Discussion of Social Problems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Discussion of Social Problems

Description:

Discussion of Social Problems A rough breakdown of sociology students sense of social problems is in the Table Not surprising is the increase in terrorism – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Elisa176
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Discussion of Social Problems


1
Discussion of Social Problems
  • A rough breakdown of sociology students sense of
    social problems is in the Table
  • Not surprising is the increase in terrorism
  • How do things get defined as social problems?
  • The interrelation of social problems
  • Each of these seems to reinforce the others.
  • Creating a dynamic of positive feedback.

2
Sociological Approaches  
  • Human behavior is socially determined insofar as
    it is socially shaped.
  • The Chicago School showed that different
    neighborhoods had very different rates of crime,
    addiction, juvenile delinquency, illegitimacy,
    academic failure, etc.
  • This demonstrated that some kind of lawful
    process was operating which can be understood
    scientifically.
  • People may be "choosing" to engage in those
    actions, but it is not an unconstrained, free
    choice.
  • You do not usually need to know which persons
    will engage in an act in order to understand and
    predict rates.
  • Something about some neighborhoods led to higher
    rates of pathology there.

3
Implications of different rates
  • The different rates highlighted the basic insight
    of sociology, that human behavior is socially
    shaped.
  • The high rates were not the result of biology,
    because even when all the people died or when the
    whole composition of the area changed, the rates
    remained the same.
  • Chicago theorists argued that they resulted from
    the social structure

4
Explanations of different rates
  • There were two main kinds of explanations of what
    was the social structural problem.  
  • Functionalist sociologists mainly explained the
    rates in terms of the norms and values embedded
    in churches, families, schools or gangs.
  • I.e. the people in different neighborhoods were
    being socialized into different subcultures
  • Migration various groups experienced similar
    disruption of families and loss of traditions.
  • Conflict theorists explained them in terms of
    class and the different life chances built into
    the class structure.
  • I.e. different rents and housing costs sort
    people by class,
  • and the different resources of different groups
    produce different life chances and subcultures.
  • The third perspective, the Interactionist
    perspective, operates at the individual
    level.          

5
Functional/Conflict Perspectives
  • Functionalists see social institutions as
    connected like organs in a body.
  • Def (p.23) An approach that focuses on how
    social parts contribute to society as a system.
  • Image façade of the Alamo
  • Examples Emile Durkheim (Parsons, Smelser)
  • Conflict theorists see different groups as having
    different interests.
  • Def. (p.26) focuses on conflict in society.
  • Image the back of the façade
  • Example Karl Marx (JoeFeagin, Massey, Reskin)

6
Functional and Conflict accounts of the most
serious social problem
  • Functional Its breakdown of families and morals,
    producing crime, etc.
  • Conflict its poverty and slums brutal
    conditions are brutalizing.

Educational failure
Weakening of families and morals
Gangs, drugs, crime.
Poverty
Poverty
Weakening of families
Gangs, drugs, crime.
7
Chicago theorists argued that the rates resulted
from the structure
  • This demonstrated some kind of lawful process
    which can be understood scientifically.
  • People may be "choosing" to engage in those
    actions, but it is a constrained choice.
  • Something about some neighborhoods led to higher
    rates of pathology there.
  • Chicago theorists also argued that socially
    produced problems could be socially changed.

8
The major sources of crime and delinquency in
Chicago
  • Neighborhoods had high rates when
  • 1) They were poor
  • 2) ethnically or racially fractionalized
  • 3) mobile with few stable families and
    institutions.
  • But these could be understood either sub
    culturally (Functional) or as class and group
    conflict and competition (Conflict Theory).

9
A Systemic model of Functions
  • Society is a control system.
  • Norms, socialized in families are the controls.
  • E.g. Durkheims theory of crime and punishment
  • Crime is functional in that enforcement is one
    of the main ways the rules are defined.


CRIME
PUNISHMENT
-
10
A Systemic model of conflict the vicious cycle
  • Society is a game of Monopoly
  • Resources aid in getting access to more
    resources the rich get richer.
  • But also education, health care, skills,
    contacts, family, drug-free, crime-free,
    gang-free environments, etc.


PROPERTIES
RENTS

11
Vicious Cycle Feedbacks and Native Americans
  • There were about 30million Native Americans on
    North America when the Europeans arrived.
  • There were about 300,000 in 1900
  • For centuries the only good Indian is a dead
    Indian and both formal policy and individual
    actions accomplished that.
  • But Europeans did not get off the boats and start
    shooting.
  • Loss of land, poverty, marginalization, broken
    families, alcoholism, smallpox, tribal wars,
    social breakdown all reinforced racism which
    reinforced these conditions.

12
Functionalism in sociology e.g. E. Durkheim
(1858-1916)    
  • Durkheim is discussed in most chapters of
    Sociology, Micro, Macro and Mega
  • Functionalism appears in all chapters
  • Functionalism believes that the society is an
    organic system
  • Fundamental concepts function, social
    integration norms normative integration.

13
Durkheims most important empirical study Suicide
  • The prediction and explanation of suicide.
  • Seeing the forest for the trees rates are social
    facts p.24.
  • Suicide rates are social facts.
  • Durkheim argued that social facts must be
    explained by other social facts.

14
How much suicide is there?
  • In the US predictably more than 30,000 people
    kill themselves every year.
  • Surgeon General's Report.
  • This compares to about 19,000 homicides.
  • These rates are stable and predictable. What
    causes them?

15
The concept of egoistic suicide
  • Some groups have consistently higher rates.
  • Rates Questions.
  • The concept of egoistic suicide p.25.
  • Were the suicide bombers social isolates?
  • Was Cesar or Garfield a social isolate?

16
Basic idea of egoistic suicide lack of social
integration.
  • Lack of social ties, leaves someone uncontrolled
    free to engage in deviance.
  • Applications to other behaviors
  • Academic failure
  • Crime.
  • 187.
  • Age effects on suicide adolescent peak and
    elderly
  • Contrasts between Durkheim and an individualist
    explanation Re morals.

17
Class on Thursday 9/5
  • Due to St Thomas of Villanova Day, classes meet
    for shorter periods at different times.
  • 1000-16 instead of 100 meets 1130
  • 1000-13 instead of 230 meets 1230
  • 1000-14 instead of 400 can meet either of the
    previous times or 515 Falvey viewing room 3
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com