Title: Structure of Presentation
1Structure of Presentation
- Why the need for the Indaba
- The Municipal Viability Indaba
- After the Indaba The Municipal Revenue
Enhancement Programme
2Why the Need for the Indaba
- Based on on-going monitoring, two issues of
greatest concern are - municipal finances and
- quality of leadership
- Both issues have direct correlation to ability to
deliver services
3Why the Need for the Indaba
- Continuous reports of municipalities in financial
difficulties (default or near default)
particularly with bulk suppliers of water and
electricity - Discovery of creative accounting as a means by
which municipalities are making it through the
financial year but receiving qualified audits - Running overdrafts
- Use of cash set aside for other purposes
capital expenditures, provisions for claims and
reserves - Deductions from employee salaries
- Non-payment of creditors including statutory
obligations
4Why the Need for the Indaba
- Minister commissioned an investigation whose
mandate was - To determine the true extent of the problem
- To gain a thorough understanding of the causes of
the problem - To recommend a realistic way forward
highlighting the role that should be played by
the National government
5Trend AnalysisDebt by Province
Total Outstanding R24,348,987,796 As at
September 2002
6Trend AnalysisAccumulated Debt vs. Revenue
Province Total Accumulated Municipal Services Debt Total Service-Related Revenue Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Accumulated Debt as of Total Service-generated Revenue
Eastern Cape R1,803,557,530 R3,097,965,875 58
Free State R1,800,984,418 R1,979,578,631 91
Gauteng R12,187,210,711 R20,390,800,751 60
KwaZulu-Natal R3,069,126,293 R10,077,210,122 30
Mpumalanga R798,787,101 R1,765,656,499 45
North West R927,800,185 R1,826,778,881 51
Northern Cape R553,947,442 R475,121,961 116
Limpopo R373,237,840 R1,373,313,613 27
Western Cape R2,534,336,277 R9,717,032,003 29
7Trend AnalysisDebt Growth Rate
- 31 of municipalities service debt is growing
at a rate of less than 5 per year - 37 of municipalities services debt is growing
at a rate of greater than 10 per year - 32 of municipalities services debt is growing
at a rate of greater than 20 per year
8Trend AnalysisGrowth of Aging Debt
9Trend AnalysisBreakout of the Problem
Category of Municipality Amount Owed As of National Total
Largest 16 R 18. 6 billion 77
Other R 5.7 billion 23
National R 24.3 billion 100
10Trend AnalysisServices for which debt is owed
11Trend AnalysisProfile of Debtors
12Trend Analysis Other Factors of Concern
- Only 40 of Category B municipalities have audit
committees that meet at least twice a year - 60 of Category B and 40 of Category C
municipalities do not have an internal audit
function - 2 metros can bring their financial records up to
date in the following month
- Only 6 of Category B municipalities are able to
bring their financial records up to date in the
following month and 10 of Category C - Alarming increase of use of overdraft facilities
(or bridge financing) and equally alarming
recalling of these facilities
13Trend Analysis Other Factors of Concern
- Aggregate capital expenditure of budgeted
amounts, by category of municipality - Category A 9.1
- Category B 6.2
- Category C 9.9
14Trend AnalysisCauses of the Problem
- Inappropriate taxes and tariffs
- Problems with the implementation of Free Basic
Services - Problems with the identification of indigent
households - Addressing existing high arrears
- Lack of credibility based on ongoing shortcomings
- Ineffective municipal revenue administration
- Reorganisations
- Under-resourcing
- Adopting to new circumstances
- Poor metering systems
- Unreliable data
- Inadequate billing systems
- Difficult accounts
- Unreliable postal service
- Inaccessible payment points
15Trend AnalysisCauses of the Problem
- Political opportunism
- Charging of interest
- Lack of effective and creative incentives and
sanctions - Lack of clarity around responsibility for revenue
administration - High government arrears
- Uncertainty relating to the establishment of the
Regional Electricity Distributors (REDs)
16The Municipal Viability Indaba
- Reasons for the Indaba
- Municipal services debt fundamentally affects the
overall viability of municipalities and therefore
lays at the crux of governments efforts and
ability to improve the quality of life for
all - The growth rate of municipal services debt
reports on the condition of the compact between
municipal governments and the communities that
they serve - The issue provides some important insight into
the complexity and fragility of the local
government transformation process - The issue fundamentally relates to all the
strategic objectives of the Presidential
Coordinating Council (PCC)
17The Municipal Viability Indaba
- Reasons for the Indaba
- All municipalities are experiencing the problem
of service arrears - Several municipalities are making concerted
efforts to address the problem with varying
degrees of success evidenced by the escalating
growth rate - The Indaba created a forum through which the
issue can be discussed comprehensively and
through which experiences can be shared and
lessons learned - The Indaba also created the opportunity to place
the issue squarely before all those affected by
it so as to achieve a common appreciation and
understanding of its implications - The Indaba created a platform to highlight
National government policies, objectives and
