PGCE Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

PGCE Science

Description:

PGCE Science Managing Enquiry – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: wikis1245
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PGCE Science


1
  • PGCE Science
  • Managing Enquiry

2
Follow-up Last session
  • Discuss Ward et al., and HQ Ch.7 and Ch.10. What
    are your views about the development of
    enquiry/inquiry skills?
  • Make sure that you have completed your audits and
    printed off summary copies for your portfolio
  • Use these to set targets for development. You may
    be able to do some of these on SE.

3
Preparation for today
  • Prepare HQ (2009) Ch.11

University of Winchester. PGCE Science
3
4
Constructivist model Scott, P. (1987) A
Constructivist View Of Teaching And Learning.
Leeds University Press.
  • Orientation
  • Elicitation
  • Restructuring, modification and extension of
    ideas
  • Application of ideas
  • Review and evaluation of ideas

4
5
Features of an effective science lesson?
6
School planning for a science lesson
  • Lesson Planning
  • Planning discussion sheet
  • discuss example/s.
  • Note University format and
  • guidance in SE handbook.

7
Headings from SE session plan pro-forma
  • DATE TIME
  • DURATION NC, NLS, NNS Refs
  • TITLE/CURRICULUM FOCUS
  • STUDENT TARGET/S
  • LINKS TO PREVIOUS WORK
  • LEARNING OBJECTIVES/INTENTIONS
  • SUCCESS CRITERIA
  • MONITORING, ASSESSMENT, RECORDING
  • POSSIBLE ERRORS AND MISCONCEPTIONS
  • RESOURCES
  • ROLES OF OTHER ADULTS
  • DIFFERENTIATION
  • KEY LANGUAGE INDIVIDUAL NEED
  • SAFETY
  • Lesson content/organisation and management of
    Learning

8
Managing Enquiry
  • http//teachfind.com/teachers-tv/ks12-science-pr
    actically-science
  • Sally Crowe, a primary AST leads a Year 4 class
    from Latchmere Primary School, Kingston upon
    Thames in a science investigation.

9
Lunchbox scenario
  • Year 1 class - science based lesson on food from
    plants.
  • Lesson A There were a range of activities planned
    but childrens responses and potential
    misconceptions had not been thought through. The
    students own scientific subject knowledge was
    weak e.g. a picture of a chocolate bar and a
    mushroom was among items presented for children
    to discuss foods from plants. When a girl put her
    hand up to say the chocolate bar came from plants
    the students response was that there werent
    any chocolate trees.
  • Lesson B This student had clearly thought through
    the potential issues around the same topic area.
    She ended the lesson by unpacking her lunchbox
    and getting the class to identify which items
    came from plants and this included a chocolate
    biscuit and a sandwich. This student had
    completed much more in depth preparation for her
    teaching and had additional resources to show
    children the source of different food items such
    as chocolate.

10
Sc1 Factors/ Variables and Fair Testing
  • occurs within the context of planning and
    carrying out investigations.
  • is set up to answer a question such as What
    will happen if?
  • 6- 7 year olds can consider fairness AFTER
    carrying out a test.
  • Older pupils can consider fairness BEFORE doing a
    test.
  • Fairness involves a discussion about variables -
    factors in an investigation that can be changed
    or kept the same.

11
Why do I need to know about variables?
  • So you can-
  • Help children succeed with their investigations
  • Manage investigations in class
  • Understand the progression in Sc 1
  • Assess childrens attainment in Sc 1

12
Types of variable
  • Variables that can be changed or manipulated
  • Independent variables
  • Variables that are to be measured or observed
  • Dependent variables
  • Variables to be kept the same in order for the
    test to be fair
  • Controlled variables

Core 1 Science Session 3 KP
12
13
Spellbound Science starting points for
enquiry
  • Food in the Fridge
  • What might you investigate?
  • S Naylor B Keogh (2007) Millgate House
    Publishers
  • Managing Enquiry Planning Reporting Boards

14
Science - Thinking Skills and Key Skills
  • See National Curriculum pp.20-22
  • Consider science learning in the context of
    Thinking and Key skills.
  • Thinking Skills
  • Information processing
  • Reasoning
  • Enquiry
  • Creativity
  • Evaluation
  • Key Skills
  • Communication
  • Application of number
  • Information Technology
  • Working with others
  • Improving own learning performance
  • Problem solving

15
CASE - Cognitive Acceleration through Science
Education
  • Key Stage 3 1984-87
  • very well established in schools
  • Key Stage 1 - CASE_at_KS1.HF 1998 (Lets Think!,
    nferNelson)
  • Key Stage 2 2000
  • (Lets Think through Science!, nferNelson)

16
Lets Think through Science! (2000)
  • AIM To help pupils to develop the ability to
    think in the context of science through a
    discussion based approach.
  • Theoretical underpinning
  • COGNITIVE CONFLICT - (Piaget) - provide
    appropriate challenge
  • SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION - (Vygotsky) - encourage
    collaborative problem solving
  • METACOGNITION - help pupils reflect
  • on their progress in solving a problem.

