Photon Efficiency Measures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Photon Efficiency Measures

Description:

Title: Improving Single Photon Sources via Linear Optics and Photodetection Author: dberry Last modified by: Dominic Berry Created Date: 9/29/2003 11:52:14 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: dbe81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Photon Efficiency Measures


1
Photon Efficiency Measures Processing
  • Dominic W. Berry
  • University of Waterloo
  • Alexander I. Lvovsky University of Calgary

2
Single Photon Sources
  • State is incoherent superposition of 0 and 1
    photon
  • J. Kim et al., Nature 397, 500 (1999).
  • http//www.engineering.ucsb.edu/Announce/quantum_c
    ryptography.html

3
Photon Processing
measurement
U(N)
Network of beam splitters and phase shifters
. . .
4
A Method for Improvement
. . .
D
0
0
  • Works for p lt 1/2.
  • A multiphoton component is introduced.

? 2
1/3
1/(N?1)
1/2
. . .
D. W. Berry, S. Scheel, B. C. Sanders, and P. L.
Knight, Phys. Rev. A 69, 031806(R) (2004).
5
Conjectures
  1. It is impossible to increase the probability of a
    single photon without introducing multiphoton
    components.
  2. It is impossible to increase the single photon
    probability for p 1/2.

6
Generalised Efficiency
  • Choose the initial state ?0 and loss channel to
    get ?.
  • Find minimum transmissivity of channel.

Ep
loss
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
105, 203601 (2010).
7
Generalised Efficiency
  • Example incoherent single photon.
  • Minimum transmissivity is for pure input photon.
  • Efficiency is p.

Ep
loss
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
105, 203601 (2010).
8
Generalised Efficiency
  • Example coherent state.
  • Can be obtained from another coherent state for
    any pgt0.
  • Efficiency is 0.

Ep
loss
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
105, 203601 (2010).
9
Proving Conjectures
measurement
U(N)
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
105, 203601 (2010).
10
Proving Conjectures
  • Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from
    some initial states.

measurement
U(N)
Ep
Ep
Ep
Ep
Ep
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
105, 203601 (2010).
11
Proving Conjectures
  • Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from
    some initial states.
  • The equal loss channels may be commuted through
    the interferometer.

measurement
Ep
Ep
Ep
Ep
Ep
U(N)
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
105, 203601 (2010).
12
Proving Conjectures
  • Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from
    some initial states.
  • The equal loss channels may be commuted through
    the interferometer.
  • The loss on the output may be delayed until after
    the measurement.
  • The output state can have efficiency no greater
    than p.

Ep
measurement
Ep
Ep
Ep
Ep
U(N)
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
105, 203601 (2010).
13
Catalytic Processing
p
measurement
U(N)
Network of beam splitters and phase shifters
?
p
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
14
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 0
  • We have equal loss on the modes.
  • The efficiency is the transmissivity p.
  • We take the infimum of p.

D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
15
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 1
  • We have independent loss on the modes.
  • The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the
    transmissivities pj.
  • We take the infimum of this over schemes.

D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
16
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 1
  • Example a single photon in one mode and vacuum
    in the other.
  • We can have complete loss in one mode, starting
    from two single photons.
  • The multimode efficiency for K2 is 1.

D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
17
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 1
  • Example The same state, but a different basis.
  • We cannot have any loss in either mode.
  • The multimode efficiency for K2 is 2.

D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
18
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 2
  • We only try to obtain the reduced density
    operators.
  • The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the
    transmissivities pj.
  • We take the infimum of this over schemes.

D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
19
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 2
  • Example a single photon in one mode and vacuum
    in the other.
  • We can have complete loss in one mode, starting
    from two single photons.
  • The multimode efficiency for K1 is 1.

D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
20
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 2
  • Example the same state in a different basis.
  • We can have loss of 1/2 in each mode, starting
    from two single photons.
  • The multimode efficiency for K1 is 1/2.

D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
21
Multimode Efficiency
  • Option 3
  • We have independent loss on the modes.
  • This is followed by an interferometer, which
    mixes the vacuum between the modes.
  • The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the
    transmissivities pj.
  • We take the infimum of this over schemes.

interferometer
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
22
Loss via Beam Splitters
  • Model the loss via beam splitters.
  • Use a vacuum input, and NO detection on one
    output.
  • In terms of annihilation operators

NO detection
NO detection
vacuum
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
23
Vacuum Components
  • We can write the annihilation operators at the
    output as
  • Form a matrix of commutators
  • The efficiency is the sum of the K maximum
    eigenvalues.

interferometer
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
24
Vacuum Components
discarded
interferometer
vacua
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
25
Method of Proof
measurement
U(N)
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
26
Method of Proof
  • Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode.

measurement
U(N)
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
27
Method of Proof
  • Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode.
  • We can relabel the vacuum modes so they
    contribute to the output modes in a triangular
    way.

measurement
U(N)
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
28
Method of Proof
  • Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode.
  • We can relabel the vacuum modes so they
    contribute to the output modes in a triangular
    way.
  • A further interferometer, X, diagonalises the
    vacuum modes.

measurement
X
U(N)
. . .
D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
(2010).
29
Conclusions
  • We have defined new measures of efficiency of
    states, for both the single-mode and multimode
    cases.
  • These quantify the amount of vacuum in a state,
    which cannot be removed using linear optical
    processing.
  • This proves conjectures from earlier work, as
    well as ruling out catalytic improvement of
    photon sources.
  • D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv1010.6302
    (2010).
  • D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
    105, 203601 (2010).

References
30
Positions Open
  • Macquarie University (Australia)
  • 1 Year postdoctoral position
  • 2 x PhD scholarships
  • Calculations on Tesla supercomputer!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com