Citigroup - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Citigroup

Description:

Citigroup s HPD Model Based Portfolio Optimization (Loans/Corporate Bonds) Raghunath Ganugapati (Newt) Associate Summer Internship(Citigroup) Doctoral Student in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: rg850
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Citigroup


1
Citigroups HPD Model Based Portfolio
Optimization(Loans/Corporate Bonds)
  • Raghunath Ganugapati (Newt)
  • Associate Summer Internship(Citigroup)
  • Doctoral Student in Particle Physics and a
    Masters Student in Quantitative Finance
  • University Of Wisconsin-Madison
  • August 25 -2005

2
Outline
  • Objective
  • Lag on the part of Rating agencies to reflect
    timely default info
  • Merton Models VS Citigroups Hybrid Probability
    Of Default Model to analyze client portfolios
  • Loans VS Cash bonds CDS
  • Overall Value addition to Citigroups Business
    and Strategy
  • and establish Norms for Relative Value of
    loans
  • Sample Loan Portfolio Analysis(Symphony Asset
    Management (Client) and Harbor Portfolio for the
    desk
  • Miscellaneous
  • Summary

3
Objective
  • To improve the Portfolios of Corporate Loans for
    the Risk adjusted Return(spread obtained while
    reducing the risk by making necessary substitutes
    to credits
  • This has been Successfully applied in the past
    for Cash Bonds and CDS but loans have never ever
    been investigated!!!!
  • To develop Loan Portfolio Analytics by
    Calculating one year expected Loss Distributions
    on a Customer Portfolio
  • using (Copula Techniques)

4
Agency Ratings
Rating agencies (e.g. Standard Poors and
Moodys ) assign credit rankings and are designed
to provide an estimate of the likelihood that a
credit will default.
Rating Agencies Are Often Slow to React to Credit
Events in an effort to provide clear signals to
the market.
OAS deviation from the rating
The graph at the right shows monthly average
spread deviations (in bp) from target rating
category means vs. time to ratings change.
It appears that investors react to changes in
credit quality at least six months prior to
ratings downgrades and even earlier prior to
upgrades.
Months From Ratings Change
5
Mertons Debt-Equity Model - Dynamics
Intuition
Formalism
  • Some Limitations
  • Default occurs only if boundary is crossed
  • No option to refinance in distress
  • Bond prices play no role in estimating the value
    of the firm
  • Under predicts spreads for both high-grade and
    short-maturity bonds
  • Difficult to implement and maintain

Distance To Default
By how much does
Asset Value

Default Point
the business value
exceed the debt?
DD

How uncertain is
Asset Vol
the future business
value?
6
Merton-Type Models vs. Hybrid Models
Merton Models Assume all information about
profitability, liquidity, market presence and
management are contained in equity prices
Hybrid Models Attempt to model profitability,
liquidity, market presence and management
explicitly
Source Citigroup
7
Loans VS Cash bonds CDS
  • Funded/Unfunded(Credit-Card Mechanics)
  • Are not liquid and hence very difficult to obtain
    market prices.
  • No loan CUSIP identifiers and Loan names are
    often random combination of English
    alphabet(if lucky!!) and should be mapped to Loan
    Prices and Citigroups HPD ID
  • Involves manually mapping these names on a
    company by company basis and it might mean doing
    all nighters on weekends!!!!
  • Loans are mostly floating RATE
  • Shorter Maturity(6yrs)
  • Secured and Senior Debt and have higher recovery
    values in case of a default
  • Have a high prepayment risk and little difference
    in spread in absolute terms

8
Value Addition of Leveraged-Loans
  • Syndicated banks to non-investment grade
    borrowers ( senior secured debt having high
    recovery) and a surprising result is that these
    are greater in terms of outstanding amount to
    non-investment grade bonds and consistent
    returns through time are guaranteed through
    structural protection .
  • Low volatility and low correlation to other asset
    classes.
  • Dominated by a few players and good investment
    for capital preservation. Middle market
    portfolios offer consistent returns with low
    volatility then large corporations
  • Overall Desk Risk Management and distribution
    capabilities taking strategic advantage of
    distribution capabilities in place
  • CLO Trading and Sales
  • Loans VS Bonds VS CDS(Cap Arb,requires confidence
    in the models)

9
Norms for Relative Value of loans
  • HPD (probability of default) (1)
  • Recovery Values(2)
  • Weighted Average Life(3)
  • ((CouponLibor)/Market Price) as proxy (4)
  • This might in some sense partly account for the
    prepayment and other optionality
  • We Regress the sum of the loge of the quantities
    1,2,3 with 4 and compute the standardized
    residual of each loan relative to the regression
    to do rich cheap analysis
  • Why use log?

