Title: Module 3 Why measure corruption?
1Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Module 3 Why measure corruption?
- Assessment anxiety?
- vast diversity of approaches that serve
different purposes - UNCAC reporting mechanism asks countries to
explain the systems used for evaluating their
compliance (UNCAC self-assessment checklist) - How best to link the processes of nationally led
assessments and UNCAC reporting? - Starting point how does a country intend to use
corruption assessments? For what purpose?
2Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Activity 1 Uses of corruption assessments
- What are corruption assessments used for?
-
- Small groups brainstorm, record responses on
paper - 5 minutes
3Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Activity 1 Uses of corruption assessments
- Ranking has been used to identify change over
time, in order to achieve the following
objectives - Naming and shaming governments and actors seen
to be the worst corruption offenders - Identifying good practices
- Praising good performance and promoting a
virtuous cycle of competition - Informing decisions about aid allocations
- Informing investment decisions
Photo by takeabreak/flickr
4Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Activity 1 Uses of corruption assessments
- National or sub-national corruption assessments
(e.g. research projects) may, additionally, be
used for - Understanding the drivers of corruption and the
blockages to reform (e.g. political economy
studies) - Assessing the functioning of anti-corruption
mechanisms - Understanding the factors underlying
well-functioning accountability policies,
mechanisms and practices - Developing AC strategies and coordinated
policies - Identifying capacity gaps
- Strengthening existing monitoring systems
- Understanding the impact of corruption, e.g. on
marginalised groups, and on business
5Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Activity 2 Monitoring compliance with UNCAC
- Poll
- Whose country has ratified the UNCAC and has
completed the process of self-assessing
compliance? - Does anyone have direct experience with the
UNCAC self-assessment tool?
6Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Mini-lecture UNCAC self-assessment
- UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC)
- adopted by UN General Assembly 31 Oct 2003
- entered into force, 14 Dec 2005
- to date (April 2009) signed by 140 countries,
ratified by 132 State Parties - first global legally binding AC instrument
common standards for national policies,
institutions, practices in areas of preventing
corruption, criminalization and law enforcement.
7Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Mini-lecture UNCAC self-assessment
- No definition of corruption specific actions
seen as corrupt everywhere - Mandatory criminalization active bribery
(Art.15), embezzlement (Art.16), misappropriation
and diversion of property (Art.17), money
laundering (Art.23) and obstruction of justice
(Art.25) - Optional Passive bribery of foreign public
officials (Art.16), Trading in influence
(Art.18), Abuse of function (Art. 19), Illicit
enrichment (Art. 20), Bribery in the private
sector (Art. 21), Embezzlement in the private
sector (Art. 22)
8Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Mini-lecture UNCAC self-assessment
- Conference of States Parties to the UNCAC (COSP)
? the body mandated to decide the best means to
review implementation of the Convention
(A.63) - First session (December 2006, Jordan) States
outlined key principles of a Review Mechanism - Transparent, efficient
- Non-intrusive, inclusive, impartial
- Non-ranking
- provides opportunities to share good practices
and challenges - complements existing international and regional
review mechanisms
9Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Mini-lecture UNCAC self-assessment
- Civil society recommendations to the Review
Mechanism, calling for active participation of
non-state stakeholders - A.13 promotes civil society participation in AC
efforts, should apply to monitoring and
implementation - Possible methods for the Review Mechanism
- Self-assessment of all provisions in UNODC
checklist - Review by expert group in dialogue with reviewed
countries - Peer review
- Country visits by experts
10Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Mini-lecture UNCAC self-assessment
- Its not a substitute for a countrys own
internal monitoring - UNCAC acknowledges the need for capacity to
assess corruption interventions. Mandates
countries to undertake periodic evaluations of
legal and administrative measures put in place to
combat corruption (A.5 3). - Related provisions (art. 61) also assert the need
for technical assistance and information exchange
in this area.
11Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Mini-lecture UNCAC self-assessment
- Self-assessment Checklist, launched in 2007
- Format Omnibus Survey Software
- Now covers all substantive provisions of UNCAC
and UN Convention on Transnational Organized
Crime (UNTOC) - Checklist includes questions about
- Successful examples of implementation
- Criteria for assessment
- Needs for technical assistance
12Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Mini-lecture UNCAC self-assessment
- Where to begin implementing UNCAC?
- Temptation to undertake too many disconnected
anti-corruption reforms at once, rather than
prioritising and sequencing reforms as part of an
overarching strategy. - Prior research can provide the evidence needed
to make these strategic decisions - Many tools and instruments exist that can provide
the more focused assessments and indicator
sources to monitor specific sectors and
institutions.
13Module 3 Why measure corruption?
Activity 3 Implications for national
assessments
- What corruption monitoring efforts have taken
place or regularly take place in your country?
What are their strengths and weaknesses? - To what extent are existing corruption research
processes linked to an overarching strategy to
combat corruption? - Do all corruption monitoring activities feed
into UNCAC self-assessment in your country?