17
The Potato Challenge
  • Concrete preparation
  • Get into groups of 5
  • Take a good look at all the equipment in front
    of you. Talk in your groups about what you think
    you are going to do today. Consider health and
    safety aspects. Feedback to everyone after 2 mins.

18
The Potato Challenge
  • Cognitive conflict and social construction
  • Work as a collaborative group. Sort out rules
    which allow all the group to contribute and
    listen to each others views. Appoint one person
    to scribe the discussions for reference.
  • Without using the equipment decide and pick up
    which potato is the heaviest. Record what you
    did. What did you need to know to find out? What
    questions were asked?

19
The Potato challenge
  • Cognitive conflict and social construction.
  • Use all the equipment to find out which of the
    potatoes is heaviest. Record what you did.
  • How can you be sure you are right?
  • What could you measure?
  • What are you looking for?
  • Are you still working together collaboratively?

20
The Potato challenge
  • Cognitive conflict and social construction
  • Collect a ruler and one 100g weight.
  • In your groups use these new pieces of equipment
    to find out which potatoes are heavier than 100g.
  • Reflect What did you do? What did you find out?
    Can you find alternative ways of finding this
    out?
  • What do you think the band length will be if you
    had 200g on the end? Test your theory. Try 300g.
    Can you find a pattern? Where did you use the
    idea of bridging?

21
The Potato challenge
  • Metacognition - a good time for reflection Think
    back to how you found the heaviest potato at the
    beginning. How did the equipment help to refine
    your investigation. What were the rulers/weights
    for? How good/not so good were the methods you
    used? Can each member of the group identify when
    someone in the group helped to move their
    thinking on?
  • Could you see this working in the classroom?

22
  • The Potato challenge was taken from
  • Continuing Professional Development Unit
  • http//www.azteachscience.co.uk/resources/cpd/lets
    -think-through-science.aspx
  • Let's Think Through Science

23
The TASC approachThinking Actively in a Social
Context
  • Develop skills of research, investigation and
    problem-solving that can be used across the
    curriculum and across age groups
  • Develop a positive sense of self as an active
    learner
  • Develop skills of self-assessment
  • In science suggested activities include field
    trips, collections, topics, nature walks, keeping
    a wild area, Sc1, making/visiting exhibitions,
    recording using photographs/videos/sketches/displa
    ys/ICT
  • http//www.nace.co.uk/oldsite/tasc/tasc_home.htm

24
The TASC approachQuestioning
  • GATHER AND ORGANIZE - assess prior learning,
    generate ideas
  • IDENTIFY - have clear objectives and assessment
    criteria
  • DECIDE AND IMPLEMENT focus on task and find
    solutions
  • EVALUATE - discuss examples that demonstrate the
    criteria
  • LEARN FROM EXPERIENCE reflection
  • Wallace, B. (ed.) (2001) Teaching Thinking
    Skills across
  • the Primary Curriculum, London, Fulton.
  • At each stage of the TASC problem solving wheel
    CHILDRENS QUESTIONS are integral tools.
  • TEACHERS QUESTIONS are a model for the children.

25
(No Transcript)
26
Using the TASC wheel
  • Using your Potato knowledge and practical
    resources use the TASC wheel to answer the
    following problem
  • Several Y2 groups have grown potatoes in their
    school allotment. The school canteen said they
    would love to try them out in their luxury
    cottage pie but they wanted no more than 500g of
    potatoes from each group.
  • Unfortunately the weighing machines have broken
    so the chef suggested using a plastic bag, an
    elastic band, a ruler, and one 100g weight to
    help the children get as close to 500g as
    possible.
  • The chef will only choose to take potatoes if the
    group presents their evidence in a convincing and
    interesting way showing how they arrived at 500g.

27
TASC Practical Feedback
  • Discuss
  • How / when / in what circumstances might you
    adopt this approach? Give your reasons.
  • If not, why not? How might you adapt the format?
  • What are the implications for your role?