programmes that adversely impact municipal
viability
18The Municipal Viability Indaba
- Objectives of the Indaba
- To share the facts, panic and opportunities
around the issue of municipal viability - To adopt strategic targets that will guide
municipal efforts to improve revenue management - To develop and adopt collective resolutions on a
way forward - To agree on mechanisms through which to manage
and monitor the implementation of the resolutions - To inform delegates of the findings and
implications of the commissioned investigation
19The Municipal Viability Indaba
- Audience for the Indaba
- Mayors
- Speakers
- Chairs of Council Finance and/or Audit Committees
- Local Government MECs
- Local Government HODs
- Municipal Managers
- Municipal Chief Financial Officers
- Related entities
- DBSA
- Eskom
- Financial institutions
20The Municipal Viability Indaba The Programme
Day One (AM) Day One (PM) Day Two (AM)
Presentation by Minister of Provincial and Local Government on Municipal Viability Presentation by National Treasury Presentation by the Department of Trade and Industry Presentation by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Presentation by the Department of Minerals and Energy Presentation by the Department of Housing Presentations of business solutions available and developable prepaid technologies (water, electricity etc.) innovative financial strategies to assist with revenue collection (municipal services debt securitisation) creative property management incentives to improve municipal revenue available and developable financing mechanisms to support local infrastructural initiatives that impact revenue collection staff development and training options that improve revenue administration (market knowledge and customer service training etc.) Presentation and launch of Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme and implementation plan Adoption of the implementation and monitoring plan Announcement of the implementation programme management structure and the chairs and members of initiative steering committees
21The Municipal Viability Indaba
- A total of 1,700 delegates were invited. 1,414
attended - Representatives from National government
departments all gave presentations and delegates
were given an opportunity to debate issues raised
in their presentations - 24 exhibitors participated in the Indaba
ranging from financial institutions to government
departments to technology vendors
22The Municipal Viability Indaba
- Based on surveyed assessment of Indaba
- Implementation requirements for solutions
presented included - Partnerships
- Funding
- Technical know-how
- Project management capability
- Support from DPLG
- Training
23The Municipal Viability Indaba
- Based on surveyed assessment of Indaba
- Positive aspects of the Indaba included
- Appreciation that all municipalities are
experiencing the same issues - Issues that matter the most were discussed
- Involving and assembling municipalities made them
feel recognised - Learning opportunity information sharing
- Involvement of National departments in single
forum - Innovative solutions presented
24The Municipal Viability Indaba
- Based on surveyed assessment of Indaba
- Negative aspects of the Indaba included
- Time management and availability of time for
further discussions - Perceived focus on urban/large versus rural/small
municipalities - Focus on developed/established municipalities
- Suggestions
- 95 of surveyed delegates would like to annualise
the Indaba mainly to gauge collective and
individual progress - Make Indabas Province-based
25Outcome of the Indaba The Municipal Revenue
Enhancement Programme
- Intended Outcomes
- Improved and sustained revenue collection
- Alleviation of causes of services debt
- Extension of services particularly free basic
services to the poor - Strategically pool resources aimed to enhance
service delivery and streamline access to these
resources - Clarify national policies pertaining to service
delivery in order to make them implementable
26The Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme
- Approach
- Seeks to reinforce and accelerate the effective
implementation of existing policies and ongoing
support programmes - Strategically involves affected parties
provinces and municipalities to ensure more
focused solution development and ease of
implementation - Seeks to provide just-in-time assistance and
support to municipal efforts to ensure success - Seeks to involve new partners particularly
national sector departments and the business
sector in order to broaden spectrum of solutions
27The Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme
Public Communication/ Education Initiatives
Revenue Enhancement Fund
Appropriate Technology Initiatives
Institutional Responsibility Initiatives
Sustainable Delivery Initiatives
28The Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme
Initiative Intended Outcome(s) Approach Key Deliverables
