Title: LD: Ethical Reasoning
1LDEthical Reasoning SACS Accreditation
CAO 17 Mar 2014
NOTE One-time Accreditation Prep Course LD 1-4,
LD 2-5, LD 3-4, LD 4-9
2Purpose
- Comprehend extent of ethical lapses in our most
respected professions - Make personal commitment to further develop
individual ethical reasoning capability - Be able to explain to SACS Accreditation Team the
basic concepts behind Quality Enhancement Program
of Ethical Reasoning
3Overview
- From the Headlines
- What Would You Do?
- Based on Lone Survivor
- QEP Video, if available
- QEP Must Knows
4Current Events
5From Todays Headlines--92 Missileers Implicated
in Cheating Scandal--
- AF Secretary Deborah Lee James said 92 missile
launch officers assigned to Malmstrom AFB, Mont.,
have been implicated in an investigation of
cheating on a monthly nuclear proficiency exam.
All 92 missileers have temporarily been
decertified pending the outcome of the
investigationthat's almost half of the
Malmstrom-based missileer force and nearly three
times that of the 34 initially implicated. Of
those 92, roughly 40 are suspected of actually
cheating. The rest likely knew of the cheating
and did not report it, said Air Force Global
Strike Command boss Lt. Gen. Stephen Wilson... AF
nuclear launch officers must receive a score of
90 percent or higher to pass nuclear exams, but
AF leaders said most missileers feel they must
score 100 percent each time. "I believe that a
very terrible irony in this whole situation is
that these missileers didn't cheat to pass, they
cheated because they felt driven to get 100
percent, getting 90 percent or 95 percent was
considered a failure in their eyes," said James.
Some 500 nuclear launch officers at all three Air
Force ICBM bases retook the test after the
cheating allegations surfaced 22 failed. Wilson
said those officers will be retrained and given
the chance to retake the test. The average score
was 95.5 percent, officials said. - Amy McCullough Friday January 31, 2014
6From Todays Headlines--Exam Scandal Hits Navy
Nuclear Propulsion Force--
- In a new twist to a widening tale of ethical
lapses in the military, the Navy is investigating
cheating allegations against about one-fifth of
its trainers at a school for naval nuclear power
reactor operatorsIt is the second exam-cheating
scandal to hit the military this year, on top of
a series of disclosures in recent months of
ethical lapses at all ranks in the military as it
transitions from more than a decade of
war-fighting - The Navy said its implicated sailors are accused
of having cheated on written tests they must pass
to be certified as instructors at a nuclear
propulsion school at Charleston, S.C. - Adm. John Richardson, director of the Navy's
nuclear propulsion program, said an undisclosed
number of senior sailors are alleged to have
provided test information to their peers. He was
not more specific, but one official said the
information was shared from the sailors' home
computers, which could be a violation of security
rules because information about nuclear reactors
operations is classifiedAdm. Jonathan Greenert,
the chief of naval operations, said at a joint
announcement with Richardson that he was upset to
learn of the breakdown in discipline. - "To say I am disappointed would be an
understatement," Greenert said. "We expect more
from our sailors especially our senior
sailors. - -- Robert Burns, AP Writer, 4 Feb 2014
-
7From Todays Headlines--Citadel Professor Weighs
In--
- "We are horrified about what we see happening
here. Particularly those of us who have attended
and graduated from military colleges," said Dr.
Earl Walker of The Citadel - "Not surprised because all organizations go
through this," said Dr. Walker. - He believes lapses of judgment is a reflection of
pressure at all military levels from the war on
terror and other conflicts. "This stress has
added and heightened the challenges that we have
faced. None of that excuses this kind of
behavior. But at the same time, it helps us
better understand that behavior," said Walker. - The Army veteran also thinks a lack of routine
reminders of core military principles can lead
some sailors, soldiers, and airmen astray. - "Clear code of conduct. Very clear values.Â
Clear mission. And constant repetition of these
things," said Dr. Walker. - Still, he emphasizes strict discipline and
punishment when those principles are broken. - -- Bill Burr, ABC News, Charleston, 5 Feb 2014
- http//www.abcnews4.com/story/24646778/retired-mil
itary-colonel-horrified-at-cheating-allegations
8From Todays Headlines--Words from Secretary of
Defense Hagel--
- But some of our people are falling short of these
high standards and expectations. Â Ethics and
character are absolute values that we cannot take
for granted. Â They must be constantly reinforced.
