Owners and officers plea bargained
  • Settled on cases for 13 million dollars
  • Shut down the operation
  • Thwarted an attempt to establish same operation
    in Pensacola Fla

34
MEDICAID PRESCRIPTIONS
  • State offers prescription drug services under the
    MEDICAID program. (Optional)
  • 420,000 residents obtained 681.4 million through
    the MEDICAID program in 2001
  • Funding is split at 60 and 40 between federal
    and state
  • State performs drug utilization reviews

35
NARCOTICS AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
  • Two major therapeutic drug classes (anti-anxiety
    and analgesics/narcotics) have addictive
    qualities that increase potential for
    inappropriate use by recipients
  • Oxycodone/Oxycontin products are highly addictive
    and are abused in epidemic proportions

36
ABUSE OF MEDICAID PROGRAM
  • 3,900 recipients visited 5 or more physicians to
    obtain multiple quantities of controlled
    substances.
  • 8.7 million was spent on these drugs
  • Not all prescriptions were for legitimate purposes

37
OXYCODONE/OXYCONTIN
  • Legitimate use for intractable pain
  • Legitimate doses can be high
  • Illegitimate use, euphoric highs similar to
    cocaine
  • Lethal

38
OXCONTIN ABUSE
  • Oxycontin is a 24-hour time-release capsule
    version of the single dosage oxycodone
  • Abusers found that if crush capsule and ingest
    contents it will give cocaine level highs
  • Because this is a 24-hour time-release, the act
    of crushing and consuming can have fatal results

39
USAGE TREND-OXYCONTIN
Year Number of Prescriptions Number of Recipients
2000 27,842 5,405
2001 45,636 7,860
Increase 64 45
40
RECIPIENTS OXYCONTIN ACTIVITY
Number who FY 2000 FY 2001
Visited many doctors and got controlled drugs 1,826 2,074
Obtained 1 or more Oxycontin prescription 661 986
Percent obtaining Oxycontin 36 48
41
HOW THEY DID IT
  • Recipients
  • Visited multiple doctors
  • Obtained multiple prescriptions
  • Visited multiple pharmacies
  • The top 5 potential abusers in 2001 visited
    between 27 and 53 doctors

42
ABUSE OF MEDICAID PROGRAM
Number of Prescribers Number of Pharmacies Number of Prescriptions
53 25 92
42 12 76
38 5 92
29 12 56
27 3 92
43
ABUSE EXAMPLE
  • Drug-Oxycontin
  • Recipient visited 10 pharmacies in 90 days
  • On 1 day obtained 26 prescriptions
  • This activity triggered alerts that showed
    therapeutic duplication

44
AUDIT METHODOLOGY
  • Analyzed States Medicaid paid prescription drug
    claims for 2 fiscal years
  • Matched pharmacies data to paid claims data and
    sorted on dates of issue interviewed pharmacy
    and state staff
  • Identified controlled substances subject to high
    abuse (contacted DEA)

45
Take Them Serious
  • As the examples show, missteps will occur
  • Whether innocently or intentionally, failed
    controls lead to extra costs and CRIME
  • Management levels HAVE to stay involved
  • Use oversight techniques such as trending
    analysis, invoice reviews, reporting and
    verifying systems
  • Take immediate action
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com