Title: WP 9: 1st Planning meeting summary
1WP 9 1st Planning meeting summary
Fundación Malpelo
- Clarification between WP members of common
objectives - Workshop planning and logistics with time-line
- Planning for deliverables and publications
- Next steps
2Refining objectives
- 1. Fundamental definitions, concepts and
development of adaptive management mechanisms for
marine eco-tourism (criteria). - Determine marine tourism activities that favour
conservation criteria and generate socio-economic
alternatives. - To determine the most appropriate criteria for
evaluating the effects of marine ecotourism
practices in reserves (carrying capacity and/or
LAC) - Development and testing of these models with
appropriately designed and defined indicator
categories - Elaborate and implement efficient,
cost-effective monitoring and evaluation
protocols (integrating biophysical,
socio-economic, user perceptions and governance
metadata) - 2. Explore cost benefit and reciprocation
mechanisms wrt conservation values - with more
emphasis upon social and economic
interdependencies. - Develop and evaluate mechanisms to mitigate
negative impacts, encourage positive impacts and
examine interdependencies - Assess human impacts on biological communities
at specific case study sites and the implications
of environmental variability (ENSO, PDO, global
warming etc) upon sustainable business practices
in the Equatorial Pacific. - 3. Application, outreach and constructing
sustainable management frameworks
3Workshop schedule (and agreement in presented
work plan)
- Workshop 1 CONCEPT AND ORIENTATION CREATING
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT MECHANISMS FOR ECOTOURISM - (Site TBD Colombia January 2006) Suggestions
- Planning and discussion forum (a) to share WP
member and MPA stakeholder experiences (b)
develop WP strategy, definitions and fundamental
concepts (i.e. Management model definitions (LAC
vs. Carrying Capacity)) (c) evaluate existing
indicators and monitoring methods (d) design
candidate indicators (transversal and specific
for WP MPA case studies) (e) design monitoring
approach/ protocols. - Workshop 2 EVALUATION, COST/BENEFIT AND
RECIPROCATION MECHANISMS TOWARDS CONSERVATION
VALUES - (Galapagos, Ecuador, November 2006) Suggestions
- Evaluation forum (a) share WP member progress
and lessons learned, revisit conceptual questions
to evaluate and modify indicators and monitoring
methods if necessary, (b) integration of WP
criteria and data between other INCOFISH WPs
(1,5,8 etc). - Discussion forum (b) cost benefit analysis of
reciprocation of ecotourism and conservation
initiatives to ensure sustainable ecosystems,
coastal marine interactions (c) develop
strategies to integrate WP recommendations into
decision making processes within MPAs (eg.
Participatory forums, conservation initiatives
within the tourism sector) - Discussion forum (d) how might we implement
long term improvements in sector group
perceptions w.r.t sustainable activities? - Workshop 3 MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND FUTURE STEPS
- (Machalilla, Ecuador Sept 2007) Suggestions
- Plenary (a) integrating technical
recommendations into management processes (b)
summary of WP advances (c) strategies to develop
WP objectives beyond the life of the project - Work groups (c) continuation of publications and
diffusion of project results
4Planning for deliverables and publications
Suggested Topics
- Concept MS with global perspective and summaries/
comparisons between case reserves. - Participatory processes for developing indicators
with stakeholders. - User perceptions and socio-economic
considerations - Outreach materials for Reserve managers and local
communities etc.
5WP 9 Work Plan
Project task Months
Start-up, Creation of a shared literature base historical data and literature review between WP members, Presentation of WP goals with local MPA administrators and stakeholders. 3 - 7
Workshop 1 (Site TBD, Colombia) January 2006) CONCEPT AND ORIENTATION CREATING ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT MECHANISMS FOR ECOTOURISM 9
Further integration of work package goals with local MPA administrators and stakeholders (strengthened links) local workshop sessions. Construct and maintain a web based Ecotourism discussion and feedback group through portal? Biophysical, socio-economic, user perception and governance data collection with MPA counterparts Data reduction and creation of local and WP data to WP1 Analysis first evaluation of marine ecotourism indicators for MPAs and monitoring methods 9 -18
Workshop 2 (Galapagos, Ecuador, November 2006). EVALUATION, COST/BENEFIT AND RECIPROCATION MECHANISMS TOWARDS CONSERVATION VALUES 18
Continued indicator data collection and assimilation. Identify, explore and where feasible apply, incentives and mechanisms to improve the contributions of tourism operations towards reciprocal sustainable ecotourism and conservation. On basis of indicator outputs design decision making tools for application by Marine Reserve Managers (interpretation) 18 - 29
Workshop 3 (Machalilla, Ecuador) Sept 2007) MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND FUTURE STEPS 29
Final dissemination of results to stakeholders, park administrators and academic community 30 - 33
6WP 9 Deliverables
D9.1 Month 10 DEFINITIONS AND CRITERIA to determine the most appropriate management models and scope of ecotourism (Carrying capacity vs. LAC/VIM) for ecotourism in the 4 MPAs under study with global review of ecotourism activities outside of Equ. Pacific
D9.2 Month 25 INDICATORS, STANDARDS AND THRESHOLD VALUES used to monitor impact of ecotourism on selected MPAs
D9.3 Month 30 A RANGE OF ADEQUATE MANAGEMENT RESPONSES application and evaluation of ecotourism concepts, standards and indicators between WPs and MPA stakeholders and managers (focus)
D9.4 Transv. with deadline schedule SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS AND DISSEMINATION TO STAKEHOLDER GROUPS Dissemination of results to stakeholders, park administrators and academic community. At least 5 publications submitted between WP members
7Milestones
Month Milestone
8 Model/s identified and concepts defined
9 Prototype indicators established
9 Presentation and exploration of work package goals with local MPA administrators and stakeholders
10 Monitoring protocols first applied in case study systems
18 Data formatted for integration into INCOFISH web-portal
21 Monitoring system/ Indicator evaluation and feedback process
10 - 33 Publication and diffusion to stakeholders, administrators and academic community (transversal activity)
8WP 9Time table
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
9WP 9 Partners and case study ecosystems
- Galapagos National Park Service (Ecuador)
- Direccion Nacional de Areas Protegidas y Vida
Silvestre (Ecuador) - Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia
- Invited experts (e.g. tourism reps, NGO experts,
WP 8 member, process facilitators, local
government etc.) - Galapagos Marine Reserve (Ecuador)
- Machalilla National Park (Ecuador)
- Malpelo Sanctuary of Flora and Fauna (Colombia)
- Gorgona National Park (Colombia)
10Next steps and synergies.
- First meeting to explore the relative methods
(LAC criteria etc) is tonight. - First approach to stakeholders and managers upon
return to host countries - Still need to meet with WP 8 involvement in the
second workshop more emphasis on socio-economic
issues? - Possible synergy with WP 6 development of
decision making tools