 It is the responsibility of all of us -- all of
us who ask for the trust and confidence of the
American people -- to ensure these values are
imbued in all our people and we all live up to
them  - Competence and character are not mutually
exclusive. Â They are woven together. Â They must
be. Â And an uncompromising culture of
accountability must exist at every level of
command. Â That must be practiced and emphasized
by leadership at every level. - Â
- Like in all institutions, it starts at the top.
 Ethics and character are the foundation of an
institution and a society. Â They must be
constantly emphasized at every level of command,
in training, curriculum, and all phases of DOD in
both the officer and the enlisted corps, top to
bottom. Â - -- SecDef Press Briefing, 7 Feb 2014
AbsoluteUncompromisingConstantly Emphasized
9The Thing About Ethics
- Its about ACTION Every Action Counts
- Core values count for little without moral
courage to put them into principled action - Building, then sustaining the capacity to be a
morally courageous leader is a lifelong endeavor - Preparation constant vigilance create the
capacity to make the right call when it counts
10The Great Communicator
"The character that takes command in moments of
crucial choices has already been determined by a
thousand other choices made earlier in seemingly
unimportant moments. It has been determined by
all the 'little' choices of the past--by all
those times when the voice of conscience was at
war with the voice of temptation, which was
whispering the lie that 'it really doesn't
matter.' It has been determined by all the
day-to-day decisions made when life seemed easy
and crises seemed far away President Ronald
Reagan
11Lone Survivor
- View Trailer with these questions in mind
- Did the SEALs make the right call? Why or why
not? - Why do you think the LT made the decision he made?
- Trailer
- http//www.youtube.com/watch?v1Iltd9P48O4
"The character that takes command in moments of
crucial choices has been determined by all the
'little' choices of the past
Note 1 Instructor should thoroughly review MOAA
What Would You Do? discussion in lesson
plan Note 2 After review, instructor will note
the movie has presented the LT decision slightly
differently than Marcus Luttrells book
12QEP ViDEO
Link to the QEP video (cut paste in web
browser, if quick link above fails) Â
https//vimeo.com/ivsvideo/review/87786310/3a1b562
d28
13What is our QEP?
- Quality Enhancement Program
- Accreditation REQUIREMENT
- Ten-year commitment
- For purpose of enhancing decision-making skills
- Knowledge of ethical constructs
- Knowledge of values that guide or influence
ethical perspectives - Appreciation of complexities of ethical decision
making - Process for reaching well-reasoned decisions
14Accreditation--Easy as 1, 2, 3--
Must know
- 1 QEP Quality Enhancement Program
- 2 Deliberately enhance SCCC ethical decision
making ability - 3
- KEY MESSAGES
- We make decisions every day
- Making the right call making sound, ethical
decisions is what leaders do - Were studying not just how to make the right
call with right versus wrong situations but also
right versus right situations
On campus 31 Mar-2 Apr
15Take Aways
- Sustaining the capacity to be a morally
courageous leader is a lifelong endeavor - QEP Quality Enhancement Program
- Citadel QEP
- ETHICS IN ACTION SINCE 1842
- We have a made personal commitment to make the
right call, every time - Accreditation team here 31 Mar 2 Apr
16Questions and Comments
17Back Up SLides
18Moral Courage
- The quality of mind and spirit that enables one
to face up to ethical challenges firmly and
confidently, without flinching or retreating.2
2 Kidders Training Manual, Moral Courage Seminar
19CASE STUDY
- One of the most difficult decisions in military
ethics is the determination of the value of the
lives of your own troops compared with the value
of the life of an innocent non-combatant. This
decision often is complicated by the need to
complete the mission. This three-way moral
dilemma (fellow troops, non-combatants, and
mission) requires a command decision that will
determine life or death in combat. - In this case study, some Navy SEALS are
confronted with that decision.
By CAPT Rick Rubel, USN-Ret. From MOAA at
http//www.moaa.org/main_article.aspx?id1167
20CASE STUDY
- Did the Navy SEALs make the right decision? Why
or why not? - Do you agree with Axelsons statement? Were not
murderers no matter what we do. Were on active
duty behind the enemy lines, sent here by our
superior commanders. We have the right to do
everything we can to save our own lives. The
military decision is obvious. To turn them loose
would be wrong. - Does this allow military fighters to do anything
to defend themselves? - Should there be a consequence short of trial for
murder for this kind of situation?
By CAPT Rick Rubel, USN-Ret. From MOAA at
http//www.moaa.org/main_article.aspx?id1167
21CASE STUDY
- Should they have taken a vote, or should the
lieutenant have made the decision? - Is there any way to avoid these kinds of
situations?
By CAPT Rick Rubel, USN-Ret. From MOAA at
http//www.moaa.org/main_article.aspx?id1167