Croatia Statistical Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Croatia Statistical Training

Description:

Croatia Statistical Training Courts Session 4, January 17th, 13.45 14.30 Overview of the Criminal Justice System and Statistics Recording and Counting rules – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:150
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: LEWI126
Learn more at: https://www.unodc.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Croatia Statistical Training


1
CroatiaStatistical Training
  • Courts
  • Session 4, January 17th, 13.45 14.30
  • Overview of the Criminal Justice System and
    Statistics Recording and Counting rules

2
Recording and counting rules
  • One of the most confusing aspects of Criminal
    Justice Statistics is the changing counting unit.
    Roughly spoken from victim to crime to offender
    to case.
  • One of the complications is that labeling is
    sometimes needed at another level of counting
    (e.g. crime type at the case level)
  • Another complication is one of communication
    between languages, but also between agencies
    within one country

3
Contents
  1. Counting unit / counting moment
  2. Principal Offence rule
  3. Principal Sanction rule

4
Recording and counting rules
  • For each item I will give a general introduction
    and I will reflect on how it is dealt with in the
    Netherlands, followed by a roundtable discussion
    establishing the situation in Croatia
  • I will discuss the whole flow through the Justice
    System, but concentrating on Courts
  • The aim of this session is to describe in detail
    the recording and counting rules in Croatia and
    to identify possible shortcomings

5
Counting unit
  • There is a multitude of potential counting units.
    To name a few (in English, not to be
    translated!)
  • Victim, Person, Household, Crime, Criminal act,
    Offence, CC article, Offender, Case, File,
    Dossier, Verdict, Sentence, Sanction,
  • The exact (legal) definition is often not clear,
    which makes it hard to translate

6
Counting unitVictim Surveys
  • The counting unit here is often (as in the Dutch
    Victim Survey) a person, however restricted to
    persons above a certain age.
  • Sometimes the unit is a household
  • For bussiness surveys the unit is a company
  • The reporting unit can be the number of
    victimizations

7
Counting unitPolice recording
  • Here it starts getting more complicated. Usually
    the unit is the crime, possibly defined as
  • a set of actions, linked together in time and
    place, committed by one or more persons at the
    expense of zero or more persons, where these
    actions are considered criminal by law
  • This would be a good description of the Dutch
    situation a crime (misdrijf) is recorded with
    possibly more victims and more offenders. And
    more offences (feiten), provided these are part
    of the same crime.

8
Counting unitPolice recording (cont.)
  • Would this be a good description of the counting
    unit for recorded crimes in Croatia? What would
    be the local terms and is crime in your view
    the logical translation in English for the whole
    and offence for the parts?

9
Counting unitSuspected Offenders
  • This seems easy, the counting unit is the person.
  • Some questions remain, such as
  • When is a person considered a suspected offender?
    (the Neth when the person is formally
    interrogated)
  • Are unique persons counted? (the Neth no)
  • Again what would the answer be in Croatia?

10
Counting unitPolice output / Prosecution input
  • Statistically, these could be the same. In the
    Netherlands police output is not seen as a
    separate statistic.
  • (But of course, the input of the Prosecution
    could come from other agencies as well)
  • The counting unit is called a zaak in the
    Netherlands, which could be translated into the
    English term case. But

11
Prosecution / Court cases (the Netherlands)
  • The basic unit for statistical purposes is the
    case (Dutch zaak). A case has always exactly
    one offender. A sentencing decision by the court
    is always made on the level of the case and can
    consist of different sanctions
  • However, a case can have more than one crime
    committed by this offender (cases can be combined
    into one case). A decision by the PPS can be on
    the level of the crime.
  • Also, a crime can consist of more than one
    offence (Dutch feit) ..

12
Prosecution / Court cases (the Netherlands)
  • And this can be done in two ways
  • The crime itself consists of more than one
    offence (e.g. robbery in combination with illegal
    arms possession)
  • The crime has been given an alternative lable by
    the PPS (e.g. manslaughter or assault leading to
    death)
  • The guilty/not guilty court verdict is on this
    level (the offence)
  • N.b. The offence can exist of more than one
    articles in the CC

13
(Prosecution / )Court cases (Croatia)
  • How is this organized in Croatia statistics
  • Offenders, cases, verdicts, offences, sanctions?
  • Are these in your view indeed the right English
    terms?
  • The same for Prosecution and Courts?

14
Prosecution / Court cases (the Netherlands)
  • Statistically, the Dutch data structure is
    problematic for two reasons
  • The number of cases is rather flexible (cases
    seem to disappear when they are combined). This
    has an effect on what is considered input/output.
  • Combining cases by Prosecutor and/or Judge is
    possible (in the Netherlands). In Croatia?
  • It is very important how to deal with those in
    Statistics. What kind of a decision would this
    be?

15
Prosecution / Court cases (the Netherlands)
  • Statistically, the Dutch data structure is
    problematic for two reasons
  • 2. Much information is available on the level of
    the offence, but needed on the level of the
    case.This makes the decision what offence level
    information to use (e.g. to answer the question
    what sentence was given to which crime type)
    rather complicated!
  • Principal Offence rule
  • Principal Sanction rule

16
Principal Offence rule
  • If a case consists of more than one offence there
    are several possibilities when establishing the
    type of crime
  • The crime type of the most important offence is
    taken (and how is most important then defined?)
  • The crime type of the first offence is taken
  • The statistics are not given on the level of the
    case, but on the level of the offence
  • Other, ...
  • The principal offence rule says to use 1. What
    would the solution be in Croatia?

17
Principal Sanction rule
  • If more than one sanction is imposed on an
    offender there are several possibilities when
    establishing the type of sanction for the crime
  • The most severe sanction is taken (and how is
    most severe then defined?)
  • The first sanction is taken
  • All sanctions are given
  • Other, ...
  • The principal sanction rule says to use 1. What
    would the solution be in Croatia?

18
Suggestion
  • An exact description / definition of all entities
    (like case, offender, offence etc.) in the
    Criminal Justice System and their relation to
    each other is very important. So is a description
    of the flow through the system of each entity
  • There are useful tools mainly used in IT - to
    model these aspects. For example class diagrams
    and state diagrams in UML (Unified Modelling
    Language)
  • It would be very useful (and necessary anyhow
    when building computer systems to support your
    statistics) to do this, together with IT
    professionals

19
CroatiaStatistical Training
  • Courts
  • Session 4, January 17th, 13.45 14.30
  • Overview of the Criminal Justice System and
    Statistics Recording and Counting rules
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com