Public Communication/ Education Initiatives MEC Lechesa Tsenoli, Free State To achieve a greater public understanding of municipal service delivery systems and the impact of non-payment (or the lack of sense of responsibility) on service delivery and the local economy. It is hoped that this greater public understanding will begin to cultivate a new culture of responsibility that will ultimately impact municipal viability. Use the 5 PCC Strategic Objectives as the parameters or framework for overall programme Determine a clear, consistent and understandable message Determine key things that must be done to reinforce our message (e.g.. National and provincial governments must pay arrears to municipalities by certain date ease of payment, enforcement of credit control, conflict resolution mechanisms etc.) National and provincial government settlement of arrears by March 2003 Constantly identify good examples of progress and expose/highlight them Longer-term public communication/ education plan that accommodates communication needs of other initiatives and incorporates Letsema
29The Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme
Initiative Intended Outcome(s) Approach Key Deliverables
Appropriate Technology Intervention Initiatives MEC Trevor Fowler, Gauteng To create and/or facilitate access to technology interventions that will assist municipalities with revenue collection and by extension, sustainable service delivery Differentiate issues by type of municipality Determine appropriate technological interventions Assess availability of interventions Assess municipalities readiness for interventions Investigate and develop financing mechanisms to avail interventions Roll-out of interventions Improved billing and accounting systems Citizen education programme to ensure public buy-in and responsiveness to technological interventions Assess feasibility and implement alternative service delivery mechanisms (e.g.. Prepaid technology, shared service centres) Assess specific infrastructure deficiencies and develop plan to address them Reinforce message of responsibility vs. message of support
30The Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme
Initiative Intended Outcome(s) Approach Key Deliverables
Sustainable Delivery Initiatives Cllr. Duma Nkosi, Ekurhuleni To provide focused leadership and resolution to issues relating to the support of the poor Use compliance with local government legislation and related mechanisms (e.g.. IDPs, Ward Committees) as framework for initiative Reinforce and utilise Ward Committee structure (i.e.. Know your people and what they need understand their circumstances and expectations determine the appropriate level of support) Understand available resources for delivery, and address access issues Reframe the issue of indigent support (i.e.. What is the moral obligation what are the minimum standards and efficiency options to address this obligation how do we frame and communicate subsidisation what is the relationship between subsidisation and sustainability) Balanced national indigent policy (to include indigent identification, what support is available, where is it coming from, and how do we apply it) Public communication around appreciating subsidisation
31The Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme
Initiative Intended Outcome(s) Approach Key Deliverables
Institutional Responsibility Initiatives Cllr. Obed Mlaba Ethekweni To provide focused leadership and resolution to issues relating to institutional responsibility as it pertains to municipal viability Need to reverse public attitude that seeks to get from government without putting in Need to change work ethic in municipal organisations Need to focus on economic growth and development for the longer-term (i.e.. discover new opportunities for revenue generation) Need to regionalise resources to maximise effect (need to engage parastatals whose mandate impacts municipal viability) Identify and pilot new mechanisms for revenue generation (i.e.. excluding trading accounts, intergovernmental transfers and donor assistance) Identify and pilot customer-friendly and focused mechanisms of interaction Develop balanced mechanisms for debt write-offs Develop balanced sanctions and rewards Explore partnerships that use larger municipalities as implementing agents
32The Municipal Revenue Enhancement Programme
Initiative Intended Outcome(s) Approach Key Deliverables
Municipal Revenue Enhancement Fund MEC Mohammed Bhabha, Mpumalanga To provide results-driven support to municipalities working toward improving revenue administration Assess and thematise issues that municipalities are trying to address Assess availability and procure specialised technical assistance Develop marketing plan for Municipal Revenue Enhancement Fund Develop streamlined application process Develop on-going monitoring and evaluation plan Needs and issue assessment report Prequalify technical assistance (with a results/performance based framework) Marketing Plan Communication plan for successful projects
33Guiding Principles for the Programme
- Programme must be about delivery i.e. geared
toward constant, visible and measurable
movement/progress - Programme should provide leadership to enable
movement - Programme should create and implement new and
sustainable options - Programme must frame a strong message that
speaks to governments intentions, movement and
impact - Programme must continuously involve those whom it
is created to benefit
34Progress to Date
- Developing a Delivery Calendar comprising of
projects/initiatives and anticipated roll-out
dates - Developing Programme Message
- Research and analysis have begun
- Trend analysis of Auditor General reports
- Trend analysis of Project Viability reports
- Will engage Provincial Departments, Provincial
Organised Local Government, ILGM and IMFO - Appointing a Reference Group
- Establishing programme management capability
within DPLG