28
CASE STUDY The Thinking Wheel Jones and
MewAZSTT and University of Winchester (2005)
  • Research focus -
  • How can we use the Thinking Wheel to support
    the development of childrens skills in
    scientific enquiry and language and thinking
    skills?
  • Each section of the wheel represents a type of
    cognitive activity such as those used by Bloom
    (1956).

29
The Thinking Wheel Jones and Mew(2005)
30
The Thinking Wheel Jones and Mew(2005)
  • We found using the thinking wheel a useful
    device for task design. It focused our attention
    on the structure of the lesson, types of
    questions we needed to ask, and the challenge we
    needed to pose to the children. It also helped
    with the pace of the lessons (Jones and Mew
    2005).

31
Drake (2007) Linking Thinking Ducks - EY
32
The Thinking Frames Approachhttp//www.azteachsci
ence.co.uk/resources/cpd/the-thinking-frames-appro
ach.aspx
33
Think sheets
Think Slowly, break it down
Think Flexibly, what do I know?
This is like
Brainstorm Ideas what could I do?
Other peoples point of view - what is someone else doing?
What I will do
34
SE tasks
  • 1. Gather what information you can about the
    schools resources for teaching science
    equipment and materials, published schemes, books
    for teachers and children.
  • Look at and make notes on the school science
    policy. What does this information tell you about
    the way in which the school teaches science and
    how the children are expected to learn?
  • 2. Gather information about the ways in which
    the teacher plans for childrens learning in
    science. You may be able to collect
  • planning for a term/half term, lesson plans, any
    ways in which science is delivered through other
    subjects e.g in English or mathematics.
  • 4. Look at the schools science medium term plans
    and identify the progression from one activity to
    another. Look for progression in knowledge and in
    skills. This will be referred to in sessions.

35
SE tasks
  • You may also be able to
  • Plan, conduct and evaluate a scientific activity
    with a small group of children.
  • Try to find out what they already know before
    you do the activity by questioning or using a
    technique such as concept mapping.
  • How will you plan for the children to develop
    investigative skills? Which particular skills
    will this activity allow them to develop?
  • How will the practical work allow them to
    develop those skills?
  • How will you know that they have developed those
    skills?

36
Core 1 Assignment Science option see handbook
  • The science assignment will draw on your
    participation in the science component of your
    course, and your reading and directed tasks
    within the field of science education. It will
    also be informed by your school experience both
    your teaching and/or observations of more
    experienced colleagues in school. In addition,
    your reflective journal will be a useful source
    of evidence.
  • Title How teachers might use misconceptions to
    support childrens learning in science.

37
  • Part A A critical discussion (2000 words -
    please do not exceed the word count.)
  • All children hold naïve ideas in science which
    go beyond the learning of information to include
    beliefs which do not match accepted understanding
    of scientific theories (Oliver, 2006 186).
  • As children learn science the sense they make of
    what they are presented with can differ from what
    we expect. Learners have alternative frameworks
    or misconceptions. The challenges that teachers
    face include how to find out what children know
    why they think like this how to address these
    issues, so that children feel that their ideas
    are valued how to keep children motivated to
    move their ideas on. In your discussion consider
  • at least two examples to illustrate, explore and
    analyse possible misconceptions
  • suggest why children might have such
    misconceptions.
  • discuss how you might address these and help
    children to build and develop their ideas. What
    questions would you ask and why? What
    activities/resources would you use to support
    learning?
  • support your work with appropriate theoretical
    references.
  • refer to the EYFS / NC to contextualise the
    progression in childrens learning of science.

38
  • Part B (2000 words - please do not exceed the
    word count.)
  • Following on from Part A and your School
    Experience review and reflect critically on how
    your approach to teaching science has changed
    since the beginning of the course. In what ways
    has your teaching of science developed? Use
    examples from your own experiences of observing
    or teaching science in the primary school/ early
    years setting to reflect on your approach to
    teaching science, making appropriate links to
    support your discussion in Part A of this
    assignment.
  • Oliver, A. (2006) Creative Teaching Science in
    the Early Years and Primary Classroom London
    Fulton

39
Directed Tasks
  • Follow up this session Read H Q (2009) Ch.13
    and Ch.19. Reflect on how you might develop
    effective planning for science investigations.
  • READING PACK
  • Harlen (2009) Science and Good Science
    Teaching. Review your understanding of science
    enquiry. How will YOU ensure that plenty of
    action is the basis for developing
    understanding?
  • Preparation for next week Traianou (2007).
    Reflect on the relationship between your subject
    skills and knowledge in science and your future
    approach to teaching science in the primary
    classroom.
  • Remember to complete all audits.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com