Pressure%20Groups - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Pressure%20Groups

Description:

Pressure Groups How much influence do they have? What are Pressure Groups? Pressure groups are informal political institutions that seek to influence the making and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:193
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Staf1292
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pressure%20Groups


1
Pressure Groups
  • How much influence do they have?

2
What are Pressure Groups?
  • Pressure groups are informal political
    institutions that seek to influence the making
    and the implementation of public policy

3
What do they do?
  • They cover a broad spectrum from the large
    business with high level contacts at national and
    European level to the smallest local group
  • Can you name any Pressure Groups based on this
    information?

4
How do they influence?
  • Secret behind the scenes lobbying of politicians
    and influential figures
  • Wynn Transport
  • Or
  • Highly visible protests
  • Fathers for Justice
  • Make Poverty History

5
Did you know..
  • More people belong to Pressure Groups than
    political parties?
  • The study of Pressure Groups and influence is
    essential in understanding how the system works
  • Can you think of any ways PGs are similar or
    ways they are different to Political parties?

6
Pressure Groups are different from political
parties because
  • They do not normally contest elections
  • When they do, they do not aim to form a
    Government
  • Their campaigns are based on single issue policies

7
Pressure Groups are similar to political parties
because
  • They are based on representation and
    participation
  • They form a mechanism for the expression of
    peoples interests
  • They influence Government and Government policy
  • Provide funds
  • Sponsor candidates
  • Influence the shaping of policies

8
Types of Pressure Group
  • Sectional Groups
  • Based on the performance of an economic function
  • i.e. CBI, BMA, Law Society, NUT
  • Cause Groups
  • Based on shared attitudes and values
  • i.e. Greenpeace, Amnesty International, Shelter
    Charter 88 etc.

9
Differences explained
Membership Purpose Extras
Sectional Groups Limited to a shared background To protect interests of members May pursue other causes i.e. BMA Ban Smoking
Cause Groups Those sharing same background Advance public welfare as perceived by members Owns premises and employs staff
10
Insider vs Outsider groups
  • Insider Groups Consulted on a regular basis by
    Government
  • Outsider Groups Either do not want to be
    closely involved or are unable to gain Government
    recognition

11
Insider Groups
  • High Profile Re-inforce contacts with
    Government through media contact
  • Low Profile Behind the scenes contact with
    Government
  • Prisoner Groups Unable to break free as either
    dependent on Government or public sector

12
Outsider Groups
  • Potential Insider Groups seeking insider
    status, a change of Government can change status
    i.e. Countryside Alliance
  • Outsider by necessity Lack the political skills
    to succeed
  • Ideological outsiders Objectives are at a
    varaince to social and political norms i.e. CND,
    ALF etc.

13
Political Relations with PGs
  • 1979-1997 Conservative Govts, saw PGs as
    Strangling Serpants Douglas Hurd
  • Curtailed TU powers
  • Won great industrial battles such as 1984 Miners
    Strike
  • Professionals groups such as Doctors and Teachers
    were seen as in need of radical reform therefore
    influence denied
  • Independent Schools, Private Health suppliers and
    housing associations flourished

14
Blair
  • The exemption of F1 from tobacco advertising had
    nothing to do with Bernie Ecclestones 1 million
    donation
  • ASH, BMA and several charities were in uproar
  • Links with the TUs have weakened, despite
    Minimum wage and increased public spending on
    education and health

15
The Countryside Alliance
  • My Heroes!
  • Marched on London in 1998, 2002 and 2004
  • Marched against the ban on fox hunting, loss of
    farmland to urban development, falling incomes,
    declining rural services
  • Supported by NFU, Clay Pigeon Assoc, Timber
    Growers Assoc and the British Field Sports Society

16
Direct Action
  • May Day Riots 2002boo hiss.
  • Soap dodgers marching against capitalism and the
    march of poverty
  • Marched through City, destroying buildings, such
    as McDonalds and defacing statues such as
    Churchills
  • City workers photocopied 50 notes and threw them
    out the windows to the protestors
  • Fuel Protestors 2000 Hooray!.....blockading
    petrol stations

17
A new Social Movement
  • Wider focus than a single issue, national or even
    global in its outlook
  • No HQ, no staff, just groups linked by the
    Internet, global, anarchic and chaotic
  • Environmentalism is an example
  • Pressure Groups i.e. Greenpeace
  • Political Parties i.e. The Green Party
  • Action Protest and Direct, i.e. Rainbow Warrior
  • They include a wide variety of ecologists,
    conservationists, eco-warriors etc..

18
Victims of Social Movements
  • Iron Triangle of Global Capitalism
  • WTO
  • IMF
  • World Bank
  • Multi nationals
  • McDonalds
  • Coca-Cola
  • Nike
  • Texaco
  • GAP
  • Microsoft
  • Disney

19
Core targets for all PG types
  • The Core Executive
  • PM, Ministers, Civil Servants
  • Parliament
  • Public Opinion
  • Local Institutions

20
So do PGs make the UK democratic?YES!
  • Participation and Political access
  • Improvement of Government
  • Information provided affects quality
  • Pluralism Freedom of Association
  • PGs serve as vital links between Govt. and Soc
  • Assist in the dispersal of political power
  • Social Progress
  • New issues to be debated, i.e. environmentalism
  • Social Cohesion
  • Safety valve for grievances
  • Opposition
  • Expose information, improving accountability

21
So do PGs make the UK democratic?Errr.No!
  • Sectionalism and Selfishness
  • Only favour the well organised
  • Anti-Parliamentary democracy
  • Insider groups may not work in public interest
  • Elitism
  • Re-inforces existing class and power structure
  • Pluralistic stagnation
  • Too many groups, lots of contrasting aims, can
    immobilise the system
  • Social disharmony and dislocation
  • Intensifies feeling of injustice by highlighted
    groups
  • Failure of opposition
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com