Chapter Thirteen: Negotiated Justice and the Plea of Guilty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter Thirteen: Negotiated Justice and the Plea of Guilty

Description:

Chapter Thirteen: Negotiated Justice and the Plea of Guilty Plea Bargaining The process through which a defendant pleads guilty to a criminal charge with the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: kwi87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter Thirteen: Negotiated Justice and the Plea of Guilty


1
Chapter ThirteenNegotiated Justice and the Plea
of Guilty
2
Plea Bargaining
  • The process through which a defendant
  • pleads guilty to a criminal charge
  • with the expectation of receiving
  • some consideration from the state.

3
Charge Bargaining
  • The defendant pleads to a charge less serious
    than the one originally filed.
  • The principal effect of a plea to a less serious
    charge is to reduce the potential sentence.
  • (Major issue Overcharging)

4
Count Bargaining
  • The defendant pleads guilty to some,
  • but not all, of the counts contained
  • in the charging document.
  • The principal effect of pleading to less counts
    is to reduce the potential sentence.
  • (Major Issue Concurrent v. Consecutive
    Sentences)

5
Sentence Bargaining
  • The defendant pleads guilty knowing the sentence
    that will be imposed.
  • The principal effect of a sentence bargain is to
    reduce the maximum sentence.
  • (Major Issue Perception of Leniency)

6
(No Transcript)
7
Questions
  • How do caseloads affect plea bargaining?
  • What is the presumption of factual guilt?
  • What are the costs and risks of trial?

8
  • With plea bargaining,
  • it is not the issue of legal guilt
  • that is most often in dispute,
  • but rather what sentence
  • to impose on the guilty.
  • (Major Issue Individualized Justice)

9
Plea Bargaining and the Courtroom Workgroup
  • Bargaining occurs between
  • the prosecutor, the defendant,
  • the defense attorney or public defender,
  • and,
  • sometimes the judge.
  • (Major Issue Conflicting Objectives)

10
Objectives of the Prosecutor
  • The prosecutor normally controls the negotiating
    process. For example, the prosecutor can bargain
    or not bargain, he can threaten a more serious
    charge if the defendant does not plead, and he
    can force a dangerous defendant to plea on the
    nose or go to trial and suffer the trial penalty.
  • The prosecutor can pursue strong cases and
    dismiss weaker cases.
  • There is the certainty and finality of a
    conviction.
  • A plea bargain minimizes the prosecutors risk
    with no trial.
  • A conviction emphasizes deterrent objectives of
    law enforcement.

11
Objectives of Defendants
  • The primary benefit of a plea is a lenient
    sentence.
  • A common perception is that defendants who refuse
    to plead guilty receive harsher sentences.
  • For those unable to post bail, a plea can mean an
    immediate release (either probation or for time
    served).

12
Objectives of Defense Attorneys
  • The defense attorney must assess the guilty plea
    offer and weigh the costs.
  • The defense attorney negotiates the terms.
  • The defense attorney counsels the defendant. The
    defendant may or may not accept the offer.
  • The defense attorney tries to get the best deal
    possible for the defendant.

13
Objectives of Judges
  • The judge is dependent on the prosecutor, and to
    a lesser extent, the defense attorney, for
    knowledge about the case.
  • The courtroom workgroup negotiate dispositions
    that incorporate the judges expectations.
  • Judges may reject a plea agreement, but rarely
    do.
  • Judicial participation varies greatly from state
    to state, from actively involved to merely
    ratifying agreements.

14
Decision Making Norms
  • Consideration of the following shared norms
  • structure plea negotiations
  • Seriousness of the Offense
  • I
  • Prior Record
  • I
  • The Strength of the Prosecutors Case, i.e.,
  • the Evidence.

15
Questions
  • Which cases are more likely to go to trial?
  • When do defense attorneys
  • recommend a trial?
  • What is the importance of
  • the Supreme Court case
  • Bordenkircher v. Hayes (1978)?

16
The Plea
  • A plea of guilty infers the following
  • Admission of guilt
  • Waiver of the presumption of innocence
  • Waiver of the right to a jury trial
  • Waiver of the right to confront witnesses
  • Waiver of the right to self-incrimination

17
Accepting the Plea
  • The judge must question the defendant
  • on the following issues
  • Boykin v. Alabama (1969)
  • Whether the defendants plea is intelligent and
    voluntary.
  • Whether the defendant understands the nature of
    the charge and the possible punishment upon
    conviction.
  • Whether any threat was made.
  • Whether the defendant is satisfied with the
    services of defense counsel.
  • Whether the defendant understands the forfeiture
    of a jury trial.

18
Recording the Plea
  • Boykin Form plea of guilty.
  • Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure plea
    agreement - federal courts. (Defendants can
    withdraw a guilty plea however, defendants must
    live up to their end of the plea agreement.)

19
(No Transcript)
20
Questions
  • What is a plea of nolo contendere?
  • What is an Alford plea?

21
  • Attempts to abolish plea bargaining
  • often produce
  • a number of offsetting changes.
  • What is the hydraulic effect?
  • How would it control discretion?

22
  • Plea bargaining is best understood,
  • not as a response to the pressure
  • of caseload, but as an adaptation to
  • the realities of the types of cases
  • requiring court disposition.

23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com