Attribution Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Attribution Theory

Description:

ATTRIBUTION THEORY The importance of giving appropriate reasons for success or failure in Sport Why did you win/loose recent games? What reasons did you give? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:227
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Laur4307
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Attribution Theory


1
Attribution Theory
  • The importance of giving appropriate reasons
    for success or failure in Sport
  • Why did you win/loose recent games?
  • What reasons did you give?
  • What did your coach say it occured?
  • If we can feel good about reasons for success
    OR if we can blame something else for losing we
    should continue to try in the future.
  • Attributions are important
  • Because they affect motivation, which in turn
    affects future performances, future effort and
    whether the individual will continue to
    participate

2
  • Young person told they failed because they do not
    have enough ability to suceed unlikely to
    try again
  • If they are told they need to try harder
    more likely to continue
  • Attribution Training
  • Attribution theory is important in sport because
    it affects future effort
  • If we think that reasons for success are stable
    and we are accountable for them, we will have the
    confidence and continue to improve.
  • If you believe that reasons for failure are
    changeable, you can change the future results and
    influence the performance

3
Attribution The Theory
  • ATTRIBUTION (REASONS) THEORY
  • Attribution theory is concerned with the reasons
    (attributions) performers give to their success
    or failure
  • Weiner suggested that high achievers and low
    achievers attribute success and failure to
    different reasons
  • To become a high achiever the performer must
    think like a high achiever they must make
    attributions like a high achiever
  • Weiners 4 Attributions
  • Ability
  • Effort
  • Luck
  • Task Difficulty

4
  • The 4 attributions can be placed along 2
    dimensions
  • Locus of Causality
  • Stability

Locus of Causality Whether the performance
outcome could be caused by factors under the
control of the performer (internal factors of
effort and ability) OR Caused by factors beyond
the control of the performer (external factors of
task difficulty and luck) Copy diagram p.174
5
The Locus of Stability
  • Stability
  • Whether the performance outcome is fixed and
    unchanging OR can vary over time.
  • Ability and Task difficulty are STABLE and FIXED
    during the period of performance.
  • Effort and luck may change (UNSTABLE) from
    performance to performance OR within a
    performance
  • High Achievers attribute success to INTERNAL
    factors
  • failure to EXTERNAL factors
  • Low Achievers attribute success to EXTERNAL
    factors
  • failure to STABLE factors

6
SELF SERVING BIAS
  • The tendency of performers to attribute success
    to themselves
  • Therefore these will be INTERNAL reasons
  • ALSO
  • Reasons for failure might be attributed to
    external/changeable reasons
  • EG
  • It was the referees fault we lost
  • This demonstrates a tendency to protect ones
    self esteem

7
Learned Helplessness
  • Redefine success where ability is the reason for
    failure
  • Acknowledge the need to change attributions
    (attribution retraining) to those appropriate to
    high achievers
  • If the performer is a low achiever, learn how to
    attribute success and failure to the same reasons
    given by high achievers
  • Be aware that low achievers often suffer from
    Learned Helplessness
  • L.H is the problem caused by continually
    attributing failure to INTERNAL reasons that can
    not be changed (Dweck 1978)
  • Failure is blamed on lack of ability and is out
    of your own control because you will never be
    able to change the situation

8
Learned Helplessness Cont
  • Performers with LH think that
  • - Failure is inevitable
  • - What they do makes little difference to the
    outcome
  • - Success might be due to luck and not
    repeatable
  • LH can be global or specific
  • LH can be based on
  • - Lack of success
  • - Low confidence
  • - A bad experience
  • In order to control LH, a change in the
    attribution process must take place this is
    known as Attribution retraining
  • Mastery Orientation is the opposite to LH. An
    athlete has confidence, they feel in control,
    have a history of success

9
Attribution Retraining A reassessment of the
reasons for failure
  • We must promote the changeable and external
    reasons
  • The coach might
  • change in tactics or blame equipment
  • adopt a positive approach
  • make the reasons for losing less personal
  • avoid citing lack of ability as a reason for
    failure
  • use positive feedback and positive reinforcement
  • encourage a change of technique
  • attribute success internally (effort/ability)
    and failure externally (luck/task difficulty)

10
  • ATTRIBUTION THEORY AND ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION
  • What can it be used for?
  • A coach should try to make the performer
  • Attribute success to internal factors in order to
    maximize confidence and satisfaction
  • Attribute success to stable factors in order to
    maximize the expectation of future success
  • Attribute failure to external factors in order to
    minimize negative feelings
  • Attribute failure to unstable factors in order to
    minimize the expectations of future losses. Be
    careful when attributing failure to lack of
    effort if the performer has tried their hardest.

11
Attribution Theory and Achievement Motivation
  • ATTRIBUTION The Main Points
  • Individuals often make INTERNAL attributions for
    success and EXTERNAL attributions for failure
  • As performers we like to feel responsible for
    success but that failure was due to factors
    beyond our control
  • Stability is usually related to future
    expectations. If we attribute success or failure
    to stable factors next time we compete we will
    expect the same result.
  • High and low achievers attribute success and
    failure to different factors

12
January 2008
13
Jan 08
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com