10
Regression
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Interc
ept 6.585561757 0.128681429 51.17725072 0 X
Variable 1 0.023837525 0.001784569 13.35758039 1.8
1612E-39 X Variable 2 -0.041828294 0.030066168 -1.
391208037 0.164275962 X Variable
3 -0.037377914 0.006960784 -5.369785205 8.54785E-0
8
 
 
11
Portfolio Analysis-1
12
Portfolio Analysis-2
13
Copula Based Loss Distribution
  • An Inter and Intra Industry Correlation of 0.15
    and 0.3 was used and a Gaussian Copula two factor
    model is used.Could compute VAR from this for
    Risk Management if it was a desk portfolio

Probability of the loss
Loss Percentage
14
Credit Momentum
  • Improving Credits
  • RELIANCE RES INC WTS
    0.405 -1.067
  • KB HOME SR SUB NT
    -0.562 -1.882
  • STANDARD PACIFIC CORP SR NT
    -0.462 -0.968
  • Deteriorating Credits
  • VANGUARD HEALTH TERM LOAN
    -1.425 0.774
  • EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS TERM LOAN -0.079 1.582
  • SMURFIT CAPITAL FUNDING CORP
    0.389 1.617

15
Loan Optimizer
  • Look at Relative Value and Credit Momentum
  • Buy the undervalued Loan and sell the Overvalued
    Loan all else same,collect the spread and go
    home!
  • Pick a loan in the same industry,same
    duration,comparable rating,comparable recovery
    and any other guidelines set by customer while
    working on his portfolio while making
    substitutions to get more return for the same
    amount if risk

16
Improving Citigroup Relative Value Model for
Corporate Bonds
  • Raghunath Ganugapati For Dennis Adler and
    Corporate Bond Strategy Group

17
Outline
  • For Each Sector
  • OASabOADcRating2
  • OAS is regressed on Duration and Rating only
  • Problem
  • As we discussed Ratings are coarse measure of
    Credit Risk and rating agencies lag in time.
  • I am working on adding the default probability
    to do Rich/Cheap Analysis Into production
    mechanism so that this can be used on a routine
    basis

18
Discussion
  • Adding HPD information would improve the fit
  • (5 year default point used)
  • Improvement significant for Industrials where we
    have maximum default data
  • I have got the code in good shape and it can be
    used to do Rich/Cheap Analysis for corporate
    bonds
  • Code computes how much a bond is Rich/Cheap
    relative to old model and adding KMV and HPD
    information as well.

19
Miscellaneous
  • I have worked on putting together a desk
    portfolio along similar lines and whenever we
    could not map an ID we infer an average HPD based
    on rating.
  • Further I also worked on other portfolios for a
    week when an Associate and Analyst Were on
    Vacations
  • During the earlier weeks of my internship I have
    studied in great length about a study done on EDF
    to forecast future default using Archimedean
    Copulas,This gives insights into Pricing Credit
    Derivatives and other correlation products and we
    could do similar studies on HPD

20
Summary
  • I have studied a universe of loans and have built
    a database for loan analytics and used to to
    optimize a client portfolio to get better return
    for lesser amount of risk.
  • I have Computed a 1 year loss distribution for
    the clients portfolio
  • Built the necessary infrastructure to do
    rich/cheap analysis on leverage high yield loans
    and this will be useful for both our clients and
    Desk Risk Management people
  • I have worked on testing the necessary
    infrastructure to produce a production level code
    for corporate bond Rich/Cheap analysis adding
    default probability as an additional parameter

21
  • A big Thank you!
  • To Citibank
  • Dennis Adler, Shuguang Mao, Hiedy Kim, Steve
    Conyers
  • Terry Benzschawel
  • Justin Jiang
  • Henry Fok
  • Ji Hoon Ryu
  • Shelli Faber
  • Speakers at our Seminars
  • My Co-interns and everyone who helped me me in
    this forge.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com